Ton (le bon ton)
|This article may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. (March 2009)|
The ton is a term commonly used to refer to Britain’s high society during the Georgian era, especially the Regency and reign of George IV. It comes from the French word meaning "taste" or "everything that is fashionable" and is pronounced the same way as tone ([tɔ̃] in French). The full phrase is le bon ton, meaning good manners or "in the fashionable mode" – characteristics held as ideal by the British ton.
The terms Beau Monde (French for "beautiful world", pronounced [bo mɔ̃d]) and polite society have been interchangeable with le bon ton during different periods.
Ton has also been used as an interchangeable term with the Upper Ten Thousand of later 19th century society, including most of the peerage, aristocracy and the wealthy merchants or bankers of the City (London).
The Social Ladder
Ton society was intensely class-conscious and the social hierarchy was incredibly rigid. Birth, wealth, titles, and other factors determined class standing:
- Middle Classes
- Artisans & Trades people
- Laboring Poor
Members of the ton came from the aristocracy, the gentry, and of course, royalty and monarch(s). Though some wealthier members of the middle classes might possibly have married into the lower ranks of the gentry, such unions would not have been completely accepted by the elite ton. Social positions could be altered or determined by income, houses, speech, clothing, or even manners. Climbing the social ladder could take generations, particularly into the aristocracy who did not readily accept those of inferior birth into their ranks.
The Best Circles
Fashion, etiquette, manners, social customs, and many other aspects of social life were all dictated by the ton. The ton's generally acknowledged leaders were the Lady Patronesses of Almack's who, during the Regency, included Lady Jersey, Lady Sefton, Lady Cowper, Lady Castlereagh, and Mrs. Drummond Burrell. As London's most exclusive mixed-sex social club, Almack’s represented the best and wealthiest among the ton. The conventions of ton life were highly structured and complex, and difficult for anyone born outside of the highest circles to fully understand. Social acceptance was crucial and based primarily, but not exclusively, on birth and family. Acceptable social behaviors were different for men and women; these behaviors were based on an intricate system validated primarily by the patronesses of Almack's, who determined who could be admitted to the club's functions. Some of these behaviors were flexible — they adapted slightly with the fashions of each season, but they always reflected the current modes of manners, fashion, and propriety.
The privileged members of the ton could pursue an opulent, extravagant life of indulgence. But there were often double standards for its members. The flexibility of social rules was unofficially determined by an individual's status, wealth, or family connections. Royalty were forgiven for almost any transgression. Scandalous activities such as having illegitimate children or conducting extra-marital affairs would incite gossip, but were often overlooked for members of the aristocracy. However, such conduct among the gentry could destroy an entire family's social aspirations.
The Season was the name given to the months between late January and early July. It officially began when Parliament re-opened in London and was an endless parade of social entertainments – balls, theatre parties, dances, masquerades, military reviews, and many other social pleasures to be enjoyed by the ton. Families with marriageable children used the Season to present their children to the ton in hopes of arranging profitable marriages. For this reason, the Season has also been referred to as the "Marriage Mart" by notable Brits such as Lord Byron. For marriageable girls, the Season was an intense period of social networking in which any misstep or breach of social etiquette could spread through gossip circles at Almack’s like wildfire and have potentially ruinous effects on her marriage and social prospects within the ton.
||This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (April 2009)|
- Hughes, Kristine (1998). Everyday Life in Regency and Victorian England: From 1811–1901. Writer's Digest Books.
- Murray, Venetia (1998). High Society: A social History of the Regency Period, 1788–1830. Viking.
- Margetson, Stella (1971). Regency London. New York: Prawger Publishers, Inc.
- Kloester, Jennifer (2005). Georgette Heyer's Regency World. London: William Heinemann.