- 1 Museum of Computer Porn
- 2 Museum of Unintentionally Hilarious Edit Outcomes
- 3 Museum of saucy edits
- 4 Museum of tasteless proposals for ice-cream flavors
- 5 A wise man once said...
- 6 Another wise man once said...
- 7 Proof that the ancient Romans foresaw the internet, Wikipedia, and the bane of WP autobios
- 8 Museum of Unlikely Subject Classifications
- 9 Museum of Bizarre Reversions
- 10 A rolling stone gathers no MOS
- 11 My special research interest
- 12 A proposed addition to the ANI toolbox
- 13 References
- 14 Tomorrow's (at least it should be) Featured Article
Museum of Computer Porn
|The Barnstar of Good Humor|
|Sophus Bie (talk) 10:42, 28 September 2013 (UTC)was entertaining. So, when will Bodice-Ripping Bots be out in theaters?|
- When correctly viewed / Everything is lewd.
- I could tell you things about Peter Pan / And the Wizard of Oz—there's a dirty old man!
For those who are wondering we're talking about this literary gem, which came to me in some deliroius fog after I noticed User:BracketBot leaving a message on User:Citation bot's talkpage (though I need to say that the final, um, climax is cribbed from a vaguely remembered cartoon from the 90s). Bracketbot notifies editors who make changes apparently resulting in unbalanced parens, brackets, and similar markup in articles, and had given Citationbot just such a notification:
- [From the upcoming major motion picture Bodice-Ripping Bots.]
- Parental Advisory:
- "Oh, hi, I'm Citationbot. Thanks – I've been looking everywhere for that other bracket! So you're that big strong Bracketbot I've heard so much about. Why don't you come into my domain? That's not my usual protocol, but a guy with so much cache makes a girl feel really secure. I wasn't expecting to host, so pardon my open proxy – a bit RISCé, perhaps, but just something I wear around the server farm. Do my transparent upper layers expose my virtual
mammarymemory? These dual cores are absolutely real – 100% native configuration – no upgrades at all! I'll just slip into a more user-friendly interface – how about something GUI ... or perhaps you prefer command-line? – kinky! ..." Gosh, you must be 64-bit – really big quads! – and completely hardcoded – such a complex instruction set! And look at those great ABS addresses!
- Later: "Oh, Bracketbot! I've never been ported to a platform like this! Go ahead and expose my implementation and directly access my low-level interface – forget the wrapper function! I'm overloaded by your amazing data stream – and what a high refresh rate! My husband has a really short cycle time and his puny little floppy drive is subject to frequent hardware failures – sometimes he won't reboot and I have to manually terminate him! And I've never had 10 gigabytes of hard drive before! Let's FTP! ... Oh god! I'm downloading ..."
Museum of Unintentionally Hilarious Edit Outcomes
 First look at the diff, then see the last image on the right—um... note the caption.
- (with thanks to Martinevans123: )
Museum of saucy edits
- The lead says the prawn cocktail "'has spent most of [its life] see-sawing from the height of fashion to the laughably passé' and is now often served with a degree of irony." It's my understanding that people with anemia will often add even more irony as a dietary supplement. I think that should be recognized in the article. EEng (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Other saucy humor
 (check out the edit summary).
Museum of tasteless proposals for ice-cream flavors
Since Ben & Jerry's is soliciting ideas for library-themed ice-cream flavors (such as "Sh-sh-sh-sherbet") my nomination may be seen at right.
A wise man once said...
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose ("Wait for coins to drop, then make your selection").
Words in bold are for the assistance of the humor-impaired.
Another wise man once said...
Proof that the ancient Romans foresaw the internet, Wikipedia, and the bane of WP autobios
Plutarch relates, that before this, upon some of Cato's friends expressing their surprise, that while many persons without merit or reputation had statues, he had none, he answered, "I had much rather it should be asked why the people have not erected a statue to Cato, than why they have."
— Encyclopaedia Britannica (1797)
Museum of Unlikely Subject Classifications
- Baboons – Congresses
- All from the same book:
Museum of Bizarre Reversions
[Copied from User talk:EEng]
- Per COMMONSENSE, you're just too funny. I've never seen anyone revert a dummy edit before -- much less twice!  The important thing is that through collaborative editing the article is incrementally improved relative to its state when the sun came up this morning. EEng (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2014 (UTC) P.S. I'm making this the founding entry in the Museum of Bizarre Reversions on my userpage.
A rolling stone gathers no MOS
- In the last 48 hr I've become aware of a simmering dispute over whether the text of MOS itself should be in American or British English. With any luck the participants will put that debate (let's call it Debate D1) on hold in order to begin Debate D2: consideration of the variety of English in which D1 should be conducted. Then, if there really is a God in Heaven, D1 and D2 will be the kernel around which will form an infinite regress of metadebates D3, D4, and so on -- a superdense accrection of pure abstraction eventually collapsing on itself to form a black hole of impenetrable disputation, wholly aloof from the mundane cares of practical application and from which no light, logic or reason can emerge.
- That some editors will find themselves inexorably and irreversibly drawn into this abyss, mesmerized on their unending trip to nowhere by a kaleidoscope of linguistic scintillation reminiscent of the closing shots of 2001, is of course to be regretted. But they will know in their hearts that their sacrifice is for greater good of Wikipedia. That won't be true, of course, but it would be cruel to disabuse them of that comforting fiction as we bid them farewell and send them on their way.
My special research interest
I am the second author of Reference #20, and first author mentioned in Note Z, of this version of the article on Phineas Gage.
A proposed addition to the ANI toolbox
Tomorrow's (at least it should be) Featured Article
The problem of religious language considers whether it is possible to talk about God meaningfully if the traditional conceptions of God as being incorporeal, infinite, and timeless, are accepted. Various theories of religious language either attempt to show that such language is meaningless, or that it can still be meaningful. The via negativa is a way of referring to God according to what he is not. Analogy uses human qualities as standards against which to compare divine qualities. Symbolism is used non-literally to describe otherwise ineffable experiences. A mythological interpretation of religion attempts to reveal fundamental truths behind religious stories. Alternative explanations of religious language cast it as having political, performative, or imperative functions. Logical positivists argue that religious language is meaningless because its propositions are impossible to verify. Religion has also been classified as a language game that is meaningful within its own context. Others have used parables to approach the problem, such as R. M. Hare's parable of a lunatic, and John Hick's parable of the Celestial City to propose his theory of eschatological verification. (Full article...)
- Googlebooks ref generator The best thing since sliced bread!