The Old Regime and the Revolution
||This article relies largely or entirely upon a single source. (May 2009)|
L'Ancien Régime et la Révolution (1856) is a work by the French historian Alexis de Tocqueville translated in English as either The Old Regime and the Revolution or The Old Regime and the French Revolution. The book analyzes French society before the French Revolution — the so-called "Ancien Régime" — and investigates the causes and forces that caused the Revolution. It is one of the major early historical works on the French Revolution. In this book, de Tocqueville develops his main theory about the French revolution, the theory of continuity, in which he states that even though the French tried to disassociate themselves from the past and from the autocratic old regime, they eventually reverted to a powerful central government.
The L'Ancien Régime and the French Revolution (Hiatus) 
The aim of the French Revolution (1789–1799), while demonstrably anti-clerical, was not so much to destroy the sovereignty of religious faith as to tear down all forms of the Ancien Régime, of which the established (church) was a foremost symbol, nor to create a state of permanent disorder (anarchy). It was essentially a movement for political and social reform. Contrary to the views expressed by the participants in the Revolution themselves, there was neither an increase in the power or the jurisdiction of the central authority. Instead, control of these forms was wrested from the monarchy and transferred in quick succession first to the People themselves and from there to a powerful autocracy. The Revolution never intended to change the whole nature of the traditional society. The chief permanent achievement of the French Revolution was the suppression of those political institutions, commonly described as feudal, which for many centuries had held unquestioned sway in most European countries. The Revolution set out to replace them with a new social and political order, based on the concepts of freedom and equality. In France, both before and after the Revolution, people relied on central authority instead of becoming economically or politically active themselves. By contrast, in the United States, political action permeated to even the lower levels of society. There, private individuals formed the basis of economic and political life, but, in France, the center of political gravity resided in a chaotic bureaucracy answerable only to the monarchy.
Another theme was the complete disassociation between French social classes, called the Estates, of which there were three- the clergy, the nobility, and the common people. Although this disassociation arose from social divisions imposed by the feudal system, the gradual disintigration of that system after the Middle Ages resulted, paradoxically in social disassociation becoming increasingly complete. Whereas the feudal lord had at least a partial symbiosis with his vassals, the post-feudal nobility left ancestoral estates in the hands of caretakers and flocked to the power center that radiated from Paris, the seat of the monarchy and central government. The nobility lost all connection with the common people. The growing middle class emulated the nobility. By the late 18th Century, the separation of classes was complete, breeding the class hatred demonstrated in the Revolution.
See also 
- Alexis de Tocqueville. The Old Regime and the French Revolution is the crash in society. New York: Anchor Books (1955).