Time trial bicycle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A cyclist riding a time trial bicycle with aerodynamic wheels and aero bars.

A time trial bicycle is a racing bicycle designed for use in an individual or team time trials raced on roads. Special time trial bikes also exist for use in a velodrome.

Since the cyclist in a time trial is not permitted to draft[1] (ride in the slipstream) behind other cyclists, reducing aerodynamic drag of the bicycle and rider is critical. One difference between a time trial bicycle and a road bicycle is the use of triathlon handlebars or aerobars. The main part of the bullhorns curves forward (like a road handlebar), but where the road handle bar curves down, the time trial bar ends. This provides a low tucked position that is aerodynamic while providing good stability. The time trial bar also uses a "clip on" bar or aerobar which attaches to the main bar near the stem and provides a position where the hands and fore-arms are close together, low and forward, providing a very aerodynamic (though less stable) position. The aerobar became popular when in 1989 Greg LeMond made up 50 seconds to defeat Laurent Fignon (the race leader) in the final stage (and final time trial) of the Tour de France. Time trial races tend to be much shorter than road races, so comfort is less of an issue. Also, control of the bike is less important, since there is little chance of bumping another rider and the courses tend to be less technical with little hill climbing, turns or descents.

Differences from road bicycles[edit]

Differences from road bicycles include:

  • Higher gearing. Since time trial races are relatively short, the rider can ride at a higher pace.
  • Deep rim or disk wheels, which are more aerodynamic.
  • The tubing of the frame may be shaped like an airfoil to make it more aerodynamic.
  • The top tube is usually a couple of centimeters shorter to give an adequate stem length when riding on aerobars.
  • Since time trials are usually flat, more emphasis is placed on aerodynamics than weight and handling.

Differences from triathlon bicycles[edit]

An aero seatpost on an Orbea Ordu with positions marked "chro" and "tri"

A time trial bicycle is very similar to a triathlon bicycle. In fact, because the market for time trial frames is so small, many manufacturers are currently making triathlon bikes that are adjustable enough that they can be set up in such a way that they are legal to ride in UCI events. The two main differences are:

  1. a triathlon bicycle will sometimes have a steeper seat tube angle (and thus a more forward saddle position), which places less stress on the hamstring leg muscles, thereby saving strength in the hamstrings for the run which follows the bike portion of the race. Several frames come with a seat post that when installed one way, give the UCI required 5 cm distance from the saddle nose to the center of the bottom bracket and when installed the other way gives a better triathlon geometry: creating a riding position that helps preserve the muscles used in running by emphasizing pedaling with non-running muscle groups.
  2. some triathlon frames do not meet the strict rules governing the design and overall shape of bicycle frames specified by the UCI and adopted by USCF for use in sanctioned event.
  3. some triathlon bikes use smaller, 650c wheels instead of the traditional 700c wheels.[2]

The bike leg of a triathlon may be hilly and long (112 miles in the Ironman), and so the higher gearing, higher weight, and lower comfort mentioned above for time trial bikes may not apply to a triathlon bike.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ UCI Rule book page 35 http://www.uci.ch/Modules/BUILTIN/getObject.asp?MenuId=MTkzNg&ObjTypeCode=FILE&type=FILE&id=34028&LangId=1
  2. ^ Dan Empfield (8.10.04). "Are 650c wheels relevant today?". slowtwitch.com. Retrieved 2014-04-14.  Check date values in: |date= (help)