User:Cullen328/sandbox/gaming

I will comment on the first. It is not encyclopedic to call a magazine "award winning" in the first sentence, espcially whne the award in question is a routine and non-notable industry award. Statements like "the sector's most widely-circulated print publication with a readership of more than 10,000 people in more than 40 different countries" raises the question, "who says so?" and must be cited to an independent source. Phrases like "key decision-makers" and "Its audience is comprised primarily of C-level executives and decision makers" are examples of promotional language that don't belong in an encyclopedia article.. We need to see references to significant coverage of the publication in independent, reliable sources, which are not yet in the draft.