User:AndyTheGrump/OnlineFlorists
Wikipedia articles on online florists: they may be excessively promotional:
Ready Flowers: the one that caught my attention. Gutted after fruitless discussion with the boss.
1800 flowers: NASDAQ company - needs sources for some material, but at first glance not too bad. I need to investigate further though.
Interflora: There appears to be a book on the subject - is this RS? Much of the history section seems to be lacking proper references.
Petals Network: Sourced, but not properly formatted (inline URLs etc) - needs checking against sources and depuffing.
Florists' Transworld Delivery: Sourced. Not particularly promotional.
Teleflora: ! needs attention - reader commentary about 'hearsay' added to article! fixed that bit.
ProFlowers: Messy. Lots of negative stuff re lawsuits etc. A bit of a minefield... cleaned up by User:Theroadislong :)
Beneva Flowers: Promotional, questionable sourcing. Seems to have survived an AfD. [1] I've cleaned up a bit, and tagged {{refimprove}}. Wants watching.
Bloomex: Poor sourcing, but seems fairly neutral - lots of edit page talk, and seems to have been cleaned up recently.
Arena Flowers New article Feb 2014. Usual puffery - removed the worst
The Online flower delivery article needs sourcing too - it is tagged as OR.
There may well be other articles on online florists see Category:Florists, Category:Florist companies, Category:Commerce websites
Floristry needs watching for plugging of companies.