User:Noosphere
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| WPC |
This user will get around to being a member of the Wikipedian Procrastination Club |
|
| Non Commercial |
This User is against commercials in Wikipedia. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Legalize |
This user supports the legalization of all drugs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This user is old enough to remember what a typewriter is, and that's all you need to know. |
|
|
|
| C |
This user can program in C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| bash |
This user is a bash scripter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| sgn-1 |
This user can communicate at a basic level in ASL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WikiProject Philosophy task list
- Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
- Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
- Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'marxist theory'- although it's an important component of marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the articles weight on Marx is also absurd.
- German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
- Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
- Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
- Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
- Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
- Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
- Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
- Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
- Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
- Amorality This page needs great attention as it is currently totally uninformative and, in my opinion, risks more to confuse readers than inform them, as most people will come here with no knowledge of amoralism and worse, often with huge bias against it.
- Percept The proposed content needs attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only a start in overhaul of perception and related articles.
Edit this list | To do | stubs | Article alerts | Cleanup listing | Category | Portal | RFC | Deletion | Requested articles | Discussion
|
[edit] Honors
-
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar. For defending the place of the encyclopedia as an aggregator and disseminator of information (and not as an entity to be governed by moral laws), at WP:NOT EVIL and elsewhere. Joe 03:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
-
I hereby award you the Barnstar of Diligence, regarding this piece of work. The Barnstar of Diligence Award is given to those individuals who have a harmonic combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. (awarded by RyanFreisling)
