Transcranial direct-current stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of neurostimulation which uses constant, low current delivered to the brain area of interest via electrodes on the scalp. It was originally developed to help patients with brain injuries such as strokes. Tests on healthy adults demonstrated that tDCS can increase cognitive performance on a variety of tasks, depending on the area of the brain being stimulated. It has been utilized to enhance language and mathematical ability, attention span, problem solving, memory, and coordination.
- 1 History
- 2 Operation
- 3 Effects on brain
- 4 Comparison to other devices
- 5 Safety
- 6 Research
- 7 Criticism
- 8 Regulatory approvals
- 9 References
The basic design of tDCS, using direct current (DC) to stimulate the area of interest, has existed for over 100 years. There were a number of rudimentary experiments completed before the 19th century using this technique that tested animal and human electricity. Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta were two such researchers that utilized the technology of tDCS in their explorations of the source of animal cell electricity. It was due to these initial studies that tDCS was first brought into the clinical scene. In 1801, Giovanni Aldini (Galvani's nephew) started a study in which he successfully used the technique of direct current stimulation to improve the mood of melancholy patients. Aldini gave a detailed account of his treatments of melancholy patient Luigi Lanzarini and also described the stunning result when he first tried the treatment on his own head:
First, the fluid took over a large part of my brain, which felt a strong shock, a sort of jolt against the inner surface of my skull. The effect increased further as I moved the electric arcs from one ear to the other. I felt a strong head stroke and I became insomniac for several days.
Transition into modern scientific research
There was a brief rise of interest in transcranial direct current stimulation in the 1960s when studies by researcher D. J. Albert proved that the stimulation could affect brain function by changing the cortical excitability. He also discovered that positive and negative stimulation had different effects on the cortical excitability. It wasn’t until recently that interest in tDCS was reignited. This time, the rediscovery was fueled by an increase of interest and understanding of basic brain functioning, therapeutic application, as well as new brain stimulation and brain imaging techniques such as TMS and fMRI. Now, Transcranial direct current stimulation is beginning to be used more frequently as a brain stimulation technique because, with proper safety protocols, tDCS is safe for human use.
Transcranial direct current stimulation works by sending constant, low direct current through the electrodes. When these electrodes are placed in the region of interest, the current induces intracerebral current flow. This current flow then either increases or decreases the neuronal excitability in the specific area being stimulated based on which type of stimulation is being used. This change of neuronal excitability leads to alteration of brain function, which can be used in various therapies as well as to provide more information about the functioning of the human brain.
Transcranial direct current stimulation is a relatively simple technique requiring only a few parts. These include two electrodes and a battery powered device that delivers constant current. Control software can also be used in experiments that require multiple sessions with differing stimulation types so that neither the person receiving the stimulation nor the experimenter knows which type is being administered. Each device has an anodal, positively charged electrode and a cathodal, negative electrode. Current is "conventionally" described as flowing from the positive anode, through the intervening conducting tissue, to the cathode, creating a circuit. Note that in traditional electric circuits constructed from metal wires, current flow is created by the motion of negatively charged electrons, which actually flow from cathode to anode. However, in biological systems, such as the head, current is usually created by the flow of ions, which may be positively or negatively charged—positive ions will flow towards the cathode; negative ions will flow toward the anode. The device may control the current as well as the duration of stimulation.
To set up the tDCS device, the electrodes and the skin need to be prepared. This ensures a strong connection between the skin and the electrode. The careful placement of the electrodes is crucial to successful tDCS technique. The electrode pads come in various sizes with benefits to each size. A smaller sized electrode achieves a more focused stimulation of a site while a larger electrode ensures that the entirety of the region of interest is being stimulated. If the electrode is placed incorrectly, a different site or more sites than intended may be stimulated resulting in faulty results. One of the electrodes is placed over the region of interest and the other electrode, the reference electrode, is placed in another location in order to complete the circuit. This reference electrode is usually placed on the neck or shoulder of the opposite side of the body than the region of interest. Since the region of interest may be small, it is often useful to locate this region before placing the electrode by using a brain imaging technique such as fMRI or PET. Once the electrodes are placed correctly, the stimulation can be started. Many devices have a built-in capability that allows the current to be "ramped up" or increased gradually until the necessary current is reached. This decreases the amount of stimulation effects felt by the person receiving the tDCS. After the stimulation has been started, the current will continue for the amount of time set on the device and then will automatically be shut off. Recently a new approach has been introduced where instead of using two large pads, multiple (more than two) smaller sized gel electrodes are used to target specific cortical structures. This new approach is called High Definition tDCS (HD-tDCS). In a pilot study, HD-tDCS was found to have greater and longer lasting motor cortex excitability changes than sponge tDCS.
Types of stimulation
There are three different types of stimulation: anodal, cathodal, and sham. The anodal stimulation is positive (V+) stimulation that increases the neuronal excitability of the area being stimulated. Cathodal (V-) stimulation decreases the neuronal excitability of the area being stimulated. Cathodal stimulation can treat psychological disorders that are caused by the hyper-activity of an area of the brain. Sham stimulation is used as a control in experiments. Sham stimulation emits a brief current but then remains off for the remainder of the stimulation time. With sham stimulation, the person receiving the tDCS does not know that they are not receiving prolonged stimulation. By comparing the results in subjects exposed to sham stimulation with the results of subjects exposed to anodal or cathodal stimulation, researchers can see how much of an effect is caused by the current stimulation, rather than by the placebo effect.
Effects on brain
One of the aspects of tDCS is its ability to achieve cortical changes even after the stimulation is ended. The duration of this change depends on the length of stimulation as well as the intensity of stimulation. The effects of stimulation increase as the duration of stimulation increases or the strength of the current increases. The way that the stimulation changes brain function is either by causing the neuron’s resting membrane potential to depolarize or hyperpolarize. When positive stimulation (anodal tDCS) is delivered, the current causes a depolarization of the resting membrane potential, which increases neuronal excitability and allows for more spontaneous cell firing. When negative stimulation (cathodal tDCS) is delivered, the current causes a hyperpolarization of the resting membrane potential. This decreases neuron excitability due to the decreased spontaneous cell firing.
Neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to change throughout life based on experiences. The way that transcranial direct current stimulation functions could be due to the plasticity concepts of long term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD) since the two share some basic similarities. Long term potentiation is the strengthening between two neurons while long term depression is the weakening between two neurons. These effects are achieved mainly through an alteration of synaptic transmission ability. LTP enhances transmission and LTD hinders transmission. Likewise, tDCS stimulation involves the alteration of synaptic transmission ability through modifications of intracellular cAMP and calcium levels. Also, both LTP, LTD, and the effects of tDCS are protein synthesis dependent. It is for these reasons that LTP and LTD are proposed mechanisms of the function of tDCS.
Comparison to other devices
While the tDCS method is gaining interest, the most commonly used method of brain stimulation is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). This technique of brain stimulation utilizes an electric coil held above the region of interest on the scalp that uses rapidly changing magnetic fields to induce small electrical currents in the brain. There are two types of TMS: repetitive TMS and single pulse TMS. Both are used in research therapy but effects lasting longer than the stimulation period are only observed in repetitive TMS. Similar to tDCS, an increase or decrease in neuronal activity can be achieved using this technique, but the method of how this is induced is very different. Transcranial direct current stimulation has the two different directions of current that cause the different effects. Increased neuronal activity is induced in repetitive TMS by using a higher frequency and decreased neuronal activity is induced by using a lower frequency.
Both TMS and tDCS are painless and considered safe for human use. However TMS is more expensive, difficult to sham, and may need a trained coil holder, whilst tDCS is relatively easy to apply. Transcranial magnetic stimulation causes the neuron’s action potentials to fire, resulting in a stronger effect. Since tDCS only causes increased spontaneous cell firing, it does not have as big of an effect. One benefit of tDCS when compared to TMS is that due to the smaller effect, there is a much smaller chance of causing seizures in the person receiving the stimulation.
Other types of stimulation
One other technique of electrical stimulation that has been used is called transcranial electrical stimulation, or TES. TES also functions by inducing neuronal change via electrical currents. TES, unlike tDCS, causes the resting neurons to fire and can be painful to the person receiving the stimulation, so this method is no longer frequently used. See also Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES).
When applied following established safety protocols, transcranial direct current stimulation is widely regarded as a safe method of brain stimulation, causing no apparent short-term harm. Safety protocols limit the current, duration, and frequency of stimulation, thereby limiting the effects and risk.
There has been much work done in the last 10 years to develop a safety protocol for administering transcranial direct current stimulation. Many studies have been conducted to determine the optimal time of stimulation and current used as well as steps to take in order to reduce or eliminate the side effects felt by the person receiving the stimulation. These standards are still not entirely set and continue to expand as more research is done. Currently, the accepted maximum current for human use is 2 mA and usually 1 mA or less is used.
Studies have been completed to determine the current density at which overt brain damage occurs in rats. It was found that in cathodal stimulation, a current density of 142.9 A/m2 delivering a charge density of 52400 C/m2 or higher caused a brain lesion in the rat. This is over two orders of magnitude from what is currently being used.
There is no strict limitation on the duration of stimulation set at this point but a stimulation time of 20 minutes is considered the ideal time. The longer the stimulation duration, the longer the observed effects of the stimulation persist once the stimulation has ended. A stimulation length of 10 minutes results in observed effects lasting for up to an hour.
It is generally encouraged to wait at least 48 hours to a week before repeating the stimulation. Also, it is advised to warn the person receiving the stimulation of the possible after effects of the tDCS stimulation.
These studies indicate that transcranial direct current stimulation is safe in a single session. However, no studies have evaluated the long-term safety of repeated sessions of stimulation.
Side effects of stimulation
There are a few minor side effects including skin irritation, a phosphene at the start of stimulation, nausea, headache, dizziness, and itching under the electrode. Nausea most commonly occurs when the electrodes are placed above the mastoid for stimulation of the vestibular system. A phosphene is a brief flash of light that can occur if an electrode is placed near the eye. A recent study of over 500 subjects using the currently accepted protocol reported only a slight skin irritation and a phosphene as side effects.
There are several ways to reduce the skin irritation felt during stimulation. Electrodes may be prepared with saline solution and the skin prepared with electrode cream. Also, ramping up (slowly increasing) the current can reduce the irritation.
There are no known risks of tDCS at this time. It is not advised to administer this stimulation to people susceptible to seizures, such as people with epilepsy, however seizures do not seem to be a risk for healthy individuals.
As of 2014 there have been several small randomized clinical trials (RCT) in major depressive disorder (MDD); most found alleviation of depressive symptoms. There have been only two RCTs in treatment-resistant MDD; both were small, and one found an effect and the other did not. One meta-analysis of the data focused on reduction in symptoms and found an effect compared to sham treatment, but another that was focused on relapse found no effect compared to sham.
Research conducted as of 2013 in schizophrenia has found that while large effect sizes were initially found, later and larger studies have found smaller effect sizes. Studies have mostly concentrated on positive symptoms like auditory hallucinations; research on negative symptoms is lacking.
Research conducted as of 2012 on the use of tDCS to treat pain, found that the research has been of low quality and cannot be used as a basis to recommend use of tDCS to treat pain. In chronic pain following spinal cord injury, research is of high quality and has found tDCS to be ineffective.
In stroke, research conducted as of 2014 has found that tDCS is not effective for improving upper limb function after stroke. Research conducted as of 2015 suggests tDCS may be effective for improving post-stroke aphasia. Research conducted as of 2013 suggests that tDCS may be effective for improve vision deficits following stroke.
tDCS has also been studied in various psychiatric disorders such as depression, and schizophrenia. Some researchers are investigating potential applications such as the improvement of focus and concentration. tDCS has also been studied in addiction.
tDCS has also been used in neuroscience research, particularly to try to link specific brain regions to specific cognitive tasks or psychological phenomena.
At least one 2014 study that reviewed results from hundreds of tDCS experiments found that there was no statistically conclusive evidence to support any net effect, positive or negative, of tDCS; however, the quality of that review has been recently called into question.
- Feilden, Tom (26 January 2012). "'Human enhancement' comes a step closer". BBC. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- André Parent (November 2004). "Aldini's Essay on Galvanism" (PDF). The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 31 (4): 576–584. (Lanzarini pdf 5 of 9)
- Aldini J. Essai théorique et expérimental sur le galvanisme, avec une série d’expériences faites devant des commissaires de l’Institut national de France, et en divers amphithéâtres anatomiques de Londres. Paris: Fournier Fils, 1804.
- Albert, D. J. (1966a). The effect of spreading depression on the consolidation of learning. Neuropsychologia, 4, 49–64.
- Albert, D. J. (1966b). The effects of polarizing currents on the consolidation of learning. Neuropsychologia, 4, 65–77.
- Utz, Kathrin S.; Dimova, Violeta; Oppenländer, Karin; Kerkhoff, Georg (2010). "Electrified minds: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology—A review of current data and future implications". Neuropsychologia 48 (10): 2789–810. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.002. PMID 20542047.
- Nitsche, Michael A.; Cohen, Leonardo G.; Wassermann, Eric M.; Priori, Alberto; Lang, Nicolas; Antal, Andrea; Paulus, Walter; Hummel, Friedhelm; Boggio, Paulo S.; Fregni, Felipe; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro (2008). "Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008". Brain Stimulation 1 (3): 206–23. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. PMID 20633386.
- Sparing, Roland; Mottaghy, Felix M. (2008). "Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)—From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction". Methods 44 (4): 329–37. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.02.001. PMID 18374276.
- Datta, Abhishek; Bansal, Varun; Diaz, Julian; Patel, Jinal; Reato, Davide; Bikson, Marom (2009). "Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad". Brain Stimulation 2 (4): 201–7, 207.e1. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005. PMC 2790295. PMID 20648973.
- Viganò, Alessandro; d'Elia, Tullia Sasso; Sava, Simona Liliana; Auvé, Maurie; De Pasqua, Victor; Colosimo, Alfredo; Di Piero, Vittorio; Schoenen, Jean; Magis, Delphine (2013). "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the visual cortex: A proof-of-concept study based on interictal electrophysiological abnormalities in migraine". The Journal of Headache and Pain 14 (1): 23. doi:10.1186/1129-2377-14-23. PMC 3620516. PMID 23566101.
- Borckardt, Jeffrey J.; Bikson, Marom; Frohman, Heather; Reeves, Scott T.; Datta, Abhishek; Bansal, Varun; Madan, Alok; Barth, Kelly; George, Mark S. (2012). "A Pilot Study of the Tolerability and Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) on Pain Perception". The Journal of Pain 13 (2): 112–20. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2011.07.001. PMID 22104190.
- Kuo, Hsiao-I.; Bikson, Marom; Datta, Abhishek; Minhas, Preet; Paulus, Walter; Kuo, Min-Fang; Nitsche, Michael A. (2013). "Comparing Cortical Plasticity Induced by Conventional and High-Definition 4 × 1 Ring tDCS: A Neurophysiological Study". Brain Stimulation 6 (4): 644–8. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.010. PMID 23149292.
- Nitsche, Michael A.; Nitsche, Maren S.; Klein, Cornelia C.; Tergau, Frithjof; Rothwell, John C.; Paulus, Walter (2003). "Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex". Clinical Neurophysiology 114 (4): 600–4. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00412-1. PMID 12686268.
- Nitsche, M. A.; Paulus, W. (2000). "Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation". The Journal of Physiology 527 (3): 633. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.
- Ruffini, Giulio; Wendling, Fabrice; Merlet, Isabelle; Molaee-Ardekani, Behnam; Mekonnen, Abeye; Salvador, Ricardo; Soria-Frisch, Aureli; Grau, Carles; Dunne, Stephen; Miranda, Pedro C. (2013). "Transcranial Current Brain Stimulation (tCS): Models and Technologies". IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 21 (3): 333–45. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2200046. PMID 22949089.
- Nitsche, Michael A; Liebetanz, David; Lang, Nicolas; Antal, Andrea; Tergau, Frithjof; Paulus, Walter (2003). "Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans". Clinical Neurophysiology 114 (11): 2220–2; author reply 2222–3. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00235-9. PMID 14580622.
- Liebetanz, David; Koch, Reinhard; Mayenfels, Susanne; König, Fatima; Paulus, Walter; Nitsche, Michael A. (2009). "Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats". Clinical Neurophysiology 120 (6): 1161–7. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.01.022. PMID 19403329.
- Bikson, Marom; Datta, Abhishek; Elwassif, Maged (2009). "Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation". Clinical Neurophysiology 120 (6): 1033–4. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.018. PMC 2754807. PMID 19394269.
- Poreisz, Csaba; Boros, Klára; Antal, Andrea; Paulus, Walter (2007). "Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients". Brain Research Bulletin 72 (4–6): 208–14. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. PMID 17452283.
- Bennabi D, Transcranial direct current stimulation for memory enhancement: from clinical research to animal models. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Sep 4;8:159. Review. PMID 25237299 PMC 4154388
- Mondino M, et al. Can transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alleviate symptoms and improve cognition in psychiatric disorders? World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014 May;15(4):261-75. Review. PMID 24447054
- Agarwal SM, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2013 Dec;11(3):118-25. Review. PMID 24465247 PMC 3897759
- Luedtke K, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the reduction of clinical and experimentally induced pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):452-61. Review. PMID 22569218
- Boldt I, et al Non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in people with spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 28;11:CD009177. Review. PMID 25432061
- Pollock A, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 12;11:CD010820. Review. PMID 2538700
- Feng WW, et al. Review of transcranial direct current stimulation in poststroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):68-77. Review. PMID 23340073
- de Aguiar V, et al. tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: The role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics. Cortex. 2015 Feb;63C:296-316. Review. PMID 25460496
- Boggio, Paulo S.; Rigonatti, Sergio P.; Ribeiro, Rafael B.; Myczkowski, Martin L.; Nitsche, Michael A.; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro; Fregni, Felipe (2007). "A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression". The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 11 (2): 249–54. doi:10.1017/S1461145707007833. PMC 3372849. PMID 17559710.
- Loo, Colleen K.; Sachdev, Perminder; Martin, Donel; Pigot, Melissa; Alonzo, Angelo; Malhi, Gin S.; Lagopoulos, Jim; Mitchell, Philip (2009). "A double-blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression". The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 13 (1): 61–9. doi:10.1017/S1461145709990411. PMID 19671217.
- Fregni, Felipe; Boggio, Paulo S.; Nitsche, Michael A.; Rigonatti, Sergio P.; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro (2006). "Cognitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression". Depression and Anxiety 23 (8): 482–4. doi:10.1002/da.20201. PMID 16845648.
- Ferrucci, R.; Bortolomasi, M.; Vergari, M.; Tadini, L.; Salvoro, B.; Giacopuzzi, M.; Barbieri, S.; Priori, A. (2009). "Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression". Journal of Affective Disorders 118 (1–3): 215–9. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.015. PMID 19286265.
- Nitsche, Michael A.; Boggio, Paulo S.; Fregni, Felipe; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro (2009). "Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A Review". Experimental Neurology 219 (1): 14–9. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.038. PMID 19348793.
- Fregni, Felipe; Boggio, Paulo S; Nitsche, Michael A; Marcolin, Marco A; Rigonatti, Sergio P; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro (2006). "Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation". Bipolar Disorders 8 (2): 203–4. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00291.x. PMID 16542193.
- Vercammen, A.; Rushby, J.; Loo, C.; Short, B.; Weickert, C.S.; Weickert, T.W. (2011). "Transcranial direct current stimulation influences probabilistic association learning in schizophrenia". Schizophrenia Research 131 (1-3): 198–205. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.021. PMID 21745726.
- Adee, Sally (6 February 2012). "Zap Your Brain Into the Fast Track". New Scientist. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- Pedron, Solène; Monnin, Julie; Haffen, Emmanuel; Sechter, Daniel; Van Waes, Vincent (24 October 2013). "Repeated Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Prevents Abnormal Behaviors Associated with Abstinence from Chronic Nicotine Consumption". Neuropsychopharmacology 39 (4): 981–8. doi:10.1038/npp.2013.298. PMID 24154668.
- Jansen, JM; Daams, JG; Koeter, MW; Veltman, DJ; van den Brink, W; Goudriaan, AE (December 2013). "Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: A meta-analysis.". Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 37 (10 Pt 2): 2472–80. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.009. PMID 23916527.
- Grimaldi G, et al Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS): A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease. Neuroscientist. 2014 Nov 18. Review. PMID 25406224
- Horvath, Jared; Forte, Jason; Carter, Olivia (2015). "Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)". Brain Stimulation. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400. PMID 25701175.
- Price, Amy; Hamilton, Roy (2015). "A Re-evaluation of the Cognitive Effects From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation". Brain Stimulation. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.03.007.
- "FDA Executive Summary - Petitions to Request Change in Classification for Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulators" (PDF).