The Hedgehog and the Fox
| The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy’s View of History | |
|---|---|
 Cover of 1993 Elephant Paperback edition |
|
| Author(s) | Isaiah Berlin |
| Country |  United Kingdom |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Weidenfeld & Nicolson |
| Publication date | 1953 |
| Followed by | The Proper Study of Mankind (1997) |
"The Hedgehog and the Fox" is an essay by the liberal philosopher Isaiah Berlin. It was one of Berlin's most popular essays with the general public. Berlin himself said of the essay: "I never meant it very seriously. I meant it as a kind of enjoyable intellectual game, but it was taken seriously. Every classification throws light on something."[1]
Contents |
[edit] Origins
The title is a reference to a fragment attributed to the ancient Greek poet Archilochus: πόλλ' οἶδ' ἀλώπηξ, ἀλλ' ἐχῖνος ἓν μέγα ("the fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing"). In Erasmus Rotterdamus's Adagia from 1500, the expression is recorded as Multa novit vulpes, verum echinus unum magnum. The fable of The Fox and the Cat embodies the same idea.
[edit] Summary
Berlin expands upon this idea to divide writers and thinkers into two categories: hedgehogs, who view the world through the lens of a single defining idea (examples given include Plato, Lucretius, Dante, Pascal, Hegel, Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, Ibsen, and Proust) and foxes who draw on a wide variety of experiences and for whom the world cannot be boiled down to a single idea (examples given include Herodotus, Aristotle, Erasmus, Shakespeare, Montaigne, Molière, Goethe, Pushkin, Balzac, Joyce, Anderson).
Turning to Tolstoy, Berlin contends that at first glance, Tolstoy escapes definition into one of these two groups. He postulates, rather, that while Tolstoy's talents are those of a fox, his beliefs are that one ought to be a hedgehog, and thus Tolstoy's own voluminous assessments of his own work are misleading. Berlin goes on to use this idea of Tolstoy as a basis for an analysis of the theory of history that Tolstoy presents in his novel War and Peace.
The essay has been published separately and as part of the collection Russian Thinkers, edited by Henry Hardy and Aileen Kelly.
[edit] Influence
Some authors (Michael Walzer, for example) have used the same pattern of description on Berlin himself, as a person who knows many things, compared to the purported narrowness of many other contemporary political philosophers. Berlin's former student, Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor, has been dubbed a hedgehog by Berlin and readily admits to it in an interview after receiving the 2007 Templeton Prize.[2]
Berlin expanded on this concept in the 1997 book The Proper Study of Mankind.
Philip E. Tetlock, a political psychology professor in the Haas Business school at UC, Berkeley, draws heavily on this distinction in his exploration of the accuracy of experts and forecasters in various fields (especially politics) in his 2005 book Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?.
The historian Joseph J. Ellis, in his Founding Brothers about key figures of the American Revolution, uses Berlin's "Hedgehog and Fox" concept in evaluating George Washington, noting that "George Washington was an archetypal hedgehog. And the one big thing he knew was that America’s future as a nation lay to the West, in its development over the next century of a continental empire,” which was one of the reasons, according to Ellis, Washington was devoted to construction of canals.[3]
James C. Collins refers to this story in his book Good to Great where he clearly shows his preference towards Hedgehog mentality.
Claudio Véliz uses Berlin's construction to contrast Anglosphere and Spanish patterns of settlement and governance in his 1994 book The New World of the Gothic Fox Culture and Economy in English and Spanish America.
Legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin's book Justice for Hedgehogs (2011), which argues the case for a single, overarching, and coherent framework of moral truth, takes its title from Berlin's conceit of the hedgehog.
"Future Babble: Why Expert Predictions are Next to Worthless and you can do Better" (2011) by Canadian journalist Dan Gardner argued that "hedgehog" experts have historically been much poorer at predicting future outcomes.
The Woody Allen movie Husbands and Wives portrays Judy Davis as a woman who cannot enjoy sex with Liam Neeson because she is mentally sorting her friends into foxes and hedgehogs.
[edit] Editions
- The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy’s View of History (London, 1953: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; New York, 1953: Simon and Schuster; New York, 1957: New American Library; New York, 1986: Simon and Schuster, with an introduction by Michael Walzer)
- Russian Thinkers (Penguin, 25 Mar 2008: ISBN 9780141442204: Isaiah Berlin, Author; Henry Hardy, Editor; Aileen Kelly, Introduction by; Jason Ferrell, Glossary; Aileen Kelly, Editor.)
[edit] See also
- Hedgehogs in culture
- Homo unius libri, similar sentiment
- Lumpers and splitters
- The Hedgehog, the Fox, and the Magister's Pox, by Stephen Jay Gould
[edit] References
- ^ Ramin Jahanbegloo, Conversations with Isaiah Berlin (London 2000), page 188
- ^ templeton.org Spiritual Thinking[dead link]
- ^ Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. By Joseph J. Ellis. p. 134. Knopf; 1st edition (October 17, 2000).
[edit] External links
- Kristof, Nicholas D., "Learning How to Think" NYTimes.com (retrieved April 6, 2009) Report on the book "Expert Political Judgment" by Philip Tetlock, who uses the fox and the hedgehog as a parable for political and economics experts.
- “Why Foxes Are Better Forecasters Than Hedgehogs” at Long Now Foundation Philip Tetlock
