Thoroughbred breeding theories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Volume Six of the General Stud Book (1857)
Volume Two of the American Stud Book (1873)

Thoroughbred horse breeding theories run the gamut from the more common careful statistical analyses to the fanciful and the superstitious. The dream of the next legendary racehorse arising from the perfect pairing of sire and dam motivates the manager both for potential financial gain and for prestige. By careful analysis of bloodlines, particularly the female line, the potential breeder can attempt to predict beneficial pairings.

The female line[edit]

Thoroughbred horses are traced through the "distaff" or female line, known as their "family", dating to the beginning of the General Stud Book (GSB). This was done because the mares produce far fewer foals than stallions. Thoroughbred Stud Books around the world cite pedigrees in tail female style - meaning that the ancestry is traced through the maternal, rather than paternal line.

Horses that come from “good’ families will usually command better prices than one with an inferior family, although they may not prove to be better as racehorses or sires/broodmares.[1] However, modern genetic studies have revealed that there are some cases where the haplotype in the mtDNA of modern Thoroughbreds differs from the stated dam line, suggesting that some records contain errors.[2]

History of breeding theories[edit]

Around 1895 an Australian, Bruce Lowe, wrote: “Breeding Racehorses by the Figure System”. This work formulated a system of family numbers from the GSB mares as explained by Lowe:

The figures are derived from a statistical compilation of the winners of the three great English classic races, Derby, Oaks and St. Leger. The family with the largest number of wins is No. 1, the next No. 2 and so on up to No. 43, and include families whose descendants have not won a classic race.[3]

He goes on to write:

My own impression is that even these three great progenitors (referring to the 3 foundation sires) owe their survival and fame mostly to the female lines they were mated with. The Figure system is based mainly upon identifying and tracing the origin of these female lines.[3]

Old Bald Peg, dam of the Old Morocco Mare (c.1655)

Old Bald Peg (family 6) is one of the earliest tap-root dams, having been foaled around 1635. Most, if not all modern Thoroughbreds trace their ancestry to her through one or both sides of their pedigree.[4]

Many horses were inbred or linebred in early years, which increased the chances of early horses appearing in many Thoroughbred pedigrees today.[5][6]

During the 1950s Captain Kaziemierz Bobinski and Count Zamoyski produced the monumental work Family Tables of Racehorses,[7] commonly known as the Bobinski Tables. This work expanded Bruce Lowe's numbering system of 43 families and identified a total of 74 families tracing to mares in the GSB.[8] There were mares in several countries whose pedigrees had been lost or whose descendants had been bred up from Arabians etc. and were unacceptable to the GSB at the time of Lowe’s work. The Family Table of Racehorses expanded research into these female families of racehorses including:

Thoroughbred families include the following:
  • Families 1-45 are described by Bruce Lowe's Breeding Racehorses by the Figure System
  • Families A1-A37 descend from Sanders Bruce's American Stud Book, with mares who cannot be traced to Weatherbys General Stud Book (GSB)
  • Families Ar1-Ar2 are Argentine families
  • Families B1-B26 trace directly to F.M. Prior's Half-Bred Studbook
  • Families C1-C16 are described in the Australian Stud Book as approved Colonial Families
  • Families C17-C33 descend from Australian and New Zealand mares who cannot be traced to the GSB
  • Families P1-P2 are Polish families


Bobinski later updated his works and split Lowe's families into sub categories.[9] Today, these numbers often follow a horse’s name in sale catalogues and pedigrees, much like a numerical surname and are very helpful for checking the accuracy of pedigrees and comparing the contributions made by various mares and families.[10]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Napier, Miles (1977). Blood will tell: Orthodox breeding theories examined. London: J. A. Allen. pp. 17–18. 
  2. ^ Erigero, Patricia. "Who's Your Momma III: Some Lines Misplaced". Genetic Markers. Thoroughbred Heritage. Retrieved 2008-02-17.  which cites Hill, E. W. et al. (2002). "History and Integrity of Thoroughbred Dam Lines Revealed in Equine mtDNA Variation". Animal Genetics 33 (4): p. 287–294. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00870.x. PMID 12139508. Retrieved 2008-02-17. 
  3. ^ a b Lowe, Bruce; William Allison (1977). Breeding Racehorses by the Figure System. London: The Field and Queen. p. 42. Facsimile. 
  4. ^ "Look here for racing's roots". The Press. Retrieved 2008-02-14. 
  5. ^ Hardiman, James R. "Inbreeding". Retrieved 2008-02-14. 
  6. ^ "Equine Business Marketing". Wild Horse Advertising. Retrieved 2008-02-14. 
  7. ^ "Reference Books". Bloodlines. Retrieved 2008-02-14. 
  8. ^ Erigero, Patricia. "New Research Sheds Light on Old Pedigrees". Genetic Markers. Thoroughbred Heritage. Retrieved 2008-02-17.  which cites Hill, E. W. et al. (2002). "History and Integrity of Thoroughbred Dam Lines Revealed in Equine mtDNA Variation". Animal Genetics 33 (4): p. 287–294. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00870.x. PMID 12139508. Retrieved 2008-02-17. 
  9. ^ "Family Tables". Bloodlines. Retrieved 2008-02-17. 
  10. ^ Wicks, B.M (1973). The Australian Racehorse: An Introduction to Breeding. Canberra: Libra Books. p. 16. 

See also[edit]