The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution
The New Left (book cover).jpg
The second edition
Author Ayn Rand
Country United States
Language English
Subject New Left
Published
  • 1971 (New American Library, 1st edition)
  • 1975 (New American Library, 2nd edition)
  • 1999 (New American Library, retitled edition)
Media type Print
Pages
  • 204 (1st edition)
  • 239 (2nd edition)
  • 352 (retitled edition)
ISBN 0-452-01184-1 (retitled edition)
OCLC 39281836

The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution is a collection of essays by Ayn Rand. Most of the essays originally appeared in The Objectivist. The essays argue that religion, the New Left, and similar forces are irrational and harmful. First published in 1971, a revised edition appeared in 1975, and an expanded, retitled edition was published in 1999 under the title Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution.

Background[edit]

The inspiration for collecting these essays into a book came from a reader, who wrote Rand a letter complimenting several of the essays and suggesting she put them out as a book to counteract the influence of the New Left among college students.[1]

Publishing history[edit]

The first edition of the book was published by New American Library in 1971, as a paperback under its Signet imprint. A revised edition, adding the essay "The Age of Envy," appeared in 1975.[2]

In 1999, Rand's estate authorized publication of an expanded edition titled Return of the Primitive: The Anti-Industrial Revolution. It was edited by Peter Schwartz and added a new introduction by Schwartz, as well as two essays by Rand ("Racism" was included in The Virtue of Selfishness, and "Global Balkanization" was in The Voice of Reason) and three by Schwartz ("Gender Tribalism", "The Philosophy of Privation", and "Multicultural Nihilism").

Reception[edit]

The book received little attention from reviewers when it was first released.[3] In a survey of Rand's works, historian James T. Baker described the book's essays as "shrill proclamations" that are "more negative than positive more destructive than constructive."[4] Rand bibliographer Mimi Reisel Gladstein said the book's topics "seem dated", but "as Rand's predictions about the negative results of some of the practices she rails against come about, one begins to appreciate the perceptiveness of her logic."[5]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Rand 1999
  2. ^ Perinn 1990, p. 38
  3. ^ Gladstein 1999, p. 119
  4. ^ Baker 1987, p. 88
  5. ^ Gladstein 1999, p. 84

Works cited[edit]