Tetrachromacy is the condition of possessing four independent channels for conveying color information, or possessing four different types of cone cells in the eye. Organisms with tetrachromacy are called tetrachromats.
In tetrachromatic organisms, the sensory color space is four-dimensional, meaning that to match the sensory effect of arbitrarily chosen spectra of light within their visible spectrum requires mixtures of at least four different primary colors.
Tetrachromacy is demonstrated among several species of birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles and insects. It was also the normal condition of most mammals in the past; a genetic change made the majority of species of this class eventually lose two of their four cones.
The normal explanation of tetrachromacy is that the organism's retina contains four types of higher-intensity light receptors (called cone cells in vertebrates as opposed to rod cells which are lower intensity light receptors) with different absorption spectra. This means the animal may see wavelengths beyond those of a typical human being's eyesight, and may be able to distinguish colors that to a human appear to be identical. Species with tetrachromatic color vision have a small physiological advantage over rival species.
Some species of birds such as the Zebra Finch and the Columbidae use the ultraviolet wavelength (300–400 nm) specific to tetrachromatic color vision as a tool during mate selection and foraging. When selecting for mates, ultraviolet plumage and skin coloration show a high level of selection. A typical bird eye will respond to wavelengths from about 300 to 700 nm. In terms of frequency, this corresponds to a band in the vicinity of 430–1000 THz.
Bird’s eyes are tetrachromats but their cone cells inside the retina are much more complex than humans. First, they contain a colored oil droplet and this droplet is placed before the visual pigment, which means the light is filtered before it reaches it. Also, the oil droplets can be transparent or colored. Furthermore, instead of having single cones, birds have also double cones just like fish, amphibians and reptiles that contain the four color pigment. Another big difference between the tetrachromacy vision of humans and birds lies in the retina. The fovea, which is the area of the retina responsible for the precise vision of the details and where there is a big concentration of cones, form a lateral strip rather than a central area. Added to the fact that some birds can have two or even more fovea ,birds have a lot more cones than humans and it explains why they see colors better than us. Finally, birds have photopigments that are sensitive to four or five peak wavelengths, which explains why they are a lot more sensitive to colors than us and why it is impossible for us to perceive colors like them.
Foraging insects can see wavelengths that flowers reflect (ranging from 300 nm to 700 nm). Pollination being a mutualistic relationship, foraging insects and plants have coevolved, both increasing wavelength range: in perception (pollinators), in reflection and variation (flower colors). Directional selection has led plants to display increasingly diverse amounts of color variations extending into the ultraviolet color scale, thus attracting higher levels of pollinators. Some pollinators may use tetrachromatic color vision to increase and maintain a higher foraging success rate over their trichromatic competitors.
Possibility of human tetrachromats
Humans and closely related primates normally have three types of cone cells and are therefore trichromats (animals with three different cones). However, at low light intensities the rod cells may contribute to color vision, giving a small region of tetrachromacy in the color space.
In humans, two cone cell pigment genes are located on the sex X chromosome, the classical type 2 opsin genes OPN1MW and OPN1MW2. It has been suggested that as women have two different X chromosomes in their cells, some of them could be carrying some variant cone cell pigments, thereby possibly being born as full tetrachromats and having four different simultaneously functioning kinds of cone cells, each type with a specific pattern of responsiveness to different wavelengths of light in the range of the visible spectrum. One study suggested that 2–3% of the world's women might have the kind of fourth cone that lies between the standard red and green cones, giving, theoretically, a significant increase in color differentiation. Another study suggests that as many as 50% of women and 8% of men may have four photopigments and corresponding increased chromatic discrimination in comparison to trichromats. In June 2012, after 20 years of study of women with four cones (non-functional tetrachromats), neuroscientist Dr. Gabriele Jordan identified a woman (subject cDa29) who was able to detect a greater variety of colors than trichromatic ones, corresponding with a functional tetrachromat (or true tetrachromat).
Variation in cone pigment genes is widespread in most human populations, but the most prevalent and pronounced tetrachromacy would derive from female carriers of major red/green pigment anomalies, usually classed as forms of "color blindness" (protanomaly or deuteranomaly). The biological basis for this phenomenon is X-inactivation of heterozygotic alleles for retinal pigment genes, which is the same mechanism that gives the majority of female new-world monkeys trichromatic vision.
In humans, preliminary visual processing occurs within the neurons of the retina. It is not known how these nerves would respond to a new color channel, that is, whether they could handle it separately or just combine it in with an existing channel. Visual information leaves the eye by way of the optic nerve; it is not known whether the optic nerve has the spare capacity to handle a new color channel. A variety of final image processing takes place in the brain; it is not known how the various areas of the brain would respond if presented with a new color channel.
Mice, which normally have only two cone pigments, can be engineered to express a third cone pigment, and appear to demonstrate increased chromatic discrimination, arguing against some of these obstacles; however, the original publication's claims about plasticity in the optic nerve have also been disputed.
Humans cannot perceive UV light directly because the lens of the eye blocks most light in the wavelength range of 300–400 nm; shorter wavelengths are blocked by the cornea. Nevertheless, the photoreceptors of the retina are sensitive to near UV light and people lacking a lens (a condition known as aphakia) perceive near UV light as whitish blue or whitish-violet, probably because all three types of cones are roughly equally sensitive to UV light, but blue cones a bit more.
- Evolution of color vision
- Jay Neitz
- Somatosensory amplification
- Figure data, uncorrected absorbance curve fits, from Hart NS, Partridge JC, Bennett ATD and Cuthill IC (2000) Visual pigments, cone oil droplets and ocular media in four species of estrildid finch. Journal of Comparative Physiology A186 (7-8): 681-694.
- Goldsmith, Timothy H. (2006). "What Birds See". Scientific American (July 2006): 69–75.
- Wilkie, Susan E.; Vissers, Peter M. A. M.; Das, Debipriya; Degrip, Willem J.; Bowmaker, James K.; Hunt, David M. (1998). "The molecular basis for UV vision in birds: spectral characteristics, cDNA sequence and retinal localization of the UV-sensitive visual pigment of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)". Biochemical Journal 330 (Pt 1): 541–47. PMC 1219171. PMID 9461554.
- Jacobs, G. H. (2009). "Evolution of colour vision in mammals". Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364 (1531): 2957–2967. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0039. PMC 2781854. PMID 19720656.
- Arrese, C. A. et al. (2005). "Cone topography and spectral sensitivity in two potentially trichromatic marsupials, the quokka (Setonix brachyurus) and quenda (Isoodon obesulus)". Proc. Biol. Sci. 272 (1565): 791–796. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3009. PMC 1599861. PMID 15888411.
- Backhaus, W., Kliegl, R., Werner, J.S. (1998). "Color vision: perspective from different disciplines". pp. 163–182.
- Neumeyer, Christa (1988). Das Farbensehen des Goldfisches: Eine verhaltensphysiologische Analyse. G. Thieme. ISBN 313718701X.
- Robinson, J.; Schmitt, E.A.; Harosi, F.I.; Reece, R.J.; Dowling, J.E. (1993). "Zebrafish ultraviolet visual pigment: absorption spectrum, sequence, and localization". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (13): 6009–6012. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.13.6009. PMC 46856. PMID 8327475.
- Bennett, Andrew T. D.; Cuthill, Innes C.; Partridge, Julian C.; Maier, Erhard J. (1996). "Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches". Nature 380 (6573): 433–435. doi:10.1038/380433a0.
- Bennett, Andrew T. D.; Théry, Marc (2007). "Avian Color Vision and Coloration: Multidisciplinary Evolutionary Biology". The American Naturalist 169 (S1): S1–S6. doi:10.1086/510163. ISSN 0003-0147.
- J. B. Slater, Peter (2000). Advances in the study of behavior. Academic Press. p. 159 Extra
- Vorobyev, M. (November 1998). "Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours". Journal of Comparative Physiology A 183 (5): 2 Extra
|at=(help). Retrieved 9 October. Check date values in:
- Markha, K. R.; Bloor, S. J.; Nicholson, R.; Rivera, R.; Shemluck, M.; Kevan, P. G.; Michener, C. (2004). "Black flower coloration in wild lisianthius nigrescens". Z Naturforsch C 59c (9-10): 625–630. PMID 15540592.
- Backhaus, W.; Kliegl, R.; Werner, J. S., eds. (1998). "Colour Vision: Perspectives from Different Disciplines". pp. 45–78.
- Hansjochem Autrum and Richard Jung (1973). Integrative Functions and Comparative Data. 7 (3). Springer-Verlag. p. 226. ISBN 978-0-387-05769-9.
- Jameson, K. A., Highnote, S. M., & Wasserman, L. M. (2001). "Richer color experience in observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes" (PDF). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8 (2): 244–261. doi:10.3758/BF03196159. PMID 11495112.
- Roth, Mark (13 September 2006). "Some women may see 100,000,000 colors, thanks to their genes". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
- Didymus, JohnThomas (Jun 19, 2012), Scientists find woman who sees 99 million more colors than others, Digital Journal
- Jordan, G.; Mollon, J. D. (1993). "A study of women heterozygous for colour deficiencies". Vision research 33 (11): 1495–1508. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90143-k. PMID 8351822.
- Jacobs et al.; Williams, GA; Cahill, H; Nathans, J (23 March 2007). "Emergence of Novel Color Vision in Mice Engineered to Express a Human Cone Photopigment". Science 315 (5819): 1723–1725. doi:10.1126/science.1138838. PMID 17379811.
- Makous, W. (12 October 2007). "Comment on "Emergence of Novel Color Vision in Mice Engineered to Express a Human Cone Photopigment"". Science 318 (5848): 196. doi:10.1126/science.1146084. PMID 17932271.
- M A Mainster (2006). "Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception". British Journal of Ophthalmology 90 (6): 784–792. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.086553. PMC 1860240.
- Hambling, David (29 May 2002). "Let the light shine in". The Guardian.
- The Human Tetrachromacy Research Collaborative
- Timothy H. "What Birds See" Scientific American July 2006. An article about the tetrachromatic vision of birds
- Thompson, Evan (2000). "Comparative color vision: Quality space and visual ecology." In Steven Davis (Ed.), Color Perception: Philosophical, Psychological, Artistic and Computational Perspectives, pp. 163–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Looking for Madam Tetrachromat By Glenn Zorpette. Red Herring magazine, 1 November 2000
- "Exploring the fourth dimension". University of Bristol School of Biological Sciences. March 20, 2009.
- Colors - The Perfect Yellow By Radiolab, 21 May 2012 (Explores tetrachromacy in humans)
- The dimensionality of color vision in carriers of anomalous trichromacy--Gabriele Jordan et al--Journal of Vision August 12, 2010:
- Murphy, Cheryl "Well I'll BEE... Bee Sees UV" Tetrachromatic vision in bees
- On Tetrachromacy Ágnes Holba & B. Lukács