User:Sławomir Biały

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:Slawekb)
Jump to: navigation, search
Depiction of WMF destroying Wikipedia with Visual Editor and flow.


SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia:Babel
en-5 This user can contribute with a professional level of English.
pl Polski jest językiem ojczystym tego użytkownika.
fr-2 Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français.
it-2 Questo utente può contribuire con un livello intermedio di italiano.
ru-2
Этот участник неплохо знает русский язык.
de-1 Dieser Benutzer hat grundlegende Deutschkenntnisse.
Spikey4.svg-4 This user is an expert Mathematica programmer.
Lambda lc.svg This user can program in Scheme.
lisp-2 This user is an intermediate Lisp programmer.
hs This user can program in Haskell.
ocaml- This user can program in OCaml.
Search user languages
Notice: As of now I am no longer maintaining a watchlist of any kind. My old watchlist is preserved at /watchlist.


Please leave me a message by email, which I check every day and respond to regularly. If you do not wish to interact by email, then you may leave a message here. This page shows up in my related changes, which I check on a sporadic basis. I do not maintain a watchlist. I typically operate an alternate account Slawekb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) because my name is long and the diacritics are not always available. If you can help it though, please don't call me "Slawek" or "Slawekb". I prefer "Sławomir" (pronounced "Swav-o-meer"), although "Slawomir" (without the diacritic) is also acceptable. If you prefer a handle, "SB" is fine as well.

In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger.

How Facts Backfire, Boston Globe, 11 July 2010

In a practical, immediate way, one sees the limits of the so-called “extended mind” clearly in the mob-made Wikipedia, the perfect product of that new vast, supersized cognition: when there’s easy agreement, it’s fine, and when there’s widespread disagreement on values or facts, as with, say, the origins of capitalism, it’s fine, too; you get both sides. The trouble comes when one side is right and the other side is wrong and doesn’t know it. The Shakespeare authorship page and the Shroud of Turin page are scenes of constant conflict and are packed with unreliable information... Our trouble is not the over-all absence of smartness but the intractable power of pure stupidity, and no machine, or mind, seems extended enough to cure that.

Adam Gopnik, "How the Internet gets inside us"; New Yorker, 14 February 2011



Articles to work on[edit]

|}

Misc links[edit]

People[edit]

External links[edit]