Usenet Death Penalty
On Usenet, the Usenet Death Penalty (or UDP) is a final penalty that may be issued against Internet service providers or single users who produce too much spam or fail to adhere to Usenet standards. Messages that fall under the jurisdiction of a Usenet Death Penalty will be cancelled. Cancelled messages are deleted from Usenet servers and not allowed to propagate. This causes users on the affected ISP to be unable to post to Usenet, and it puts pressure on the ISP to change their policies. Notable cases include actions taken against UUNET, CompuServe, and Excite@Home.
There are three types of Usenet Death Penalty:
- Active: with an active UDP, messages that fall under the UDP will be automatically cancelled by third parties or their agents, such as by using cancelbots.
- Passive: with a passive UDP, messages that fall under the UDP will simply be ignored and will not spread.
- Partial: a partial UDP applies only to a certain subset of newsgroups, not the entire Usenet newsgroup hierarchy.
To be effective, the UDP must be supported by a large number of servers, or the majority of the major transit servers. Otherwise, the articles will propagate throughout the smaller, slower peerings. UDPs are not casual acts. They are announced beforehand, only after the owner of the offending server has been contacted and given several chances to correct the perceived problem. Since the effects on the users of a server under a UDP can be significant, if the users want to post, the impact of a UDP can induce the operators of an offending server to address problems quickly.
The first UDP software was written by Karl Kleinpaste in 1990, though there is disagreement when the term itself was coined: the Net Abuse FAQ claims 1993, but a message posted on 18 August of that year claims that it was coined "years earlier" by Eliot Lear.
A UDP was implemented against UUNET on 1 August 1997 after it became a host for many spammers and was unresponsive to abuse complaints. It forced the provider to implement antispam policies and tools and close their open relays. Executives called the UDP "digital terrorism", threatened legal action, and asserted they had been planning to move against spammers anyway. As the volume of spam from UUNET decreased, the organizers called off the penalty on August 6, though their announcement was stifled by cancel messages from UDP opponents.
An active UDP was implemented against CompuServe on 18 November 1997, which was lifted the following day after the company implemented anti-spamming measures and instituted a new acceptable use policy addressing spamming.
A UDP scheduled to begin against Excite@Home on 19 January 2000 was lifted the day before it was scheduled to begin after the ISP began scanning for the misconfigured proxy servers on home users' computers which it blamed for spam originating from its network.
- Patrizio, Andy (13 January 2000). "Dead ISP Walking". Wired.com. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
- Net Abuse FAQ[dead link]
- Rich Salz posting including a perl script used to implement a UDP
- Frauenfelder, Mark (1 August 1997). "UUNET Given the 'Death Penalty'". Wired. Archived from the original on 16 December 2004. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
- "Information about the UUNet UDP". Retrieved 5 June 2011.
- Komblum, Janet (7 August 1997). "Word of UUNet truce stifled". CNET News. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
- Pappalardo, Denise; Wallack, Todd (11 August 1997), "Antispammers take matters into their own hands", Network World: 8
- Komblum, Janet (6 August 1997). "Death penalty lifted against UUNet". CNET News. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
- Komblum, Janet (18 November 1997). "CompuServe given "death penalty"". CNET News. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
- Komblum, Janet (19 November 1997). "CompuServe "death penalty" lifted". CNET News. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
- Mack, Jennifer (14 January 2000). "@Home-Usenet scuffle could be settled". ZDNet. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
- Grice, Corey; Hu, Jim (18 January 2000). "Excite@Home Usenet death penalty lifted". CNET News. Retrieved 31 January 2015.