# Thermoelectric materials

Thermoelectric materials show the thermoelectric effect in a strong or convenient form. The thermoelectric effect refers to phenomena by which either a temperature difference creates an electric potential or an electric potential creates a temperature difference. These phenomena are known more specifically as the Seebeck effect (converting temperature to current), Peltier effect (converting current to temperature), and Thomson effect (conductor heating/cooling). While all materials have a nonzero thermoelectric effect, in most materials it is too small to be useful. However, low-cost materials that have a sufficiently strong thermoelectric effect (and other required properties) could be used in applications including power generation and refrigeration.

A commonly used thermoelectric material in such applications is bismuth telluride (Bi
2
Te
3
).

## Applications

### Power generation

Approximately 90% of the world’s electricity is generated by heat energy, typically operating at 30–40% efficiency, losing roughly 15 terawatts of power in the form of heat to the environment. Thermoelectric devices could convert some of this waste heat into useful electricity.[1] Thermoelectric efficiency depends on the figure of merit, ZT. There is no theoretical upper limit to ZT, and as ZT approaches infinity, the thermoelectric efficiency approaches the Carnot limit. However, no known thermoelectrics have a ZT>3.[2] As of 2010, thermoelectric generators serve application niches where efficiency and cost are less important than reliability, light weight, and small size.[3]

Internal combustion engines capture 20–25% of the energy released during fuel combustion.[4] Increasing the conversion rate can increase mileage and provide more electricity for on-board controls and creature comforts (stability controls, telematics, navigation systems, electronic braking, etc.)[5] It may be possible to shift energy draw from the engine (in certain cases) to the electrical load in the car, e.g. electrical power steering or electrical coolant pump operation.[4]

Cogeneration power plants use the heat produced during electricity generation for alternative purposes. Thermoelectrics may find applications in such systems or in solar thermal energy generation.[6]

### Refrigeration

Thermoelectric materials can be used as refrigerators, called "thermoelectric coolers", or "Peltier coolers" after the Peltier effect that controls their operation. As a refrigeration technology, Peltier cooling is far less common than vapor-compression refrigeration. The main advantages of a Peltier cooler (compared to a vapor-compression refrigerator) are its lack of moving parts or circulating fluid, and its small size and flexible shape (form factor). Another advantage is that Peltier coolers do not require refrigerant fluids, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and related chemicals, which can have harmful environmental effects.[7]

The main disadvantage of Peltier coolers is that they cannot simultaneously have low cost and high power efficiency. Advances in thermoelectric materials may allow the creation of Peltier coolers that are both cheap and efficient. It is estimated that materials with ZT>3 (about 20–30% Carnot efficiency) are required to replace traditional coolers in most applications.[8] Today, Peltier coolers are only used in niche applications.

## Materials selection criteria

### Power factor

The Seebeck coefficient is not the only number that determines the usefulness of a material in a thermoelectric generator or a thermoelectric cooler. Under a given temperature difference, the ability of a material to produce useful electrical power is quantified by its power factor,

$\mathrm{Power~factor} = \sigma S^2.$

where S is the Seebeck coefficient, and σ is the electrical conductivity. Materials with high power factor are able to generate more energy in a space-constrained application, but they are not necessarily efficient.

### Device efficiency

The efficiency of a thermoelectric device for electricity generation is given by $\eta$, defined as

$\eta = {\text{energy provided to the load} \over \text{heat energy absorbed at hot junction}}.$

The ability of a given material to efficiently produce thermoelectric power is related to its dimensionless figure of merit given by:

$ZT = {\sigma S^2 T \over \lambda}$,

which depends on the Seebeck coefficient S, thermal conductivity λ,　and electrical conductivity σ, and temperature T.

In an actual thermoelectric device, two materials are used. The maximum efficiency $\eta_\mathrm{max}$ is then given by

$\eta_\mathrm{max} = {T_H - T_C \over T_H} {\sqrt{1+Z\bar{T}}-1 \over \sqrt{1+Z\bar{T}} + {T_C \over T_H}},$

where $T_H$ is the temperature at the hot junction and $T_C$ is the temperature at the surface being cooled. $Z\bar{T}$ is the modified dimensionless figure of merit, which takes into consideration the thermoelectric capacity of both thermoelectric materials being used in the device and, after geometrical optimization regarding the legs sections,[9] is defined as

$Z\bar{T} = {(S_p - S_n)^2 \bar{T} \over [(\rho_n \kappa_n)^{1/2} + (\rho_p \kappa_p)^{1/2}]^2}$

where $\rho$ is the electrical resistivity, $\bar{T}$ is the average temperature between the hot and cold surfaces and the subscripts n and p denote properties related to the n- and p-type semiconducting thermoelectric materials, respectively. Since thermoelectric devices are heat engines, their efficiency is limited by the Carnot efficiency, hence the $T_H$ and $T_C$ terms in $\eta_\mathrm{max}$. Regardless, the coefficient of performance of current commercial thermoelectric refrigerators ranges from 0.3 to 0.6, one-sixth the value of traditional vapor-compression refrigerators.[10]

### Phonon-glass, electron-crystal behavior

In the efficiency equations above, thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity compete. G. A. Slack[11] proposed that in order to optimize the figure of merit, phonons, which are responsible for thermal conductivity must experience the material as they would in a glass (experiencing a high degree of phonon scattering—lowering thermal conductivity) while electrons must experience it as a crystal (experiencing very little scattering—maintaining electrical conductivity). The figure of merit can be improved through the independent adjustment of these properties.

### Semiconductors

Semiconductors are ideal thermoelectric devices because of their band structure and electronic properties at high temperatures. Device efficiency is proportional to ZT, so ideal materials have a large Z value at high temperatures. Since temperature is easily adjustable, electrical conductivity is crucial. Specifically, maximizing electrical conductivity at high temperatures and minimizing thermal conductivity optimizes ZT.

#### Thermal conductivity

κ = κ electron + κ phonon

According to the Wiedemann–Franz law, the higher the electrical conductivity, the higher κ electron becomes.[12] Therefore, it is necessary to minimize κ phonon. In semiconductors, κ electron < κ phonon, so it is easier to decouple κ and σ in a semiconductor through engineering κ phonon.

#### Electrical conductivity

Metals are typically good electrical conductors, but the higher the temperature, the lower the conductivity. This tendency can be explained (approximately) in terms of the Drude conductivity formula:

σ = ne2τ/m

As temperature increases, τ decreases while the other numbers stay constant, thereby decreasing σmetal.

In contrast, the electrical conductivity of a semiconductors generally increases with temperature. In semiconductors, carrier mean free time decreases with increasing temperature, however carrier density increases faster with increasing temperature, resulting in increasing σsemiconductor.[13]

#### State density

The band structure of semiconductors offers better thermoelectric effects than the band structure of metals.

The Fermi energy is below the conduction band causing the state density to be asymmetric around the Fermi energy. Therefore, the average electron energy is higher than the Fermi energy, making the system conducive for charge motion into a lower energy state. By contrast, the Fermi energy lies in the conduction band in metals. This makes the state density symmetric about the Fermi energy so that the average conduction electron energy is close to the Fermi energy, reducing the forces pushing for charge transport. Therefore, semiconductors are ideal thermoelectric materials.[12]

## Materials of interest

Strategies to improve thermoelectrics include both advanced bulk materials and the use of low-dimensional systems. Such approaches to reduce lattice thermal conductivity fall under three general material types: (1) Alloys: create point defects, vacancies, or rattling structures (heavy-ion species with large vibrational amplitudes contained within partially filled structural sites) to scatter phonons within the unit cell crystal.[14] (2) Complex crystals: separate the phonon-glass from the electron crystal using approaches similar to those for superconductors. The region responsible for electron transport would be an electron-crystal of a high-mobility semiconductor, while the phonon-glass would be ideal to house disordered structures and dopants without disrupting the electron-crystal (analogous to the charge reservoir in high-Tc superconductors.[15]) (3) Multiphase nanocomposites: scatter phonons at the interfaces of nanostructured materials,[16] be they mixed composites or thin film superlattices.

Materials under consideration for thermoelectric device applications include:

### Bismuth chalcogenides

Materials such as Bi
2
Te
3
and Bi
2
Se
3
comprise some of the best performing room temperature thermoelectrics with a temperature-independent thermoelectric effect, ZT, between 0.8 and 1.0.[17] Nanostructuring these materials to produce a layered superlattice structure of alternating Bi
2
Te
3
and Bi
2
Se
3
layers produces a device within which there is good electrical conductivity but perpendicular to which thermal conductivity is poor. The result is an enhanced ZT (approximately 2.4 at room temperature for p-type).[18] Note that this high value has not entirely been independently confirmed.

Bismuth telluride and its solid solutions are good thermoelectric materials at room temperature and therefore suitable for refrigeration applications around 300 K. The Czochralski method has been used to grow single crystalline bismuth telluride compounds. These compounds are usually obtained with directional solidification from melt or powder metallurgy processes. Materials produced with these methods have lower efficiency than single crystalline ones due to the random orientation of crystal grains, but their mechanical properties are superior and the sensitivity to structural defects and impurities is lower due to high optimal carrier concentration.

The required carrier concentration is obtained by choosing a nonstoichiometric composition, which is achieved by introducing excess bismuth or tellurium atoms to primary melt or by dopant impurities. Some possible dopants are halogens and group IV and V atoms. Due to the small bandgap (0.16 eV) Bi2Te3 is partially degenerate and the corresponding Fermi-level should be close to the conduction band minimum at room temperature. The size of the band-gap means that Bi2Te3 has high intrinsic carrier concentration. Therefore, minority carrier conduction cannot be neglected for small stoichiometric deviations. Use of telluride compounds is limited by the toxicity and rarity of tellurium.[19]

In 2008 Joseph Heremans and his colleagues have demonstrated that with thallium-doped lead telluride alloy (PbTe) it is possible to achieve ZT of 1.5 at 773 K.[20] Later, Snyder and his colleagues reported ZT~1.4 at 750 K in sodium-doped PbTe,[21] and ZT~1.8 at 850 K in sodium-doped PbTe1-xSex alloy.[22] Snyder’s group has determined that both thallium and sodium alter the electronic structure of the crystal increasing electric conductivity. They also claim that selenium increases electric conductivity and reduces thermal conductivity.

### Inorganic clathrates

Inorganic clathrates have a general formula AxByC46-y (type I) and AxByC136-y (type II), in these formulas B and C are group III and IV atoms, respectively, which form the framework where “guest” atoms A (alkali or alkaline earth metal) are encapsulated in two different polyhedra facing each other. The differences between types I and II comes from number and size of voids present in their unit cells. Transport properties depend a lot on the properties of the framework, but tuning is possible through the “guest” atoms.[23][24]

The most direct approach to the synthesis and optimization of thermoelectric properties of semiconducting type I clathrates is substitutional doping, where some framework atoms are replaced with dopant atoms. In addition, powder metallurgical and crystal growth techniques have been used in the synthesis of clathrates. The structural and chemical properties of clathrates enable the optimization of their transport properties with stoichiometry. Type II materials should be investigated in future because their structure allows a partial filling of the polyhedron enabling a better tuning of the electrical properties and therefore a better control of the doping level. Partially filled variants can also be synthesized as semiconducting or even insulating.

Blake et al. have predicted ZT~0.5 at room temperature and ZT~1.7 at 800 K for optimized compositions. Kuznetsov et al. measured electrical resistance and Seebeck coefficient for three different type I clathrates above room temperature and by estimating high temperature thermal conductivity from the published low temperature data they obtained ZT~0.7 at 700 K for Ba8Ga16Ge30 and ZT~0.87 at 870 K for Ba8Ga16Si30.[23]

### Magnesium group IV compounds

Mg2BIV (BIV=Si, Ge, Sn) compounds and their solid solutions are good thermoelectric materials and their figure of merit values are comparable with those of established materials. Due to a lack of systematic studies about their thermoelectric properties, however, the suitability of these materials, and in particular their quasi-ternary solutions, for thermoelectric energy conversion remains in question. The appropriate production methods are based on direct co-melting, but mechanical alloying has also been used. During synthesis, magnesium losses due to evaporation and segregation of components (especially for Mg2Sn) need to be taken into account. Directed crystallization methods can produce single crystalline material. Solid solutions and doped compounds have to be annealed in order to produce homogeneous samples. At 800 K Mg2Si1-xSnx has been reported to have a figure of merit about 0.9.[25]

### Silicides

Higher silicides seem promising materials for thermoelectric energy conversion, because their figure of merit is at the level with materials currently in use and they are mechanically and chemically strong and therefore can often be used in harsh environments without any protection. More detailed studies are needed to assess their potential in thermoelectrics and possibly to find a way to increase their figure of merit. Some of possible fabrication methods are Czochralski and floating zone for single crystals and hot pressing and sintering for polycrystalline.[26]

### Skutterudite thermoelectrics

Recently, skutterudite materials have sparked the interest of researchers in search of new thermoelectrics[27] These structures are of the form (Co,Ni,Fe)(P,Sb,As)
3
and are cubic with space group Im3. Unfilled, these materials contain voids into which low-coordination ions (usually rare earth elements) can be inserted in order to alter thermal conductivity by producing sources for lattice phonon scattering and decrease thermal conductivity due to the lattice without reducing electrical conductivity.[28] Such qualities make these materials exhibit PGEC behavior.

The composition of skutterudites corresponds to the chemical formula LM4X12, where L is a rare earth metal, M a transition metal and X a metalloid, a group V element or pnictogen whose properties lie between those of a metal and nonmetal such as phosphorus, antimony, or arsenic. These materials could be potential in multistage thermoelectric devices as it has been shown that they have ZT>1.0, but their properties are not well known and optimization of their structures is under way.[29]

### Oxide thermoelectrics

Because of their layered superlattice structure, homologous oxide compounds (such as those of the form (SrTiO
3
)n(SrO)
m
—the Ruddleson-Popper phase) have the potential to be used in high-temperature thermoelectric devices.[30] These materials exhibit low thermal conductivity perpendicular to the layers while maintaining electrical conductivity within the layers. The figure of merit in oxides is still relatively low (~0.34 at 1,000K),[31] but their enhanced thermal stability, as compared to conventional high-ZT bismuth compounds, makes them superior for use in high-temperature applications.[32]

Interest in oxides as thermoelectric materials was reawakened in 1997 when NaxCoO2 was found to exhibit good thermoelectric behavior. In addition to their thermal stability, other advantages of oxides are their nontoxicity and high oxidation resistance. Research on thermoelectric oxide materials is ongoing, but it seems that in order to simultaneously control both the electric and phonon systems, nanostructured materials are required. Some layered oxide materials are thought to have ZT~2.7 at 900 K. If the layers in a given material have the same stoichiometry, they will be stacked so that the same atoms will not be positioned on top of each other, impeding phonon conductivity perpendicular to the layers.[33]

### Half Heusler alloys

Half Heusler alloys have potential for high temperature power generation applications especially as n-type material. These alloys have three components that originate from different element groups or might even be a combination of elements in the group. Two of the groups are composed of transition metals and the third group consists of metals and metalloids. Currently only n-type material is usable in thermoelectrics but some sources claim that they have achieved ZT~1.5 at 700 K, but according to other source only ZT~0.5 at 700 K has been achieved. They state that primary reason for this difference is the disagreement between thermal conductivities measured by different groups. These alloys are relatively cheap and also have a high power factor.[34]

### Electrically conducting organic materials

Some electrically conducting organic materials may have a higher figure of merit than existing inorganic materials. Seebeck coefficient can be even millivolts per Kelvin but electrical conductivity is usually very low resulting small figure of merit. Quasi one-dimensional organic crystals are formed from linear chains or stacks of molecules that are packed into a 3D crystal. It has theoretically been shown that under certain conditions some Q1D organic crystals may have ZT~20 at room temperature for both p- and n-type materials. In the Thermoelectrics Handbook chapter 36.4 this has been accredited to an unspecified interference between two main electron-phonon interactions leading to the formation of narrow strip of states in the conduction band with a significantly reduced scattering rate as the mechanism compensate each other causing high ZT.[35]

### Silicon-germanium

Silicon-germanium alloys are currently the best thermoelectric materials around 1000 ℃ and are therefore used in some radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG) (notably the MHW-RTG and GPHS-RTG) and some other high temperature applications, such as waste heat recovery. Usability of silicon-germanium alloys is limited by their high price and in addition, ZT is also only in the mid-range (~0.7).

### Sodium-cobaltate

Experiments on crystals of sodium cobaltate, using X-ray and neutron scattering experiments carried out at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) and the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) in Grenoble were able to suppress thermal conductivity by a factor of six compared to vacancy-free sodium cobaltate. The experiments agreed with corresponding density functional calculations. The technique involved large anharmonic displacements of Na
0.8
CoO
2
contained within the crystals.[36][37]

With functionally graded materials, it is possible to improve the conversion efficiency of existing thermoelectric materials. These materials have a non-uniform carrier concentration distribution and in some cases also solid solution composition. In power generation applications the temperature difference can be several hundred degrees and therefore devices made from homogeneous materials have some part that operates at the temperature where ZT is substantially lower than its maximum value. This problem can be solved by using materials whose transport properties vary along their length thus enabling substantial improvements to the operating efficiency over large temperature differences. This is possible with functionally graded materials as they have a variable carrier concentration along the length of the material, which is optimized for operations over specific temperature range.[38]

### Nanomaterials

In addition to the nanostructured Bi
2
Te
3
/Bi
2
Se
3
superlattice thin films that have shown a great deal of promise, other nanomaterials show potential in improving thermoelectric materials. One example involving PbTe/PbSeTe quantum dot superlattices provides an enhanced ZT (approximately 1.5 at room temperature) that was higher than the bulk ZT value for either PbTe or PbSeTe (approximately 0.5).[8] Not all nanocrystalline materials are stable, because the crystal size can grow at high temperatures ruining materials desired characteristics. In nanocrystalline material, there are many interfaces between crystals, which scatter phonons so the thermal conductivity is reduced. Phonons are confined to the grain, if their mean free path is larger than the material grain size. Measured lattice thermal conductivity in nanowires is known to depend on roughness, the method of synthesis and properties of the source material.[39]

Nanocrystalline transition metal silicides are a promising material group for thermoelectric applications, because they fulfill several criteria that are demanded from the commercial applications point of view. In some nanocrystalline transition metal silicides the power factor is higher than in the corresponding polycrystalline material but the lack of reliable data on thermal conductivity prevents the evaluation of their thermoelectric efficiency.[40]

One advantage of nanostructured skutterudites over normal skutterudites is their reduced thermal conductivity but further performance improvements can be achieved by using composites and by controlling the grain size, the compaction conditions of polycrystalline samples and the carrier concentration. Thermal conductivity reduction is caused by grain boundary scattering. ZT values of ~ 0.65 and >0.4 have been achieved with CoSb3 based samples, the former value is 2.0 for Ni and 0.75 for Te doped material at 680 K and latter for Au-composite at T>700 K.[41]

Due to the unique nature of graphene, engineering of thermoelectric device with extremely high Seebeck coefficient based on this material is possible. One theoretical study suggests that the Seebeck coefficient might achieve a value of 30 mV/K at room temperature and ZT for their proposed device would be approximately 20.[42]

Superlattices and quantum wells can be good thermoelectric materials, but their production is too difficult and expensive for general use because of their fabrication is based on various thin film growth methods. Superlattice structures allow the independent manipulation of transport parameters by adjusting the structural parameters enabling the search for better understanding of thermoelectric phenomena in nanoscale. Many strategies exist to decrease the superlattice thermal conductivity that are based on engineering of phonon transport. The thermal conductivity along the film plane and wire axis can be reduced by creating diffuse interface scattering and by reducing the interface separation distance, both which are caused by interface roughness. The interface roughness can be natural due to the mixing of atoms at the interfaces or artificial. Many different structure types, such as quantum dot interfaces and thin films on step-covered substrates, can act as source for artificial roughness.[43]

However while engineering interface structures for reduced phonon thermal conductivity effects to electron transport has to be taken into account because the reduced electrical conductivity could negate the advantage received from phonon transport engineering. Because electrons and phonons have different wavelengths, it may be possible to engineer the structure in such a way that phonons are scattered more diffusely at the interface than electrons. This would reduce the decrease of the electrical conductivity.

Second approach is to increase phonon reflectivity and therefore decrease the thermal conductivity perpendicular to interfaces. This can be achieved by increasing the mismatch between the materials. Some of these properties are density, group velocity, specific heat, and the phonon spectrum between adjacent layers. Interface roughness causes diffuse phonon scattering, which either increases or decreases the phonon reflectivity at the interfaces. Mismatch between bulk dispersion relations confines phonons and the confinement becomes more favorable as the difference in dispersion increases. The amount of confinement is currently unknown as only some models and experimental data exist. As with a previous method, the effects on the electrical conductivity have to be considered.[43]

In order to further reduce the thermal conductivity, the localization of long wavelength phonons can be attempted with aperiodic superlattices or composite superlattices with different periodicities. In addition, defects, especially dislocations, can be used to reduce thermal conductivity in low dimensional systems.[43]

Thermoelectric performance improvements in superlattices originate from various sources, usually at least the lattice thermal conductivity in the cross plane direction is very low but depending on the type of superlattice, the thermoelectric coefficient may also increase because the band structure changes. Low lattice thermal conductivity in superlattices is usually due to strong interface scattering of phonons. Electronic band structure in superlattices comprises the so-called minibands, which appear due to quantum confinement effects. In superlattices, electronic band structure depends on the superlattice period so that with very short period (~1 nm) the band structure approaches the alloy limit and with long period (≥ ~60 nm) minibands become so close to each other that they can be approximated with a continuum.[44]

Especially in multi quantum well structures the parasitic heat conduction could cause significant performance reduction. Fortunately, the impact of this phenomenon can be reduced by choosing the distance between the quantum wells correctly.

The Seebeck coefficient can change its sign in superlattice nanowires due to the existence of minigaps as Fermi energy varies. This indicates that superlattices can be tailored to exhibit n or p-type behavior by using the same dopants as those that are used for corresponding bulk materials by carefully controlling Fermi energy or the dopant concentration. With nanowire arrays, it is possible to exploit semimetal-semiconductor transition due to the quantum confinement and use materials that normally would not be good thermoelectric materials in bulk form. Such elements are for example bismuth. The Seebeck effect could also be used to determine the carrier concentration and Fermi energy in nanowires.[45]

In quantum dot thermoelectrics, unconventional or nonband transport behavior (e.g. tunneling or hopping) is necessary to utilize their special electronic band structure in the transport direction. It is possible to achieve ZT~3 at elevated temperatures with quantum dot superlattices, but they are almost always unsuitable for mass production. Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 superlattice as a microcooler has been reported to have ZT~2.4 at 300 K.[46]

Nanocomposites are promising material class for bulk thermoelectric devices, but several challenges have to be overcome to make them suitable for practical applications. It is not well understood why the improved thermoelectric properties appear only in certain materials with specific fabrication processes.[47]

SrTe nanocrystals can be embedded in a bulk PbTe matrix so that rocksalt lattices of both materials are completely aligned (endotaxy) with optimal molar concentration for SrTe only 2%. This can cause strong phonon scattering but would not affect charge transport. In such case, ZT~1.7 can be achieved at 815 K for p-type material.[48]

Recently, high ZT values in single crystal silicon nanowires have been realized. Since silicon is an earth abundant material and its processing techniques have been well developed in industry. This breakthrough may have potentially great impact in commercial applications. By varying the nanowire size and impurity doping levels, researchers from Caltech were able to achieve an approximately 100-fold improvement of ZT values over bulk material, in single-component system of silicon nanowires for cross-sectional areas of 10 nm×20 nm and 20 nm×20 nm over a broad temperature range, including ZT<1 at 200 K.[49] Though the mechanism behind this phonomenon is still not perfectly clear. Independent measurements of the Seebeck coefficient, the electrical conductivity and the thermal conductivity, combined with theory, indicate that the improved efficiency originates from phonon effects, namely, phonon drags. These results are expected to apply to other classes of semiconductor nanomaterials.

## Production methods

Production methods for these materials can be divided into powder and crystal growth based techniques. Powder based techniques offer excellent ability to control and maintain desired carrier distribution. In crystal growth techniques dopants are often mixed with melt, but diffusion from gaseous phase can also be used. In the zone melting techniques disks of different materials are stacked on top of others and then materials are mixed with each other when a traveling heater causes melting. In powder techniques, either different powders are mixed with a varying ratio before melting or they are in different layers as a stack before pressing and melting.

## References

1. ^ Hochbaum, Allon I.; Chen, Renkun; Delgado, Raul Diaz; Liang, Wenjie; Garnett, Erik C.; Najarian, Mark; Majumdar, Arun; Yang, Peidong (2008). "Enhanced thermoelectric performance of rough silicon and nanowires". Nature 451 (7175): 163–7. Bibcode:2008Natur.451..163H. doi:10.1038/nature06381. PMID 18185582.
2. ^ Tritt, Terry M.; Subramanian, M. A. (2011). "Thermoelectric Materials, Phenomena, and Applications: A Bird's Eye View". MRS Bulletin 31 (3): 188. doi:10.1557/mrs2006.44.
3. ^ Labudovic, M.; Li, J. (2004). "Modeling of TE cooling of pump lasers". IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies 27 (4): 724. doi:10.1109/TCAPT.2004.838874.
4. ^ a b Yang, J. (2005). "Potential applications of thermoelectric waste heat recovery in the automotive industry". ICT 2005. 24th International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2005. p. 170. doi:10.1109/ICT.2005.1519911. ISBN 0-7803-9552-2.
5. ^ Fairbanks, J., Thermoelectric Developments for Vehicular Applications, U.S. Department of Energy: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Presented on: August 24, 2006.
6. ^ Goldsmid, H.J.; Giutronich, J.E.; Kaila, M.M. (1980). "Thermoelectrics: Direct Solar Thermal Energy Conversion". Solar Energy 24 (5): 435. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(80)90311-4.
7. ^
8. ^ a b Harman, T. C.; Taylor, PJ; Walsh, MP; Laforge, BE (2002). "Quantum dot superlattice thermoelectric materials and devices". Science 297 (5590): 2229–32. Bibcode:2002Sci...297.2229H. doi:10.1126/science.1072886. PMID 12351781.
9. ^ A.F. Ioffe, Physics of semiconductors, Academic Press Inc., New York (1960)
10. ^ Solar refrigeration options – a state-of-the-art review. D.S. Kim, C.A. Infante Ferreira. 2008, International Journal of Refrigeration, pp. 3–15. DOI web link
11. ^ Slack GA., CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics, ed. DM Rowe, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (1995) ISBN 0-8493-0146-7
12. ^ a b Timothy D. Sands (2005), Designing Nanocomposite Thermoelectric Materials
13. ^ N.W. Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1976).
14. ^ Bhandari, C. M. in CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics (ed. Rowe, D. M.) pp. 55–65 (CRC, Boca Raton, 1995) ISBN 0-8493-0146-7.
15. ^ Cava, R. J. (1990). "Structural chemistry and the local charge picture of copper-oxide superconductors". Science 247 (4943): 656–62. Bibcode:1990Sci...247..656C. doi:10.1126/science.247.4943.656. PMID 17771881.
16. ^ Dresselhaus, M. S.; Chen, G.; Tang, M. Y.; Yang, R. G.; Lee, H.; Wang, D. Z.; Ren, Z. F.; Fleurial, J.-P. et al. (2007). "New directions for low-dimensional thermoelectric materials". Advanced Materials 19 (8): 1043. doi:10.1002/adma.200600527.
17. ^ Duck Young Chung; Hogan, T.; Schindler, J.; Iordarridis, L.; Brazis, P.; Kannewurf, C.R.; Baoxing Chen; Uher, C. et al. (1997). "Complex bismuth chalcogenides as thermoelectrics". XVI ICT '97. Proceedings ICT'97. 16th International Conference on Thermoelectrics (Cat. No.97TH8291). p. 459. doi:10.1109/ICT.1997.667185. ISBN 0-7803-4057-4.
18. ^ Venkatasubramanian, Rama; Siivola, Edward; Colpitts, Thomas; O'Quinn, Brooks (2001). "Thin-film thermoelectric devices with high room-temperature figures of merit". Nature 413 (6856): 597–602. Bibcode:2001Natur.413..597V. doi:10.1038/35098012. PMID 11595940.
19. ^ Rowe, ch. 27
20. ^ Heremans, J. P.; Jovovic, V.; Toberer, E. S.; Saramat, A.; Kurosaki, K.; Charoenphakdee, A.; Yamanaka, S.; Snyder, G. J. (2008). "Enhancement of Thermoelectric Efficiency in PbTe by Distortion of the Electronic Density of States". Science 321 (5888): 554–7. Bibcode:2008Sci...321..554H. doi:10.1126/science.1159725. PMID 18653890.
21. ^ Pei, Yanzhong; Lalonde, Aaron; Iwanaga, Shiho; Snyder, G. Jeffrey (2011). "High thermoelectric figure of merit in heavy hole dominated PbTe". Energy & Environmental Science 4 (6): 2085. doi:10.1039/C0EE00456A.
22. ^ Pei, Yanzhong; Shi, Xiaoya; Lalonde, Aaron; Wang, Heng; Chen, Lidong; Snyder, G. Jeffrey (2011). "Convergence of electronic bands for high performance bulk thermoelectrics". Nature 473 (7345): 66–9. Bibcode:2011Natur.473...66P. doi:10.1038/nature09996. PMID 21544143.
23. ^ a b Rowe, ch. 32–33
24. ^ Gatti, C., Bertini, L., Blake, N. P. and Iversen, B. B. Guest–Framework Interaction in Type I Inorganic Clathrates with Promising Thermoelectric Properties: On the Ionic versus Neutral Nature of the Alkaline-Earth Metal Guest A in A8Ga16Ge30 (A=Sr, Ba). doi:10.1002/chem.20030483.7
25. ^ Rowe, ch. 29
26. ^ Rowe, ch. 31
27. ^ Caillat, T., Borshchevsky, A., and Fleurial, J.-P., In Proceedings of 7th International Conference TEs, K. Rao, ed., pp. 98 – 101. University of Texas, Arlington, 1993.
28. ^ Nolas, G. S.; Slack, G. A.; Morelli, D. T.; Tritt, T. M.; Ehrlich, A. C. (1996). "The effect of rare-earth filling on the lattice thermal conductivity of skutterudites". Journal of Applied Physics 79 (8): 4002. Bibcode:1996JAP....79.4002N. doi:10.1063/1.361828.
29. ^ Rowe, ch. 34
30. ^ “Oxide Thermoelectrics”: Rowe, ch. 35
31. ^ Wunderlich, W.; Ohta, S.; Ohta, H.; Koumoto, K. (2005). "Effective mass and thermoelectric properties of SrTiO/sub 3/-based natural superlattices evaluated by ab-initio calculations". Effective mass and thermoelectric properties of SrTiO3-based natural superlattices evaluated by ab-initio calculations. p. 252. doi:10.1109/ICT.2005.1519931. ISBN 0-7803-9552-2.
32. ^ Senthilkumar, Meenakshisundaram; Vijayaraghavan, Rajagopalan (2009). "High-temperature resistivity and thermoelectric properties of coupled substituted Ca3Co2O6". Science and Technology of Advanced Materials (free download) 10: 015007. Bibcode:2009STAdM..10a5007S. doi:10.1088/1468-6996/10/1/015007.
33. ^ Rowe, ch. 35
34. ^ Culp, Slade R.; Poon, S. Joseph; Hickman, Nicoleta; Tritt, Terry M.; Blumm, J. (2006). "Effect of substitutions on the thermoelectric figure of merit of half-Heusler phases at 800 °C". Applied Physics Letters 88 (4): 042106. Bibcode:2006ApPhL..88d2106C. doi:10.1063/1.2168019.
35. ^ Rowe, ch. 36
36. ^ "Improved thermoelectric materials may give a push to Moore’s law". KurzweilAI. Retrieved 2013-09-02.
37. ^ Voneshen, D. J.; Refson, K.; Borissenko, E.; Krisch, M.; Bosak, A.; Piovano, A.; Cemal, E.; Enderle, M.; Gutmann, M. J.; Hoesch, M.; Roger, M.; Gannon, L.; Boothroyd, A. T.; Uthayakumar, S.; Porter, D. G.; Goff, J. P. (2013). "Suppression of thermal conductivity by rattling modes in thermoelectric sodium cobaltate". Nature Materials. doi:10.1038/nmat3739. edit
38. ^ Rowe, ch. 38
39. ^ Akram I. Boukai, Yuri Bunimovich; Jamil Tahir-Kheli, Jen-Kan Yu (2008). "Silicon nanowires as efficient thermoelectric materials". Nature letters 451 (3): 19. doi:10.1038.
40. ^ Rowe, ch. 40
41. ^ Rowe, ch. 41
42. ^ Dragoman, D.; Dragoman, M. (2007). "Giant thermoelectric effect in graphene". Applied Physics Letters 91 (20): 203116. Bibcode:2007ApPhL..91t3116D. doi:10.1063/1.2814080.
43. ^ a b c Chen, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Dresselhaus, G.; Fleurial, J.-P.; Caillat, T. (2003). "Recent developments in thermoelectric materials". International Materials Reviews 48: 45. doi:10.1179/095066003225010182.
44. ^ Rowe, ch. 16, 39
45. ^ Rowe, ch. 39
46. ^ Rowe, ch. 49
47. ^ Minnich, A. J.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Ren, Z. F.; Chen, G. (2009). "Bulk nanostructured thermoelectric materials: current research and future prospects". Energy & Environmental Science 2 (5): 466. doi:10.1039/b822664b.
48. ^ Biswas, Kanishka; He, Jiaqing; Zhang, Qichun; Wang, Guoyu; Uher, Ctirad; Dravid, Vinayak P.; Kanatzidis, Mercouri G. (2011). "Strained endotaxial nanostructure with high thermoelectric figure of merit". Nature Chemistry 3 (2): 160–6. Bibcode:2011NatCh...3..160B. doi:10.1038/nchem.955. PMID 21258390.
49. ^ Akram I. Boukai, Yuri Bunimovich; Jamil Tahir-Kheli, Jen-Kan Yu; William A. Goddard (2008). "Silicon nanowires as efficient thermoelectric materials". Nature letters 451 (3): 466. doi:10.1038.

## Bibliography

• Rowe, David Michael. Thermoelectrics handbook : macro to nano. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis, 2006. ISBN 0-8493-2264-2