Thomas Friedman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Thomas Friedman
Thomas Friedman 2005 (5).jpg
Born Thomas Loren Friedman
(1953-07-20) July 20, 1953 (age 60)
St. Louis Park, Minnesota, U.S.
Residence Bethesda, Maryland
Alma mater University of Minnesota
Brandeis University
St Antony's College, Oxford
Occupation Author, columnist
Religion Jewish
Spouse(s) Ann Bucksbaum
Children Orly and Natalie
Website
ThomasLFriedman.com

Thomas Loren Friedman (born July 20, 1953) is an American journalist, columnist and author. He writes a twice-weekly column for The New York Times and has written extensively on foreign affairs including global trade, the Middle East, globalization, and environmental issues, and has won the Pulitzer Prize three times.

Biography[edit]

Friedman was born in St. Louis Park, Minnesota – a suburb of Minneapolis – on July 20, 1953. He is the son of Harold and Margaret Friedman. Harold, who was vice president of a ball bearing company, United Bearing, died of a heart attack in 1973, when Tom was nineteen years old. Margaret, who served in the U.S. Navy in World War II and studied home economics at the University of Wisconsin, was a homemaker and a part-time bookkeeper. She was also a Senior Life Master duplicate bridge player, and died in 2008. Friedman has two older sisters, Shelly and Jane.

From an early age, Friedman, whose father often brought him to the golf course for a round after work, wanted to be a professional golfer. He played a lot of sports, and became serious about tennis and golf. He caddied at a local country club and in 1970 caddied for the legendary Chi Chi Rodriguez when the US Open came to town.[1]

Friedman is Jewish.[2] He attended Hebrew school five days a week until his Bar Mitzvah,[3] then St. Louis Park High School, where he wrote articles for his school's newspaper.[4] He became enamored of Israel after a visit there in December 1968, and he spent all three of his high school summers living on Kibbutz Hahotrim, near Haifa.[5] He has characterized his high school years as "one big celebration of Israel's victory in the Six-Day War."[5]

Friedman studied at the University of Minnesota for two years, but later transferred to Brandeis University and graduated summa cum laude in 1975 with a degree in Mediterranean studies. While at Brandeis he roomed with psychologist Steven Fox. Friedman taught a class in economics at his alma mater Brandeis University in 2006, and was a commencement speaker at Brandeis in 2007.[6]

After graduating from Brandeis, he attended St Antony's College at the University of Oxford on a Marshall scholarship, earning an M.Phil. in Middle Eastern studies. He names Professor Albert Hourani among his important academic influences.[citation needed]

Friedman's wife, Ann (née Bucksbaum), is a graduate of Stanford University and the London School of Economics.[7] She is the daughter of real estate developer Matthew Bucksbaum.[8] They were married in London on Thanksgiving Day 1978 and live in Bethesda, Maryland.[9] The couple has two daughters, Orly (b. 1985) and Natalie (b. 1988).[10][11]

Journalism career[edit]

Friedman at the Miami Book Fair International, 1990

Friedman joined the London bureau of United Press International after completing his master's degree. He was dispatched a year later to Beirut, where he lived from June 1979 to May 1981 while covering the Lebanon Civil War. He was hired by The New York Times as a reporter in 1981 and redispatched to Beirut at the start of the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon. His coverage of the war, particularly the Sabra and Shatila massacre,[12] won him the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting (shared with Loren Jenkins of The Washington Post).[13] Alongside David K. Shipler[clarification needed] he also won the George Polk Award for foreign reporting.[1]

In June 1984, Friedman was transferred to Jerusalem, where he served as the New York Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief until February 1988. That year he received a second Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting, which cited his coverage of the First Palestinian Intifada.[13] Afterward he wrote a book, From Beirut to Jerusalem, describing his experiences in the Middle East,[14] which won the 1989 U.S. National Book Award for Nonfiction.[15]

Friedman covered Secretary of State James Baker during the administration of United States President George H. W. Bush. Following the election of Bill Clinton in 1992, he became the White House correspondent for the New York Times. In 1994, he began to write more about foreign policy and economics, and moved to the op-ed page of The New York Times the following year as a foreign affairs columnist. In 2002, Friedman won the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary "for his clarity of vision, based on extensive reporting, in commenting on the worldwide impact of the terrorist threat."[16][17]

In February 2002, Friedman met Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah and personally encouraged him to make his comprehensive attempt to end the Arab-Israeli conflict by normalizing Arab relations with Israel in exchange for the return of refugees alongside an end to the Israel territorial occupations. Abdullah proposed the Arab Peace Initiative at the Beirut Summit that March, which Friedman has strongly supported since.[18]

Friedman received the 2004 Overseas Press Club Award for lifetime achievement and was named to the Order of the British Empire by Queen Elizabeth II.[when?][19][20][21][22][23]

In May 2011, The New York Times reported that President Obama "has sounded out" Friedman concerning Middle East issues.[24]

Awards, recognition, and criticism[edit]

Friedman has won the Pulitzer Prize three times:

  • 1983: for his coverage of the war in Lebanon. A distinguished example of international reporting[citation needed]
  • 1988: for coverage of Israel: a distinguished example of reporting on international affairs[citation needed]
  • 2002: for his commentary illuminating the worldwide impact of the terrorist threat[citation needed]

Additionally, in 2005 he was elected as a member of the Pulitzer Prize Board.[25]

American journalist and former civil rights litigator Glenn Greenwald, writing for Salon on July 25, 2012, commented: "His status among American elites is the single most potent fact for understanding the nation's imperial decline."[26]

Another American academic and commentator, Haroon Moghul, has described Friedman as hating Islam, stating that: "he hates Muslims enough to want to bomb them."[27]

Writing style[edit]

Some critics have derided Friedman's idiosyncratic prose style, with its tendency to use mixed metaphors and analogies. Walter Russell Mead described his prose as being "an occasionally flat Midwestern demotic punctuated by gee-whiz exclamations about just how doggone irresistible globalization is – lacks the steely elegance of a Lippmann, the unobtrusive serviceability of a Scotty Reston or the restless fireworks of a Maureen Dowd and is best taken in small doses."[28] Similarly, journalist Matt Taibbi has said of Friedman's writing that, "Friedman came up with lines so hilarious you couldn't make them up even if you were trying – and when you tried to actually picture the 'illustrative' figures of speech he offered to explain himself, what you often ended up with was pure physical comedy of the Buster Keaton/Three Stooges school, with whole nations and peoples slipping and falling on the misplaced banana peels of his literary endeavors."[29]

In a column for the New York Press, Alexander Cockburn wrote: "Friedman exhibits on a weekly basis one of the severest cases known to science of Lippmann’s condition,--named for the legendary journalistic hot-air salesman, Walter Lippmann, and alluding to the inherent tendency of all pundits to swell in self-importance to zeppelin-like dimensions." Cockburn goes on to demonstrate how Friedman's hubris allowed him to pass off another war correspondent's experience in Beirut as his own.[30]

Views and opinions[edit]

Globalization[edit]

Friedman first discussed his views on globalization in the book The Lexus and the Olive Tree (1999). In 2004, a visit to Bangalore, India, and Dalian, China, gave Friedman new insights into the continuing trends of globalization and the forces behind the process, leading him to write a follow-up analysis, The World Is Flat (2005).

One of Friedman's theses states that individual countries must sacrifice some degree of economic sovereignty to global institutions (such as capital markets and multinational corporations), a situation he has termed the "golden straitjacket".[citation needed]

While Friedman is an advocate of globalization, he also points out (in The Lexus and the Olive Tree[citation needed]Thomas Friedman) the need for a country to preserve its local traditions, a process he termed "glocalization", although the term was already in use by most social anthropology theorists.[citation needed]

In today's global situation, Friedman is concerned about the United States' lack of independence when it comes to energy. He states, "First rule of oil – addicts never tell the truth to their pushers. We are the addicts, the oil producers are the pushers – we’ve never had an honest conversation with the Saudis."[citation needed] Friedman expresses a strong stance on America's need to become more energy independent and to lead in technologies concerning environmental compatibility. He believes this will cause the authoritarian rulers in the Middle East to be coerced out of power – as their petrodollar reserves are depleted – by a growing population of young people. He also believes this is the best way to spread stability and modernization in an autocratic and theocratic region.[citation needed] Friedman argues also that energy independence will strengthen America's economy by basing its energy infrastructure on domestic products (such as biodiesel), and will ease the world tensions caused by burgeoning energy demand, exacerbated by emerging economies such as those of India and China.[citation needed]

Opponents of free trade charge that Friedman does not consider the purchasing power of domestic labor as a key driver in economic output. However, Friedman argues that when low-skill and low-wage jobs are exported to foreign countries, more advanced and higher-skilled jobs will be freed up and made available for those displaced by the outsourcing. He theorizes that as long as those whose jobs are outsourced continue to further their education and specialize in their field, they will find better-paying and higher-skilled jobs.[citation needed]

He also views American immigration laws as too restrictive and damaging to economic output: "It is pure idiocy that Congress will not open our borders – as wide as possible – to attract and keep the world's first-round intellectual draft choices in an age when everyone increasingly has the same innovation tools and the key differentiator is human talent."[31]

Terrorism[edit]

After the September 11 attacks in 2001, Friedman's writing focused more on the threat of terrorism and the Middle East. He was awarded the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for Commentary "for his clarity of vision, based on extensive reporting, in commenting on the worldwide impact of the terrorist threat". These columns were collected and published in the book Longitudes and Attitudes.[citation needed] For a while, his reporting on post-9/11 topics led him to diverge from his prior interests in technological advances and globalization, until he began to research The World Is Flat.[citation needed]

After the 7 July 2005 London bombings, Friedman called for the U.S. State Department to "shine a spotlight on hate speech wherever it appears", to create a quarterly "War of Ideas Report, which would focus on those religious leaders and writers who are inciting violence against others".[citation needed] Friedman said the governmental speech-monitoring should go beyond those who actually advocate violence, and include also those whom former State Department spokesperson Jamie Rubin calls "excuse makers".[citation needed] In his July 25 column, Friedman wrote against the "excuses" made by terrorists or apologists who blame their actions on third-party influences or pressures. "After every major terrorist incident, the excuse makers come out to tell us ... why the terrorists acted. These excuse makers are just one notch less despicable than the terrorists and also deserve to be exposed. When you live in an open society like London, where anyone with a grievance can publish an article, run for office or start a political movement, the notion that blowing up a busload of innocent civilians in response to Iraq is somehow "understandable" is outrageous. "It erases the distinction between legitimate dissent and terrorism" Mr. Rubin said, "and an open society needs to maintain a clear wall between them."[citation needed]

Kosovo War[edit]

During the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, Friedman wrote the following in The New York Times on April 23, 1999: "Like it or not, we are at war with the Serbian nation (the Serbs certainly think so), and the stakes have to be very clear: Every week you ravage Kosovo is another decade we will set your country back by pulverizing you. You want 1950? We can do 1950. You want 1389? We can do 1389 too."[32]

Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) labeled Freidman's remarks "war-mongering, crude race-hatred and war-crime agitation".[33] Steve Chapman, critical of the response taken by NATO, referred to Friedman as "the most fervent supporter of the air war" and ironically asked in the Chicago Tribune: "Why stop at 1389? Why not revive the idea, proposed but never adopted in Vietnam, of bombing the enemy all the way back to the Stone Age?"[34] Norman Solomon asserted in 2007 that "a tone of sadism could be discerned" in Friedman's article.[35]

Iraq[edit]

Friedman supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq, writing that the establishment of a democratic state in the Middle East would force other countries in the region to liberalize and modernize.[citation needed] In his February 9, 2003, column for The Wall Street, Friedman also pointed to the lack of compliance with the United Nations Security Council Resolution regarding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction: "The French position is utterly incoherent. The inspections have not worked yet, says Mr. de Villepin, because Saddam has not fully cooperated, and, therefore, we should triple the number of inspectors. But the inspections have failed not because of a shortage of inspectors. They have failed because of a shortage of compliance on Saddam's part, as the French know. The way you get that compliance out of a thug like Saddam is not by tripling the inspectors, but by tripling the threat that if he does not comply he will be faced with a U.N.-approved war."[36] Since the invasion, Friedman has expressed alarm over the post-invasion conduct of the war by the George W. Bush administration. Nevertheless, until his piece dated August 4, 2006 (see below), his columns remained hopeful to the possibility of a positive conclusion to the Iraq conflict (although his optimism appeared to steadily diminish as the conflict continued). Friedman chided George W. Bush and Tony Blair for "hyping" the evidence, and stated plainly that converting Iraq to democracy "would be a huge undertaking, though, and maybe impossible, given Iraq's fractious history". In January 2004, he participated in a forum on Slate.com called "Liberal Hawks Reconsider the Iraq War", in which he dismisses the justification for war based on Iraq's lack of compliance with the U.N. Resolutions: "The right reason for this war.. was to oust Saddam's regime and partner with the Iraqi people to try to implement the Arab Human Development report's prescriptions in the heart of the Arab world. That report said the Arab world is falling off the globe because of a lack of freedom, women's empowerment, and modern education. The right reason for this war was to partner with Arab moderates in a long-term strategy of dehumiliation and redignification.[37]

In his September 29, 2005, column in The New York Times, Friedman entertained the idea of supporting the Kurds and Shias in a civil war against the Sunnis:"If they the Sunnis won't come around, we should arm the Shiites and Kurds and leave the Sunnis of Iraq to reap the wind."[38]

Iran's Great Weakness May Be Its Oil, by Thomas Friedman, challenges and debates conflicts about oil. Friedman states,"The best tool we have for curbing Iran's influence is not containment or engagement, but getting the price of oil down in the long term with conservation and an alternative-energy strategy. Let's exploit Iran's oil addiction by ending ours".[39]

Critics of Friedman's position on the Iraq War have noted his recurrent assertion that "the next six months" will prove critical in determining the outcome of the conflict. A May 2006 study by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting cited 14 examples of Friedman's declaring the next "few months" or "six months" as a decisive or critical period, dating from in November 2003, describing it as "a long series of similar do-or-die dates that never seem to get any closer".[40] The blogger Atrios coined the neologism "Friedman Unit" to refer to this unit of time in relation to Iraq, noting its use as a supposedly critical window of opportunity.[41][42]

In a live television interview aired June 11, 2006, on CNN, Howard Kurtz asked Friedman himself about the concept: "Now, I want to understand how a columnist's mind works when you take positions, because you were chided recently for writing several times in different occasions 'the next six months are crucial in Iraq.'" Friedman responded, "The fact is that the outcome there is unclear, and I reflected that in my column. And I will continue to reflect."[43] Responding to prodding from Stephen Colbert, Friedman said in 2007, "We've run out of six months. It's really time to set a deadline."[44]

Environment[edit]

In Hot, Flat, and Crowded, he says that "any car company that gets taxpayer money must demonstrate a plan for transforming every vehicle in its fleet to a hybrid-electric engine with flex-fuel capability, so its entire fleet can also run on next generation cellulosic ethanol".[45]

In a Fresh Dialogues interview, Friedman described his motivations for writing the book: "My concern is about America.... Demand for clean energy, clean fuel and energy efficiency is clearly going to explode; it’s going to be the next great global industry. I know that as sure as I know that I’m sitting here at De Anza College talking to you. By being big in the next big thing, we’ll be seen by the rest of the world as working on the most important problem in the world."[46]

Some of Friedman's environmental critics question his support of still undeveloped "clean coal" technology and coal mining as emblematic of Friedman's less than "green" commitment to renewable energy.[47] While Friedman supports the elimination of coal-based power, he believes improving coal technology is necessary in the short term.[48]

Israel[edit]

Friedman has been criticized by organizations such as Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting for defending Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon as a form of "educating" Israel's opponents; according to FAIR, Friedman was explicitly endorsing terrorism by Israel against Lebanese and Palestinians.[49] Journalist Glenn Greenwald and professor Noam Chomsky also accused Friedman of endorsing and encouraging terrorism by Israeli forces.[50][51]

Political reporter Belen Fernandez heavily critiques Friedman's commentary regarding Israel. Among other criticisms, Fernandez singles out Friedman's suggestion that Israeli forces were unaware that their allied Lebanese militias carried out the Sabra and Shatila massacre while under their guard, contradicting the assessments of other journalists and observers; his encouragement of strong-armed force by the Israeli army against Palestinians; and his opposition to settlements only on the grounds that they are counter-productive, rather than because they violate international law or cause suffering for Palestinians. Fernandez suggests that Friedman is most worried about successfully maintaining Israel's Jewish ethnocracy and actively opposing a "one-man, one-vote" system of democracy.[52]

Friedman has also come under criticism from supporters of Israel. In an op-ed, Yitzhak Benhorin criticized Friedman's alleged suggestion that Israel relinquish territory it had confiscated to build settlements.[53]

Friedman sparked criticism for writing that congressional ovations for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were "bought and paid for by the Israel lobby."[54] A letter from the American Jewish Committee objected that "Public opinion polls consistently show a high level of American ... support for and identification with Israel. This indicates that the people’s elected representatives are fully reflecting the will of the voters." [55] Friedman responded to criticism by writing: "In retrospect I probably should have used a more precise term like ‘engineered’ by the Israel lobby – a term that does not suggest grand conspiracy theories that I don’t subscribe to."[56]

China[edit]

In September 2009, Friedman wrote an article praising China's one-party autocracy, saying that it was "led by a reasonably enlightened group of people"[57] and that China's leaders are "boosting gasoline prices" and "overtaking us in electric cars, solar power, energy efficiency, batteries, nuclear power and wind power."[58][dead link]. The article was in turn subject to critical analysis: Matt Lewis who wrote, "Friedman's apparent wish for a 'benign' dictator is utopian, inasmuch as it ignores Lord Acton's warning that 'absolute power corrupts absolutely.'"[59] and William Easterly who quotes Friedman's one-party autocracy assertions[60] as part of his academic paper in which he concluded that, "Formal theory and evidence provides little or no basis on which to believe the benevolent autocrat story" and that, "economists should retain their traditional skepticism for stories that have little good theory or empirics to support them."[61] However in a July 2012 article in the NYT,[58] he also wrote that the current Chinese leadership has not used its surging economic growth to also introduce gradual political reform and that, "Corruption is as bad as ever, institutionalized transparency and rule of law remain weak and consensual politics nonexistent."[62] When asked if he had "China envy" during a Fresh Dialogues interview, Friedman replied, "You detect the envy of someone who wants his own government to act democratically with the same effectiveness that China can do autocratically."[63] Likewise, in a 2011 interview with the BBC Friedman says that he wants his children to live in a world where "there's a strong America counterbalancing a strong and thriving China, and not one where you have a strong and rising China and an America that is uncertain, weak and unable to project power economically and militarily it historically did."[64]

Friedman's work is popular in China. His book The World is Flat was a bestseller in the country, although criticism of China in the book was removed when it was published in the country.[65] A translated version of his article from The New York Times, "China Needs Its Own Dream", has been credited with popularizing the phrase "Chinese Dream" in China, a term that was later adopted as a slogan by Xi Jinping.[65] Friedman, in the magazine Foreign Policy, has attributed the phrase to Peggy Liu and her environmental NGO JUCCCE.[66]

Radical centrism[edit]

In the 2010s, Friedman wrote several columns supporting the politics of radical centrism. In one he stated that, if the "radical center wants to be empowered, it can't just whine. It needs its own grass-roots movement".[67] In another column Friedman promoted Americans Elect, an organization trying to field a radical-centrist candidate for the 2012 U.S. Presidential election. That column decried "the two-party duopoly that has dominated American political life".[68] Friedman's radical-centrist columns received a considerable amount of criticism, particularly from liberals.[69]

Published works[edit]

Friedman's books have seen considerable commercial success. His book The World Is Flat was on the New York Times Best Seller list from its publication in April 2005 until May 2007. Since July 2006, the book has sold more than two million copies.

Documentaries[edit]

Friedman[70] has hosted several documentaries for the Discovery Channel from several locations around the world. In Straddling the Fence (2003), he visited the West Bank and spoke to Israelis and Palestinians about the Israeli West Bank barrier and its impact on their lives. Also in 2003, Thomas L. Friedman Reporting: Searching for the Roots of 9/11[71] aired on the Discovery Times Channel. This program investigated the reason for Muslim hatred of the United States, and how the Sept. 11th attacks in New York, Pennsylvania, and the Pentagon were viewed in the Muslim world.

In The Other Side of Outsourcing (2004),[72] he visited a call centre in Bangalore, interviewing the young Indians working there, and then travelled to an impoverished rural part of India, where he debated the pros and cons of globalization with locals (this trip spawned his eventual best-selling book The World is Flat).

In Does Europe Hate Us? (2005), Friedman travelled through Britain, France and Germany, talking with academics, journalists, Marshall and Rhodes scholars, young Muslims and others about the nature of the strained relationship between Europe and the United States.

Addicted to Oil (2006)[73][74] premiered at the Silverdocs Documentary Festival at 5:30 PM on June 16, 2006, and aired on June 24, 2006, on the Discovery Times Channel. In it he examined the geopolitical, economic, and environmental consequences of petroleum use and ways that green technologies such as alternative fuels and energy efficiency and conservation can reduce oil dependence.

In Green: The New, Red, White and Blue (2007),[75] Friedman elaborates on the green technologies and efforts touched on in Addicted to Oil and in doing so, attempts to redefine green energy as geostrategic, geoeconomic, capitalistic and patriotic. He explores efforts by companies and individuals to reduce their carbon footprint and save money with conservation, efficiency, and technologies such as solar, wind, biomass, nuclear, and clean coal.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Why the World Is Flat". Wired. May 2005. Retrieved February 6, 2012. 
  2. ^ Friedman, Thomas L. (2011-12-14). "Newt, Mitt, Bibi and Vladimir". Nytimes.com. Retrieved 2012-03-26. 
  3. ^ From Beirut to Jerusalem. 1990, page 4
  4. ^ The Echo[dead link]
  5. ^ a b From Beirut to Jerusalem. 1990, page 5
  6. ^ "Brandeis University :: News". My.brandeis.edu. Retrieved 2012-03-26. 
  7. ^ "College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Iowa State University". Las.iastate.edu. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  8. ^ Forbes: "Thomas Friedman is On Top of the World" by By Garrett M. Graff July 1, 2006
  9. ^ "Thomas Friedman’s World Is Flat Broke". Vanity Fair. November 2008. 
  10. ^ College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Iowa State University http://www.las.iastate.edu/kiosk/2892.shtml |url= missing title (help). 
  11. ^ "Notable Names DataBase". 
  12. ^ Friedman, Thomas L. (September 26, 1982). "article by Thomas Friedman on Beirut massacre". New York Times. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  13. ^ a b "International Reporting: Past winners & finalists by category". The Pulitzer Prizes. Retrieved March 25, 2012. 
  14. ^ "Thomas L. Friedman – Bio". University of Southern California. Retrieved 5 August 2011. 
  15. ^ a b "National Book Awards – 1989". National Book Foundation. Retrieved March 25, 2012. 
  16. ^ "Commentary: Past winners & finalists by category". The Pulitzer Prizes. Retrieved 2012-03-25. 
  17. ^ "The 2002 Pulitzer Prize Winners: Commentary: Works". The Pulitzer Prizes. Retrieved March 25, 2012.  [(List of ten 2001 articles.)]
  18. ^ Akiva Eldar. "What Arab initiative?". Haaretz. 
  19. ^ Thomas L. Friedman, "179 Ideas" (March 11, 2009). "Official Website". Thomaslfriedman.com. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  20. ^ "Columns for The New York Times". Nytimes.com. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  21. ^ "People: Thomas Friedman". NNDB. 
  22. ^ "Around the Table Biography of Thomas Friedman". Washington Week. [dead link]
  23. ^ "Interview with Oliver Burkeman". The Guardian. 2003. 
  24. ^ Landler, Mark (11 May 2011). "Obama Seeks Reset in Arab World". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 May 2011. 
  25. ^ "The Pulitzer Prizes: Board Member Thomas Friedman". Pulitzer.org. December 31, 2007. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  26. ^ "The Value of Tom Friedman". Salon. July 2112. Retrieved July 25, 2012. 
  27. ^ Moghul, Haroon. "Islam Invented Democracy". The Islamic Monthly. Retrieved 5 February 2014. 
  28. ^ "BOOKS OF THE TIMES; Grappling With the Dangers Of the New World Order". The New York Times. October 22, 2002. Retrieved March 28, 2010. 
  29. ^ Matt Taibbi. "Someone Take Away Thomas Friedman's Computer Before He Types Another Sentence". New York Press. Retrieved December 18, 2010. 
  30. ^ Alexander Cockburn (October 3, 2000). "I and I: The World According to Tom Friedman". NY Press. Retrieved November 12, 2013. 
  31. ^ Friedman, Thomas L. (May 27, 2007). "Laughing and Crying". NYTimes.com. Retrieved November 17, 2010. 
  32. ^ Thomas Friedman (23 April 1999). "Stop the Music". The New York Times. 
  33. ^ "CPJ Declares Open Season on Thomas Friedman". FAIR. 
  34. ^ Steve Chapman (April 29, 1999). "A War Against All Of The Serbs". Chicago Tribune. 
  35. ^ Norman Solomon (September 6, 2007). "Thomas Friedman: Hooked on War". The Huffington Post. 
  36. ^ "Vote France Off the Island". Globalpolicy.org. February 9, 2003. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  37. ^ Friedman, Thomas (January 12, 2004). "Liberal Hawks Reconsider the Iraq War: Four Reasons To Invade Iraq". Slate.com. Retrieved December 7, 2006. 
  38. ^ The Endgame in Iraq Sep 29. 2005
  39. ^ "Economist's View: Thomas Friedman: Iran's Great Weakness May Be Its Oil". Economistsview.typepad.com. 2007-02-03. Retrieved 2011-10-06. 
  40. ^ Tom Friedman's Flexible Deadlines: Iraq's 'decisive' six months have lasted two and a half years May 16, 2006
  41. ^ Black, Duncan (May 21, 2006). "The Six Monthers". Blogspot. Retrieved March 18, 2007. 
  42. ^ The Huffington Post cited it as the "Best New Phrase" of 2006."Media Winners of 2006: Honorable Mentions (Rapid-Fire Round II)". The Huffington Post. January 2, 2007. Retrieved March 18, 2007. 
  43. ^ White House Mounts Media Blitz After Killing of Zarqawi June 11, 2006
  44. ^ Corley, Matt (2007-09-25). "No more ‘Friedmans’ for Friedman.". ThinkProgress. Retrieved 2011-10-06. 
  45. ^ Friedman, Thomas L. (November 12, 2008). "How to Fix a Flat". The New York Times. Retrieved March 28, 2010. 
  46. ^ "Fresh Dialogues interview with Alison van Diggelen, September 10, 2009". Freshdialogues.com. September 18, 2009. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  47. ^ The NYT's Thomas Friedman January 2007
  48. ^ Hot, Flat, and Crowded
  49. ^ http://fair.org/take-action/action-alerts/terrorism-on-the-new-york-times-op-ed-page/
  50. ^ http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/friedman_7/
  51. ^ http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20090119.htm
  52. ^ Fernandez, Belen. The Imperial Messenger: Thomas Friedman at Work. Verso Books, 2011, p 99-107
  53. ^ http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4028408,00.html
  54. ^ Thomas L. Friedman: Newt, Mitt, Bibi and Vladimir New York Times 13 December 2011.
  55. ^ New York Times Columnist Tom Friedman Crossed a Line Jerusalem Post, 19 December 2011.
  56. ^ Friedman responds to criticism over ‘bought and paid for’ jab at Congress JTA, December 20, 2011.
  57. ^ http://beta.mrc.org/articles/friedman-again-hails-communist-chinas-one-party-autocracy-superior-american-democracy
  58. ^ a b 12:10 EDT (September 13, 2009). "New York Times columnist Tom Friedman hails China's one-party autocracy". Washington Examiner. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  59. ^ Matt Lewis (January 20, 2011). "Tom Friedman, in Praising China's 'One-Party Autocracy,' Just Doesn't Get It". Politics Daily. Retrieved October 26, 2012. 
  60. ^ William Easterly (May 2011). Benevolent Autocrats. William Easterly. p. 2. Retrieved October 26, 2012. 
  61. ^ William Easterly (May 2011). Benevolent Autocrats. William Easterly. p. 44. Retrieved October 26, 2012. 
  62. ^ Thomas Friedman (June 5, 2012). "What the Locusts Ate". NYT. Retrieved October 26, 2012. 
  63. ^ "Fresh Dialogues Interview with Alison van Diggelen". Freshdialogues.com. September 16, 2009. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  64. ^ BBC Two: The Chinese Are Coming: Episode 2: The Americas (Part 4 of 4), quote can be heard from 11:50 to 12:15 on YouTube[dead link]
  65. ^ a b "The role of Thomas Friedman". The Economist. May 6, 2013. 
  66. ^ Fish, Isaac Stone (May 3, 2013). "Thomas Friedman: I only deserve partial credit for coining the 'Chinese dream'". Foreign Policy. 
  67. ^ Friedman, Thomas L. (20 March 2010). "A Tea Party Without Nuts". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 February 2013.
  68. ^ Friedman, Thomas (23 July 2011). "Make Way for the Radical Center". The New York Times. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  69. ^ Marx, Greg (25 July 2011). "Tom Friedman's 'Radical' Wrongness". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved 28 February 2013.
  70. ^ Thomas Friedman at the Internet Movie Database
  71. ^ Thomas L. Friedman Reporting: Searching for the Roots of 9/11 at the Internet Movie Database
  72. ^ Thomas L. Friedman Reporting: The Other Side of Outsourcing at the Internet Movie Database
  73. ^ "Addicted to Oil: Thomas L. Friedman Reporting – Reviews, Movie Trailers, Cast & Crew. Movies at". Film.com. Retrieved May 15, 2010. 
  74. ^ Addicted to Oil: Thomas L. Friedman Reporting at the Internet Movie Database
  75. ^ Green: The New Red, White and Blue at the Internet Movie Database

External links[edit]