Theodicy

For the book, see Théodicée.

Gottfried Leibniz coined the term 'theodicy' in an attempt to justify God's existence in light of the apparent imperfections of the world.

Part of a series on
Philosophy of religion
Concepts in religion
Concepts Afterlife Euthyphro dilemma Faith Intelligent design Miracle Religious belief Soul Spirit Theodicy Theological veto
Problem of evil Concepts Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy
Conceptions of God
Topics Aristotelian view Brahman Demiurge Divine simplicity Egoism Holy Spirit Maltheism Pandeism Personal god Process theology Supreme being Unmoved mover
By religion Abrahamic religions Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Mormonism Sikhism Bahá'í Faith
Existence of God
Arguments for Beauty Christological Consciousness Cosmological Intelligent design Love Miracles Morality Ontological Pascal's wager Proper basis Reason Teleological (Natural-law) Transcendental
Arguments against 747 gambit Atheist's Wager Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's razor Omnipotence paradox Poor design Russell's teapot
Theories of religion
Theories Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Dharmism Deism Divine command theory Dualism Esotericism Exclusivism Existentialism (Christian Agnostic Atheist) Feminist theology Fundamentalism Gnosticism Henotheism Humanism (Religious Secular Christian) Inclusivism Monism Monotheism Mysticism Naturalism (Metaphysical Religious Humanistic) New Age Nondualism Nontheism Pandeism Pantheism Perennialism Polytheism Process theology Spiritualism Shamanism Taoic Theism Transcendentalism
Religious language
Topics Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism
Philosophers of religion
Atheist & agnostic philosophers Simon Critchley Daniel Dennett Theodore Drange Paul Draper Anthony Kenny Jennifer Michael Hecht Michael Martin Ramendra Nath Jeffrey W. Robbins
Buddhist philosophers Hajime Nakamura Keiji Nishitani Huston Smith
Christian philosophers Robert Merrihew Adams William Alston Charles Bell Vincent Brümmer Elizabeth Burns John Caird Alexandre Christoyannopoulos Paul Copan William Lane Craig Ingolf U. Dalferth Brian Davies Lynn de Silva Mircea Eliade C. Stephen Evans Franklin I. Gamwell Norman Geisler Gary Habermas John E. Hare John Hick Alice von Hildebrand Dietrich von Hildebrand Peter van Inwagen Søren Kierkegaard Norman Kretzmann Brian Leftow Herbert McCabe John McIntyre George F. McLean John Macquarrie Trenton Merricks Vincent Miceli Paul Moser Rudolf Otto William Paley Kuruvilla Pandikattu David L. Paulsen Nancy Pearcey Alvin Plantinga Hans Rookmaaker Francis Schaeffer Wolfgang Smith Melville Y. Stewart Richard Swinburne Charles Taliaferro Georges Tamer Anthony Thiselton Keith Ward Vernon White Phillip H. Wiebe William Wollaston Keith Yandell
Islamic philosophers Abu al-Hassan al-Amiri
Jewish philosophers Abraham Joshua Heschel Steven Schwarzschild Joseph B. Soloveitchik
Spiritualist philosophers A. H. Almaas Robert K.C. Forman
Other Pamela Sue Anderson William Hatcher Davis Dorothy Emmet Ivan Esaulov Frederick Ferré Gustav Glogau Charles Hartshorne Seiichi Hatano William S. Hatcher Klaus Klostermaier Jonathan Kvanvig A.P. Martinich Françoise Meltzer Joseph Runzo J. J. C. Smart William F. Vallicella Michael Zank Dean Zimmerman
Related concepts
Concepts Criticism of religion Ethics in religion Exegesis History of religions Religion Religious philosophy Theology Relationship between religion and science Political science of religion Faith and rationality more...

The term theodicy ( /θiːˈɒdɪsi/ from Greek theos - "god" + dike - "justice") has no universally agreed upon definition, but usually refers to an attempt to resolve the evidential problem of evil and reconcile God's traditional characteristics of omnibenevolence, omnipotence and omniscience (all-loving, all-powerful, and all-knowing) with the occurrence of evil in the world. Although such arguments have existed for centuries, the term theodicy was coined in 1710 by German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz in his work, Théodicée.

Definition

A theodicy is a response to the evidential problem of evil and attempts to justify the existence of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God in light of the occurrence of evil in the world. The evidential problem of evil argues that evil constitutes evidence against the existence of God and that, considering the occurrence of evil in the world, God's existence becomes unlikely.

There is a distinction between a theodicy and a defence. A defence is presented merely to indicate the logical possibility of the coexistence of God and evil, whereas a theodicy attempts to justify God's allowance of evil. Defences, therefore, propose solutions to the logical problem of evil, while theodicies attempt to answer the evidential problem. In the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Nick Trakakis proposed an additional three requirements which must be contained within a theodicy:

• Common sense views of the world
• Widely held historical and scientific opinion
• Plausible moral principles

History

The term theodicy was coined in 1710 by Germany philosopher Gottfried Leibniz in his French work, Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l'homme et l'origine du mal (Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil). Leibniz's Théodicée was a response to Dictionnaire Historique et Critique, written by skeptical Protestant philosopher, Pierre Bayle. Bayle saw no rational solution to the problem of evil, arguing against three attempts to solve it, and believed that since the Bible asserts to coexistence of evil and God, that state of affairs must simply be accepted.

The Catholic Encyclopedia (1914), in an article by Constantine Kempf, gives a different definition of theodicy:

Imitating the example of Leibniz other philosophers now called their treatises on the problem of evil "theodicies". As in a thorough treatment of the question the proofs both of the existence and of the attributes of God cannot be disregarded, our entire knowledge of God was gradually brought within the domain of theodicy. Thus theodicy came to be synonymous with natural theology (theologia naturalis) that is, the department of metaphysics which presents the positive proofs for the existence and attributes of God and solves the opposing difficulties. Theodicy, therefore, may be defined as the science which treats of God through the exercise of reason alone. It is a science because it systematically arranges the content of our knowledge about God and demonstrates, in the strict sense of the word, each of its propositions. But it appeals to nature as its only source of proof, whereas theology sets forth our knowledge of God as drawn from the sources of supernatural revelation.

Theodicies

Main article: Problem of evil

Augustinian theodicy

Main article: Augustinian theodicy

Augustine of Hippo proposed a theodicy reconciling God's goodness with evil present in the world. He argued that evil does not exist in itself, but is a privation, or going wrong, of goodness. He argued that evil exists as a result of free will of either humans or angels and, as a result, all evil is either sin or the punishment of sin. Aquinas agreed with Augustine and suggested that evil must exist for the appreciation of goodness: if there is no suffering, freedom from suffering cannot be truly appreciated. Like Augustine, Aquinas believed that evil does not exist independently and can only be understood in terms of goodness, which does exist. He thus saw evil as a deviation from goodness.

Irenaean theodicy

Main article: Irenaean theodicy

Irenaeus expressed ideas which explained the existence of evil as necessary for human development. Irenaeus argued that human creation was split into two parts: humans were made first in the image, the like likeness, of God. The image of God consists of having the potential to achieve moral perfection, whereas the likeness of God is the achievement of that perfection. To achieve moral perfection, Irenaeus suggested that humans must have free will. To achieve such free will, humans must experience suffering and God must be at an epistemic distance (a distance of knowledge) from humanity. Therefore, evil exists to allow humans to develop as moral agents. In the twentieth century, John Hick collated the ideas of Irenaeus into a distinct theodicy. He argued that the world exists as a "vale of soul-making", and that suffering and evil must therefore occur. He argued that human goodness is developed through the experience of evil and suffering.

Post-Holocaust

The Holocaust performed by Nazi Germany during World War II prompted a reconsideration of theodicy in Christian and Jewish circles. French Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas declared theodicy to be "blasphemous", arguing that it is the "source of all immorality". Levinas insisted that, since the Holocaust, there can be no absolute morality.

Professor of theology David R. Blumenthal, in his book Facing the Abusing God (1993), has drawn on data from the field of child abuse and proposed "worship of God through protest" (which could be characterized as misotheism) as a legitimate response of survivors of both the Holocaust and child abuse. Despite the term "abuse" being new in Jewish theology, the arguments connected to it have a long tradition in Jewish theology.

In 1998, Jewish theologian Zacahry Braiterman wrote (God) After Auschwitz, in which he coined the term anti-theodicy. In the book, Braiterman referred to a trend which he saw to be developing in post-war Europe, and defined anti-theodicy as a rejection of any meaningful relationship between God and suffering. Anti-theodicy therefore puts complete blame for evil on God, but rises from an individual's belief in God. Anti-theodicy has been likened to Job's protests in the book of Job.

Cosmodicy and anthropodicy

A cosmodicy is an attempt to justify the fundamental goodness of the universe in the face of evil. Similarly, an anthropodicy attempts to justify the fundamental goodness of human nature in the face of the evils produced by humans.

Considering the relationship between theodicy and cosmodicy, Johannes van der Ven argued that the choice between theodicy and cosmodicy is a false dilemma. Philip E. Devenish proposed what he described as "a nuanced view in which theodicy and cosmodicy are rendered complementary, rather than alternative concepts". Theologian J. Matthew Ashley described the relationship between theodicy, cosmodicy and anthropodicy:

"In classical terms, this is to broach the problem of theodicy: how to think about God in the face of the presence of suffering in God's creation. After God's dethronement as the subject of history, the question rebounds to the new subject of history: the human being. As a consequence, theodicy becomes anthropodicy — justifications of our faith in humanity as the subject of history, in the face of the suffering that is so inextricably woven into the history that humanity makes."

Cosmodicy has been identified as a major theme in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche.

See also

• Flannery O' Connor
• Problem of evil, answers and theodicies

Bibliography

• Birnbaum, David (1989). God and evil: a unified theodicy/theology/philosophy. KTAV Publishing House. ISBN 9780881253078. 
• Davis, Stephen T. (2001). Encountering evil: live options in theodicy. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 9780664222512. 
• Gibbs, Robert; Wolfson, Elliot (2002). Suffering religion. Psychology Press. ISBN 9780415266123. 
• Svendsen, Lars Fr. H.; Pierce, Kerri A. (2010). A philosophy of evil. Dalkey Archive Press. ISBN 1564785718. 
• Liebniz, Gottfried (1734). Theodicy. 
• Marty, Charles; Taliaferro (2010). Dictionary of Philosophy of Religion. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 9781441111975. 
• Patterson, David; Roth, John (2005). Fire in the ashes: God, evil, and the Holocaust. University of Washington Press. ISBN 9780295985473. 
• Pinnock, Sarah Katherine (2002). Beyond theodicy: Jewish and Christian continental thinkers respond to the Holocaust. SUNY Press. ISBN 9780791455234. 
• Sharma, Arvind (2006). A primal perspective on the philosophy of religion. Springer. ISBN 9781402050138. 
• Stump, Eleonore (1999). Philosophy of religion: the big questions. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 9780631206040. 

External links

• Brown, Paterson. "Religious Morality", Mind, 1963.
• Brown, Paterson. "Religious Morality: a Reply to Flew and Campbell", Mind, 1964.
• Brown, Paterson. "God and the Good", Religious Studies, 1967.
• Catholic Encyclopedia: Theodicy
• The Polkinghorne Reader : Science, Faith, and the Search for Meaning (Edited by Thomas Jay Oord) (SPCK and Templeton Foundation Press, 2010) ISBN 1-59947-315-1 and ISBN 978-0-281-06053-5