In the differential geometry of surfaces in three dimensions, umbilics or umbilical points are points on a surface that are locally spherical. At such points the normal curvature in all directions are equal, hence, both principal curvatures are equal, and every tangent vector is a principal direction. The name "umbilic" comes from the Latin umbilicus - navel.
Umbilic points generally occur as isolated points in the elliptical region of the surface; that is, where the Gaussian curvature is positive. For a surfaces with genus 0, e.g. an ellipsoid, there must be at least four umbilics, a consequence of the Poincaré–Hopf theorem.
The sphere is the only surface with non-zero curvature where every point is umbilic. A flat umbilic is an umbilic with zero Gaussian curvature. The monkey saddle is an example of a surface with a flat umbilic and on the plane every point is a flat umbilic.
The three main type of umbilic points are elliptical umbilics, parabolic umbilics and hyperbolic umbilics. Elliptical umbilics have the three ridge lines passing through the umbilic and hyperbolic umbilics have just one. Parabolic umbilics are a transitional case with two ridges one of which is singular. Other configurations are possible for transitional cases. These cases correspond to the D4-, D5 and D4+ elementary catastrophes of René Thom's catastrophe theory.
Umbilics can also be characterised by the pattern of the principal direction vector field around the umbilic which typically form one of three configurations: star, lemon, and lemonstar (or monstar). The index of the vector field is either −½ (star) or ½ (lemon, monstar). Elliptical and parabolic umbilics always have the star pattern, whilst hyperbolic umbilics can be star, lemon, or monstar. This classification was first due to Darboux and the names come from Hannay.
Classification of umbilics
The classification of umbilics is closely linked to the classification of real cubic forms . A cubic form will have a number of root lines such that the cubic form is zero for all real . There are a number of possibilities including:
- Three distinct lines: an elliptical cubic form, standard model .
- Three lines, two of which are coincident: a parabolic cubic form, standard model .
- A single real line: a hyperbolic cubic form, standard model .
- Three coincident lines, standard model .
The equivalence classes of such cubics under uniform scaling form a three-dimensional real projective space and the subset of parabolic forms define a surface – called the umbilic bracelet by Christopher Zeeman. Taking equivalence classes under rotation of the coordinate system removes one further parameter and a cubic forms can be represent by the complex cubic form with a single complex parameter . Parabolic forms occur when , the inner deltoid, elliptical forms are inside the deltoid and hyperbolic one outside. If and is not a cube root of unity then the cubic form is a right-angled cubic form which play a special role for umbilics. If then two of the root lines are orthogonal.
A second cubic form, the Jacobian is formed by taking the Jacobian determinant of the vector valued function , . Up to a constant multiple this is the cubic form . Using complex numbers the Jacobian is a parabolic cubic form when , the outer deltoid in the classification diagram.
Any surface with an isolated umbilic point at the origin can be expressed as a Monge form parameterisation , where is the unique principal curvature. The type of umbilic is classified by the cubic form from the cubic part and corresponding Jacobian cubic form. Whilst principal directions are not uniquely defined at an umbilic the limits of the principal directions when following a ridge on the surface can be found and these correspond to the root-lines of the cubic form. The pattern of lines of curvature is determined by the Jacobian.
The classification of umbilic points is as follows:
- Inside inner deltoid - elliptical umbilics
- On inner circle - two ridge lines tangent
- On inner deltoid - parabolic umbilics
- Outside inner deltoid - hyperbolic umbilics
- Inside outer circle - star pattern
- On outer circle - birth of umbilics
- Between outer circle and outer deltoid - monstar pattern
- Outside outer circle - lemon pattern
- Cusps of the inner deltoid - cubic (symbolic) umbilics
- On the diagonals and the horizontal line - symmetrical umbilics with mirror symmetry
In a generic family of surfaces umbilics can be created, or destroyed, in pairs: the birth of umbilics transition. Both umbilics will be hyperbolic, one with a star pattern and one with a monstar pattern. The outer circle in the diagram, a right angle cubic form, gives these transitional cases. Symbolic umbilics are a special case of this.
The elliptical umbilics and hyperbolic umbilics have distinctly different focal surfaces. A ridge on the surface corresponds to a cuspidal edges so each sheet of the elliptical focal surface will have three cuspidal edges which come together at the umbilic focus and then switch to the other sheet. For a hyperbolic umbilic there is a single cuspidal edge which switch from one sheet to the other.
Definition in higher dimension in Riemannian manifolds
A point p in a Riemannian submanifold is umbilical if, at p, the (vector-valued) Second fundamental form is some normal vector tensor the induced metric (First fundamental form). Equivalently, for all vectors U, V at p, II(U, V) = gp(U, V), where is the mean curvature vector at p.
A submanifold is said to be umbilic (or all-umbilic) if this condition holds at every point "p". This is equivalent to saying that the submanifold can be made totally geodesic by an appropriate conformal change of the metric of the surrounding ("ambient") manifold. For example, a surface in Euclidean space is umbilic if and only if it is a piece of a sphere.
- Darboux, Gaston (1887,1889,1896), Leçons sur la théorie génerale des surfaces: Volume I, Volume II, Volume III, Volume IV, Gauthier-Villars
- Pictures of star, lemon, monstar, and further references
- Berry, M V; Hannay, J H (1977). "Umbilic points on Gaussian random surfaces". J. Phys. A 10: 1809–21.
- Poston, Tim; Stewart, Ian (1978), Catastrophe Theory and its Applications, Pitman, ISBN 0-273-01029-8
- Porteous, Ian R. (2001), Geometric Differentiation, Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–213, ISBN 0-521-00264-8