User talk:BlackJack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:BlackJack)
Jump to: navigation, search
This editor is a Master Editor III and is entitled to display this Bufonite Editor Star.
Blackjack! The face cards (Jack, Queen, and King) count as 10 points, and the Ace counts as 1 or 11.
United States Government 1875 reissue of the original 1863 "Black Jack" postage stamp

Contents

Miscellany

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Courtkittie 20:30, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

Sandboxes

Archived topics

Messages

Category:Postage by country

Category:Postage by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 12:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Too late to take part but I wouldn't have opposed the nom. I guess the project outgrew the category which was created seven years ago. ----Jack | talk page 13:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elyard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elyard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Launchballer 13:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I removed the speedy deletion nomination, as the player clear meets the WP Cricket's notability criteria. JH (talk page) 18:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. He definitely played a first-class match. --Jack | talk page 16:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Bowes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Corrected. Jack | talk page 11:18, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Bowes

Not a problem; that to-do list is largely bollocks anyway, and I don't particularly work from it. I might be able to help a bit though, as I have a copy of his (pretty marvellous) autobiography. There was also a nice article in one of the recent Yorkshire CCC yearbooks, and if you have that Gentlemen and Players book, Bowes is in there a lot. If not, ping me for anything I can get for you. It would be nice to go for GA/FA with it. Also, when I worked on Leyland, I used quite a few of the Wisden summaries to avoid getting long lists of stats; Johnlp has the required volumes if you want to go down this road. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

And to be fair, "Sir" hasn't been quite as horrible as I'd expected (although I'm a long way from being a fan), even accounting for Swanton's hagiography. In my book, Walter Robins was far, far worse. Although there was a bit of antagonism between Allen and Yorkshire, I think, particularly with Bowes. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
And I see you have the Bowes autobiography, so ignore that one! (Although mine is signed!) Sarastro1 (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Marshall, actually. See Allen's bibliography if you want details. I can recommend it; it's quite gossipy and lacking on specifics, but worth reading and pulls few punches. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Bandy merger

I propose to merge List of bandy clubs in the United States, American Bandy Association, and American Bandy League into a new article titled, Bandy in the United States. These three articles are all short, with a significant amount of overlap. A single article could include all of the information contained in those three, and present a more robust and better organized view of the topic. Please discuss this proposal at Talk:List of bandy clubs in the United States. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian Imperial Force Touring XI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Referee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Albert Bennett (cricketer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to St Helens
Henry Bennett (cricketer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pilsley, Derbyshire
Mike Beddow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to St Helens
Tom Bailey (cricketer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Preston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

All fixed. Jack | talk page 17:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

English cricket team in Australia and New Zealand in 1878–79 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hoboken
South African cricket team in New Zealand in 1994–95 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ken Rutherford

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Both done. Didn't know there are THREE Hobokens! Jack | talk page 09:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your note

Hi. :) I just noticed this. That was a substitution error at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_league#Copyright_concerns_related_to_your_project. I've fixed it, so if you want to leave a note there now, you certainly can! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

History of Bangladeshi cricket

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of Bangladeshi cricket, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://bangladeshcricketarchive.wordpress.com/2014/04/07/history/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Bangladeshi cricket, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nazimuddin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Jack | talk page 12:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, History of cricket in Bangladesh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, History of cricket in Bangladesh. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – History of Bangladeshi cricket. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of Bangladeshi cricket – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jack | talk page 03:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Young (MCC cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Young (MCC cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young (MCC cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Category 1909 in Ceylon

I happened to notice that you've added the category "1909 in Ceylon" to an article. Unfortunately that category doesn't appear to exist. I don't know whether "1909 in Sri Lanka" exists as an alternative, even though Ceylon wouldn't be renamed Sri Lanka for another 60 or 70 years. JH (talk page) 20:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I'm trying to clarify the history of tours in Ceylon and Sri Lanka which is a bit of a mess. I'm working on tours in all other countries too and a few are now completed. With these ccyy in country categories, the series tend to be incomplete with the missing years awaiting an article that uses them so I need to create this 1909 one along with several others. The switchover from Ceylon to Sri Lanka is in about 1971, I think. Jack | talk page 18:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Copy-paste move

Hi! I'm sure you know that copy-and-paste isn't the way to move an article. I've reversed what you did at History of cricket in Bangladesh and asked for (another!) history merge. If you want to move it to a different title, requested moves is probably the way to go. This clumsily-written note is instead of the template customary in these cases. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I know. The problem was the copyvio investigation and the need to preserve the good content. But I'm happy to have the original article restored without the bad content. Thanks. Jack | talk page 18:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pakistani cricket team in Ceylon in 1948–49, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohammed Saeed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 09:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

English cricket team in Ceylon and Pakistan in 1968–69
added a link pointing to Saeed Ahmed
Pakistani cricket team in Australia in 1978–79
added a link pointing to Majid Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 09:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

No, I'm Spartacus...

I saw. Very droll. I'm getting very confused who I really am, as there was another edit earlier this year that bracketed me with some quite different characters. Ho hum. Johnlp (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

ANI

I'm a bit red-faced, for having failed (along with anyone else, I think) to notify you about the ANI case. However, it didn't take long to figure out what the complainant was up to. The funny thing about sockpuppets and block-evaders is that they often seem to think they're the first ones who ever tried it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

That's certainly true of this one. Repeatedly. No need to apologise as I was keeping tabs on the IP contribs in case he attacked anyone else. All the best. Jack | talk page 12:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

West Indies

Hi Jack. Great work on all the tour articles. Just one question: surely tours of the West Indies should be titled "Team X in the West Indies in YYYY", rather than simply "Team X in West Indies in YYYY"? Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 12:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jenks. Actually, I agree but there was a consensus years ago. I know why. It's because CricketArchive uses titles like "New Zealand in West Indies 2014" and it was thought we should comply with that. If you like, we could take it up at CRIC. What do you think? Jack | talk page 13:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Ah, OK. Thought it might be something like that. Worth taking up at CRIC I think, "in West Indies" just looks so jarring to me. Jenks24 (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for starting the discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
No problem, Jenks. Jack | talk page 08:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Re: Want a good laugh?

Hello me! Yes, I also shouldn't be talking to myself!!! You would really hope people would have better things to be doing with their time, instead of obsessing over you and I and our contributions. I can only imagine this Daft creature is a rather lonesome character. Amusingly, he claims to be watching the Scheldt from his window... yet his IP is coming up near Kidderminster. I think our Daft friend might have gotten himself lost, or confused... either or! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

He claims to be a solicitor and yet he cannot differentiate between a threat, which of necessity pertains to a potential FUTURE action, and a report, in this case information about a PAST action which has probably been done already. Well, I see I have just received his "last-ever message" to me (and he "means it") so I must now face the future without his invaluable guidance and mentoring. How will I cope? As Winston Churchill said, I will just have to KBO, I suppose.
After another short trip to SPI, of course, and this time a request for CU as apparently he has a whole battalion of trolls under his command. You've seen it all before.
Anyway, I've noticed all the categorisation work you've done lately as it has touched on many of the 18th century players and this is good stuff as I think the system needs better and more thorough categorisation as an aid to reader navigation. I've been trying to tie up loose ends and repair categorisation in the international tour articles; working on West Indies at the moment.
All the best. Jack | talk page 08:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes, he left me a most romantic "parting" comment. I though the way he was obsessing he would ask me on a date, alas it's not to be! I do like this though, his comment to you where he says, "As you could not resist more offensive remarks we leave with a list of crimes...". And he claims you have multiple personalities! Who are "we"?
I finally got through MCC category, which took an age and compiled a list of fc MCC cricketers who don't have an article... just 839 players outstanding! I'll try and set up some categories for the early "J Blogs XI" teams. I also have a list of English first-class teams here, but am at a loss of a quick way to find out total matches played, won and lost and overall win/loss %. Liking your tour work, very thorough! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 23:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
I've always found MCC a daunting prospect and not surprised there are so many, especially in the 19th century. I believe we do have articles or stubs about all players up to the early 1830s. Without those, I think your figure would be well over the thousand. I'll keep an eye on the list and see if I can help at some stage but I'll have to finish all the tours first now I've started. For the first-class win/loss stats, you could try the ACS via their website as they just might have something like that. They probably would welcome the enquiry and try to assist. All the best. Jack | talk page 05:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

It was quite interesting, found many who we had done as "J. Smith" who I managed to find their full names and a bit about them, one of them was a Norfolk MP and merchant. Those who say nothing will ever be discovered about them are talking nonsense. On the subject of our Daft friend, it seems his socks are coming out of the drawer. Amusingly he doesn't seem to understand an IP will geolocate him to a rough area... he's not in Belgium or wherever it was he said he is! He's as successful a troll as Cook is a captain! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Exactly. There's always the possibility of finding more information somewhere and it makes complete sense to have a stub set up so that the information can be added in due course. With players, as long as we can confirm he played in a first-class match that is enough for a stub. We must have a lot of these "gentlemen" cricketers who have turned out to be notable in another sphere. I remember one a while back, Methuen or something, and it turned out he already had an article as a politician or whatever.
I think Cook has to go now but the problem is who will take over? Probably Bell, but has he done any captaincy? Maybe they'll have to think back to Mike Brearley and pick someone just as a captain. Andrew Gale, possibly? Jack | talk page 19:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
It's like Welsh (MCC cricketer) who is Richard Welch (cricketer), or A. Buller who is Anthony Buller (MP). If we didn't have these stubs this probably would have been neglected to have been discovered. Setting the inclusion guideline at one fc appearance is practical and very simple! Personally I think the whole Cook/Moores/Downton "experiment" is an abject failure and those three, along with Giles Clarke should resign in shame at the awful team they have produced. I can't see an obvious replacement for captain, this seasons best in the Championship is an Irishman! Pietersen must return, but won't with the clowns in charge of the circus. Oddly Bell averaged 44 with him in the team and 26 with him out of the team. Madness! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
They'll have to persuade Andrew Strauss out of retirement at this rate but you're right that Moores, Downton and Clarke have failed miserably. Can't see them lasting till lunchtime tomorrow in this Test. Jack | talk page 19:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Strauss is part of the problem, Cook was influenced by his useless characterless captaincy. It's a shame Dimitri Mascarenhas was never a Test cricketer, he had Warne's addiction to playing to win, even if it meant losing. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 20:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

All told, we're right back to the problems we had in the eighties and nineties when those "experts" on Sky were playing. We need a Mike Gatting / Ray Illingworth type if there is one out there. Jack | talk page 05:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Jenks have protected the pages. Well they made it past lunch... but that was about it. Shocking shots! But captain useless wants to stay on. Of course he no doubt believes himself to be above criticism and part of the Moores/Downton club. As long as the dressing room is happy and there's no whistling! How a certain Mr Pietersen must be laughing to himself. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 18:10, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English cricket team in India, Pakistan and Ceylon in 1961–62, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imtiaz Ahmed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 08:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English cricket team in the West Indies in 1925–26, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kingston and Georgetown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 05:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English cricket team in South Africa in 1922–23, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Mann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 10:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Indian cricket team in India in 1958–59, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nehru Stadium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 14:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Room for improvement

Hello Jack. I've finally pieced together more or less the stats for every English first-class team. However, in the prose for the list I'm stuggling with sources a little. I don't have the sources at hand to source the expansion of first-class cricket in the main body of writing and wondered whether you would be able to help if you have any written sources which document from Hambledon to Lord's, personal XI's to early county sides, town clubs, formal county matches ect. I've started a little bit here, any help would be appreciated :) Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 12:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@AssociateAffiliate:. Hi AA. First of all, apologies for the long delay in replying. I was on holiday in August when you wrote to me and since then I've been incredibly busy with no time at all for the internet. Well, not for leisure; plenty of development work as I'm helping two members of my family to set up a new business and I'm designing a website for them. Great fun.
For the pre-Wisden period from 1772 to 1863, the best book sources are Arthur Haygarth's Scores and Biographies, G. B. Buckley's two Fresh Light works and the books by F. S. Ashley-Cooper and H. T. Waghorn. However, they don't provide team summaries if that is what you need. You would find scorecards of the vast majority of matches now rated first-class in them, of course. Please note that with Waghorn in particular, care needs to be taken re dating errors and the like. Can you let me know of specific needs such as page numbers for matches played by a certain team and I'll do what I can to assist. Jack | talk page 17:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Bank War

Dear BlackJack -

My apologies for not getting back to you sooner. The controversy over the BUS and the significance to the Jackson administration is well documented among mainstream historians. Your improvements to the article will be welcome. Thanks for taking up the task. I may be delayed in responding to your requests, but will get to them at the earliest opportunity. Best, 36. 36hourblock (talk) 17:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

@36hourblock: Hi, 36hourblock. I really must apologise but I've been away from the site for nearly two months. First on holiday and then incredibly busy in both the personal and professional spheres. I did have an initial read of it just before I went on holiday and it is very interesting; and new to me as I don't know very much about Jackson's presidency (except he was called Black Jack like me: LOL!). I will try and get on with it. Thanks very much. Jack | talk page 17:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

GA Cup

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar

Cricket-barnstar-small.png The Cricket Barnstar
For all your good work on cricket related articles! Vensatry (ping) 16:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
@Vensatry:Thank you very much, Vensatry. I do my best but there are plenty of others who do better. Still, the project is coming along and we can all feel pride in a job well done so far, but with a long way yet to go. All the best. Jack | talk page 17:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup
Symbol support vote.svg

WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers.

Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition.

Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges.

Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.

Email enabled!

Hi Jack, I've enabled my email and would be most interested in seeing what the ACS have to say about Daft. I've not been very active of late, been training a lot for an upcoming Tough Mudder event in March. PinchHittingLeggy (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Crowhurst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birling. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Bank War/GA1

Blackjack, you opened this review over two months ago, and it has been sitting ever since. Please let me know whether you plan to do the review or not (and very soon, if so), or whether it should be put back into the reviewing pool. You could even have the review page deleted if you don't plan to conduct the review. Thanks for your prompt response. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:20, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Hi, BlueMoonset. Per my reply above to 36hourblock, I really must apologise but I was away from the site for nearly two months from August till a week ago (first on holiday and then incredibly busy in both the personal and professional spheres). I do intend to review the article and have had an initial read of it. I will try and get on with it in the next week. Thanks very much. Jack | talk page 06:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Great! Thanks for letting me know. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:21, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

John Brocklebank...

...already has an article. He was also in the 1939-40 touring party selected for the India tour, BTW. Cheers. Johnlp (talk) 22:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sidney Smith (cricketer)
added links pointing to Heywood and Middleton
Edward Kelly (cricketer)
added a link pointing to Leyland
Fred Goodwin (cricketer)
added a link pointing to Heywood
Gerard Houlton
added a link pointing to St Helens
Kenneth Bowling
added a link pointing to Preston
Paul Robinson (cricketer)
added a link pointing to Transvaal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

All done. Jack | talk page 14:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sid Hird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balmain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Earlysportsyearcat

Template:Earlysportsyearcat has been nominated for merging with Template:Sportsyearcat. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 16:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Francis Parr...

= Frank Parr (musician). One of the livelier Lancastrian cricketers. KR. Johnlp (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

@Johnlp: Thanks, John. I'll put mine into speedy delete. I'll admit that Lancashire is famous for its musicians. :-) All the best. Jack | talk page 19:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
John McMahon (cricketer) was another now-largely-forgotten cricketer of that era whose experiences with alcohol provided entertainment. Not Lancastrian, though... Johnlp (talk) 20:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
@Johnlp: Definitely a character. I love the POW-loop trick. LOL. Jack | talk page 20:15, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Just spotted this discussion. Frank Parr (musician) is one of mine. When I read his obituary in the Telegraph a couple of years ago, he was such an interesting character that I couldn't resist creating the article. :) At present it relies over-heavily on that obituary, so if you have some alternative sources they'd be a welcome addition to the article. When deciding what to call it, I felt that he was more notable as a musician than as a cricketer. JH (talk page) 20:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
@Jhall1:I'm afraid I know little of him, John. My article was only a brief stub to introduce him along with other Lancashire players. I agree with you that he should be remembered as a musician. All the best. Jack | talk page 20:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frederick Coward
added a link pointing to Preston
Frederick Crabtree
added a link pointing to Shipley
Harold Douthwaite
added a link pointing to Lancaster
John Broughton (cricketer)
added a link pointing to Orrell
William Burrows (cricketer)
added a link pointing to Preston
William Cook (cricketer)
added a link pointing to Preston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 20:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arthur Gibson (Lancashire cricketer)
added a link pointing to Salford
Jeremy Ellis
added a link pointing to Billington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Done. Jack | talk page 19:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cecil Holden
added a link pointing to Claughton
Charlie Hartley
added a link pointing to Sale
William Hibbert
added a link pointing to Lincoln
William Houldsworth (cricketer)
added a link pointing to Flixton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

All done. Jack | talk page 20:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Help Please

Hello BlackJack, The pages Twenty20 cricket and Twenty20 International cricket have been moved to Twenty20 and Twenty20 International. So I'm assuming that just "Twenty20" and "Twenty20 International" are the standard terms used. Also the page List of Twenty20 International records does not have the word cricket in it. I created a page named List of Twenty20 International matches played by Nepal and another author also created a page for the same purpose later on with the word 'cricket' added to it (List of Twenty20 International cricket matches played by Nepal). Earlier, I moved a page named List of Twenty20 cricket matches played by Nepal‎ to List of Twenty20 matches played by Nepal‎. But the author who created the page moved back the page saying "Non cricket watching viewers wouldn't understand what the page is about by just looking at the previous title." I thought that didn't make sense as non-cricket viewers wouldn't be interested in looking at the list of matches a cricket team has played. And at the moment both pages exist. I don't think it's a good idea to have two similar pages for the same purpose. I'm wondering which is generally accepted that's why I'm asking for your help. I also asked an expert, who have been editing cricket related articles since very long time, regarding the matter. The author also believes that the consensus would be that the pages without the word cricket is correct. Please have a look at them, and delete one of those pages or do what you think would be suitable. Cricshady (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

@Cricshady:Sorry about the delay in replying, but I haven't been on the site for several days. I'm afraid I can't do anything directly as a move would not work and a merger is subject to consensus via discussion. The correct procedure is to go via WP:AFD and request either that the second article is deleted or that it is merged into the first. If you do that, please let me know and also post a notice on WT:CRIC. I agree with you and will support your motion. Thanks. Jack | talk page 20:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I've created a discussion in the talk pages of both the articles. Please consider giving your opinion in the discussion here and here. As you suggested, I have also mentioned about the discussion on WT:CRIC. Is it enough or something else needs to be done? If something more is need to be done please do it. Thank you once again. Cricshady (talk) 07:50, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I see that you have not provided your opinion regarding the matter. Please consider giving your opinion in the discussion here and here so that the consensus can be reached. Thank you, Cricshady (talk) 08:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)