Unequal treaty
| Unequal treaty | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese name | |||||||||||
| Traditional Chinese | 不平等條約 | ||||||||||
| Simplified Chinese | 不平等条约 | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Korean name | |||||||||||
| Hangul | 불평등 조약 | ||||||||||
| Hanja | 不平等條約 | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Japanese name | |||||||||||
| Kanji | 不平等条約 | ||||||||||
| Kana | ふびょうどうじょうやく | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
“Unequal treaty” is a term used in specific reference to a number of treaties imposed by Western powers, during the 19th and early 20th centuries, on Qing Dynasty China and late Tokugawa Japan. The term is also applied to treaties imposed during the same time frame on late Joseon Dynasty Korea by the post-Meiji Restoration Empire of Japan.
The treaties were often signed by these Asian states after suffering military defeat in various skirmishes or wars with the foreign powers or when there was a threat of military action by those powers.
Contents |
[edit] Overview
The term "unequal treaty" did not come into use until early in the 20th century. These treaties were considered unequal in China "because they were not negotiated by nations treating each other as equals but were imposed on China after a war, and because they encroached upon China's sovereign rights ... which reduced her to semicolonial status".[1] In many cases China was effectively forced to pay large amounts of reparations, open up ports for trade, cede or lease territories (such as Hong Kong to Great Britain and Macau to Portugal), and make various other concessions of sovereignty to foreign "spheres of influence", following military defeats.
The earliest attempt to settle a conflict between Western and Asian powers was the 1841 Convention of Chuenpee negotiations during the First Opium War.[2] China and Great Britain signed the first unequal treaties under the Treaty of Nanjing in 1842.[3] Following Qing China's defeat, treaties with Britain opened up five ports to foreign trade, while also allowing foreign missionaries, at least in theory, to reside within China. In addition, the administration of justice on foreign residents in the port cities were afforded trials by their own consular authorities rather than the Chinese legal system, a concept termed extraterritoriality.
Some countries failed to press unequal treaties upon China: the Chinese forced the Italians to give up on a demand to hand over Sanmen Bay to them.[4]
When the United States Commodore Matthew Perry forced open Japan in 1854, Japan was soon prompted to sign the Convention of Kanagawa, which was similar to ones China had signed.
Korea's first unequal treaty was not with the West but with Japan. Taking a page from Western tactics, in 1875 Japan sent Captain Inoue Yoshika and the warship Un'yō to display military might over Korea in the Ganghwa Island incident. This forced Korea to open its doors to Japan by signing the Japan-Korea Treaty of 1876.[5]
The unequal treaties ended at various times for the countries involved. Japan's victories in the 1894–95 First Sino-Japanese War convinced many in the West that unequal treaties could no longer be enforced on Japan. Korea's unequal treaties with European states became largely null and void in 1910, when it was annexed by Japan.
After World War I, patriotic consciousness in China focused on the treaties, which now became widely known as "unequal treaties." Nationalist Party and the Communist Party competed to convince the public that their approach would be more effective. [6] Germany was forced to terminate its rights, the Soviet Union ostentatiously surrendered them, and the United States organized Washington Conference to negotiate them. After Chiang Kai-shek declared a new national government in 1927, the western powers quickly offered diplomatic recognition, arousing anxiety in Japan. [7] The new government declared to the Great Powers that China had been exploited for decades under unequal treaties, and that the time for such treaties was over, demanding they renegotiate all of them on equal terms.[8] In the face of Japanese expansion in China, however, ending the system was postponed.
Most of China's unequal treaties were abrogated during the Second Sino-Japanese War, which started in 1937 and merged into the larger context of World War II. The United States Congress ended American extraterritoriality in December, 1943. Significant examples of unequal treaties on China did outlast World War II: unequal treaties regarding Hong Kong remained in place until Hong Kong's 1997 handover, and in 1969, to improve Sino-Russian relations, China reconfirmed the 1859 Treaty of Aigun.
[edit] Select list of unequal treaties
[edit] Alternative viewpoints
Writing in the Hong Kong Law Journal, Peter Wesley-Smith suggests that many of these treaties were signed by participants acting ultra vires of their legal authority, which should have made those treaties illegitimate.[39]
Writing in the Yale Law Journal, March 1972, Lung-chu Chen and W. M. Reisman argued that the proclamation by China in 1941 that all treaties with Japan were abrogated was devoid of any legality and effect in international law. As supporting evidence, they refer to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, art. 43. However, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties did not come into force until after 1980 and only covered treaties concluded after the entry into force of the Convention. Moreover, they note that "title" to Taiwan territory vested in Japan at the time of, and/or because of, the Treaty of Shimonoseki, as the language of the Treaty clearly indicated. Such title, insofar as it is title, ceases to be a bilateral contractual relationship and becomes a real relationship in international law. Though contract may be a modality for transferring title, title is not a contractual relationship.[40] Professor Y. Frank Chiang, writing in the Fordham International Law Journal in 2004, expanded upon this analysis to state that there are no international law principles which can serve to validate a unilateral proclamation to abrogate (or revoke) a territorial treaty, whether based on a charge of being "unequal," or due to a subsequent "aggression" of the other party to the treaty, or any other reason.[41]
[edit] Other uses
Recently, the term "unequal treaty" has been used by the RESPECT leader George Galloway and the then Liberal Democrat leader Menzies Campbell to refer to the 2003 UK–US extradition treaty.[42][43]
The 1903 Cuban–American Treaty, which granted the United States a perpetual lease of Guantanamo Bay, is seen as an "unequal treaty" by Professor Alfred de Zayas.[44]
The American annexation of Hawaii in 1898 was an example of an "unequal treaty doctrine" and its consequences.[45]
[edit] See also
- Client state
- Puppet state
- Most favoured nation
- Treaty of Waitangi
- Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire
[edit] Notes
- ^ Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. (1970). The Rise of Modern China. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 239. ISBN 7883022.
- ^ Courtauld, Caroline. Holdsworth, May. Vickers, Simon. [1997] (1997). The Hong Kong Story. HK University press. ISBN 0195903536
- ^ Wiltshire, Trea. [First published 1987] (republished & reduced 2003). Old Hong Kong – Volume One. Central, Hong Kong: Text Form Asia books Ltd. ISBN Volume One 962-7283-59-2
- ^ Diana Preston (2000). The boxer rebellion: the dramatic story of China's war on foreigners that shook the world in the summer of 1900. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 21. ISBN 0802713610. http://books.google.com/books?id=iWxKQejMtlMC&dq=inscribing+the+name+of+Yuan+Shih-kai+on+its+back.+The+tortoise+was+a+symbol+of+homosexuality+and+hence+intended+as+a+grievous+insult+to+the+enemy+who+had+betrayed+his+attempts+at+reform.+Kuang+Hsu+would+stick+the+picture&q=ice+melons+generosity#v=snippet&q=sanmen%20refused%20to%20yield&f=false. Retrieved March 4 2011.
- ^ Preston, Peter Wallace. [1998] (1998). Blackwell Publishing. Pacific Asia in the Global System: An Introduction. ISBN 0631202382
- ^ Dong Wang, China's Unequal Treaties: Narrating National History (Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 2005).
- ^ Akira Iriye, After Imperialism: The Search for a New Order in the Far East, 1921-1931 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965; Reprinted: Chicago: Imprint Publications, 1990), passim.
- ^ "CHINA: Nationalist Notes". TIME. Monday, June 25, 1928. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,786420,00.html. Retrieved April 11, 2011.
- ^ Auslin, Michael R. (2004) Negotiating with Imperialism: The Unequal Treaties and the Culture of Japanese Diplomacy, p. 17. at Google Books
- ^ Auslin, p. 30. at Google Books
- ^ Auslin, pp. 1, 7. at Google Books
- ^ Auslin, p. 214. at Google Books
- ^ Auslin, pp. 47–48. at Google Books
- ^ Auslin, p. 71. at Google Books
- ^ Korean Mission to the Conference on the Limitation of Armament, Washington, D.C., 1921–1922. (1922). Korea's Appeal to the Conference on Limitation of Armament, p. 33. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty Between Japan and Korea, dated February 26, 1876."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 29. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between the United States and Korea. Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation dated May 22, 1882."
- ^ Moon, Myungki. "Korea-China Treaty System in the 1880s and the Opening of Seoul: Review of the Joseon-Qing Communication and Commerce Rules," Journal of Northeast Asian History, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Dec 2008), pp. 85–120.
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Germany and Korea. Treaty of Amity and Commerce dated November 23, 1883."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Great Britain and Korea ... dated November 26, 1883."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Korea and Russia. Treaty of Amity and Commerce dated June 25, 1884."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Korea and Italy. Treaty of Friendship and Commerce dated June 26, 1884."
- ^ Yi, Kwang-gyu and Joseph P. Linskey. (2003). Korean Traditional Culture, p. 63. at Google Books; excerpt, "The so-called Hanseong Treaty was concluded between Korea and Japan. Korea paid compensation for Japanese losses. Japan and China worked out the Tien-Tsin Treaty, which ensured that both Japanese and Chinese troops withraw from Korea."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Korea and France. Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation dated June 4, 1886."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Korea and Austria. Treaty of Amity and Commerce dated July 23, 1892."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Korea and Belgium. Treaty of Amity and Commerce dated March 23, 1901."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 32. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty and Diplomatic Relations Between Korea and Denmark. Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation dated July 15, 1902."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 34. at Google Books; excerpt, "Treaty of Alliance Between Japan and Korea, dated February 23, 1904."
- ^ Note that the Korean Mission to the Conference on the Limitation of Armament in Washington, D.C., 1921–1922 identified this as "Treaty of Alliance Between Japan and Korea, dated February 23, 1904"
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 35. at Google Books; excerpt, "Alleged Treaty, dated August 22, 1904."
- ^ Note that the Korean diplomats in 1921–1922 identified this as "Alleged Treaty, dated August 22, 1904"
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 35. at Google Books; excerpt, "Alleged Treaty, dated April 1, 1905."
- ^ Note that the Korean diplomats in 1921–1922 identified this as "Alleged Treaty, dated April 1, 1905"
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 35. at Google Books; excerpt, "Alleged Treaty, dated August 13, 1905."
- ^ Note that the Korean diplomats in 1921–1922 identified this as "Alleged Treaty, dated August 13, 1905"
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 35. at Google Books; excerpt, "Alleged Treaty, dated November 17, 1905."
- ^ Note that the Korean diplomats in 1921–1922 identified this as "Alleged Treaty, dated NOvember 17, 1905"
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 35. at Google Books; excerpt, "Alleged Treaty, dated July 24, 1907."
- ^ Korean Mission, p. 36. at Google Books; excerpt, "Alleged Treaty, dated August 20, 1910."
- ^ Wesley-Smith, Peter. (1981) "Legal Limitations upon the Legislative Competence of the Hong Kong Legislature," 11 Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 11, p. 3.
- ^ "Who Owns Taiwan: A Search for International Title". Yale Law Journal. March 1972. http://www.civil-taiwan.org/cairo-potsdam.htm.
- ^ Y. Frank Chiang (2004). "One-China Policy and Taiwan". Fordham International Law Journal. http://www.taiwanbasic.com/lawjrn/onechina-tai.htm. Retrieved 21 February 2010.
- ^ UK–US Extradition Treaty, House of Commons Hansard column 1437, 12 July 2006
- ^ Trapped by an unequal treaty The Independent, 6 July 2006
- ^ A. de Zayas The status of Guantanamo Bay and the status of the detainees, 2003
- ^ Morse, Bradford Wilmot. (1990). "American Annexation of Hawaii: An Example of the Unequal Treaty Doctrine" (with Kazi A. Hamid). Connecticut Journal of International Law, Vol. 5, pp. 407–456.
[edit] References
- Auslin, Michael R. (2004). Negotiating with Imperialism: The Unequal Treaties and the Culture of Japanese Diplomacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10-ISBN 0674015215; 13-ISBN 9780674015210; OCLC 56493769
- Halleck, Henry Wager. (1861). International law: or, Rules regulating the intercourse of states in peace and war New York: D. Van Nostrand. OCLC 852699
- Hsü, Immanuel Chung-yueh (1970). The Rise of Modern China. New York: Oxford University Press. OCLC 300287988
- Korean Mission to the Conference on the Limitation of Armament, Washington, D.C., 1921–1922. (1922). Korea's Appeal to the Conference on Limitation of Armament. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. OCLC 12923609
- Wang, Dong. (2005). China's Unequal Treaties: Narrating National History. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books. 10-ISBN 0739112082/13-ISBN 9780739112083; OCLC 60311787