| Deletion discussions |
- Articles (today, all, closing)
- Templates (today, all, closing)
- Files (today, all, closing)
- PUF (today, all, closing)
- Categories (today, all, closing)
- Redirects (today, all, closing)
- Miscellany (today, all, closing)
- Stub types (all)
|
[edit] Alerts
[edit] Bot-reported
[edit] User-reported
Note: Administrators should also kindly consider usernames listed at Filter 149, Filter 188, Filter 354, WP:UAA/HP and CAT:UAA.
-
-
 Wait until the user edits. Tyrol5 [Talk] 02:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
- Wait until the user edits. something other than his automated userpage. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
 Not a blatant or serious violation of policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
 Not a blatant or serious violation of username policy. False positive. Beowulf Agate... --Jayron32 05:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] User-reported
-
 Question: Like the man says below, how is this offensive? Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Requests for permissions
[edit] Rollback
-
- (add request • view requests)
- Hello, I'm Michael and I recently picked up my account back in late November after months of inactivity. Through this 4 month period, I have learned a lot. In December I started reading some of Wikipedia policy, and I was instantly hooked. I began to patrol Special:Log/newusers for vandalism with the help of Twinkle in January and began working in the AfD recently in the past month and a half. I'm requesting rollback because I feel that I have a good understanding of Wikipedia policy and would like to become admin someday. I feel I don't need this feature, and if an admin feels I'm not ready yet they can decline this request, but I feel I am ready to step forth and gain one more user right. Thank you. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 22:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 Y Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- I'm a very active Wikipedian, and am not involved in any "edit-wars" etc. I have already promoted 3 articles to GA, which may help your decision. :) I'd like to stop vandalism, and this can help me. Best, Khanassassin ☪ 11:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Y Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:09, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry if I'm being very stalkish here and if there is indeed no SP problems (which I am not convinced of) but I do have to point out Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/7arazred/Archive at this point for full disclosure because you are requesting this permission and given the fact that you tend to remove all notices from your user talk page. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have been fighting vandalism from the past two days and have reverted more than 50 edits. I currently use Twinkle and it takes some time and a procedure to revert the vandalism. So, I would like to have the rollbacker feature for faster reverts as I wish to continue fighting vandalism and lend a hand in keeping Wikipedia clean. Thank you. BPositive (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator observation) You might find that Twinkle is a far better system than rollback will ever be. Mlpearc (powwow) 17:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Y Done Acalamari 19:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Periodically, I fight against vandalism here on English Wikipedia, and with this feature it would be easier. I have long experience on Serbian Wikipedia, where I am rollbacker and patroller.--В и к и T 16:25, 23 February 2012 (UTC) В и к и T 16:25, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- Y Done An optimist on the run! 16:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- It will help me in serving better MehrajMir ' (Talk) 03:59, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 N Not done - I see no evidence of reverting vandalism in your contributions. Try using Twinkle for a while, and come back when you've gained some experience. An optimist on the run! 07:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Account creator
-
- (add request • view requests)
|
|
|
| General |
|
|
| Content |
|
|
| User issues |
|
|
| Noticeboards |
|
|
|
Clerk note: There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- 
Wait until the user edits. 
Not a blatant or serious violation of 
Not a blatant or serious violation of username policy. False positive. Beowulf Agate... --
Question: Like the man says below, how is this offensive? 
