United Nations Security Council

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
United Nations Security Council

مجلس أمن الأمم المتحدة (Arabic)
联合国安全理事会 (Chinese)
Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies (French)
Совет Безопасности Организации Объединённых Наций (Russian)

Consejo de Seguridad de
las Naciones Unidas (Spanish)
United Nations Security Council.jpg
UN Security Council Chamber in New York
Formation 1946
Type Principal Organ
Legal status Active
Head

Council President

Luxembourg Sylvie Lucas
Website http://un.org/en/sc/

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations and is charged with the maintenance of international peace and security. Its powers include the establishment of peacekeeping operations, the establishment of international sanctions, and the authorization of military action through Security Council resolutions; it is the only UN body with the authority to issue binding resolutions to member states. The Security Council held its first session on 17 January 1946.

Like the UN as a whole, the Security Council was created following World War II to address the failings of another international organization, the League of Nations, in maintaining world peace. In its early decades, the body was largely paralysed by the Cold War division between the US and USSR and their allies, though it authorized interventions in the Korean War and the Congo Crisis and peacekeeping missions in the Suez Crisis, Cyprus, and West New Guinea. With the collapse of the Soviet Union, UN peacekeeping efforts increased dramatically in scale, and the Security Council authorized major military and peacekeeping missions in Kuwait, Namibia, Cambodia, Bosnia, Rwanda, Somalia, Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo with varying degrees of failure.

The Security Council consists of fifteen members. The great powers that were the victors of World War II—China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US—serve as the body's five permanent members. These permanent members can veto any substantive Security Council resolution, including those on the admission of new member states or candidates for Secretary-General. The Security Council also has 10 non-permanent members, elected on a regional basis to serve two-year terms. The body's presidency rotates monthly between its members.

Security Council resolutions are typically enforced by UN peacekeepers, military forces voluntarily provided by member states and funded independently of the main UN budget. As of 2013, 116,837 peacekeeping soldiers and other personnel are deployed on 15 missions around the world. Evaluations of the Security Council's effectiveness are mixed, and calls for its reform pre-date the body's first meeting; however, little consensus exists on how its structure should be changed.

History[edit]

Background and creation[edit]

In the century prior to the UN's creation, several international treaty organizations and conferences had been formed to regulate conflicts between nations, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.[1] Following the catastrophic loss of life in World War I, the Paris Peace Conference established the League of Nations to maintain harmony between the nations.[2] This organization successfully resolved some territorial disputes and created international structures for areas such as postal mail, aviation, and opium control, some of which would later be absorbed into the UN.[3] However, the League lacked representation for colonial peoples (then half the world's population) and significant participation from several major powers, including the US, USSR, Germany, and Japan; it failed to act against the 1931 Japanese invasion of Manchuria, the Second Italo-Ethiopian War in 1935, the 1937 Japanese invasion of China, and German expansions under Adolf Hitler that culminated in World War II.[4]

British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Soviet General Secretary Joseph Stalin at the Yalta Conference, February 1945

The earliest concrete plan for a new world organization was begun under the aegis of the US State Department in 1939. US President Franklin D. Roosevelt first coined the term 'United Nations' as a term to describe the Allied countries.[a] The term was first officially used on 1 January 1942, when 26 governments signed the Atlantic Charter.[6]

In mid-1944, the Allied powers met for the Dumbarton Oaks Conference in Washington, D.C. to negotiate the UN's structure, and the composition of the UN Security Council quickly became the dominant issue. France, the Republic of China, the Soviet Union, the UK, and US were selected as permanent members of the Security Council; the US attempted to add Brazil as a sixth member, but was opposed by the heads of the Russian and British delegations.[7] The most contentious issue at Dumbarton and in successive talks proved to be the veto rights of permanent members. The Soviet delegation argued that each nation should have an absolute veto that could block matters from even being discussed, while the British argued that nations should not be able to veto resolutions on disputes to which they were a party. At the Yalta Conference of February 1945, the American, British, and Russian delegations agreed that each of the "Big Five" could veto any action by the council, but not procedural resolutions, meaning that the permanent members could not prevent debate on a resolution.[8]

On 25 April 1945, the UN Conference on International Organization began in San Francisco, attended by 50 governments and a number of non-governmental organizations involved in drafting the United Nations Charter.[9] At the conference, H. V. Evatt of the Australian delegation pushed to further restrict the veto power of Security Council permanent members.[10] Due to the fear that rejecting the strong veto would cause the conference's failure, his proposal was defeated twenty votes to ten.[11]

The UN officially came into existence on 24 October 1945 upon ratification of the Charter by the five then-permanent members of the Security Council and by a majority of the other 46 signatories.[9] On 17 January 1946, the Security Council met for the first time at Church House, Westminster, in London, England.[12]

Cold War[edit]

The Security Council was largely paralysed in its early decades by the Cold War between the US and USSR and their allies, and the Council generally was only able to intervene in unrelated conflicts.[13] (A notable exception was the 1950 Security Council resolution authorizing a US-led coalition to repel the North Korean invasion of South Korea, passed in the absence of the USSR.)[9][14] In 1956, the first UN peacekeeping force was established to end the Suez Crisis;[9] however, the UN was unable to intervene against the USSR's simultaneous invasion of Hungary following that country's revolution.[15] Cold War divisions also paralysed the Security Council's Military Staff Committee, which had been formed by Articles 45–47 of the UN Charter to oversee UN forces and create UN military bases. The committee continued to exist on paper but largely abandoned its work in the mid-'50s.[16][17]

In 1960, the UN deployed the United Nations Operation in the Congo (UNOC), the largest military force of its early decades, to restore order to the breakaway State of Katanga, restoring it to the control of the Democratic Republic of the Congo by 1964.[18] However, the Security Council found itself bypassed in favour of direct negotiations between the superpowers in some of the decade's larger conflicts, such as the Cuban missile crisis or the Vietnam War.[19] Focusing instead on smaller conflicts without an immediate Cold War connection, the Security Council deployed the United Nations Temporary Executive Authority in West New Guinea in 1962 and the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus in 1964, the latter of which would become one of the UN's longest-running peacekeeping missions.[20][21]

On 25 October 1971, over US opposition but with the support of many Third World nations, the mainland, communist People's Republic of China was given the Chinese seat on the Security Council in place of the Republic of China that occupied Taiwan; the vote was widely seen as a sign of waning US influence in the organization.[22] With an increasing Third World presence and the failure of UN mediation in conflicts in the Middle East, Vietnam, and Kashmir, the UN increasingly shifted its attention to its ostensibly secondary goals of economic development and cultural exchange. By the 1970s, the UN budget for social and economic development was far greater than its budget for peacekeeping.[23]

Post-Cold War[edit]

US Secretary of State Colin Powell holds a model vial of anthrax while giving a presentation to the Security Council in February 2003.

After the Cold War, the UN saw a radical expansion in its peacekeeping duties, taking on more missions in ten years' time than it had in its previous four decades.[24] Between 1988 and 2000, the number of adopted Security Council resolutions more than doubled, and the peacekeeping budget increased more than tenfold.[25] The UN negotiated an end to the Salvadoran Civil War, launched a successful peacekeeping mission in Namibia, and oversaw democratic elections in post-apartheid South Africa and post-Khmer Rouge Cambodia.[26] In 1991, the Security Council demonstrated its renewed vigor by condemning the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on the same day of the attack, and later authorizing a US-led coalition that successfully repulsed the Iraqis.[27] Undersecretary-General Brian Urquhart later described the hopes raised by these successes as a "false renaissance" for the organization, given the more troubled missions that followed.[28]

Though the UN Charter had been written primarily to prevent aggression by one nation against another, in the early 1990s, the UN faced a number of simultaneous, serious crises within nations such as Somalia, Haiti, Mozambique, and the former Yugoslavia.[29] The UN mission in Somalia was widely viewed as a failure after the US withdrawal following casualties in the Battle of Mogadishu, and the UN mission to Bosnia faced "worldwide ridicule" for its indecisive and confused mission in the face of ethnic cleansing.[30] In 1994, the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda failed to intervene in the Rwandan Genocide in the face of Security Council indecision.[31]

In the late 1990s and 2000s, UN-authorised international interventions took a wider variety of forms. The UN mission in the 1991–2002 Sierra Leone Civil War was supplemented by British Royal Marines, and the UN-authorised 2001 invasion of Afghanistan was overseen by NATO.[32] In 2003, the US invaded Iraq despite failing to pass a UN Security Council resolution for authorization, prompting a new round of questioning of the organization's effectiveness.[33] In the same decade, the Security Council intervened with peacekeepers in crises including the War in Darfur in Sudan and the Kivu conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In 2013, an internal review of UN actions in the final battles of the Sri Lankan Civil War in 2009 concluded that the organization had suffered "systemic failure".[34]

Role[edit]

UN Security Council Resolutions
1 to 100 (1946–1953)
101 to 200 (1953–1965)
201 to 300 (1965–1971)
301 to 400 (1971–1976)
401 to 500 (1976–1982)
501 to 600 (1982–1987)
601 to 700 (1987–1991)
701 to 800 (1991–1993)
801 to 900 (1993–1994)
901 to 1000 (1994–1995)
1001 to 1100 (1995–1997)
1101 to 1200 (1997–1998)
1201 to 1300 (1998–2000)
1301 to 1400 (2000–2002)
1401 to 1500 (2002–2003)
1501 to 1600 (2003–2005)
1601 to 1700 (2005–2006)
1701 to 1800 (2006–2008)
1801 to 1900 (2008–2009)
1901 to 2000 (2009–2011)
2001 to 2100 (2011–2013)
2101 to 2200 (2013–present)

The UN's role in international collective security is defined by the UN Charter, which authorizes the Security Council to investigate any situation threatening international peace; recommend procedures for peaceful resolution of a dispute; call upon other member nations to completely or partially interrupt economic relations as well as sea, air, postal, and radio communications, or to sever diplomatic relations; and enforce its decisions militarily, or by any means necessary. The Security Council also recommends the new Secretary-General to the General Assembly and recommends new states for admission as member states of the United Nations.[35][36] The Security Council has traditionally interpreted its mandate as covering only military security, though US Ambassador Richard Holbrooke controversially persuaded the body to pass a resolution on HIV/AIDS in Africa in 2000.[37]

Under Chapter VI of the Charter, "Pacific Settlement of Disputes", the Security Council "may investigate any dispute, or any situation which might lead to international friction or give rise to a dispute". The Council may "recommend appropriate procedures or methods of adjustment" if it determines that the situation might endanger international peace and security.[38] These recommendations are generally considered to not be binding, as they lack an enforcement mechanism.[39] A minority of scholars, such as Stephen Zunes, have argued that resolutions made under Chapter VI are "still directives by the Security Council and differ only in that they do not have the same stringent enforcement options, such as the use of military force".[40]

Under Chapter VII, the Council has broader power to decide what measures are to be taken in situations involving "threats to the peace, breaches of the peace, or acts of aggression".[17] In such situations, the Council is not limited to recommendations but may take action, including the use of armed force "to maintain or restore international peace and security".[17] This was the legal basis for UN armed action in Korea in 1950 during the Korean War and the use of coalition forces in Iraq and Kuwait in 1991 and Libya in 2011.[41][42] Decisions taken under Chapter VII, such as economic sanctions, are binding on UN members; the Security Council is the only UN body with the authority to issue binding resolutions.[43][44]

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court recognizes that the Security Council has authority to refer cases to the Court in which the Court could not otherwise exercise jurisdiction.[45] The Council exercised this power for the first time in March 2005, when it referred to the Court “the situation prevailing in Darfur since 1 July 2002”; since Sudan is not a party to the Rome Statute, the Court could not otherwise have exercised jurisdiction.[46][47] The Security Council made its second such referral in February 2011 when it asked the ICC to investigate the Libyan government's violent response to the Libyan civil war.[48]

Security Council Resolution 1674, adopted on 28 April 2006, "reaffirms the provisions of paragraphs 138 and 139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document regarding the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity".[49] The Security Council reaffirmed this responsibility to protect in Resolution 1706 on 31 August of that year.[50] These resolutions commit the Security Council to take action to protect civilians in an armed conflict, including taking action against genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.[51]

Members[edit]

Permanent members[edit]

The Security Council's five permanent members, below, have the power to veto any substantive resolution; this allows a permanent member to block adoption of a resolution, but not to prevent or end debate.[52]

Country Current state representation Former state representation
 China  People's Republic of China (1971–present) Taiwan Republic of China (1946–1949) (on the Mainland)
Taiwan Republic of China (1949–1971) (on Taiwan)
 France France French Fifth Republic (1958–present) France French Fourth Republic (1946-1958)
 Russia  Russian Federation (1992–present)  Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1946–1991)
 United Kingdom  United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1946–present)
 United States  United States of America (1946–present)

At the UN's founding in 1946, the five permanent members of the Security Council were the Republic of China, the French Republic, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States. There have been two major seat changes since then. China's seat was originally held by Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalist Government, the Republic of China. However, the Nationalists were forced to retreat to the island of Taiwan in 1949, during the Chinese Civil War. The Communist government assumed control of mainland China, henceforth known as the People's Republic of China. In 1971, Resolution 2758 recognized the People's Republic as the rightful representative of China in the UN and gave it the seat on the Security Council that had been held by the Republic of China, which was expelled from the UN altogether with no opportunity of membership as a separate nation.[22] After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia was recognized as the legal successor state of the Soviet Union and maintained the latter's position on the Security Council.[53] Additionally, France reformed its government into the French Fifth Republic in 1958, under the leadership of Charles de Gaulle. France maintained its seat as there was no change in its international status or recognition, although many of its overseas possessions eventually became independent.[54]

The five permanent members of the Security Council were the victorious powers in World War II[55] and have maintained the world's most powerful military forces ever since. Until 2012 (when Japan surpassed France), they annually topped the list of countries with the highest military expenditures.[56] In 2013, they spent over US$1 trillion combined on defence, accounting for over 55% of global military expenditures (the US alone accounting for over 35%).[56] They are also among the world's largest arms exporters[57] and are the only nations officially recognized as "nuclear-weapon states" under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), though there are other states known or believed to be in possession of nuclear weapons.[58]

Veto power[edit]

Number of resolutions vetoed by each of the five permanent members of the Security Council between 1946 and 2007[59]

Under Article 27 of the UN Charter, Security Council decisions on all substantive matters require the affirmative votes of nine members. A negative vote or "veto" by a permanent member prevents adoption of a proposal, even if it has received the required votes.[52] Abstention is not regarded as a veto in most cases, though all five permanent members must actively concur to amend the UN Charter or to recommend the admission of a new UN member state.[43] Procedural matters are not subject to a veto, so the veto cannot be used to avoid discussion of an issue. The same holds for certain decisions that directly regard permanent members.[52] A majority of vetoes are used not in critical international security situations, but for purposes such as blocking a candidate for Secretary-General or the admission of a member state.[60]

As of 2012, 269 vetoes had been cast since the Security Council's inception.[b] In this period, China (ROC/PRC) used the veto 9 times, France 18, Russia/USSR 128, the UK 32, and the US 89. Roughly two-thirds of Russian/Soviet vetoes were in the first ten years of the Security Council's existence. Between 1996 and 2012, China vetoed 5 resolutions, Russia 7, and the US 13, while France and the UK did not use the veto.[60]

An early veto by Soviet Commissar Andrei Vishinsky blocked a resolution on the withdrawal of French forces from the then-colonies of Syria and Lebanon in February 1946; this veto established the precedent that permanent members could use the veto on matters outside of immediate concerns of war and peace. The USSR went on to veto matters including the admission of Austria, Cambodia, Ceylon, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Laos, Libya, Portugal, South Vietnam, and Transjordan as UN member states, delaying their joining by several years. Britain and France used the veto to avoid Security Council condemnation of their actions in the 1956 Suez Crisis. The first veto by the US came in 1970, blocking General Assembly action in Southern Rhodesia. From 1985–90, the US vetoed 27 resolutions, primarily to block resolutions it perceived as anti-Israel but also to protect its interests in Panama and Korea. The USSR, US, and China have all vetoed candidates for Secretary-General, with the US using the veto to block the re-election of Boutros Boutros-Ghali in 1996.[61]

Non-permanent members[edit]

A chart representing the Security Council seats held by each of the United Nations Regional Groups. The United States, a WEOG observer, is treated as if it were a full member. This is not how the seats are arranged in actual meetings of the Council.
  African Group
  Asia-Pacific Group
  Eastern European Group
  Group of Latin American and Caribbean States (GRULAC)
  Western European and Others Group (WEOG)

Along with the five permanent members, the Security Council has temporary members that hold their seats on a rotating basis by geographic region. In its first two decades, the Security Council had six non-permanent members, the first of which were Australia, Brazil, Egypt, Mexico, the Netherlands, and Poland. In 1965, the number of non-permanent members was expanded to ten.[62]

These ten non-permanent members are elected by the General Assembly for two-year terms starting on 1 January, with five replaced each year.[63] To be approved, a candidate must receive at least two-thirds of all votes cast for that seat, which can result in deadlock if there are two roughly evenly matched candidates. In 1979, a standoff between Cuba and Colombia only ended after three months and a record 154 rounds of voting; both eventually withdrew in favour of Mexico as a compromise candidate.[64] A retiring member is not eligible for immediate re-election.[65]

The African bloc is represented by three members; the Latin America and the Caribbean, Asian, and Western European and Others blocs by two apiece; and the Eastern European bloc by one. Also, one of the members is an "Arab country", alternately from the Asian or African bloc.[66] Currently, elections for terms beginning in even-numbered years select two African members, and one each within Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean. Terms beginning in odd-numbered years consist of two Western European and Other members, and one each from Asia, Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean.[64]

The current elected members, with the regions they were elected to represent and their Permanent Representatives, are as follows:[63]

President[edit]

The role of president of the Security Council involves setting the agenda, presiding at its meetings and overseeing any crisis. The president is authorized to issue both presidential statements (subject to consensus among Council members) and notes,[67][68] which are used to make declarations of intent that the full Security Council can then pursue.[68] The presidency rotates monthly in alphabetical order of the Security Council member nations' names in English.[69]

Meeting locations[edit]

US President Barack Obama chairs a United Nations Security Council meeting

Unlike the General Assembly, the Security Council meets year-round. Each Security Council member must have a representative available at UN Headquarters at all times in case an emergency meeting becomes necessary.[70]

The Security Council generally meets in a designated chamber in the United Nations Conference Building in New York City, US. The chamber was designed by the Norwegian architect Arnstein Arneberg and was a gift from Norway. The mural painted by the Norwegian artist Per Krohg depicts a phoenix rising from its ashes, symbolic of the world's rebirth after World War II.[71]

The Security Council has also held meetings in cities including Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Panama City, Panama; and Geneva, Switzerland.[70] In March 2010, the Security Council moved into a temporary facility in the General Assembly Building as its chamber underwent renovations as part of the UN Capital Master Plan.[72] The renovations were funded by Norway, the chamber's original donor, for a total cost of US$5million.[73] The chamber reopened on 16 April 2013.[74]

United Nations peacekeepers[edit]

After approval by the Security Council, the UN may send peacekeepers to regions where armed conflict has recently ceased or paused to enforce the terms of peace agreements and to discourage combatants from resuming hostilities. Since the UN does not maintain its own military, peacekeeping forces are voluntarily provided by member states. These soldiers are sometimes nicknamed "Blue Helmets" for their distinctive gear.[75][76] The peacekeeping force as a whole received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1988.[77]

Bolivian "Blue Helmet" at an exercise in Chile

In September 2013, the UN had 116,837 peacekeeping soldiers and other personnel deployed on 15 missions. The largest was the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), which included 20,688 uniformed personnel. The smallest, United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP), included 42 uniformed personnel responsible for monitoring the ceasefire in Jammu and Kashmir. Peacekeepers with the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) have been stationed in the Middle East since 1948, the longest-running active peacekeeping mission.[78]

UN peacekeepers have also drawn criticism in several postings. Peacekeepers have been accused of child rape, soliciting prostitutes, or sexual abuse during various peacekeeping missions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,[79] Haiti,[80] Liberia,[81] Sudan and what is now South Sudan,[82] Burundi and Ivory Coast.[83] Scientists cited UN peacekeepers from Nepal as the likely source of the 2010–13 Haiti cholera outbreak, which killed more than 8,000 Haitians following the 2010 Haiti earthquake.[84]

The budget for peacekeeping is assessed separately from the main UN organisational budget; in the 2013–2014 fiscal year, peacekeeping expenditures totalled $7.54 billion.[78][85] UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale, but including a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. In 2013, the top 10 providers of assessed financial contributions to United Nations peacekeeping operations were the US (28.38%), Japan (10.83%), France (7.22%), Germany (7.14%), the United Kingdom (6.68%), China (6.64%), Italy (4.45%), Russian Federation (3.15%), Canada (2.98%), and Spain (2.97%).[86]

Evaluations[edit]

In examining the first sixty years of the Security Council's existence, British historian Paul Kennedy concludes that "glaring failures had not only accompanied the UN's many achievements, they overshadowed them", identifying the lack of will to prevent ethnic massacres in Bosnia and Rwanda as particular failures.[87] Kennedy attributes the failures to the UN's lack of reliable military resources, writing that "above all, one can conclude that the practice of announcing (through a Security Council resolution) a new peacekeeping mission without ensuring that sufficient armed forces will be available has usually proven to be a recipe for humiliation and disaster."[88]

A 2005 RAND Corporation study found the UN to be successful in two out of three peacekeeping efforts. It compared UN nation-building efforts to those of the United States, and found that seven out of eight UN cases are at peace, as compared with four out of eight US cases at peace.[89] Also in 2005, the Human Security Report documented a decline in the number of wars, genocides and human rights abuses since the end of the Cold War, and presented evidence, albeit circumstantial, that international activism—mostly spearheaded by the UN—has been the main cause of the decline in armed conflict since the end of the Cold War.[90]

Scholar Sudhir Chella Rajan argued in 2006 that the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, who are all nuclear powers, have created an exclusive nuclear club that predominately addresses the strategic interests and political motives of the permanent members—for example, protecting the oil-rich Kuwaitis in 1991 but poorly protecting resource-poor Rwandans in 1994.[91] Since three of the five permanent members are also European, and three or four are predominantly white Western nations, the Security Council has been described as a pillar of global apartheid by Titus Alexander, former Chair of Westminster United Nations Association.[92]

The Security Council's effectiveness and relevance is questioned by some because, in most high-profile cases, there are essentially no consequences for violating a Security Council resolution. During the Darfur crisis, Janjaweed militias, allowed by elements of the Sudanese government, committed violence against an indigenous population, killing thousands of civilians. In the Srebrenica massacre, Serbian troops committed genocide against Bosniaks, although Srebrenica had been declared a UN “safe area” and was even “protected” by 400 armed Dutch peacekeepers.[93] The UN Charter gives all three powers of the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches to the Security Council.[94]

In his inaugural speech at the 16th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement in August 2012, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei criticized the United Nations Security Council as having an "illogical, unjust and completely undemocratic structure and mechanism" and called for a complete reform of the body.[95]

The amount of time devoted to the Israeli-Arab conflict in the UNSC has been described as excessive by some pro-Israel political organizations such as the UN Watch[96] and the Anti-Defamation League,[97] and academics such as Alan Dershowitz,[98] Martin Kramer, and Mitchell Bard. This “excessiveness” is partially due to the existence of the Security Council Resolution 1322 (2000), that serves the legal basis for a monthly discussion on this protracted conflict.[99][100] Paragraph 7 stated that “invites the Secretary-General to continue to follow the situation and to keep the Security Council informed.” In accordance with its general practices,[101] it is considered that this issue has to be dealt on a regular basis (i.e. every month). The resolution was adopted with 14 affirmative votes and one abstention.[102] At the 68th Session of the UN General Assembly, New Zealand Prime Minister John Key heavily criticized the UN's inaction on Syria, more than two years after the Syrian civil war began.[103]

Membership reform[edit]

The G4 nations: Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan. Most support one another's bids for permanent seats on the Security Council, though they are heavily opposed by various member nations of the UN.[104]

Proposals to reform the Security Council began with the conference that wrote the UN Charter and have continued to the present day. As British historian Paul Kennedy writes, "Everyone agrees that the present structure is flawed. But consensus on how to fix it remains out of reach."[105]

There has been discussion of increasing the number of permanent members. The countries who have made the strongest demands for permanent seats are Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan. Japan and Germany, the main defeated powers in WWII, are now the UN's second- and third-largest funders respectively, while Brazil and India are two of the largest contributors of troops to UN-mandated peace-keeping missions. This proposal has found opposition in a group of countries called Uniting for Consensus.

Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan asked a team of advisers to come up with recommendations for reforming the United Nations by the end of 2004. One proposed measure is to increase the number of permanent members by five, which, in most proposals, would include Brazil, Germany, India, Japan (known as the G4 nations), one seat from Africa (most likely between Egypt, Nigeria or South Africa) and/or one seat from the Arab League.[106] On 21 September 2004, the G4 nations issued a joint statement mutually backing each other's claim to permanent status, together with two African countries. Currently the proposal has to be accepted by two-thirds of the General Assembly (128 votes).

The permanent members, each holding the right of veto, announced their positions on Security Council reform reluctantly. The United States has unequivocally supported the permanent membership of Japan and lent its support to India and a small number of additional non-permanent members. The United Kingdom and France essentially supported the G4 position, with the expansion of permanent and non-permanent members and the accession of Germany, Brazil, India and Japan to permanent member status, as well as an increase in the presence by African countries on the Council. China has supported the stronger representation of developing countries and firmly opposed Japan's membership.[107]

India's bid for permanent member of UNSC is backed by all permanent members namely France,[108] Russia,[109] the United Kingdom[110] and United States,[111] although the United States initially opposed India's candidacy on grounds of nuclear proliferation, as India has acquired nuclear weapons and not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.[112] On 15 April 2011, China officially expressed its support for an increased Indian role at the United Nations, without explicitly endorsing India's Security Council ambitions.[113][114] However, recently China has expressed its support for Indian candidacy as a permanent member of the Security Council if India revoked its support for Japanese candidacy,[115] thus making India the only candidate that has received support from all permanent members and most other nations as well.

See also[edit]


References[edit]

Notes
  1. ^ Roosevelt suggested the name as an alternative to the name "Associated Powers." British Prime Minister Winston Churchill accepted it, noting that the phase was used by Lord Byron in the poem Childe Harold's Pilgrimage (Stanza 35).[5]
  2. ^ This figure and the figures that follow exclude vetoes cast to block candidates for Secretary-General, as these occur in closed session; 43 such vetoes have occurred.[60]
Citations
  1. ^ Kennedy, p. 5
  2. ^ Kennedy, p. 8
  3. ^ Kennedy, p. 10
  4. ^ Kennedy, pp. 13–24
  5. ^ Manchester and Reid, p. 461
  6. ^ Mires, p. 15
  7. ^ Meisler, p. 9
  8. ^ Meisler, pp. 10–13
  9. ^ a b c d "Milestones in United Nations History". Department of Public Information, United Nations. Retrieved 22 November 2013. 
  10. ^ Schlesinger, p. 196
  11. ^ Meisler, pp. 18–19
  12. ^ "What is the Security Council?". United Nations. Retrieved 24 November 2013. 
  13. ^ Meisler, p. 35
  14. ^ Meisler, pp. 58–59
  15. ^ Meisler, p. 114
  16. ^ Kennedy, pp. 38, 55–56
  17. ^ a b c "Charter of the United Nations: Chapter VII: Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression". United Nations. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  18. ^ Meisler, pp. 115–134
  19. ^ Kennedy, pp. 61–62
  20. ^ Meisler, pp. 156–57
  21. ^ Kennedy, p. 59
  22. ^ a b Meisler, pp. 195–97
  23. ^ Meisler, pp. 167–68, 224–25
  24. ^ Meisler, p. 286
  25. ^ Fasulo, p. 43; Meisler, p. 334
  26. ^ Meisler, pp. 252–56
  27. ^ Meisler, pp. 264–77
  28. ^ Meisler, p. 334
  29. ^ Kennedy, pp. 66–67
  30. ^ For quotation "worldwide ridicule", see Meisler, p. 293; for description of UN missions in Somalia and Bosnia, see Meisler, pp. 312–29.
  31. ^ Kennedy, p. 104
  32. ^ Kennedy, pp. 110–11
  33. ^ Kennedy, p. 111
  34. ^ "UN failed during final days of Lankan ethnic war: Ban Ki-moon". FirstPost. Press Trust of India. 25 September 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013. 
  35. ^ "Charter of the United Nations: Chapter II: Membership". United Nations. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  36. ^ "Charter of the United Nations: Chapter V: The Security Council". United Nations. Retrieved 9 June 2012. 
  37. ^ Fasulo, p. 46
  38. ^ "Charter of the United Nations: Chapter VI: Pacific Settlement of Disputes". United Nations. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  39. ^ See Fomerand, p. 287; Hillier, p. 568; Köchler, p. 21; Matthews, p. 130; Neuhold, p. 66. For lack of enforcement mechanism, see Magliveras, p. 113.
  40. ^ Zunes, Stephen (Sept. 2004). "International law, the UN and Middle Eastern conflicts". Peace Review 16.3: 285–92. p. 291.
  41. ^ Kennedy, pp. 56–57
  42. ^ "Security Council Approves 'No-Fly Zone' Over Libya, Authorizing 'All Necessary Measures' to Protect Civilians, by Vote of 10 in Favour with 5 Abasentions". United Nations. 17 March 2011. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  43. ^ a b Fomerand, p. 287
  44. ^ Fasulo, p. 39
  45. ^ Article 13 of the Rome Statute. United Nations. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  46. ^ "Security Council Refers Situation in Darfur, Sudan, To Prosecutor of International Criminal Court" (Press release). United Nations Security Council. 31 March 2006. Retrieved 14 March 2007. 
  47. ^ Wadhams, Nick (2 April 2005). "Bush relents to allow UN vote on Sudan war crimes". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 27 November 2013. 
  48. ^ Gray-Block, Aaron and Greg Roumeliotis (27 February 2011). "Q+A: How will the world's war crimes court act on Libya?". Reuters. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  49. ^ "Resolution 1674 (2006)". UN Security Council via Refworld. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  50. ^ Mikulaschek, p. 20
  51. ^ Mikulaschek, p. 49
  52. ^ a b c Fasulo, pp. 40–41
  53. ^ Blum, Yehuda Z (1992). "Russia Takes Over the Soviet Union's Seat at the United Nations" (PDF). European Journal of International Law. 
  54. ^ "Permanent members of the United Nations Security Council". Wikipedia. 2014. 
  55. ^ Kennedy, p. 70
  56. ^ a b "SIPRI Military Expenditure Database". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  57. ^ Nichols, Michelle (27 July 2012). "United Nations fails to agree landmark arms-trade treaty". Reuters. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  58. ^ Medalia, Jonathan (14 November 1996). "92099: Nuclear Weapons Testing and Negotiation of a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty". Global Security. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  59. ^ Global Policy Forum (2008): "Changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto in the Security Council". Retrieved 25 August 2008.
  60. ^ a b c "Changing Patterns in the Use of the Veto in The Security Council" (PDF). Global Policy Forum. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  61. ^ Kennedy, pp. 52–54
  62. ^ "The UN Security Council". United Nations Foundation. Retrieved 15 May 2012. 
  63. ^ a b "Current Members". United Nations. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  64. ^ a b "Special Research Report No. 4Security Council Elections 201121 September 2011". Security Council Report. Retrieved 8 June 2012. 
  65. ^ "Charter of the United Nations: Chapter V: The Security Council". United Nations. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  66. ^ Malone, David (25 October 2003). "Reforming the Security Council: Where Are the Arabs?". The Daily Star (Beirut). Retrieved 3 January 2011. 
  67. ^ "Notes by the president of the Security Council". United Nations. Retrieved 9 June 2012. 
  68. ^ a b "UN Security Council: Presidential Statements 2008". United Nations. Retrieved 9 June 2012. 
  69. ^ "Security Council Presidency in 2011 – United Nations Security Council". United Nations. Retrieved 9 June 2012. 
  70. ^ a b "What is the Security Council?". United Nations. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  71. ^ "The Security Council". United Nations Cyberschoolbus. United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  72. ^ "UN Capital Master Plan Timeline". United Nations. Retrieved 29 September 2013. 
  73. ^ "An unrecognizable Security Council Chamber". Norway Mission to the UN. 28 August 2012. Retrieved 29 September 2013. 
  74. ^ "Secretary-General, at inauguaration of renovated Security Council Chamber, says room speaks 'language of dignity and seriousness'". United Nations. 16 April 2013. Retrieved 26 November 2013. 
  75. ^ Fasulo, p. 52
  76. ^ Coulon, p. ix
  77. ^ Nobel Prize. "The Nobel Peace Prize 1988". Retrieved 3 April 2011. 
  78. ^ a b "United Nations Peacekeeping Operations". United Nations. 30 September 2013. Retrieved 9 November 2013. 
  79. ^ Lynch, Colum (16 December 2004). "U.N. Sexual Abuse Alleged in Congo". The Washington Post. Retrieved 21 November 2013. 
  80. ^ "UN troops face child abuse claims". BBC News. 30 November 2006. Retrieved 21 November 2013. 
  81. ^ "Aid workers in Liberia accused of sex abuse". The New York Times. 8 May 2006. Retrieved 22 November 2013. 
  82. ^ Holt, Kate (4 January 2007). "UN staff accused of raping children in Sudan". The Telegraph. Retrieved 21 November 2013. 
  83. ^ "Peacekeepers 'abusing children'". BBC. 28 May 2007. Retrieved 21 November 2013. 
  84. ^ Watson, Ivan and Joe Vaccarello (10 October 2013). "U.N. sued for 'bringing cholera to Haiti,' causing outbreak that killed thousands". CNN. Retrieved 18 November 2013. 
  85. ^ Fasulo, p. 115
  86. ^ "Financing of UN Peacekeeping Operations". United Nations. Retrieved 9 November 2013. 
  87. ^ Kennedy, pp. 101–03, 110
  88. ^ Kennedy, p. 110
  89. ^ RAND Corporation. "The UN's Role in Nation Building: From the Congo to Iraq" (PDF). Retrieved 30 December 2008. 
  90. ^ Human Security Centre. "The Human Security Report 2005". Retrieved 8 February 2007. 
  91. ^ Rajan, Sudhir Chella (2006). "Global Politics and Institutions" (PDF). GTI Paper Series: Frontiers of a Great Transition (Tellus Institute) 3. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  92. ^ Alexander, Titus (1996). Unravelling Global Apartheid: an overview of world politics. Polity Press. pp. 158–160. 
  93. ^ Deni, John R. (2007). Alliance management and maintenance: Restructuring NATO for the 21st century. Ashgate Publishing. p. 71. ISBN 978-0-7546-7039-1. "As Serbian forces attacked Srebrenica in July 1995, the [400] Dutch soldiers escorted women and children out of the city, leaving behind roughly 7,500 Muslim men who were subsequently massacred by the attacking Serbs." 
  94. ^ Creery, Janet (2004). "Read the fine print first". Peace Magazine (Jan–Feb 1994): 20. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  95. ^ "Supreme Leader’s Inaugural Speech at 16th NAM Summit". Non-Aligned Movement News Agency. Retrieved 31 August 2012.
  96. ^ "UN, Israel & Anti-Semitism". UN Watch. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  97. ^ "Israel at the UN: Progress Amid A History of Bias". The Anti-Defamation League. September 2010. Retrieved 13 June 2011. 
  98. ^ "The United Nations Kangaroo "Investigation" of Israeli War Crimes". The Huffington Post. 30 June 2009. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  99. ^ "Publications on the Middle East (including Israel/Palestine)". Securitycouncilreport.org. Retrieved 13 June 2011. 
  100. ^ "Security Council resolution 1322 (2000)". United Nations. 7 October 2000. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  101. ^ "Charter of the United Nations". Hrweb.org. Retrieved 9 June 2012. 
  102. ^ "Voting record for Security Council resolution 1322 (2000)". United Nations. 7 October 2000. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  103. ^ Key compromises on UN Syria deal. 3 News NZ. 28 September 2013.
  104. ^ Swart, Lydia (24 February 2009). "Countries Welcome Work Plan as Security Council Reform Process Commences New Phase". Center for UN Reform Education. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  105. ^ Kennedy, p. 76
  106. ^ "UN Security Council Reform May Shadow Annan's Legacy". Voice of America. 1 November 2006. Retrieved 11 December 2011. 
  107. ^ "US embassy cables: China reiterates 'red lines'". The Guardian. 29 November 2010. Retrieved 11 December 2011. "[I]t would be difficult for the Chinese public to accept Japan as a permanent member of the UNSC." 
  108. ^ "Latest India News"
  109. ^ "Putin backs India's UN seat bid". BBC News. 4 December 2004. Retrieved 22 May 2010. 
  110. ^ "UNSC without India unrealistic: Brown. The Economic Times.
  111. ^ "Countering China, Obama Backs India for U.N. Council". The New York Times. 8 November 2010.
  112. ^ "U.S. Priorities for a Stronger, More Effective United Nations". U.S. Department of State. 20 June 2005. Archived from the original on 2009-01-15. 
  113. ^ "China and Russia officially endorse India's place in UN Security Council". Business Standard. 15 April 2011. 
  114. ^ "China backs India's aspiration for greater role in UN". Daily News and Analysis. 
  115. ^ Krishnan, Ananth (16 July 2011). "China ready to support Indian bid for UNSC". The Hindu (Chennai, India). 
Bibliography
  • Coulon, Jocelyn. Soldiers of Diplomacy: The United Nations, Peacekeeping, and the New World Order. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998.
  • Fasulo, Linda. An Insider's Guide to the UN. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.
  • Fomerand, Jacques. The A to Z of the United Nations. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2009.
  • Hillier, Timothy. Sourcebook on Public International Law. London: Cavendish Publishing, 1998.
  • Kennedy, Paul. The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations. New York: Random House, 2006.
  • Köchler, Hans. The Concept of Humanitarian Intervention in the Context of Modern Power. Vienna: International Progress Organization, 2001.
  • Magliveras, Konstantinos D. Exclusion from Participation in International Organisations. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1999.
  • Manchester, William and Reid, Paul. The Last Lion: Defender of the Realm vol. 3. New York: Little Brown and Company, 2012.
  • Matthews, Ken. The Gulf Conflict and International Relations. London: Routledge, 1993.
  • Meisler, Stanley. United Nations: The First Fifty Years. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1995.
  • Mikulaschek, Christoph. "Report from the 39th International Peace Institute Vienna Seminar on Peacemaking and Peacekeeping". The United Nations Security Council and the Responsibility to Protect: Policy, Process, and Practice. Vienna: Diplomatic Academy of Vienna, 2010.
  • Mires, Charlene. Capital of the World: The Race to Host the United Nations. New York: New York University Press, 2013.
  • Neuhold, Hanspeter. "The United Nations System for the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes", in Cede, Franz & Sucharipa-Behrmann, Lilly. The United Nations. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001.
  • Schlesinger, Stephen C. Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2003.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]