| Deletion discussions |
- Articles (today, all, closing)
- Templates (today, all, closing)
- Files (today, all, closing)
- PUF (today, all, closing)
- Categories (today, all, closing)
- Redirects (today, all, closing)
- Miscellany (today, all, closing)
- Stub types (all)
|
[edit] Alerts
[edit] Bot-reported
[edit] User-reported
 This noticeboard is for persistent vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to WP:SPI. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- The user is a persistent vandal, indefinately blocked for edit warring on Optometry. Chrisieboy (talk) 15:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Edit warring and sockpuppetry are not vandalism, and the edits don't look like vandalism, either. Please see either WP:ANEW or WP:SPI. —DoRD (talk) 17:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. TerriersFan (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: Administrators should also kindly consider usernames listed at Filter 149, Filter 188, Filter 354, WP:UAA/HP and CAT:UAA.
[edit] User-reported
-
 Comment: Not sure the name is a vio. Had no warnings for spam. Gave him a level 3 warning as a spammer. -- Alexf(talk) 16:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
-
 This noticeboard is for blatant violations of the username policy. Consider taking this report to the conflict of interest noticeboard. While this person does seem to be self-promoting, I don't think the name is promoting a specific product, just something they claim to be good at. Daniel Case (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Requests for permissions
[edit] Rollback
-
- (add request • view requests)
- I have been using twinkle for experience, now I'm thinking of building a Bot. But I only have over a month experience in English Wikipedia. I'm also active in Malayalam Wikipedia. I have about 616 edits in total in all Wikipedia's, I joined 43 days ago. I'm active on 30 project sites. /\ talk← Aviyal →Policy) /\ 21:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, folks. I've worked on removing vandalism from the project for some time; with recent changes patrols, AIV reports, new page patrols, etc. I think it's a good time to take advantage of the rollback tool for some further good. It will render itself useful especially with some of the anti-vandal tools that require it. NTox · talk 12:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 Y Done CharlieEchoTango (contact) 00:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Reverting larger cases of vandalism, (E.G. 4+ cases of vandalism in one article by one user) one edit at a time can be time consuming and causes my efficiency to drop. I am also interested in using other anti-vandalism tools, such as Huggle (Rollback feature is a requirement in this case). I have been editing Wikipedia frequently for about 15-18 months. I enjoy reading and editing Wikipedia, and just recently (about one month ago), I started reverting vandalism on a larger scale (around 300-400 of my edits in the past month have contributed to the reduction of vandalism.) Dusty777 (talk) 00:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Y Done CharlieEchoTango (contact) 00:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have been patrolling the recent changes and reverting vandalism, but I need an easy way to revert vandalism quickly so I can revert more vandalism. Agent 78787 talk contribs 02:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Account creator
-
- (add request • view requests)
|
|
|
| General |
|
|
| Content |
|
|
| User issues |
|
|
| Noticeboards |
|
|
|
This noticeboard is for 
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. 
Comment: Not sure the name is a vio. Had no warnings for spam. Gave him a level 3 warning as a spammer. -- 
This noticeboard is for 
