||This article may require copy editing for MOS:FOOTERS, MOS:SECTIONCAPS, etc. (March 2014)|
Uncertainty Avoidance, "a society's tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity". It reflects the extent to which members of a society attempt to cope with anxiety by minimizing uncertainty. The uncertainty avoidance dimension expresses the degree to which a person in society feels uncomfortable with a sense of uncertainty and ambiguity. The fundamental issue here is how a society deals with the fact that the future can never be known: should we try to control the future or just let it happen? Countries exhibiting strong Uncertainty avoidance Index or UAI, maintain rigid codes of belief and behavior and are intolerant of unorthodox behavior and ideas. Weak UAI societies maintain a more relaxed attitude in which practice counts more than principles. People in cultures with high uncertainty avoidance tend to be more emotional. They try to minimize the occurrence of unknown and unusual circumstances and to proceed with careful changes step by step by planning and by implementing rules, laws and regulations. In contrast, low uncertainty avoidance cultures accept and feel comfortable in unstructured situations or changeable environments and try to have as few rules as possible. People in these cultures tend to be more pragmatic, they are more tolerant of change.
High uncertainty avoidance
There are many ways to detect if someone has a high amount of Uncertainty Avoidance. For example, the use of formality in interaction with others, dependence of formalized policies and procedures, apparent resistance of change are all characteristics of high uncertainty avoidance.
Signs of High Uncertainty avoidance More physical and apparent ways to detect if someone has a high Uncertainty Avoidance is to check if they display the following descriptions or attributes. Do they follow a strict structure with rules and expertise, do they have high security (avoiding the unfamiliar). Also you can check if they are hectic, stressful or even emotional.
Low uncertainty avoidance
In contrast people can also exhibit characteristics of low Uncertainty Avoidance. Unlike high UA, those with a low level use informality in interaction with others, they often rely on informal norms and behaviors in most matters. Also, they will show moderate resistance to change.
Signs of low uncertainty avoidance To detect if someone has a low uncertainty avoidance keep a keen eye out for the following symptoms and hints. Such people often abide by only a few rules and live a life with little set structure, one that is loose and free; they will appear to be calm and collected. Also, they are interested most likely in entrepreneurship and business matters.
Those with High uncertainty avoidance prefer formal rules, strong social norms, and other ways of avoiding uncertainty or risk. The low uncertainty avoidance cultures rely more on informal, unstructured, or fluid roles and behaviors. The following characterizations were by the average perceived Uncertainty Avoidance based on the basic concepts of uncertainty avoidance like risky behaviors and personality.
High Uncertainty Avoidance Countries Some of the highest uncertainty avoidance countries include Russia, Germany, Turkey, or France.
Low Uncertainty Avoidance Countries Some of the lowest uncertainty avoidance countries include Switzerland, Sweden, and Denmark.
Uncertainty Avoidance is taught so managers can have an idea what sort of rules and practices are accepted and necessary in different cultures. For example cultures with high uncertainty avoidance usually do better with more laws and regulations and cultures with low uncertainty avoidance expect more space and more freedom. Managers study uncertainty avoidance to be better prepared to manage in an international setting.
In the same way managers can face situations where they have to deal with employees of different cultures businessmen are expected to do business across different cultures and uncertainty avoidance can give insight to whether a culture expects you to strictly adhere to rules and traditions or whether you are allowed more freedom and familiarity.
Similar to international business, international communications requires you to bridge the gap between many cultures and adhering to social norms is an important part of international relations. And uncertainty avoidance applies to social norms in different cultures.
Uncertainty avoidance is important in international negotiations because negotiations relies on reaching an understanding and that can be made difficult if the other party expects you to follow different norms or if the other party is not comfortable with certain situations. Uncertainty avoidance also applies in many fields other than international business and the cultures associated with high or low uncertainty avoidance are also associated with specific traits.
In politics, cultures with high uncertainty avoidance citizens tend to have low interest in politics and citizen protests are repressed. This is because political unrest would bring about changes which the majority would not be comfortable with. There also tends to be many laws with laws being more specific as to avoid any uncertainty in the interpretation and to guide which behavior is acceptable. On the other side of the spectrum in cultures with low uncertainty avoidance citizens tend to be very interested in politics as it serves as a tool for change. Protests are accepted as another tool for change and laws are general.
In education, cultures with high uncertainty avoidance, teachers as viewed as having all the answers and learning is structured. A lot of focus is emphasized on mathematics and science. In cultures with low uncertainty avoidance, teachers are not necessarily viewed as all knowing and the learning is open minded with less focus on facts.
Uncertainty avoidance also affects the family life, cultures with uncertainty avoidance tend to have rigid gender roles and cultures with low uncertainty avoidance have more flexible and more varied gender roles.
Related & Future Research
One of the greatest and most renowned researchers in this field studying the terms and concepts of Uncertainty avoidance is Hofstede. He has a theory called “cultural dimensions theory” where he studies different dimensions of national culture including, Power Distance, Individualism versus Collectivism, Masculinity versus Femeninity, Long-term versus Short-term orientation and of course the concepts of Uncertainty Avoidance.
David S. Baker and Kerry D. Carson performed a study to evaluate the uncertainty avoidance among field sales personnel. They selected 155 of them from United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. They inspected attachment and avoidance as the two ways of expressing individual uncertainty avoidance. Their research pointed towards individuals using both attachment and avoidance to lower their uncertainty avoidance in the workplace. People who were high on uncertainty avoidance and those low on it behaved differently. Those sales personnel that were low on uncertainty avoidance saw no need to attach with their team or adapt to their environment settings, but those high on it used both avoidance and attachment to deal with situations. Those who reported moderate levels on uncertainty avoidance preferred to use adaptation rather than attachment when needed.
It is also believed that the Uncertainty Avoidance Index has a significant effect on consumer's acceptance of unfamiliar brands in the retail market. Brand familiarity, celebrity endorsement and cultural differences all have an effect on determining an individual's Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI). Eliane Karsaklian has studied the effect these influences towards UAI have on consumer's attitude towards familiar and unfamiliar brands in different cultures (specifically American and French). She concludes that uncertainty avoidance has a deep role in shaping consumer's attitude towards brands.
- Hofstede, Geert (July 1978). "The Poverty of Management Control Philosophy". The Academy of Management Review (Academy of Management) 3 (3): 450–461. doi:10.2307/257536. JSTOR 257536.
- Hofstede, Geert (July 1967). "The Game of Budget Control: How to Live with Budgetary Standards and Yet be Motivated by Them". OR (Operational Research Society) 20 (3): 388–390. JSTOR 3008751.
- Hofstede, Geert (December 1983). "Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values". Administrative Science Quarterly (Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University) 28 (4): 625–629. JSTOR 2393017.
- Hofstede, Geert (March 1993). "Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind". Administrative Science Quarterly (Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University) 38 (1): 132–134. JSTOR 2393257.
- Hofstede, Geert (March 2002). "Dimensions Do Not Exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney". Human Relations (Sage Publications) 55 (11).
- Hofstede, Geert (2010). "The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance". Journal of International Business Studies (Sage Publications) 41 (8): 1339–46. doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.31. SSRN 1697436.
- S. Baker, David; D. Carson, Kerry (2012). "The Two Faces of Uncertainty Avoidance: Attachment and Adaptation". The Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 12 (2): 128–141.
- Ambiguity aversion also known as uncertainty aversion
- Cross-cultural communication
- Cross-cultural leadership
- Cross-cultural psychology
- Cultural norms
- Culture shock
- Edward T. Hall
- Emotions and culture
- Fons Trompenaars
- Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory
- Intercultural communication
- National character studies
- National identity