|This user is busy reading many editors' reasons for being busy and may not respond swiftly to queries.|
This is a new account but I'm not new to Wikipedia. I originally started editing years ago, mostly anonymously, other times under the username, NwJerseyLiz (contributions here, not many edits) which I stopped using in 2010. That year, I switched to editing under IP accounts 18.104.22.168 (contributions here, over 2,000 edits) or 22.214.171.124 (contributions here), but have created this username account (contributions here) so I can do a variety of activities that unregistered accounts can not do. There are times though that I do not want to log in, especially if I'm feeling Wikihounded. But you can find me on either one of those two last accounts. Here's my breakdown of edit history with this account. Newjerseyliz (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Due to another username change, I'm now Liz Let's Talk ! 16:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
There are currently 4,555,245 articles and 124,164 active users on English Wikipedia.
|Picture of the day|
A cross section of a post-clitellum segment of an annelid (ringed worm); almost all segments of an annelid contain the same set of organs and parts, a pattern called metamerism. Annelids have no lungs, but rather exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen directly through the moist skin when blood reaches the extremely fine capillaries of the body walls; a dry worm cannot breathe and will die of suffocation. The worm's red blood, which does not consist of platelets or red cells but mostly of a liquid containing suspended hemoglobin, makes a circuit up and down the animal in its closed circulatory systems.
My edit stats | More edit stats | Traffic | AfT | DRV | LFH
Citation issues | Google Translator Toolkit | UCP | Backlog
|This user is a member of the
Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists
Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet
It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.