User:Ittakezou0

I am a physics student, but I currently de facto discontinued my physics studies. I can program. My most used nick on the net is currently ShinTakezou. My real name is Mauro Panigada.

What Am I doing on Wiki(pedia?) right now?

I am being very critic since I've discovered SNUSP was deleted while other (less notable) esolangs (e.g. LOLCODE) was saved, I can't understand the principle behind this choice. And many more principles. They simply stop me from contributing. Let's call this (maybe democratically) selected knowledge wiki, not Wiki(pedia?).

What the f**k?

If I am not in the predetermined list of users authorised to vote in this election, why do you put that ads on top inviting me to the vote? I wonder who is in the list, and why, and if it is a good thing that a vote for such a matter of a Wiki is permitted only to a "elite". If it is so, why all people outside the list should modify this wiki?! Or maybe this is a first step to make Wikipedia more selective, and eliminate de facto the peculiarities of a wiki? (I.e. content that can be modified by everyone)... --Ittakezou0 (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I believed I had more than 25 edits before the timeline... maybe not. But surely the criteria were not too much clear and exposed. --Ittakezou0 (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Becoming more critic

I am going to be day by day more critic against Wikipedia (or rather some people ruling in this wiki). My last edits are all about critics on Cite and Reference rules, when applied blindly by blind persons. But I believe there's no solution, nor a way I can make clearer my thoughts in english, so I stop thinking about contributing to this Wiki. There exists places that can contain more, and the web as a whole is enough for a better knowledge, for people who are able. About the others? I can't care less. (What I wrote now is verifiable, don't you think?) --Ittakezou0 (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Another one bites the dust

Here I want to put a list of thisWiki's articles that was deleted according to antidemocratic (no quorum!) behaviours, without taking into account simple things about a Wiki and what a digital encyclopedia should be... (rules? rules? who interprets them? and how? and why they exist, it's not always clear)

• Arecibo reply, read Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arecibo_reply

5 votes there expressed, 3 for deletion, 2 for retention. Maybe more on the discussion? However, a digital encyclopedia should have a page about that, and the main piece to consider about the fact the original article was poor or "biased", is Wikipedia:Wikipedia is a work in progress

• SNUSP, read Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SNUSP_programming_language

6 votes, 1 abstains, 3 for deletion, 2 for retention... But remember, LOLCODE exists, and it is there since "it is funny", ... really? And SNUSP wasn't? Why it's less good than other esoteric that survived on this Wiki? ... It's also interesting take a read at what LotLE wrote about the process according to which a lot of esolanguages was deleted.

About voting, here it seems we have 4 votes, 2 for deletion, 2 for retention... but one was "weak keep". LOL