User talk:LM2000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:LM2000)
Jump to: navigation, search

Yes, this is my talk page. I'm honored that you have chosen to pay me a visit.

RE: Sources[edit]

I'm aware that BR is not a reliable source but it was the only one available as hadn't posted the results at the time. Sorry Wikipedia police. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emcg93 (talkcontribs) 15:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand how wrestlezone isn't a reliable source but fine, I apologize. I've used it before and you're the only one who appears to have a problem with it.


Thanks. I think too. Also, he had discussions in Pokemon articles and an user support you. :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

RE: Airbender[edit]

Understood, although if you want some sources that call it one of the worst, I know some examples. I can add the film to the list again with these credentials if you wish.

--Matthew (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heath Slater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


No disrepect intended but please stop erasing the contents on JoJo Offerman's page. You are the ONLY one who seems to always have a problem. I have not recieved any other complaints from any other wikipedia user besides you. I have not added ANY false information to JoJo's page and not to mention, I also created her wikipedia page. Therefore I will continue to re add the information. So please back off. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BGCTwinsEdit (talkcontribs) 15:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC) Actually you have me confused. I very well understand the image issues as it was my first time & I made mistakes but as far as others deleting my text can't be further from the truth. The only text I added to her personal life is her race. Others contributed the rest. Also the things I added were very much true AND verified, just because JoJo's name wasn't mentioned doesn't mean anything. Since you are very concerned with JoJo, I'm sure you saw her at ringside. So like I stated before, I will continue to add back the deleted context & if JoJo appears at ringside next week, I will add that as well so if you want to play tag then so be it. Thank you again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BGCTwinsEdit (talkcontribs) 00:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC) himy name is bob — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 06:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


I'm not going to argue with you, because I been through this before, and talked to the people on wikipedia about this. Just because the Chickbusters page was deleted like two times, does not mean that it isn't a notable milestone in Kaitlyn's career. When Kaitlyn, or even AJ Lee is seen, the WWE still brings up and reminiscence about the Chickbusters all the time. It may not be "notable" to you, but it is DEFINITELY notable to the WWE. About the NXT (once again) thing, WWE actually said those words, "first and only female in history to have won NXT" on their main page, I just mistakenly left out the "only" part. These things are WELL noticed by the WWE, and they are defining moments in Kaitlyn's career, and like I said, I've been through this before. The intro, as we all know, is a summary of the entire page, but of course listing (in this case) Kaitlyn's accomplishments/championships. If you need to tell me anything else, don't hesitate to. And I'm going to say this right now, this IS NOT a war, this is just a disagreement that were discussing as adults. Hemmeband17 (talk)

Sock-puppetry? Really? I have nothing to hide when I edit, because they are legit edits. So your accusing me of sock-puppetry with that 166.etc because they're not doing what your doing? Just because you do not agree with my edits, that does not mean everyone will agree with YOUR edits. You need to take acceptance to other peoples edits, and obviously this is not your first time getting this kind of feedback for deleting someone else's edits. You also had that same problem with BGCTwinsEdit (talk). Like I said before this is a discussion, and I'm not even going to bother with the "sock-puppetry" mishap, because this is just about the Kaitlyn page. Again, this is a discussion and not a war. Hemmeband17 (talk) 11:08 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Are you serious right now? This has nothing to do with you at all, but even you must know that Kaitlyn didn't use the Spear as a finisher until this year. And for the love of God, knock off the whole sock puppetry thing, cause now he believes that he's right about it! My edits are NOT wrong. So do NOT try and make this sock puppetry thing look like my edits are all wrong and think that I don't let anyone add anything on the pages. So stop Hemmeband17 (talk) 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I didn't see what you wrote on my page about the reverting. I think i fixed the problem. Hemmeband17 (talk) 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Sock puppetry?[edit]

Oh my God, I've been ignoring this whole situation with this sock puppetry thing, and quite frankly I think it is not that big of a deal. Not going to speak on Hemmeband17s behalf and stuff, but it is obvious that we both are huge fans of Kaitlyn and that we agreed on some stuff, but sock puppetry? That just sounds like an excuse to get someone blocked if you ask me. Like I said, I was ignoring it cause I didn't even know what it meant, but now Hemmeband17 is pissed at me (not that I really care) because he is blamed, and etc. Since this thing is just REALLY annoying, I'm not even going to be on here anymore cause ya'll take this stuff way to seriously. I admit, I did too sometimes though. Oh yea, this one is full on my fault, but the user is actually me, I will also admit to that. Because everytime I leave a wikipedia page, my computer does this stupid thing where it logs me out and crap, and sometimes I forget to log in. I did not think that would lead to "sock puppetry". Still to me this is really like "wow", but whatever I guess. I'm deleting this anyway once I find out how. I already apologized to HHH Pedigree (talk) because I was actually wrong, and now I'm apologizing for ignoring this whole thing. And I really hardly ever apologize so, yea. Oh, and about after reading that "investigation" about not signing what I write, here is a hint why....I DIDN'T FREAKING KNOW HOW! I don't know Hemmeband17's excuse, but I didn't much know how. I still kind of don't! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hauntingwhisper (talkcontribs) 19:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

You finally got a confession, and you're still going on about this?? Really, what is your problem? You're taking this way too far. A check user? Really? Oh God, enjoy yourself. Haha, cause I'm done with this whole thing. Hemmeband17 (talk) 16 October 2013 (UTC)

TNA World Tag Team Titles[edit]

Hi I posted the offical video of the Kaz and Young situation here it is for you too see they won the titles and were stripped but HHH Pedrigree keeps saying the video is reliable because the TNA website doesn't list them together as champions but the website it's self isn't even up to date I would like your opinion on this after seeing the video thank you JMichael22 (talk) 00:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Also here is this JMichael22 (talk) 00:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Do you believe their title reign was offical? JMichael22 (talk) 01:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Every wrestling site already provides the title reign TNA's website doesn't go into full detail regarding wrestlers title history I feel in this case we should go by other websites that show the proof of the title reign JMichael22 (talk) 01:27, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, LM2000. About OWOW, the website listed Drew McIntyre as two times IC Champion and Kofi as 5 times champion. ( I think like WWE Roster. TNA Titles are fictional and only the company decides the champions. In WWE Roster, we use only to put them in main roster, I think that we should use TNA for TNA titles (until 2010, when the website erased the title list). Also, the video don't say too much. Cornette, in a promo, vacated the titles, but never said that Kaz and Eric were recognized as champions (like, for example, Ted DiBiase as WWE Champion). Anycase, TNA title history don't list them and Kaz profile says that he is Two time champion (2 with christopher daniels) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
TNA recognizes them as Champions who ever did the TNA wrestlers profiles got the information directly from this website WIKIPEDIA and I have the proof on Kazarian's TNA profile it says this (In 2007, Kazarian won the Fight for the Right Tournament. He also reigned as X Division King of the Mountain in 2008 and 2009.) which is not true if TNA payed any attention to their wrestling company they would of known that in 2009 Suicide won the X Division King of the Mountion Kazarian play'd the character of Suicide and TNA recognizes Suicide as the winner also. Kazarian as Kazarian or Kaz or Frankie Kazarian is a four time TNA X Division Champion not five the fifth title he won as Suicide so that clearly show Kazarian's TNA Profile isn't correct it also states (He’s a two-time TNA World Tag Team Champion and a five-time X Division Champion.) the Exact same way way on the it says on his WIKIPEDIA profile which means at the time of them making his profile they copied it the way it was written on the WIKIPEDIA so if someone changed him being a Tag Team Champion from three-times to two-times that's what the website copied because in reality Kaz and Eric Young/Super Eric won the TNA World Tag Team Championships that is my proof the profile isn't up to date JMichael22 (talk) 16:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Can you add the reign on the page the correct way? JMichael22 (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks sounds great JMichael22 (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. What do you think about my idea to send TNA a message? An OTRS. They can give us a list of TNA champions and create the articles and dodge the controversy (Angle is 5 time or 4 times WHC? Creed was a substitute or a champion under the freebird rule? Kaz/Eric are recognized as champions?). You know about my english level, so I prefer somebody with a better level than me. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. TNA fuck us since they retired the titles lists. If Michaels is right and TNA uses Wikipedia for the profiles... Wikipedia changes, so TNA profiles too. I always have some questions. 1st Angle's reign, I thought that it' was unofficial, because the title list started on June 17. Creed as World Tag Team champion... I don't find a source about the freebird rule, I always hear that Creed was a substitute, not a champion (like Shelley and Beer Money). --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2013 (UTC)


I left a note on the talk page regarding the naming situation. Regards, --Tærkast (Discuss) 20:49, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Michael Cole[edit]

I don't feel as though the edit should be reverted. You don't agree that Michael Cole has conspicuous characteristics about him? He's supposed to be press people's buttons and be vocal. AmericanDad86 (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, LM2000. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 21:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, LM2000. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 22:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Rollback userright[edit]

Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg

Hi LM2000, thank you for helping to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep in mind these things when using rollback:

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).

The reviewer userright may also be helpful for countering vandalism. If you are interested in helping out with it after you know how it works. Please feel free to request it at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Reviewer or leave a message on my talk page. Regards, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Ability: Keen Eye[edit]

Whoa, I hadn't noticed that, thanks for the link. I did notice a recent GameFaqs thread though. Starship.paint (talk) 03:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Whoops[edit]

No problemo! I was a bit surprised when that came up in my notifications but I figured it was either a mistake or you had a good reason for it. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 22:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Excuse Me[edit]

Daddy Day Camp was panned. It has a very low rating on IMBD, and was ranked as the 16 lowest rated film on RT. Are you completely sure? Please inform me if I was wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C4CB:C810:C5F2:50D6:B6D7:4F39 (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok. 2602:306:C4CB:C810:C5F2:50D6:B6D7:4F39 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

You're quite active...[edit]

I see you have a history. :) I left the Melissa Harris-Perry article be, with no mention at all of her tampon earrings, which I find quite interesting. I did link to the Romney subsection on the main MSNBC page, though. Hope that sits better with you. Cheers. -- Cirrus Editor (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Millionaire Edit[edit]

I made a valid edit on Millionaire. It ORIGINATED in the United Kingdom! Then came to the US as the EXACT same show. Same graphics, same music, same lifelines, same logos, same cash tier, and even almost an exact replica of the original UK stage.


All I want edited was country of origin. Get your facts right, people! You're supposed to have the "valid information" ...bullcrap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BugleBoi (talkcontribs) 07:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Seethisway SPI[edit]

"David"? Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Work Shall be done[edit]

Done, I've gotten almost a 100 reliable sources for this article. Honestly, if people could give me a chance I can show them what I can do. -- Miss X-Factor (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack and Jill (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battlefield Earth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


Stop violating Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into articles and stop abusing your rollback rights. -- (talk) 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in, but what you are accusing simply didn't occur; your changes were reverted, nothing was added by LM2000 (talk). In my experience, LM2000 (talk) has always acted in good faith. Why are you so passionate about moving an article that has been nominated for deletion anyway? Did you consider the fact that you could interrupt the discussion by moving pages that are under review? —Josh3580talk/hist 22:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
I reverted the move because the article under its current name is being nominated for deletion and your redirect removed the nomination tag. Also, the page that you redirected it to has previously been undone by someone else. Seems controversial, you may want to request a move. You may want to assume good faith in the future, and also brush up on WP:BLP as Josh points out no BLP violations have occurred here.LM2000 (talk) 22:52, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded for your key contributions to removing the scourge of Brimstone from our esteemed website. starship.paint (talk | contribs) 11:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Harpalji[edit]

Hello LM2000. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Harpalji, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 13:26, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Giant Haystacks move.[edit]

Were you thinking of Haystacks Calhoun? You did help move him recently. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:23, February 3, 2014 (UTC)

Meatpuppet Question[edit]

No, nobody ever asked me to do anything of the sort. RaveBlack (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia Pro Wrestling Community[edit]

I didn't want to clutter the AfD by asking, but I wanted to ask someone who was a lot more knowledgeable than me regarding this. I didn't even know there was a wrestling community here until recently, and I would like to contribute in whatever way I can, even if it's just helping to clean up/proofread articles. I have found my way to the project page, but beyond the pages listed there, is there any other reading that I should do before contributing to the community? Thank you in advance for any guidance you can provide this neophyte! RaveBlack (talk) 07:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for replying to me, and for that page on sources. That seems to be the thing that trips me up in attempting to contribute here beyond just proofreading. Too much time on TVTropes leads one to believe that everything has merit. I have an additional question regarding them: is there an official stance regarding the use of social media as a source, like an official Twitter or Facebook account? One of my past edits was reverted due to attempting to use an official Twitter account as a source, and it wasn't really explained how it wasn't valid then.
I understand fully how bad this all looks. I really should be more active, and now that I'm learning what to do and how not to look ridiculous in the process, I'm sure I can be. And even I thought that it was odd how people seemed to appear out of nowhere to vote. RaveBlack (talk) 05:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
I now have a lot of reading to do. Thanks again! RaveBlack (talk) 05:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

WWE Countdown[edit]

Thanks dude, my first time making a wrestling article so I will try and use these sources in the future. Also thanks for the table fix.

--Moonschool (talk) 03:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png No hard feelings Vjmlhds 22:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
No hard feelings! Upon rereading my edit summary, it sounds a bit more snooty than I intended. Hopefully no offense was taken.LM2000 (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I am so sorry.[edit]

Handshake icon.svg
The Good Friend Award
I'm so sorry you got mixed up in this mess...we usually work well together, and this got outta hand. Please accept this award as a token of appreciation for your efforts and intents, and as a token of apology. Vjmlhds 02:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Take a looksie at the WWE roster talk page at the proposal I laid out. I'm basically removing the tumor that caused the problems to start with...whatcha think? Vjmlhds (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, LM2000. You have new messages at Musdan77's talk page.
Message added 05:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Musdan77 (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

I understand where you're coming from, but the subject of the discussion was whether the urban legend the film bears so many similarities to should be mentioned on the page. That is an appropriate subject for discussion on the talk page per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. I've left the wipe and will re-phrase the issue more succinctly, because the discussion better resembled an argument. I would ask however, in the future that you try to be more clear on the issue being discussed before making such a wipe. Thank you. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 04:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

I have to agree that my initial remark was not productive, however I didn't remove it myself both because it began a discussion, and because I am leery of removing my own words from a discussion, as the act reeks of deception. I believe than any civility issues I may have had began and ended with that remark, however it is difficult to engage someone as confrontational as that IP editor without the appearance of loosing one's cool. I have already re-phrased my opinion on the talk page, if you wish to involve yourself in the discussion. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


Right now, I'm watching WM. Spoiler free (maybe show is the new WWE World champ). If you want, ask for the ban yourself. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I saw the show and I cryed a lot. About the user, It's better to ask for a ban. Some users warned him months ago and he doesn't learn. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit[edit]

ThaddeusB (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Warrior image[edit]

Hi LM2000, just sayin' your Commons upload was incomplete starship.paint "YES!" 05:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

mm. I'm in a bit of a mess now. Will probably do other stuff than Warrior's in the next few days. starship.paint "YES!" 07:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]


This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Information pertaining to the "Death" section of recently deceased public figure/professional wrestler, Warrior aka Ultimate Warrior aka James Hellwig". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

ric flairs gonna return dumbass!![edit]

 it has been reported that ric flair is gonna return to monday night june 16 hes gonna manag the miz so if you think im not gonna write again yo ass is wrong if you delete it again ima write again if you do delete it ill report you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwelover620 (talkcontribs) 05:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC) 


Michael22 finaly appeared in the talk page. Some help? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:15, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Did you know we also have this --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Money in the Bank (2011) peer review[edit]

Hi LM2000, due to your experience in editing professional wrestling related articles (and other experience for GAs), I'd like to invite you to comment on the peer review for Money in the Bank (2011), which I have an interest to eventually push for Featured Article status. Thank you very much. starship.paint ~ regal 15:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Veda Scott[edit]

FYI: The article Veda Scott, which was previously deleted per your vote to do so, has been recreated and is up for deletion again. Your input would be appreciated. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Veda_Scott_(2nd_nomination) Tchaliburton (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Hey, LM2000. I've been watching this AfD, and I need to respond to several questions that were raised. I am not actively involved in editing pro wrestling articles, and wanted to talk with someone who is. Do you edit wrestling articles? If so, would you mind trading an email or two about questions I have? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Team Dixie[edit]

I have absolutely no "Ownership" issues all I'm trying too do is use the proper wrestling terminology that was created too describe certain characters in professional wrestling JMichael22 (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


I added convenience store broker. Why was it removed?

Anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talkcontribs) 09:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Spammed Link?[edit]

I don't know what you mean? I just signed up today to add an edit?

Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talkcontribs) 09:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

There is no external link under broker? Only see also[edit]

I see a bunch of other brokers, but I can't add convenience store broker? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Bautista (talkcontribs) 09:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

WWE Reliable Source[edit]

i want to thank you for showing me what websites are okay and not okay to use, and trying to find a reliable source on what i posted is by websites are there not reliable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salineb (talkcontribs) 01:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Yea i've been trying to fix stuff, like HHH Pedigree, deleted all of Stings Themes off his Wiki, and left one theme on there and that source was from a website i never heard of and the link was dead, so i had to take 4 hours out of my day and try to find sources, and i bet HHH Pedigree will remove what i did anyways — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salineb (talkcontribs) 01:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

(professional wrestling) -> (wrestling)[edit]

I saw you sorta proposed moving the articles as so, and so did InedibleHulk. I support that as well. If anyone of you is willing to propose it after the current requested move fails, I compiled a list. Controversial ones like Referee (professional wrestling) are at the top and might not be wise to move those. starship.paint ~ regal 07:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry about Cruiserweight. Unlike boxing and MMA, wrestling weight classes have boring names like "66 kg" and "84 kg". The Authority is probably safe, too. Amateur wrestling's authority is called FILA. The (WCW) and (TNA) bits are probably enough for Team Canada. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:38, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
Apparently, FILA's called United World Wrestling now. Sounds sort of fake. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:41, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
Sounds totally "professional", heh. I have already inserted a note at the top of the Authority pointing to UWW. starship.paint ~ regal 23:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Great work as always starship. One that stands out for me is Shoot (professional wrestling), which should probably stay where it is so it is not confused with Shoot wrestling.LM2000 (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Also, "shooting" in wrestling wrestling means going for a takedown. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:44, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
Updated the list. LM2000 do you agree with Hulk's explanation for Cruiserweight? starship.paint ~ regal 23:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't have much of an issue with it as the MMA Cruiserweight article was deleted for being not notable enough, so the professional wrestling article is the only Cruiserweight wrestling article extant, unless you count boxing for some reason.LM2000 (talk) 03:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Right. List finalized then? Only five pages won't be moved. starship.paint ~ regal 04:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Feedback's suggestion for Pinfall was a good one. Besides that I think we're just about finalized.LM2000 (talk) 05:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
Hulk brought up that pinfall only refers to a successful 1, 2, 3, instead of any unsuccessful pin. Therefore, pin should stay. I got Team Canada (WCW) moved. 1 down, 999 to go. starship.paint ~ regal 05:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Looking at the Cruiserweight article, it seems we should do something about that title. Of all the championships listed, few are called that. "Light Heavyweight" seems the most common, or "Junior". But yeah, no rush. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:32, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
InedibleHulk - I thought this division's greatest exposure was through WCW/WWF/WWE. List of WWE Cruiserweight Champions says "WCW/WWF/WWE Cruiserweight Championship" from 1996–2007. While other promotions have other names, I'm not sure their terms have had the same exposure. starship.paint ~ regal 05:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
"Was", definitely. Today, not so much. The Internet has opened up a whole world beyond regularly scheduled programming. But aside from that, when people are reading that particular article, they'll be exposed to all the names. So that article's title should reflect the article's content.
On the other hand, despite the list, the Promotions section content obviously couldn't be less concerned about any of the twelve current divisions that aren't TNA, or the other ten defunct ones (that's even counting the NWA as one). So by that math, "Cruiserweight" has 66% and is fine, I suppose. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:31, September 26, 2014 (UTC)

Bayley and the rest were closed at not moved, I'd say we have a green light to start a new move request. Tag InedibleHulk. I started Talk:Blading (professional wrestling)#Requested moves for the first 20. starship.paint ~ regal 13:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

  • So, judging by the responses to the new move request... would you, LM2000 and InedibleHulk be willing to compromise to (pro wrestling) instead? In the hope of some progress rather than none. starship.paint ~ regal 13:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
I think the (wrestling) side makes a very good case, and see no reason not to hope for full progress. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:34, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
I agree with Hulk, there's still a good chance the move will happen. If it doesn't we can talk about it then.LM2000 (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Please read and comment delete or keep Dao's theorem[edit]

Hello LM2000,

See history of Euclidean geometry I think You have knowledgeable classical geometry, please read pages Dao's theorem and comment anything You think. Delete or keep pages Dao's theorem. Thank to You very much.

Best regards


--Eightcirclestheorem (talk) 03:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

What delete roman reigns,Nicknames and managers?what?i again edit roman reigns wikipedia.never again boy,never. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanreigns54 (talkcontribs) 00:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


Hi. Can you help me? An user, Peroxwhyhalo, includes unsourced and unnecesary information in Matt Taven and Cedric Alexander. We warned him and explaned the situation, but he includes the information over and over (no notable events/matches). I reproted him for vandal, but the user told me he wasn't a vandal. What can I do? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, man. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I Hear You[edit]

So if I get sources from these sites can I keep my info on the page ?

Dont you think you should put what ppv the specific defense happened at instead of just listing people he beat?