Three-parent babies are potential human offspring that will have three genetic parents. The procedure is intended to prevent mitochondrial diseases including muscular dystrophy and some heart and liver conditions. It is the subject of considerable controversy in the field of bioethics. Scientists have already produced pregnancies in which the fetuses contain DNA from three parents, but none have yet been brought to term.
The process is currently prohibited in the United States, but is being actively researched in China. Some research is also taking place in the United States and in the United Kingdom where the government said they were planning to make the procedure legal in 2014.
The process of producing a three-parent baby, Three Parent In Vitro Fertilization (TPIVF),involves taking the nucleus of one egg and inserting it into the cytoplasm of another egg which has had its nucleus removed, but still contains mitochondrial DNA, and then fertilizing the hybrid egg with a sperm. The purpose of the procedure is to remove a nucleus from a cell with defective mitochondria and place it in a donor cell with healthy mitochondria, which after fertilization will contain a nucleus with genetic material from only the two parents. There is more than one method of TPIVF. The two main methods are pronuclear transfer and spindle transfer; Spindle transfer is a process where the spindle of chromosomes taken from the mother’s egg are placed into the donor egg and pronuclear transfer is the process described at the beginning of this paragraph.
Although the donor egg is said to contribute only 0.1% to the genetic make up of the child, when examining the genetic material of these children there are still three identifiable genetic parents. This is due to the fact that the donor egg came from a non-maternal relative. For the child to have only two identifiable genetic parents and still have undergone this procedure, the donor egg must have come from a maternal relative because maternal mtDNA is almost identical. Maternal relative egg donation is not commonly used, because if the female egg has a mitochondrial disease then it is highly likely that the maternal relatives inherited the disease as well.
New York University researcher James Grifo, a critic of the American ban, has argued that society "would never have made the advances in treating infertility that we have if these bans had been imposed 10 years" earlier.
Opponents argue that scientists are "playing God" and that children with three genetic parents may suffer both psychological and physical damage. These critics include Alison Cook of Great Britain's Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, who argues that bans were "written to protect the welfare of the embryo and the child."
The mito-mom (female with healthy mitochondria) and the geno-mom (female with the genomic nucleus) go through vigorous test and are involved in potential risks for physical and psychological threats associated with the requisite medical procedures. Both patients incur the physical and psychological risks of hormonal stimulation and egg retrieval, but only one of them gets the benefit of having a child. The in-vitro fertilization(IVF) patient has the potential benefit of having a child. The female that provides the egg; her potential benefit is a more emotional and possibly financial result. An ethical dilemma left contested is, do these potential benefits for both patients compensate for the potential harm?
Most procedures present are classified as cloning. Other procedures are still in the preclinical trials, being performed on animals with some extent to humans. The most common procedure that is done on humans and is FDA approved is done by meiotic spindle-chromosomal complex transfer followed by fertilization, preimplantation embryo development and embryonic stem cell derivation. Of this transferring of mitochondria to the oocytes, trials have showed 53% showing abnormal fertilization, giving it only less than 50% chance that the fertilization will be viable. Given all the vigorous test and risks, it is not always certain it will work and therefore majority of this vacillating process will have to be re-done.
The children produced from this type of procedure are also a main concern. This procedure is meant to avoid the potential risks associated with mutated mtDNA including blindness, neurodegenerative disease, diabetes, muscular dystrophy and death. Considering only the benefits associated from removing mutated mtDNA, this procedure seems ethical. However, this type of procedure is still relatively new and not much information about long-term health effects are known. Could the child still inherit mutated mtDNA from the maternal nuclei? How will future generations be affected? There is currently no way of telling what future consequences will occur in the genetic child or its progeny until this method is further studied with humans. However ooplasmic transfer, a fertility treatment, has been successfully used to conceive "three-parent offspring" without problems.
The concern with three-parent babies, is it applies to genetic modification to avoid illnesses, as well as genetic modification for the improvement of the human race. An important investment of resources is into research of avoiding inherited diseases being passed down generation to generation. Though this type of scientific investment is keen on scientific excellence, it is also to be in account of its social significance. The sociological approach assumes that biology alone is not able to successfully enable human reproduction. That it is in needed of these procedures involving IVF, especially three-parent embryos, for the increasing survival of the human kind.
Some other issues can be solved from implementing this procedure. Cryopreserved embryos will not only be used for IVF reproduction but for mitochondria transferring as well. A survey was done by Fertility and Sterility in 2008 that 40% of patients that have frozen their embryos are undecided on what is to be done with them once they have already conceived a child. While other problems, like adoption, will more likely take a suffering toll.
The physiological effects of this procedure are still unknown. Cora de Kleck, medical psychologist and associated professor at Erasmus University Medical Center stated that with procedures of this nature women experience certain behaviors. Infertile woman hope and believe strongly in her physicians and that they will be able to assist her to have a successful pregnancy. This typically manifests itself in complete trust and reliance in their physician. In a clinical study when women coping with different forms of infertility were asked about who they felt about their treatment and procedural options. These women said that the choices and procedures that the doctors prescribed were forced on them. Women reported that they felt that they had very little choice in the matter and felt as if they were constrained by their own ignorance. This procedure would be seen as a last resort for families and ultimately the final decision is made by the patient. The mothers and fathers of IVF have no different reactions than normal parent.
The potential success rates for TPIVF are dependent on age, gender, and other factors. However the National Association of Infertility stated that the rates of fertility parallel with the rates of a fertile couple with prime conditions. Typically, “A young and fertile couple has just a 15-20% chance to conceive naturally in any one month. Women with top chances of IVF success have per-cycle success rates of 40% or higher, while the majority of women have per-cycle success rates of 20-35%.” Pregnancy can be affected by many factors so it is essential for any member of the family unit trying to conceive to be informed about their family history and get tested. Though TPIVF has not been tested in human yet the results are expected to parallel the affects predicted for other forms of IVF.
- Three-parent IVF needs more research, review says - BBC News article
- Short film with experts discussing the ethical / practical issues surrounding 'Three Parent Babies' / 'Mitochondria Replacement'
- Why We Should Approve 'Three-Parent' Embryos - Real Clear Science Article
- In depth: three-person IVF is about saving lives, not a slippery slope to eugenics - Wired Article
- 'Three-parent babies' cure for illness raises ethical fear - The Guardian Article
- Three-parent babies on the way, say IVF experts - The Independent Article
- 'Three-Parent' IVF Technique Set for Approval - Web MD Article
- Proposed IVF Technique Uses Three Parents - The ABC News Article
- THREE-PARENT IVF IS HERE, AND THERE’S NOTHING TO FEAR - An Al Jazeera Article
- Keim, Brandon, Three-Parent Children: Reality or Technicality?, Feb 5, 2008.
- Alleyne, Richard.'Three parent babies' take a step closer to reality, The Telegraph, Nov. 12, 2009.
- Randerson, James. Scientists seek to create 'three-parent' babies The New Scientist Oct. 19. 2004
- Three-Parent IVF Set to Go Ahead in Britain, Discover Magazine, June 28, 2013
- Frith, Maxine. Ban on scientists trying to create three-parent baby, The Independent, October 14, 2003
- Now, a three-parent baby
- Knapton, Sarah (1 March 2014) 'Three-parent babies' could be born in Britain next year The Daily Telegraph Science News, Retrieved 1 March 2014
- "Background: Maternal spindle transfer". Retrieved 22 April 2014.
- Françoise Baylis (2013) The ethics of creating children with three genetic parents, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 26(6): 531-534
- Check E (November 2005). "Gene study raises fears for three-parent babies". Nature 438 (7064): 12. doi:10.1038/438012a. PMID 16267521.
- Baylis, F. 2013. The ethics of creating children with three genetic parents. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 26(6): 531-534.
- Yabuuchi, A. Beyhan, Z. Kagawa, N. et al. 2012. Prevention of mitochondrial disease inheritance by assisted reproductive technologies: Prospects and challenges. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – General Subjects 1820(5): 637-642.
- Tachibana, M. et al. 2012. Effect of mitochondrial gene replacement in human oocytes on fertilization and embryo development. Fertility and Sterility 98(3): S108.
- Cohen, J., Scott, R., Schimmel, T., Levron, J., Willadsen, S., 1997. Birth of infant after transfer of anucleate donor oocyte cytoplasm into recipient eggs. Lancet 350, 186–187.
- (20 March 2013) Don't fear babies made with genes from three parents New Scientist, Retrieved 1 March 2014
- Barritt, J. A.; Brenner, C. A.; Malter, H. E.; Cohen, J. (2001). "Mitochondria in human offspring derived from ooplasmic transplantation: Brief communication". Human Reproduction 16 (3): 513. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.3.513.
- Franklin, S. 2013. Conception through a looking glass: the paradox of IVF. Reproductive BioMedicine Online.
- Stanger, J.D. Yovich, J.L. 2013. Follicle recruitment determines IVF productivity rate via number of embryos frozen and subsequent transfers. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 27(3): 286-296.
- Lyerly, A.D. Steinhauser, K. Voils, C. et al. 2010. Fertility patients’ views about frozen embryo disposition: Results of a multi-institutional U.S. survey. Fertility and Sterility. 93(2): 499-509.