Tumor hypoxia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Tumour hypoxia is the situation where tumor cells have been deprived of oxygen. As a tumor grows, it rapidly outgrows its blood supply, leaving portions of the tumor with regions where the oxygen concentration is significantly lower than in healthy tissues. Hypoxic microenvironements in solid tumors are in result of available oxygen being consumed within 70 to 150 μm of tumour vasculature by rapidly proliferating tumor cells thus limiting the amount of oxygen available to diffuse further into the tumor tissue. In order to support continuous growth and proliferation in challenging hypoxic environments, cancer cells are found to alter their metabolism.

Changes in the glycolytic pathway[edit]

A particular change in metabolism, historically known as the Warburg effect [1] results in high rates of glycolysis in both normoxic and hypoxic cancer cells. Expression of genes responsible for glycolytic enzymes and glucose transporters are enhanced by numerous oncogenes including RAS, SRC, and MYC.[2][3]

HIF-1 induced changes in gene expression[edit]

Traditionally, hypoxia leads to increased production of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1), containing HIF-1α and HIF-1β subunits, that acts as a key regulatory transcription factor responsible for adaptive cellular changes. In humans, HIF-1 has been shown to up-regulate expression of genes affecting a range of target areas of physiology. These genes range from those involved in triggering an inflammatory response to those responsible for iron metabolism. Particularly notable when focusing on metabolism, HIF-1 is shown to affect glycolytic genes to cope with reductions in oxygen availability and consumption.

These genes include: solute carrier family 2 (GLUT1), hexokinase (HK), phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI), phosphofructokinase (PFKL), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (ALDO), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), phosphoglycerate mutase (PGM), enolase 1 (ENOA), pyruvate kinase (PK), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 1 (PDK1) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH-A).[4]

In addition to alterations in oxygen concentration associated with hypoxic microenvironments, glucose concentration gradients found in tumors also influence the rate of aerobic and anearobic glycolysis. A carbohydrate-response element (ChoRE) is responsible for regulating glycolytic enzyme gene expression in response to changing glucose concentrations through a binding interaction at the same consensus sequence as HIF-1. Interactions of HIF-1 and ChoRE with the DNA sequence 5’-RCGTG-3’ leads to increased expression of genes listed above. [5]

GLUT1 transporter expression[edit]

GLUT1 Glucose Transporter

GLUT1 is a member of the GLUT transporter family of 14 hexose transporters responsible for facilitating the transport of hexose sugars along the concentration gradient. GLUT1 is the most abundantly expressed of the family thought to maintain basal glucose transport in almost all cell types. GLUT1 levels, in response to hypoxic conditions, have been shown to increase with changes at both the mRNA and protein levels.[6] Moreover, transport of GLUT1 has been shown to increase under these hypoxic conditions. With the role of transporting sugars from the extracellular to the intracellular environment, GLUT1, along with other members of the GLUT family, can be rate-controlling for cellular glycolytic metabolism. Having an increased level of GLUT1, in the case of hypoxic tumors, increases the flux of glucose into the cells allowing for a higher rate of glycolysis and thus greater risks of metastasis (as elaborated upon below).[7]

Hexokinase 2 expression[edit]

Hexokinase (HK) is the first enzyme in the glycolytic pathway converting glucose to glucose-6-phosphate through an ATP-dependent phosphorylation event. Important for glycolysis to proceed, the hexokinase reaction activates glucose for subsequent steps. In hypoxic tumors, hexokinase mRNA abundance is significantly increased as well as protein levels.[8] Increased expression of hexokinase 2, in some cases nearly 10-fold, allows for an increased flux of glucose through the glycolytic pathway subsequent to the increased uptake by GLUT1.[9]

D-Glucose Hexokinase Expression up-regulated by HIF-1 α-D-Glucose 6-phosphate
D-glucose wpmp.png   Alpha-D-glucose-6-phosphate wpmp.png
ATP ADP
Biochem reaction arrow reversible YYYY horiz med.png
PO3-
4
H2O
 
  Glucose 6-phosphatase

Phosphoglucose isomerase expression[edit]

Phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) is a housekeeping cytosolic enzyme with roles in both glycolysis and gluconeogenesis pathways. It is responsible for catalyzing the interconversion of glucose 6-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate. Extracellularly, PGI is known as an autocrine motility factor (AMF) eliciting mitogenic, motogenic, differentiation functions as well as tumor progression and metastasis.[10] Activation of PGI through proposed HIF-1 induced mechanisms results in increased conversion of glucose 6-phosphate to fructose 6-phosphate and also contributes to cell motility and invasion during cancer metastasis.

α-D-Glucose 6-phosphate Phosphoglucose isomerase Expression up-regulated by HIF-1 β-D-Fructose 6-phosphate
Alpha-D-glucose-6-phosphate wpmp.png   Beta-D-fructose-6-phosphate wpmp.png
Biochem reaction arrow reversible NNNN horiz med.png
 
  Phosphoglucose isomerase
Regulatory pathway of PFK-1 by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate

6-Phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose 2,6-bisphosphatases expression[edit]

6-Phosphofructo-2-kinases/fructose 2,6-bisphosphatases (PFKFBs) belong to a family of bifunctional ATP-dependent enzymes responsible for controlling the level of glycolysis intermediate fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. HIF-1-induced expression of these enzymes (PFK-2/FBPase-2) subsequently alters the balance of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate which plays an important role as an allosteric activator of phospho-fructokinase 1 (PFK-1). PFK-1 is an enzyme that controls one of the most critical steps of glycolysis. Regulation of PFK-1 is also mediated by the cellular energy status in result of ATP's inhibitory effect. Greater quantities of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate in cancer cells, in result of HIF-1 expression of PFK-2/FBPase-2, thus activates PFK-1allowing for an increased glycolytic flux converting fructose-6-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Allosteric regulation of glycolysis by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate allows cancer cells to maintain a glycolytic balance to match their bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands.[11]

β-D-Fructose 6-phosphate (F6P) phosphofructokinase (PFK-1)
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
β-D-Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (F1,6BP)
Beta-D-fructose-6-phosphate wpmp.png   Beta-D-fructose-1,6-bisphosphate wpmp.png
ATP H+ + ADP
Biochem reaction arrow forward YYNN horiz med.png
 
 

Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase expression[edit]

Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (ALDO) belongs to a family include aldolase A, B and C. Unique in glycolysis, aldolase enzymes cleave fructose-1,6-bisphosphate into two 3-C molecules including glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP). With the HIF-1 mediated expression of aldolase A under hypoxic conditions, the catalysis of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate is increased thus leading to increased glycolytic flux.[12]

β-D-Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (F1,6BP) fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
D-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GADP) Dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP)
Beta-D-fructose-1,6-bisphosphate wpmp.png D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate wpmp.png + Glycerone-phosphate wpmp.png
Biochem reaction arrow reversible NNNN horiz med.png

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression[edit]

The glycolytic enzyme, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), is responsible for the oxidative conversion of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GADP) to 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate (1,3BPG). Up-regulation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression is maximal (4-5 fold) following hypoxic conditions of ~24 hours in vascular endothelial cells.[13] Various models for the exact glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activation mechanisms have been proposed.

glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GADP) glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
D-1,3-bisphosphoglycerate (1,3BPG)
D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate wpmp.png   D-1,3-bisphosphoglycerate.png
NAD+ + Pi NADH + H+
Biochem reaction arrow reversible YYYY horiz med.png
   
 
 

Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 expression[edit]

Hypoxia has been shown to induce a 10-fold accumulation of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK-1) mRNA in mouse hepatoma (Hepa 1c1c7) cells. Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 is an enzyme involved in the conversion of 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate (1,3-BPG) to 3-phosphoglycerate (3-P-G) leading the production of ATP from ADP. Induction of gene expression by HIF-1 is thought to be dependent on the presence of aromatic hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT1). Arnt's N-terminal region and HIF-1 are thought to work together to induce transcription of phosphoglycerate kinase 1.[14]

1,3-bisphosphoglycerate (1,3-BPG) phosphoglycerate kinase
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
3-phosphoglycerate (3-P-G)
1,3-bisphospho-D-glycerate.png   3-phospho-D-glycerate trulyglycerate wpmp.png
ADP ATP
Biochem reaction arrow reversible YYYY horiz med.png
   
 
  phosphoglycerate kinase

Phosphoglycerate mutase expression[edit]

Phosphoglycerate mutase B (PGM-B) is one of the latter glycolytic enzymes responsible for the conversion of 3-phosphoglycerate (3PG) to 2-phosphoglycerate (2PG). Both protein and mRNA levels were shown to increase 2-3-fold in research exposing fetal rat lung fibroblasts to hypoxic conditions. Increased levels appeared to be regulated at the transcriptional level as per many of the other glycolytic enzymes. Maximum up regulation was shown following 16 hours thus supporting its role in contributing to an increased glycolytic flux for adaption of cells to hypoxia.[15]

3-phosphoglycerate (3PG) phosphoglycerate mutase
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
2-phosphoglycerate (2PG)
3-phospho-D-glycerate trulyglycerate wpmp.png   2-phospho-D-glycerate wpmp.png
Biochem reaction arrow reversible NNNN horiz med.png
 
 

Enolase 1 expression[edit]

Enolase 1, also known as α-enolase, is encoded by the ENOA gene and is responsible for converting 2-phosphoglycerate to phosphoenolpyruvate in the glycolytic pathway. Both enolase 1 overexpression and its post-translational modifications could be of value for diagnostic and prognostic work in terms of cancer. Although the exact roles of post-translational modifications have not been completely elucidated, patterns are shown between certain cancer cell types suggesting they may have important influence on function, localization and immunogenicity.[16] Aside from its role in promoting glycolytic flux and anearobic energy production, it has been shown to induce a specific humoral and cellular immune response. On all levels, hypoxia-induced over-expression of enolase 1 may possess important roles in hypoxic tumors including the most straightforward increase in anearobic respiration.


2-phosphoglycerate (2PG) enolase 1
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)
2-phospho-D-glycerate wpmp.png   Phosphoenolpyruvate wpmp.png
H2O
Biochem reaction arrow reversible NYYN horiz med.png
 
 
  enolase 1

Pyruvate kinase expression[edit]

HIF-1 activated pyruvate kinase M comes in multiple isoforms known as PKM1 and PKM2. Pyruvate kinase is shown to convert phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate forming ATP from ADP. Along with phospho-fructokinase 1, pyruvate kinase is also allosterically activated by fructose-2,6-bisphosphate. In cancer cells pyruvate kinase M2 has been shown to interact directly with HIF-1α enhancing HIF-1 binding and p300 recruitment to hypoxia response elements. This positive feedback loop leads to HIF-1 transactivation and an amplified effect on glucose metabolism.[17]

Pyruvate kinase M2 is often considered the main regulator of cancer metabolism with roles in various parallel, feed-forward, positive and negative feedback mechanisms. The genetic difference between pyruvate kinase M1 and pyruvate kinase M2 is only 22 out of 531 amino acids which makes an immense difference. Pyruvate kinase M2 has metabolic activity regulated by post-translational modifications including acetylation, oxidation, phosphorylation, hydroxylation and sumoylation. These different modifications can cause the shift from the metabolically active tetrameric form to the in-active monomeric form. The well-known EGFR-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) and death-associated protein kinase are both shown to bind and directly phosphorylate pyruvate kinase M2 leading to increased activity in the glycolysis pathway.[18] In hypoxic conditions found in a solid tumor, pyruvate kinase M2 plays a large role in promoting anearobic energy production.


phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) pyruvate kinase
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
pyruvate (Pyr)
Phosphoenolpyruvate wpmp.png   Pyruvate wpmp.png
ADP + H+ ATP
Biochem reaction arrow forward YYNN horiz med.png
 
 
The areas surrounding the phosphorylation sites on pyruvate dehydrogenase are shown in red. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase phosphorylation of these sites leads to decreased dehydrogenase activity

Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase expression[edit]

Pyruvate dehydrogenase directly follows the glycolytic pathway and is responsible for the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA which enters into the TCA cycle. The TCA cycle, although not directly requiring oxygen, requires the cycling of NADH to NAD+ as performed by the electron transport chain under aerobic conditions. Under anaerobic conditions, such as those found in hypoxic tumors, the TCA cycle provides little ATP yield due to the lack of electron transport chain function. In order to direct the glycolytically produced pyruvate away from the TCA cycle, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase is over-expressed in response to hypoxic conditions. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase is not a glycolytic enzymes but more of a glycolytic regulator. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases, transcriptionally activated by HIF-1 in hypoxic conditions, are responsible for phosphorylating the E1 subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase ultimately suppressing its function.[19] By inhibiting this specific pathway, the glycolytic products are directed away from the mitochondrial TCA cycle and towards lactate dehydrogenase.[20]

Lactate dehydrogenase expression[edit]

Activated expression of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH-A), parallels with deactivation of pyruvate dehydrogenase mediated by pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. Subsequent inactivation of pyruvate dehydrogenase following phosphorylation and increased expression of lactate dehydrogenase A shunts pyruvate away from the mitochondrial TCA cycle. In many different tumor types lactate dehydrogenase A is found at elevated levels and has even been linked to poor prognosis and a greater metastatic potential [21] The high levels of lactate production surface the question of whether lactate has some influence on the aggressive behaviour shown in hypoxic tumors.

pyruvate lactate dehydrogenase
Expression up-regulated by HIF-1
Lactate
Pyruvic acid2.png   Lactic acid2.png
NADH NAD+
Biochem reaction arrow reversible YYYY horiz med.png
   
 
  lactate dehydrogenase

Overview of glycolytic changes and consequences[edit]

Overview of the HIF-1 effect on the expression of glycolytic enzymes

Increased expression of almost every glycolytic enzyme is seen in hypoxic tumor conditions. The over-expression of these proteins is mediated by HIF-1 and completely alters normal cellular metabolism. With decreases in the rate of mitochondrial oxidation, lactate and protons begin to accumulate. Interestingly, high levels of glycolysis and the production of lactate, as shown in hypoxic tumor cells, is hallmark of cancer cells even in the presence of oxygen.

To relieve tumors cells of acidosis, carbonic anhydrases appear to be highly expressed once again downstream of HIF-1 activation. These enzymes catalyze the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide into bicarbonate and protons. They also assist in acidifying the extracellular environment and maintaining a slightly alkaline intracellular compartments contributing to tumor cell survival.[22] Lactate from the hypoxic tumor cells is excreted to the surrounding environment by carbonic anhydrase 9 and sodium-hydrogen exchanger 1 MCT4. Local aerobic cancer cells are though to take up this lactate forming a metabolic symbiosis.[23]

The Structure of Lactic Acid

Lactate and cancer[edit]

It is commonly accepted that cancer cells (both hypoxic and normoxic) produce large amounts of lactate in result of a large metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation to altered glycolysis. The high levels of released lactate contribute to immune escape for the tumor cells. Activated T cells, use glycolysis as an energy source and thus must regulate their own lactate levels. Traditionally done by a secretion method, immune cells in a lactate rich environment cannot rid themselves of their own lactate due to the concentration gradient. It is thought that leukocytes may be asphyxiated by lactate while low extracellular pHs may also reduce cytotoxic T-cell function.[24]

In endothelial cells it has also been shown that lactate stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production leading to enhanced cellular migration in result of lactate-induced angiogenesis.[25] Recent work has also uncovered that lactate uptake by MCT-1 in endothelial cells stimulates NF-κB activation and thus IL-8 expression. Release of lactate from tumor cells through MCT-4 was sufficient to stimulate angiogenesis and tumor growth through an IL-8-dependent mechanism.

Lactate has demonstrated the ability to increase hyaluronan production leading to elevated expression of CD44. Hyaluronan is a glycosaminoglycan polymer critical for maintaining extracellular matrix integrity and modulating cell-cell interactions. Hyaluronan is tethered to cell surfaces by CD44 which are anchored in caveolin-rich lipid rafts. Cleavage and further degradation of hyaluronan is facilitated by Hyal2 and Hyal1, respectively.[26] Increased levels of hyaluronan surrounding carcinomas leads to the promotion of cellular growth and motility. A lactate-sensitive response element for genes in fibroblasts involved in hyaluronan metabolism has been identified.

Finally, it is also worth noting that lactate concentrations are positively correlated with radioresistance. Many anticancer therapies, including ionizing radiation and many chemotherapeutics, rely on the overproduction of reactive oxygen species to cause genomic instability. Lactate, as an antioxidant, may act to scrub down the levels of reactive oxygen species thus enhancing resistance to radiation and chemotherapy.[27]

Acidic microenvironment and metastasis[edit]

It is thought that the low pH of hypoxic tumors in result of high levels of lactic acid can promote tumor cell invasion by destruction of adjacent non-cancerous tissue.[28] Carbonic anhydrase 9 involved in maintaining a slightly alkaline intracellular pH does so by removing carbonate from the extracellular space consequently acidifying the cells surroundings. Moreover proton pumping from the hypoxic tumor cells further decreases the surrounding pH. On a completely different note, as briefly discussed above, the autocrine function of phosphoglucose isomerase also promotes cell motility and metastasis.

Schematic highlighting the metabolic symbiosis formed between hypoxic and normoxic tumor cells

Metabolic symbiosis[edit]

With the hypoxic tumor cells consuming large amounts of glucose to maintain energy homeostasis, the tumor has found a way of using its resources most efficiently. The end glycolytic product of hypoxic tumors, lactate, is transported out of the hypoxic cell by monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) which is a hypoxia induced transporter. The free lactate in the extracellular space is then taken up by monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) which is a non-hypoxia induced transporter found on the surface of aerobic cells. This transporter allows aerobic cancer cells to efficiently take up lactate, convert it back to pyruvate with the oxygen-dependent expression of lactate dehydrogenase B (LDH-B), and use it as an energy source. This frees these cells from requiring large quantities of glucose allowing the hypoxic cells to take up the majority of the available resources.

Tumor cells have also shown the remarkable ability to adapt to regional variation of oxygen availability. Cancer cells demonstrate the ability to be hypoxic at one point in time and aerobic at the next.[29] This shows cyclic variations in oxygenation implying dynamic regulation of the metabolic symbiosis between lactate-producing and lactate-consuming states.

The pentose phosphate pathway[edit]

In order to meet the demands of rapid tumor growth, the tumor must find ways to support the synthesis of a complete daughter cell while facing depleting nutrient supplies. They must coordinate production of precursors for macromolecular synthesis as well as maintain cellular bioenergetics without impairing cell growth, proliferation and viability. One way of doing this is by shuffling glycolytic intermediates such as glucose-6-phosphate into the pentose phosphate pathway to give ribose-5-phosphate and NADPH. Ribose-5-phosphate acts as an intermediate for the production of nucleotides thus providing a connection between glycolysis and nucleotide synthesis in hypoxic tumor cells. In cases where glycolysis remains highly active in normoxic conditions, NADPH acts as a mediator of antioxidative reactions to protect cells from oxidative damage.[30]

Cancer treatments and tumor hypoxia[edit]

Radiotherapy[edit]

The presence or absence of oxygen has a strong influence on the biological effect on ionizing radiation. Under hypoxic conditions it has been shown that cells obtain radioresistance through HIF-1 mediated mechanisms. To overcome this problem, radiation oncologists have developed powerful tools and approaches such as simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT), which enables a booster dose of radiation to be delivered to small target fractions in a malignant tumor, hypoxia-selective cytotoxins/drugs, and HIF-1 inhibitors.[31]

Other treatment options[edit]

Bioreductive prodrugs play a significant part in dealing with these kinds of cells: they can kill the oxygen-deficient tumor cells selectively as hypoxic cytotoxins. The study of tumors in such conditions was pioneered by Dr L. H. Gray.

Targeting tumor hypoxia to overcome metastasis[edit]

An association between tumor hypoxia and metastatic progression has been shown through numerous publications.[32][33]

Drug development[edit]

There are several companies working to address tumor hypoxia: Novacea, Inc., Proacta Inc. and Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. These companies are developing the following drug candidates: AQ4N (Novacea), PR-104 (Proacta) and TH-302 (Threshold Pharmaceuticals). These drug candidates target levels of hypoxia that are common in tumors but are rare in normal tissues. The hypoxic zones of tumors generally evade traditional chemotherapeutic agents and ultimately contribute to relapse. In the literature, hypoxia has been demonstrated to be associated with a worse prognosis, making it a determinant of cancer progression and therapeutic response.[34][35] Several recent review articles summarize the current status of hypoxic cytotoxins (hypoxia activated prodrugs).[36][37][38][39]

Niacinamide, the active form of vitamin B3, acts as a chemo- and radio-sensitizing agent by enhancing tumor blood flow, thereby reducing tumor hypoxia. Niacinamide also inhibits poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP-1), enzymes involved in the rejoining of DNA strand breaks induced by radiation or chemotherapy.[40]

A newer, non-traditional approach to the treatment of tumor hypoxia is the use of an oxygen diffusion-enhancing compound to reoxygenate the hypoxic zones of tumors. The developer of oxygen diffusion-enhancing compounds, Diffusion Pharmaceuticals, is currently testing the lead compound, trans sodium crocetinate (TSC), in a multi-center clinical trial in 59 patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme.[41]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Vander Heiden, Matthew G., Lewis C. Cantley, and Craig B. Thompson. "Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation." science 324.5930 (2009): 1029-1033.
  2. ^ Flier, Jeffrey S., et al. "Elevated levels of glucose transport and transporter messenger RNA are induced by ras or src oncogenes." Science 235.4795 (1987): 1492-1495.
  3. ^ Osthus, Rebecca C., et al. "Deregulation of glucose transporter 1 and glycolytic gene expression by c-Myc." Journal of Biological Chemistry 275.29 (2000): 21797-21800.
  4. ^ Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Furumichi, M., and Tanabe, M.; KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D109-D114 (2012).
  5. ^ Dang, Chi V., and Gregg L. Semenza. "Oncogenic alterations of metabolism." Trends in biochemical sciences 24.2 (1999): 68-72.
  6. ^ Zhang, Jin-Zhong, Alireza Behrooz, and Faramarz Ismail-Beigi. "Regulation of glucose transport by hypoxia." American journal of kidney diseases 34.1 (1999): 189-202.
  7. ^ Airley, Rachel, et al. "Glucose transporter glut-1 expression correlates with tumor hypoxia and predicts metastasis-free survival in advanced carcinoma of the cervix." Clinical cancer research 7.4 (2001): 928-934.
  8. ^ Yasuda, Seiichi, et al. "Hexokinase II and VEGF expression in liver tumors: correlation with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and its significance." Journal of hepatology 40.1 (2004): 117-123.
  9. ^ Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru, et al. "Synergistic up-regulation of Hexokinase-2, glucose transporters and angiogenic factors in pancreatic cancer cells by glucose deprivation and hypoxia." Experimental cell research 313.15 (2007): 3337-3348.
  10. ^ Funasaka, Tatsuyoshi, et al. "Regulation of phosphoglucose isomerase/autocrine motility factor expression by hypoxia." The FASEB journal 19.11 (2005): 1422-1430.
  11. ^ Ros, Susana, and Almut Schulze. "Balancing glycolytic flux: the role of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose 2, 6-bisphosphatases in cancer metabolism." Cancer & Metabolism 1.1 (2013): 8.
  12. ^ Lorentzen, Esben, et al. "Mechanism of the Schiff base forming fructose-1, 6-bisphosphate aldolase: structural analysis of reaction intermediates." Biochemistry 44.11 (2005): 4222-4229.
  13. ^ Graven, Krista K., Robert J. McDonald, and Harrison W. Farber. "Hypoxic regulation of endothelial glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase." American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 274.2 (1998): C347-C355.
  14. ^ Li, Hui, Hyunsung P. Ko, and James P. Whitlock. "Induction of Phosphoglycerate Kinase 1 Gene Expression by Hypoxia ROLES OF ARNT AND HIF1α." Journal of Biological Chemistry 271.35 (1996): 21262-21267.
  15. ^ Takahashi, Yuji, et al. "Hypoxia‐induced expression of phosphoglycerate mutase B in fibroblasts." European Journal of Biochemistry 254.3 (1998): 497-504.
  16. ^ Capello, Michela, et al. "α‐enolase: a promising therapeutic and diagnostic tumor target." FEBS Journal 278.7 (2011): 1064-1074.
  17. ^ Luo, Weibo, et al. "Pyruvate kinase M2 is a PHD3-stimulated coactivator for hypoxia-inducible factor 1." Cell 145.5 (2011): 732-744.
  18. ^ Filipp, Fabian V. "Cancer metabolism meets systems biology: Pyruvate kinase isoform PKM2 is a metabolic master regulator." Journal of carcinogenesis 12.1 (2013): 14.
  19. ^ Koukourakis, Michael I., et al. "Pyruvate dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase expression in non small cell lung cancer and tumor-associated stroma." Neoplasia (New York, NY) 7.1 (2005): 1.
  20. ^ Kim, Jung-whan, and Chi V. Dang. "Cancer's molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect." Cancer research 66.18 (2006): 8927-8930.
  21. ^ Serganova, Inna, et al. "Metabolic imaging: a link between lactate dehydrogenase A, lactate, and tumor phenotype." Clinical Cancer Research 17.19 (2011): 6250-6261.
  22. ^ Chiche, Johanna, et al. "Hypoxia-inducible carbonic anhydrase IX and XII promote tumor cell growth by counteracting acidosis through the regulation of the intracellular pH." Cancer research 69.1 (2009): 358-368.
  23. ^ Sonveaux, Pierre, et al. "Targeting lactate-fueled respiration selectively kills hypoxic tumor cells in mice." The Journal of clinical investigation 118.12 (2008): 3930.
  24. ^ Fischer, Karin, et al. "Inhibitory effect of tumor cell–derived lactic acid on human T cells." Blood 109.9 (2007): 3812-3819.
  25. ^ Beckert, Stefan, et al. "Lactate stimulates endothelial cell migration." Wound repair and regeneration 14.3 (2006): 321-324.
  26. ^ Stern, Robert. "Hyaluronidases in cancer biology." Seminars in cancer biology. Vol. 18. No. 4. Academic Press, 2008.
  27. ^ Sattler, Ulrike GA, and Wolfgang Mueller-Klieser. "The anti-oxidant capacity of tumour glycolysis." International journal of radiation biology 85.11 (2009): 963-971.
  28. ^ Vooijs, Marc A., et al. "Hypoxic regulation of metastasis via hypoxia-inducible factors." Current molecular medicine 8.1 (2008): 60-67.
  29. ^ Cárdenas-Navia, Laura I., et al. "The pervasive presence of fluctuating oxygenation in tumors." Cancer research 68.14 (2008): 5812-5819.
  30. ^ DeBerardinis, Ralph J. "Is cancer a disease of abnormal cellular metabolism? New angles on an old idea." Genetics in Medicine 10.11 (2008): 767-777.
  31. ^ Harada, Hiroshi. "How can we overcome tumor hypoxia in radiation therapy?." Journal of radiation research 52.5 (2011): 545-556.
  32. ^ Hockel M, Schlenger K, Aral B, Mitze M, Schaffer U, Vaupel P: Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res 1996, 56:4509-4515.
  33. ^ Vergis R, Corbishley CM, Norman AR, Bartlett J, Jhavar S, Borre M, Heeboll S, Horwich A, Huddart R, Khoo V, Eeles R, Cooper C, Sydes M, Dearnaley D, Parker C: Intrinsic markers of tumour hypoxia and angiogenesis in localised prostate cancer and outcome of radical treatment: a retrospective analysis of two randomised radiotherapy trials and one surgical cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2008, 9:342-351.
  34. ^ Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix; M. Hockel; Canc. Res. 56: 4509, 1996.
  35. ^ Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome; P. Vaupel and A. Mayer; Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26: 225, 2007.
  36. ^ Exploiting tumor hypoxia in cancer treatment; J.M. Brown and W.R. Wilson; Nat.Rev.Canc.4,437, 2004.
  37. ^ Hypoxia: targeting the tumor; R.G. Boyle and S. Travess; Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 64:281, 2006.
  38. ^ Targeting tumors with hypoxia-activated cytotoxins; G.O. Ahn and M. Brown; Frontiers in Bioscience 12, 3483, 2007.
  39. ^ Bioreductive drugs: from concept to clinic; S.R. McKeown; Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 19,427, 2007.
  40. ^ "Definition of niacinamide - National Cancer Institute Drug Dictionary - National Cancer Institute". Cancer.gov. Retrieved 2011-12-21. 
  41. ^ "Safety and Efficacy Study of Trans Sodium Crocetinate (TSC) With Concomitant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (GBM)". ClinicalTrials.gov. November 2011. 
  • Hypoxia-driven selection of the metastatic phenotype; Richard Sullivan, Charles H. Graham; Cancer Metastatis Review (2007) 26:319-331