User:Pictureuploader
[edit] My aim and policy here
To make readers and visitors say: "Wow, they thought writing even about this topic!!!"
Inclusionist: Because of a perceived greater acceptance of trivialities, small articles, non-traditional topics, and non-academic articles, inclusionists may find themselves in opposition to those who hold stricter views about the proper content of an encyclopedia. Inclusionists may feel such critics are simply suffering from the academic standards kick.
WP:UCS (and perhaps sometimes WP:IAR) is the most important of the other rules for me. Wiki is not paper. However Wikipedia:Notability guidelines, 'Google tests' etc have taken over (once) useful and interesting articles... something which makes more harm to Wikipedia than benefit; Notability criteria are POV. For these reasons I am not much addicted to Wikipedia as I used to be.
Although I subscribed in order to be able to upload pictures, some copyright regulations prevent me, at least without doing any mistake or being a lawyer, but it nearly seems to be complicated: What ever you do, you have to fight with regulations, prohibitions, instructions, restrictions, rationales... Even for the most simple creative commons pictures.
However I oppose large articles about fictional subjects (Star Wars, Star Trek etc) in Wikipedia, while there exist separate wikis for them, such as Wookieepedia or Memory Alpha. I wish that I will see a separate wiki for every fandom.
