Tidewater (marketing)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Tidewater is a term used by industries and governments[1] to refer to access to ocean ports with international marine services for import and export of commodities. For export, the commodities can be shipped via trucks, trains[2] and/or pipelines[3] to a port, thereby opening the door to more lucrative prices on global markets. Getting to such a port is particularly important for landlocked jurisdictions seeking to expand and diversify markets for natural resources.[4] If the Keystone pipeline were completed and WCS could reach Gulf Coast refineries and tidewater.[4] and WCS would "be priced at the equivalent discount of Maya" (Moore et al. 2011:2).[4]

Alberta Tar Sands

An example of the use of the term "tidewater" can be seen in the debate over exports of oil produced by the Alberta Tar Sands, recently renamed the Athabaska oil sands. Upon separated from the sand, this bituminous oil, marketed as Western Canadian Select, is forced to sell at the price established for landlocked oil (see: West Texas Intermediate benchmark). If this oil were able to reach "tidewater" for export using oil tankers, it would presumably command a higher price (see: Brent Crude benchmark). Several pipelines have been proposed to bring the oil to "tidewater", including the Keystone XL project (via the Gulf of Mexico), the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines project (via the British Columbia coast), the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline project (via the Beaufort Sea), or the Energy East pipeline project (via the Bay of Fundy).[1][5] The Government of Alberta and the Government of Canada are losing $4 – $30 billion (CAD) in taxes and non-renewable natural resource royalties. In comparison, Maya crude oil, a similar product to Western Canadian Select, but located close to tidewater, is reaching peak prices.[3] In the United States, opponents of pipeline projects have expressed concern that pipeline construction and expansion would simply facilitate getting Alberta oil sands products to an American port for export to China and other countries via the Gulf of Mexico and that the resulting expansion in production in Alberta and consumption of fossil fuels worldwide would have a detrimental contribution to greenhouse gases.[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Hussain, Yadullah (25 April 2013). "Alberta exploring at least two oil pipeline projects to North". Financial Post. 
  2. ^ "First Nations and Alaskan Tribes show support for Alberta-Alaska rail link". Vancouver, British Columbia: PR Newswire. 14 November 2012. 
  3. ^ a b Vanderklippe, Nathan (22 January 2013). "Oil differential darkens Alberta’s budget". Calgary, Alberta: Globe and Mail. 
  4. ^ a b c D. Hackett; L. Noda; S. Grissom; M.C. Moore; J. Winter (February 8, 2013). Pacific Basin Heavy Oil Refining Capacity (PDF) 6 (8). Calgary, Alberta: School of Public Policy, University of Calgary. 
  5. ^ Krugel, Lauren (5 February 2013). "New Brunswick an ally in getting landlocked Alberta crude to tidewater". Edmonton Journal (The Canadian Press). 
  6. ^ Goodman, Lee-Anne (22 May 22, 2013). "Republicans aim to take Keystone XL decision out of Obama's hands". The Canadian Press.