Unmanned combat air vehicle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A MQ-9 Reaper during a training mission

An unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV), also known as a combat drone or drone, is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that is usually armed. Aircraft of this type have no onboard human pilot.[1] Drones are usually under real-time human control, with "the human's role in UCAV system [varying] according to levels of autonomy of UCAV and data communication requirement[s]".[2]

Equipment necessary for a human pilot (such as the cockpit, armor, ejection seat, flight controls, and environmental controls for pressure and oxygen) are not needed, as the operator runs the vehicle from a remote terminal, resulting in a lower weight and size than a manned aircraft. Common UAVs that rely on a single propeller engine are slower and less maneuverable than manned high performance aircraft.[3]

As of November 2013, only three nations kill with drones: the USA, the UK, and Israel.[4] But this number is expected to increase.

History[edit]

One of the earliest explorations of the concept of the combat drone was by Dr. Lee De Forest, an early inventor of radio devices, and U. A. Sanabria, a TV engineer. They presented their idea in an article in a 1940 publication of Popular Mechanics.[5] The modern military drone as known today was the brainchild of John Stuart Foster Jr., a nuclear physicist and former head of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (then called the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory).[6] In 1971, Foster was a model airplane hobbyist and had the idea this hobby could be applied to building weapons.[6] He drew up plans and by 1973 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) built two prototypes called "Praeire" and "Calere", they were powered by a modified lawn-mower engine and could stay aloft for two hours while carrying 28-pounds of load.[6]

In the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israel used unarmed U.S. Ryan Firebee target drones to spur Egypt into firing its entire arsenal of anti-aircraft missiles. This mission was accomplished with no injuries to Israeli pilots, who soon exploited the depleted Egyptian defenses. In the late 1970s and 80s, Israel developed the Scout and the Pioneer, which represented a shift toward the lighter, glider-type model of UAV in use today. Israel pioneered the use of Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for real-time surveillance, electronic warfare, and decoys.[7][8][9] The images and radar decoying provided by these UAVs helped Israel to completely neutralize the Syrian air defenses in Operation Mole Cricket 19 at the start of the 1982 Lebanon War, resulting in no pilots downed.[10]

In the late 1980s, Iran deployed a drone armed with six RPG-7 rounds in the Iran–Iraq War. This was the first time an armed drone was used in war.[11]

Impressed by Israel's success, the US quickly acquired a number of UAVs, and its Hunter and Pioneer systems are direct derivatives of Israeli models. The first 'UAV war' was the first Gulf War: according to a May 1991 Department of the Navy report: "At least one UAV was airborne at all times during Desert Storm." After the Gulf War successfully demonstrated their utility, global militaries invested widely in the domestic development of combat UAVs.[12]

In recent years the U.S. has increased its use of drone strikes in Pakistan as part of the War on Terrorism.

Future models[edit]

A BAE Raven during flight testing
The EADS Barracuda on the Manching Air Base in Germany

Overview[edit]

Note: Some of these are not aircraft prototypes but technology demonstrators (TD) that are not expected to enter service.

Name Manufacturer(s) Developing nation(s)
A-10PCAS Elbit Systems Israel
Sky-X (TD) Alenia Aeronautica Italy
Eitan Israel Aerospace Industries Israel
Harop Israel Aerospace Industries Israel
Burraq Pakistan
AURA Defence Research and Development Organisation India
Taranis (TD) BAE Systems United Kingdom
Dassault nEUROn (TD) Dassault Aviation
Rustom (TD) Defence Research and Development Organisation India
Avenger General Atomics Aeronautical Systems United States
X-47A (TD)/B (TD)/C Northrop Grumman United States
Armstechno Dulo (TD) Armstechno Bulgaria
Bateleur (TD) Denel Dynamics South Africa
Anka-TP (SIHA) Turkish Aerospace Industries Turkey
Ra'd[13] Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran Iran
Karrar[14] Iran Iran
Sofreh Mahi[15] Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industrial Company Iran
Shahed 129[16] Shahed Aviation Industries Research Center Iran
Barracuda (TD) EADS
Skat[17] Mikoyan Russia

Various Chinese UCAV concepts have also materialized.[citation needed] WZ-2000, UCAV versions of the Xianglong high altitude are long endurance UAV. Also, dedicated UCAV's Shenyang's Dark Sword (Anjian), and also revealed at Zhuhai 2008 was a model of a stealth strike UCAV with forward swept wings, filling a similar niche to U.S. X-45 called the Warrior Eagle.

BAE Taranis[edit]

BAE Taranis model, one of the largest design concepts
Main article: BAE Taranis

Taranis is a British demonstrator programme for unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV) technology. It is part of the UK's Strategic Unmanned Air Vehicle (Experimental) programme (SUAV[E]). BAE describes Taranis's role in this context as following: "This £124m four year programme is part of the UK Government's Strategic Unmanned Air Vehicle Experiment (SUAVE) and will result in a UCAV demonstrator with fully integrated autonomous systems and low observable features." The Taranis demonstrator will have an MTOW (Maximum Takeoff Weight) of about 8000 kilograms and be of comparable size to the BAE Hawk – making it one of the world's largest UAVs. It will be stealthy, fast, and able to deploy a range of munitions over a number of targets, as well as being capable of defending itself against manned and other unmanned enemy aircraft. The first steel was cut in September 2007 and ground testing started in early 2009. The first flight of the Taranis took place in August 2013 in Woomera, Australia.[18] The demonstrator will have two internal weapons bays. With the inclusion of "full autonomy" the intention is thus for this platform to be able to "think for itself" for a large part of the mission.[citation needed]

J-UCAS[edit]

J-UCAS Boeing X-45A UCAV technology demonstrator

Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems, or J-UCAS, was the name for the joint U.S. Navy/U.S. Air Force unmanned combat air vehicle procurement project. J-UCAS was managed by DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. In the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review, the J-UCAS program was terminated.[19] The program would have used stealth technologies and allowed UCAVs to be armed with precision-guided weapons such as Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) or precision miniature munitions, such as the Small-Diameter Bomb, which are used to suppress enemy air defenses. Controllers could have used real-time data sources, including satellites, to plan for and respond to changes on and around the battlefield.

The program was later revitalized into UCAS-D, a United States Navy program designed to develop a carrier-based unmanned aircraft.[20]

N-UCAS[edit]

UCAS-D and Northrop Grumman X-47B are the U.S. Navy-only successors to the J-UCAS, which was cancelled in 2006. Boeing is also working on the X-45N in this sector.

In a New Year 2011 editorial titled "China's Naval Ambitions", The New York Times said "[t]he Pentagon must accelerate efforts to make American naval forces in Asia less vulnerable to Chinese missile threats by giving them the means to project their deterrent power from further offshore. Cutting back purchases of the Navy's DDG-1000 destroyer (with its deficient missile defense system) was a first step. A bigger one would be to reduce the Navy's reliance on short-range manned strike aircraft like the F-18 and the F-35, in favor of the carrier-launched N-UCAS ...."[21]

On 6 January 2011, the DOD announced that this would be one area of additional investment in the 2012 budget request.[22]

USAF Hunter-Killer[edit]

Main article: USAF Hunter-Killer

The United States Air Force has shifted its UCAV program from medium-range tactical strike aircraft to long-range strategic bombers.[19] The technology of the Long Range Strike program is based on the Lockheed Martin Polecat demonstrator.

Sagem Sperwer[edit]

Sagem Sperwer B (not weaponized on this photo)
Main article: SAGEM Sperwer

The Sagem Sperwer B is a long endurance tactical UAV capable of surveillance and armed combat missions. The Sperwer B improves on its predecessor, the Sperwer A, with twice the payload capacity and twice the endurance, offering a 100 kg payload and 12 hours of sustained flight. It can be outfitted with electro-optic/infrared sensors, electronic and communications intelligence (ELINT/COMINT), synthetic aperture radar (SAR), as well as weapons payloads such as the Rafael Spike-LR anti-tank missile and the Bonus munition from Nexter/BAE Systems Bofors.[23] All ground facilities of the Sperwer A (used by France, Netherlands, Sweden, Greece, Canada and Denmark) are compatible with the Sperwer B.

Elbit Hermes 450[edit]

Main article: Elbit Hermes 450

The Israeli Air Force, which operates a squadron of Hermes 450s out of Palmachim Airbase south of Tel Aviv, has adapted the Hermes 450 for use as an assault UAV, reportedly equipping it with two Hellfire missiles or, according to various sources, two Rafael-made missiles. According to Israeli, Palestinian, Lebanese and independent reports, the Israeli assault UAV has seen extensive service in the Gaza Strip and was used intensively in the Second Lebanon War. Israel has not denied this capability, but to date, its policy has been not to officially confirm it either.[citation needed]

Lethal Miniature Aerial Munition System (LMAMS)[edit]

The LMAMS is a man-carried missile with many UAV characteristics such as loitering time and a hand-held ground station.[24][25]

F-16[edit]

In 2013 Boeing retrofitted retired multiple Lockheed Martin F-16s (re-designated QF-16) with UAV technology. The company demonstrated combat maneuvers including barrel rolls and a "split S" (where the aircraft turns upside down and flies a descending half-loop, reversing direction) and a perfect center line landing. During the test flight, the plane cruised at 40,000 feet (12,000 m) and reached speeds of Mach 1.47. The aircraft reached 7Gs of acceleration, but was expected to operate at 9Gs. The existing six QF-16s will be augmented in 2015.[26][irrelevant citation]

Proliferation[edit]

Countries with known operational armed drones:

Laws and ethics of war[edit]

The international laws of war (such as the Geneva Conventions) govern the conduct of participants in war (and also define combatants). These laws place a burden upon participants to limit civilian deaths and injuries through proper identification of targets and distinction between combatants and non-combatants. The use of completely autonomous weapon systems is problematic, however, because of the difficulty in assigning accountability to a person. Therefore, current designs still incorporate an element of human control (a "man in the loop") – meaning that a ground controller must authorize weapons release.

Concerns also include the human controller's role, because if he is a civilian and not a member of the military (which is quite possible with developmental and highly sophisticated weapons systems) he would be considered a combatant under international law which carries a distinct set of responsibilities and consequences. It is for this reason that the "man in the loop" should ideally be a member of the military that understands and accepts his role as combatant.[38]

Controllers can also experience psychological stress from the combat they are involved in. A few may even experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).[39][40]

Professor Shannon E. French, the director of the Center for Ethics and Excellence at Case Western Reserve University and a former professor at the U.S. Naval Academy, wonders if the PTSD may be rooted in a suspicion that something else was at stake. According to Professor French, the author of the 2003 book The Code of the Warrior (ISBN 0847697568):[41]

If [I'm] in the field risking and taking a life, there's a sense that I'm putting skin in the game ... I'm taking a risk so it feels more honorable. Someone who kills at a distance—it can make them doubt. Am I truly honorable?

On 28 October 2009, United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Philip Alston, presented a report to the Third Committee (social, humanitarian and cultural) of the General Assembly arguing that the use of unmanned combat air vehicles for targeted killings should be regarded as a breach of international law unless the United States can demonstrate appropriate precautions and accountability mechanisms are in place.[42]

The Missile Technology Control Regime applies to UCAVs.

Collateral damage of civilians still takes place with drone combat, although some (like John O. Brennan) have argued that it greatly reduces the likelihood.[43] Although drones enable advance tactical surveillance and up-to-the-minute data, flaws can become apparent.[44] The U.S. drone program in Pakistan has killed several dozen civilians accidentally.[45] An example is the operation in 2010 Feb near Khod, in Urozgan Province, Afghanistan. Over ten civilians in a three-vehicle convoy travelling from Daykundi Province were accidentally killed after a drone crew misidentified the civilians as hostile threats. A force of Bell OH-58 Kiowa helicopters, who were attempting to protect ground troops fighting several km away, fired AGM-114 Hellfire missiles at the vehicles.[46][47]

In January 2010, the American Civil Liberties Union sued the CIA to force them to turn over documents relating to the Obama Administration's use of drones in "targeted killings."[48] They won the case in March 2013; whether the CIA has since turned over the requested documents is unclear.[49]

As of March 2013, the evolution of laws governing drones use continued to be debated.[50][51]

In July 2013, former Pentagon lawyer Jeh Johnson said, on a panel at the Aspen Institute's Security Forum, that he felt an emotional reaction upon reading Nasser al-Awlaki's account of how his 16-year-old grandson was killed by a U.S. drone.[52]

In December 2013, a U.S. drone strike in Radda, capital of Yemen's Bayda province, killed members of a wedding party.[53] The following February, Human Rights Watch published a 28-page report reviewing the strike and its legality, among other things. Titled "A Wedding That Became A Funeral", the report concludes that some (but not necessarily all) of the casualties were civilians, not the intended regional Al-Qaeda targets. The organization demanded US and Yemeni investigations into the attack. In its research, HRW "found no evidence that the individuals taking part in the wedding procession posed an imminent threat to life. In the absence of an armed conflict, killings them would be a violation of international human rights law."[54]

Professor Faisal Kutty of Valparaiso University Law School argues that the use of drones creates "blowback" and undermines core principles of American identity.[55] He cites statistics from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism,[56] Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the findings of reports issued by Henry L. Stimson Center[57] and a joint report issued by Stanford Law School and New York University School of Law[58] to make his case.[55] The Stimson report was issued by a bipartisan ten-member panel (co-chaired by John Abizaid, a retired US Army general and former chief of US Central Command and Professor Rosa Brooks from Georgetown). The report unequivocally concluded that "The United States should not conduct a long-term killing program based on secret rationales."[57] Kutty also pointed to an op-ed published by two members of the panel, John B Bellinger III, former legal counsel to the White House National Security Council and Jeff Smith, former legal counsel to the CIA, who wrote arguing that a long-term, secret US drone programme, even if authorised under US law and defensible under international law, may not be consistent with "more basic rule-of-law principles that are at the core of the American identity and that we seek to promote around the world."[55]

Political and personal effects[edit]

As a new weapon, drones are having unforeseen political effects. Some scholars have argued that the extensive use of drones will undermine the popular legitimacy of local governments, which are blamed for permitting the strikes. The case study for this analysis is Yemen, where drone strikes seem to be increasing resentment against the Yemeni government as well as against the U.S.[59]

Some leaders worry about the effect drone warfare will have on soldiers' psychology. Keith Shurtleff, an army chaplain at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, worries "that as war becomes safer and easier, as soldiers are removed from the horrors of war and see the enemy not as humans but as blips on a screen, there is very real danger of losing the deterrent that such horrors provide".[60] Similar worries surfaced when "smart" bombs began to be used extensively in the First Gulf War.

Mark Bowden has disputed this viewpoint saying in his The Atlantic article, "But flying a drone, [the pilot] sees the carnage close-up, in real time—the blood and severed body parts, the arrival of emergency responders, the anguish of friends and family. Often he’s been watching the people he kills for a long time before pulling the trigger. Drone pilots become familiar with their victims. They see them in the ordinary rhythms of their lives—with their wives and friends, with their children. War by remote control turns out to be intimate and disturbing. Pilots are sometimes shaken."[61]

This assessment is corroborated by a sensor operator’s account:

The smoke clears, and there’s pieces of the two guys around the crater. And there’s this guy over here, and he’s missing his right leg above his knee. He’s holding it, and he’s rolling around, and the blood is squirting out of his leg … It took him a long time to die. I just watched him.

Airman First Class Brandon Bryant in GQ[62]

Cultural and career issues have led to a shortfall in USAF drone operators, which is seen as a "dead end job".[63]

Public opinion summary[edit]

In February 2013, Fairleigh Dickinson University's PublicMind poll conducted a study to measure U.S. public opinion on the use of drones. The study was conducted nationwide, and it asked registered voters whether they "approve or disapprove of the U.S. Military using drones to carry out attacks abroad on people and other targets deemed a threat to the U.S.?" The results showed that three in every four (75%) of voters approved of the U.S. Military using drones to carry out attacks, while (13%) disapproved.[64]

Another poll in February 2013 conducted by the Huffington Post was more equivocal: 56% of Americans support using drones to kill "high level terrorists," 13% support using drones to kill "anyone associated with terrorists," 16% thought no one should be killed with drones, and 15% were not sure. [65]

In Europe, support for drones is far lower. A Pew Research study of 20 countries in 2012 found "widespread international opposition" to US drone killings.[66][67]

Drone carrier ships[edit]

In March 2013 DARPA began efforts to develop a fleet of small naval vessels capable of launching and retrieving combat drones without the need for large and expensive aircraft carriers.[68]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ dowd, alan. "Drone wars: risks and warnings". Retrieved 03/04/2014. 
  2. ^ "The Simulation of the Human-Machine Partnership in UCAV Operation". College of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China. Retrieved 7 February 2013. 
  3. ^ ugur, Ozdemir. "Design of commercial Hybird VTOL systems". 
  4. ^ http://truth-out.org/news/item/19904-how-europeans-are-opposing-drone-and-robot-warfare-an-overview-of-the-anti-drone-movement-in-europe
  5. ^ "Robot Television Bomber" Popular Mechanics June 1940
  6. ^ a b c Fred Kaplan (June 7, 2013). "The World as Free-Fire Zone". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved June 17, 2013. 
  7. ^ "A Brief History of UAVs". 
  8. ^ "Russia Buys A Bunch Of Israeli UAVs". 
  9. ^ Azoulai, Yuval (October 24, 2011). "Unmanned combat vehicles shaping future warfare". Globes. 
  10. ^ Levinson, Charles (January 13, 2010). "Israeli Robots Remake Battlefield". The Wall Street Journal. p. A10. Retrieved January 13, 2010. 
  11. ^ Haghshenass, Fariborz (September 2008), "Iran's Asymmetric Naval Warfare", Policy Focus (The Washington Institute for Near East Policy) (87): 17 
  12. ^ "UAV evolution – how natural selection directed the drone revolution". 15 November 2012. 
  13. ^ "Iran builds own aerial drones with strike capabilities | Defense | RIA Novosti". En.rian.ru. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  14. ^ "Iran unveils first bomber drone". BBC News. 22 August 2010. 
  15. ^ 'Sofreh Mahi': The Radar Evading UAV from Iran
  16. ^ "Iran’s Shahed-129 Combat Drone to Enter Serial Production". defense-update.com. Retrieved 2013-10-02. 
  17. ^ Mikoyan-Gurevitch Skat in Aviation Week[dead link]
  18. ^ Farmer, Ben (6 February 2014) Successful test flight for Taranis stealth drone Daily Telegraph, Page 12
  19. ^ a b "Pentagon Sets Plan For New Bomber, Terminates J-UCAS Program", by Jason Sherman, GlobalSecurity.org, 13 January 2006
  20. ^ "Carrier UCAVs: The Return of UCAS", Defense Industry Daily, 7 February 2010
  21. ^ Editorial, The New York Times, January 1, 2011 (January 2, 2011 p. WK7 NY ed.). Retrieved 2011-01-02.
  22. ^ "Gates Reveals Budget Efficiencies, Reinvestment Possibilities". Defense.gov. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  23. ^ "Sperwer Tactical Unmanned Air Vehicle, France". army-technology.com. Retrieved 2/7/13. 
  24. ^ "Request for Information (RFI) - A Lethal Miniature Aerial Munition System (LMAMS)". United States Army, 5 February 2010.
  25. ^ Eshel, Tamir. "Aerovironment, Textron Systems, IAT to Deliver Lethal Mini-Drone Prototypes in Four Months". Defense-Update, 31 December 2010.
  26. ^ "Poverty: Growth or safety net?". The Economist. 2013-09-21. Retrieved 2013-10-04. 
  27. ^ "PICTURE: Germany's first Heron UAV emerges". Flightglobal.com. 2010-02-19. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  28. ^ "Defence Industry Daily: Israel sells heron UAVs to India and Australia". Strategypage.com. 2005-11-11. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  29. ^ "India joins select group to develop UCAV technology". The Hindu. 27 August 2007. 
  30. ^ "N. Korea developing unmanned attack aircraft from U.S. drones: source". Yonhap. 2012-02-05. Retrieved 19 June 2012. 
  31. ^ SEBASTIAN ABBOT November 17, 2012 3:21 PM (2012-11-17). "Pakistan struggles in race to develop armed drones - Yahoo News". News.yahoo.com. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  32. ^ (14 July 2014) Israel downs Gaza drone as suspects in Palestinian's killing appear in court The Globe and Mail/ Associated Press, Retrieved 18 July 2014
  33. ^ Zitun, Yoav (14 July 2014) Hamas claims multiple UAVs launched into Israel YNet News, Retrieved 18 July 2014
  34. ^ "Israel and Russia in UAV Deal". Defenseindustrydaily.com. 2011-05-30. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  35. ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAJlgahx-x8%7CTaiwan conceptual UAVs and UCAVs
  36. ^ http://zuilon2000.pixnet.net/album/photo/158242292-photo-0633.jpg%7C2011 TADTE from Taipei
  37. ^ "Fixed Wing UAV: Buraq | Tunisia Aero Technologies Industries S.A". Tati-uas.com. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  38. ^ Legal Implications of the Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicle – Air & Space Power Journal
  39. ^ David Zucchino (March 18, 2012). "Stress of combat reaches drone crews". Los Angeles Times. 
  40. ^ Rachel Martin (Dec 19, 2011). "Report: High Levels Of 'Burnout' In U.S. Drone Pilots". NPR. 
  41. ^ Blake, John (March 9, 2013). "Two enemies discover a 'higher call' in battle". CNN. Retrieved 2013-03-09. 
  42. ^ "UN News Centre, "UN rights expert voices concern over use of unmanned drones by United States", 28 October 2009". Un.org. 2009-10-28. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  43. ^ John O. Brennan (30 April 2012). "The Ethics and Efficacy of the President's Counterterrorism Strategy". Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Retrieved 1 May 2012. 
  44. ^ Owens, Hudson L.; Flannes, M. (2011). "Drone Warfare: Blowback from the New American Way of War". Middle East Policy 18: 122–132. 
  45. ^ Alex Rodriguez; David Zucchino; David S. Cloud (May 2, 2010). "U.S. drone attacks in Pakistan get mixed response". Los Angeles Times. p. 2. 
  46. ^ Anatomy of an Afghan war tragedy, David S. Cloud, Los Angeles Times, April 10, 2011
  47. ^ Drone operators blamed in airstrike that killed Afghan civilians in February, Karin Brulliard, The Washington Post, Sunday, May 30, 2010
  48. ^ http://rt.com/usa/cia-drone-program-aclu-516/
  49. ^ http://rt.com/usa/cia-drone-program-aclu-516/
  50. ^ What Rules Should Govern US Drone Attacks? April 4, 2013 Kenneth Roth in The New York Review of Books
  51. ^ "Mounting Criticism Sparks Push to Move Lethal Program to Military From CIA" March 21, 2013 The Wall Street Journal
  52. ^ Michael Isikoff: Ex-Pentagon official has 'heavy heart' over US teen's inadvertent killing by drone
  53. ^ [Yemeni] Official: U.S. drone attack in Yemen kills wedding guests - AP, December 12, 2013
  54. ^ "A Wedding That Became A Funeral: US Drone Attack on Marriage Procession in Yemen". Human Rights Watch. 19 February 2014. Retrieved 20 July 2014. 
  55. ^ a b c "The drone `blowback'"
  56. ^ "Covert Drone War"
  57. ^ a b "Recommendations And Report Of The Stimson Task Force On US Drone Policy"
  58. ^ "Living Under Drones"
  59. ^ Smith, Jordan Michael (5 September 2012). "Drone "blowback" is real A new analysis finds five ways drone strikes in Yemen are hurting American interests". Salon.com. Retrieved 8 September 2012. 
  60. ^ Cole, Jim and Chris Wright. "Drone Wars UK". January 2010. http://dronewarsuk.wordpress.com/aboutdrone/
  61. ^ Mark Bowden. "The Killing Machines - Mark Bowden". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  62. ^ Confessions of a Drone Warrior
  63. ^ 8/21/13 5:44pm 8/21/13 5:44pm. "Nobody Wants to Fly Air Force Drones Because It's a Dead End Job.". Gizmodo.com. Retrieved 2013-09-22. 
  64. ^ Fairleigh Dickinson University's PublicMind, (February 7, 2013). Public says it's illegal to target Americans abroad as some question CIA drone attacks (press release)
  65. ^ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/drone-program-poll_n_2696352.html
  66. ^ http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/02/06/u-s-use-of-drones-under-new-scrutiny-has-been-widely-opposed-abroad/
  67. ^ http://truth-out.org/news/item/19904-how-europeans-are-opposing-drone-and-robot-warfare-an-overview-of-the-anti-drone-movement-in-europe
  68. ^ "Darpa looks to use small ships as drone bases". BBC. 4 March 2013. Retrieved 4 March 2013. 

External links[edit]