User:Bloodofox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
" |-
Seeland-II-C.jpg This user is a member of the Ancient Germanic studies WikiProject
This user is a member of the Norse history and culture WikiProject
Runic letter fehu.svg This user is a member of the Runic studies work group.
"The Wolves Pursuing Sol and Mani" (1909) by J. C. Dollman.
Hail to the Day! Hail to the sons of Day!
To Night and her daughter hail!
With placid eyes behold us here,
and here sitting give us victory.
Hail to the Æsir! Hail to the Asyniur!
Hail to the bounteous earth!
Words and wisdom give to us noble twain,
and healing hands while we live![1]
Sigrdrífa, Sigrdrífumál

Runic letter haglaz.svg Runic letter ehwaz.svg Runic letter laukaz.svg Runic letter laukaz.svg Runic letter othalan.svg and ƿelcome to my corner of Ƿikipedia. While I have a general interest in all things folklore, mythology, linguistics, and archaeology (and for that matter just about anything that wiggles, wanders, or waxes along the sky, earth, or sea), I often focus on topics relating to the indigenous beliefs, practices, culture, and values of the Germanic peoples and their continued influence in modern society. I frequently edit on topics in Slavic, Classical, and general Indo-European studies as well. All of my edits are rooted in Wikipedia:Good article criteria.

About[edit]

I have been editing Wikipedia for several years now. While the process itself is a messy, often difficult matter, I continue to think that Wikipedia is a beautiful thing and I am glad to be a part of it. There is a joy in producing what has every opportunity to be a peerless, entirely neutral reference work, limited neither by space nor deadline. I have a systematic approach to the articles I edit, and while these articles are never "finished", I continue to hack away at bringing a variety of articles up to snuff. Ideally, these articles come closer and closer to being the highest quality springboards for further research one can find anywhere. And it's all free; no socio-economic advantage needed.

Unfortunately, behind the scenes, the nature of the medium means that a lot of time can be wasted on misunderstandings, confusion regarding interpretation of policy, and, well, resident trolls. I prefer to be quite frank in situations such as these, so please don't be offended. If you're here due to an editing dispute, know that I simply edit with policy in mind; my one goal on Wikipedia is to build articles. I am sure that we can all agree that Wikipedia articles should be easy to read, sources should be frankly stated up front, and no corners should be cut. I edit with this in mind.

You are welcome to help me continue to do my part here by way of collaboration—in fact I hope you will, there's a lot to be done—but I ask that you first please take a look at Wikipedia:Good article criteria. If I make an edit that doesn't reflect this, let me know. To do so, please use my talk page.

Written/developed "Good Article"-status articles[edit]

Who is really behind all of those GA articles? Faster, dwarf minions!

Harvested (47)[edit]

Articles I've contributed to heavily, or had a large hand in developing, that have reached (and remain at) Good Article status:

Awaiting inspection[edit]

Freshly grown articles currently waiting to be inspected at Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations:

None at this time

The Farm[edit]

A 16th century depiction of children being educated in runelore.

While I've authored/rewritten numerous articles on Wikipedia, here are some articles that I'm attempting to grow into something of quality enough for GA-examination:

Needs Replanting[edit]

High-priority articles that need to be rewritten:

Gallery[edit]

A selection of my photographs that I've contributed to Wikipedia:

More...

People Being Nice[edit]

A collection of people being nice to me:

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg You... you are a wonder. Not only knowledgeable, but dedicated, a trait far less common, yet far more valuable. You are the reason Wikipedia is free from those who would wish to destroy it for their own enjoyment. You are the reason people can come to Wikipedia for reliable and factual information. You are a person that, despite the misinformation and clutter of the world, can be trusted to give clarity and understanding on a subject that has touched the imaginations of many. For your work on culture on the medieval peoples of northern Europe, thank you. Floatsam (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


GA barnstar.png The Good Article Barnstar
I award you this barnstar for your incredible efforts of bringing 30 articles on Norse and Germanic topics to Good Article status. Keep it up, but don't make your dwarven minions work too hard! –Holt TC 17:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
GA Award.png The Good Article Medal of Merit 
I award you this barnstar for you endless stream of Nordic mythology-related articles that pass themselves through the GA process. No other editor delivers such comprehensive quality in their nominations, making your articles a dream to review. Thanks for making Wikipedia a better encyclopedia. Arsenikk (talk) 11:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
In spite of our less than auspicious interactions in the past, I would like to recognize your valuable contributions to our coverage of Germanic topics. You have done some good work on Wikipedia. dab (𒁳) 20:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Editors Barnstar.png The Editor's Barnstar
I award User:Bloodofox the Editor's Barnstar for his valiant efforts to keep irrelevant, unsourced and subtrivial material out of our articles. Haukur 14:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
SpecialBarnstar.png The Special Barnstar
For this excellent edit to Danish People's Party, I hereby award you The Special Barntar. Law Lord (talk) 22:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Featured article star.svg

User:Bloodofox has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Bloodofox's day!
You have made remarkable contributions to the project,
and the editors and readers of those pages are and always will be grateful to you for them.
We all look forward to seeing you return and continue in such development.
Thank you again for your outstanding efforts at article development.

Peace,
Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

A record of your Day will always be kept here. Sorry, a bit late this one.

Sprouts[edit]

A tree grows atop a Bronze Age burial mound in Roskilde, Denmark.
Odin gives breath to Ask and Embla (1919) by Robert Engels.

To expand or rewrite[edit]

Notes to myself (or you?) for eventual future work:

Alu (runic)
Beowa
Corn dolly, needs plenty of attention.
Fjörgyn and Fjörgynn
Frigg, badly needs to be rewritten
Godwulf
Hel (location),needs expansion
Merseburg Incantations
Neorxnawang
Nine Herbs Charm
Odin, badly needs to be rewritten
Rune poems, needs expansion, particularly Scandinavian rune poems.
Runic alphabet, needs major work, including overhaul and standardization of individual rune articles.
Valravn
Zisa (goddess)
Æcerbot

To create[edit]

Articles I intend to create (or I encourage someone to start):

Boar helmet
Jelling stone ship, apparently easily the largest stone ship in all of Scandinavia
Menglöð
Reincarnation in Norse mythology
Suti in Norse mythology

Workshop[edit]

Ongoing article projects that are not yet ready to be brought into their articles for various reasons:

  • Odin article rewrite: Ongoing rewrite of the current Odin article(s).
  • The Grimmdex: An extensive and ongoing table of contents for Jacob Grimm's landmark 19th century work Deutsche Mythologie. Based on James Stallybrass's English translations of the volumes. Grimm's work is very massive, intricate, frequently referred to, but is itself pretty difficult to approach. The original table of contents for the tomes is very lacking. I've built a new, sprawling table of contents in an attempt to help others dig through the dusty corridors found within.
  • Haukurth's Germanic Mythology Art Project: An ongoing project to collect and upload all of the (now public domain) illustrations of Germanic mythology to Wikipedia. Many of these illustrations have not seen the light of day since the 19th century, and few realize they exist. That is, until now.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Thorpe (1907:181).

References[edit]

|}|}