It's a brand new day, don't you see me, changing up my way.. So completely ,This time I'm una sing and you gonna hear it, This time I'm una to show you that I got the spirit, It's , brand new day, And I'm feelin' good, And I'm feelin' good.
This user has fractured a foot, which I will be resting, so it is highly doubtful that you can answer your posts, as much as I will be connected is to revert some vandalism or destructive issues.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 00:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I can tell pretty much how these 3 novelas will play out here in Univision USA once they are rready to air here. Take notes man,. and I dont need no guide or resourses that you speak of, get me? I dont care if you belive me or not, but this is how is going to go down....
I don't really know that it is what you want. And I don't know that you want to tell me this to me, in all cases when these soap operas will premiere because they will be placed on page of Univision programming.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 17:04, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
The reference I laid in the respective pages linked to Telemundo Africa which is a subsidiary channel for Telemundo and airs English versions of Telemundo's telenovelas.So the names I used are acceptable by the production company itself.You can also google and find out for your self. Nyanchoka (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for re-applying just about everything. For reference (no pun intended), it's generally okay to remove references from aired premieres/seasons/episodes/finales unless the title's contentious or something. For everything else where references don't really apply anymore, we should deem them at their own merit and leave them in if in doubt. See a discussion with Geraldo Perez and Cyphoidbomb (you guys want to add another article to your watch list?) here. Hope that explains my edits. I've already cleaned up some articles, which hasn't generally been a problem. Amaury (talk) 14:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I generally disagree with the notion that it's okay to remove references once something's aired. A title is likely not going to be an issue, but we should not be removing airdate references and things of that nature. The strength of this encyclopedia is in its references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
The problem with that is that that the source links can eventually potentially become dead or change and therefore reflect incorrect information, and other sources can't always be found. For example, Kirby Buckets' episode guide is a bit off over on Zap2 if you compare it to the Kirby Buckets page even though the episodes already aired. It seems to be okay for upcoming episodes, but after that it seems the guides for some shows get messed up sometimes. Amaury (talk) 14:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
We should have a link to a scheduling guide of some sort either as a column reference or a general reference in the references section. Using RTitle for each cite to the same source for all aired episodes is generally not necessary if other references for the same info are in the article and obvious. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I'd be down for that. Having it as a column reference might be better as it's right there when editing the episode guide and you don't have to scroll down to the references section to make sure there are sources. Amaury (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I understand all that, but references Amaury remove had nothing to do with "Zap2", were references confirming that series would be released, I say to demonstrate the notability of the article, the article cannot be based only in references to the episodes, or Yes?. And they should those sources be damaged or cease to exist the links, there is a bot that is responsible for notification. But I doubt that the sources that I added when you create the item expires. I've been editing here for quite some time and I've never seen the sources used as references to expire. Anyway the only thing I did was to restore information to Amaury I remove and leave all as is as the update article.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 18:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
In my opinion, that also counts. Since the series premiered yesterday evening, sources confirming its (or any show's) release are no longer needed. Amaury (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
No need to rush stuff, wait for episode to have finished airing. I generally like to wait a few days to make sure it shows up on iTunes and Amazon (if they carry it) to show wide-spread support for air date and title. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I think that an article while you have more references, will be better, (of course that they are reliable sources). For example in the article "Mi corazón es tuyo", there are 50 references and all talk about the premiere of the telenovela and other things, and already spent a year since it was created the article and the references are still intact.--Philip J Fry•(talk) 19:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)