From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Editor - bufonite star.jpg This editor is a Master Editor III
and is entitled to display this
Bufonite Editor Star.

Paullusmagnus-logo.JPG This user has been a Wikipedian since March 2004.

23% This user has been a Wikipedian for 22.9% of their life.

Fleur-de-lis-3d.png This user is from
Louisville, Kentucky,
home of the Kentucky Derby.

Ky With HP Background.png

Wikignome crop.gif This editor is a WikiGnome.

Stevietheman is Steve Magruder from Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Steve operates Twitter, Facebook and Google+ pages for Metro Issues, where Steve covers issues from Louisville and the surrounding region.

Steve returned to regular editing in Spring 2014 after a three-year break.

What the Wikipedia is ultimately about[edit]

The Wikipedia is beyond an encyclopedia of all potential notable subjects — it is also an almanac and the beginning of a possibly unforeseen civic infrastructure. I have often thought about what the Wikipedia's raison d'être really is beyond how it is commonly promoted. Ultimately, in my humble opinion, the Wikipedia and derivative efforts are about:

  • Creating a future (not so far away) where everyone on Earth has the right and access to know everything. Everything.
  • Destroying knowledge-based elitism in all its forms.
  • Creating a global expectation of radical transparency in government, business and all other walks of life.

And I think all of these are a Good Thing™.

Philosophy of participation[edit]

Dedicating one's time to the development of anything positively useful by humankind is the highest moral act, especially because these kind of contributions tend to keep on giving past one's existence.

Steve participates in the Wikipedia to:

  • Ensure that people understand what they need to know about subjects he cares deeply about. This especially applies to Louisville-related things.
  • Give the people of the world the power to control all knowledge and keep it out of the hands of the elite, greedy and power-hungry.
  • Enrich the commons and bolster openness and the public domain.
  • Give something back in appreciation to all those who have taught Steve something in this thing called life. We stand on the shoulders of giants.
  • Show everyone he's a smart dude. :)
  • Put Microsoft Encarta and Encyclopædia Britannica out of business. Who needs 'em?

Steve can accomplish all of the above without ever becoming an admin. He sees no joy in the idea of being an admin—boring, thankless tasks aren't his bag. On the contrary, he finds immense joy in authoring articles and managing projects that enhance the process of authoring articles. Unless and until admins are paid a significant stipend, please do not nominate him for adminship.


Fleur-de-lis-3d.png This user is a member of
WikiProject Louisville.

Ky With HP Background.png This user is a member of WikiProject Kentucky.

73,000+ This user has made more than 73,000 contributions to Wikipedia.

Ellipse sign 544.svg This user is ranked 544 on the list of Wikipedians by number of edits.

Herostratus defcon2.jpg 6.1CVS / 7.1RPM according to DefconBot 18:00, 26 April 2015 (UTC) change

Categorist.jpg This user is a member of the Association of Categorist Wikipedians

AWB logo draft.png This user uses AutoWikiBrowser.


This user tags articles for maintenance with Twinkle!

Template icon This user is a template maker

Arrow redr.png This user knows why redirects exist and how to use them effectively.

<ref> This user recognizes the importance of citing sources.

AddLinks.jpg This user believes that adding relevant links is never a bad thing

Copyright-problem.svg This user enforces WP:NFC.

No-peacock.svg This user thinks that peacocks and weasels should be extinct. Mustela frenata.jpg

Unbalanced scales.svg This user has strong political views, but feels that Wikipedia is not the proper place to express them.

Text-x-generic with pencil.svg This user believes that process is important on Wikipedia and is opposed to its circumvention.

<sum>:1 This user believes that every edit should have a summary.

Steve made his first contribution to the Wikipedia on March 20, 2004, adding a self-promotional link to direct democracy (note: he realized not much later that this wasn't appropriate). Ultimately, though, he actually added worthwhile content to this and many other articles related to the subject of democracy.

Steve contributes to many articles and discussions, especially related to his hometown of Louisville, Kentucky, as well as politics and computer science.

As of April 23, 2015, Steve is the 544th most active Wikipedian and has completed more than 73,000 live edits, over 41,000 of which are directly to articles! See his full list of contributions.

Approach to editing[edit]

Steve believes in making constructive changes to articles in a very bold manner, but whenever a change dramatically alters the content of a well-established article, he will either: 1) seek consensus first from currently heavily involved contributors to the article; or 2) if there are not any currently heavily involved contributors, simply explain his changes on the talk page and then proceed.

When it comes to editing articles, Steve addresses obvious spelling, grammar and structural issues. But that's not all. As an editor, Steve always takes a strong look at:

  • Vandalism, whether it's blatant or sneaky. People who think they can vandalize or otherwise play games with our articles need to realize that established Wikipedia editors are engaged in serious business here, and our tolerance of vandalism, especially now that Wikipedia is undeniably a high-quality work, is about as low as it gets.
  • Blatant advertising, especially of unrelated products/sites, but also of related entities that could eventually get out of hand (e.g., under Internet forum, listing all forums on the web).
  • "Brochure-itis", where the content looks like it came from some corporate marketing department. Glowing, flowery, promotional language of a subject simply does not belong in an encyclopedia.
  • Making people out as saints in bios (similar to brochure-itis), where biographical content looks like came from some rabid supporter or fan. Hagiographic language about a person also does not belong.
  • Non-neutral or imbalanced points of view and subjectivity in general. Editors must strive to keep their personal opinions out of Wikipedia articles.
  • Lack of encyclopedic relevance — For the subject of an article to have encyclopedic relevance, there must be provable common knowledge and reverence of the article's subject within the subject's expected natural sphere of influence. Further, all references provided for proof should rest outside the direct influence of the subject itself as well as integrally linked parties or organizations. Neither the volume of Google hits nor a subject's ranking in Alexa (if it's a website) provide sufficient evidence for these purposes.
  • Egos of contributors in their promotion of original research and pet ideas that don't belong here.
  • Elitism — Steve supports a very non-elitist Wikipedia and thus takes a dim view of stuffy, highfalutin wording as well as self-appointed experts who claim dominion over a particular article.
  • Quick radical rewrites — Oftentimes when a long-established article (especially one related to politics) is virtually redrafted in a short period of time without any discussion beforehand, it is a victim of POV-pushing. As a rule, Steve reverts these radical rewrites and asks the author of those rewrites to explain their changes and get consensus approval before making them.
  • Whitewashing — Sometimes a contributor loyal to the subject of an article (or a part thereof) will remove inconvenient facts that they believe make their subject look bad, or in other cases, a contributor loyal to a particular side of a controversy will re-write content to buttress their side (usually with peacock terms) while effectively denigrating the other one.
  • Lack of edit summary — When content is changed significantly and especially if content is removed, the edit needs to have a summary. If it doesn't, Steve will normally revert.
  • Unwikified unfactored text dumps — On occasion contributors take free content from other sources and dump it into existing articles without wikifying it or factoring it into the article so that the article flows as well as it did before. These contributors seemingly expect others to clean up their shit. This is unacceptable and Steve challenges these text dumps.
  • Non-adherence to standard reference formats — Some people seem to think they can invent their own style of reference, or go with an off-beat style, when we have easy-to-use templates that enforce reasonable standards. Readers normally expect consistency across a single work, such as an encyclopedia; therefore, all references should have a common appearance.
  • Treating articles like Christmas trees, with images as ornaments — Images added to articles ordinarily need to help convey information that is presented in the article, and shouldn't ever be added for mere decorative or aesthetic effect.
  • TMI — Steve pretty much zaps trivialities, highly personal info, hours of operation, non-notable/minor things a subject is involved with, and other excessive details that normally go on a subject's website but not their encyclopedia article.

Policies and guidelines[edit]

The Signpost
22 April 2015

Steve adheres to the idea that policies are law in the Wikipedia and should be strictly followed, except when doing that interferes with reasonable, very necessary actions. However, he believes that guidelines are just that, guidelines, and are not absolute. Guidelines should be used to guide in one's contributions and to serve as weighted points in the determination of the correctness of content or its structuring. In some cases, strict adherence to guidelines over common sense or usability has been a bad thing for the Wikipedia. Further, while most guidelines are sensible and well-considered, Steve every now and then comes across a guideline and thinks "Who wrote this shit?".


Steve uses {{prod}} to deal with unencyclopedic articles he comes across in the Wikipedia. But he won't bother unless the article's subject is obviously non-notable or the article's development is extremely weak. If he can't decide one way or another, he defaults to doing nothing.

Except with respect to pages included by WikiProject Louisville, he does not participate in XfD processes, as the model for determining the result has become too convoluted. Steve is not exactly an "inclusionist", but figures the inclusion disputes are best left to those who enjoy the heat of these kind of disputes. It's also hard for Steve to think of himself as a truly contributive Wikipedia "author" if he spends much, if any, time deciding whether an article hardly anybody will ever look at should be kept or removed.


When it comes to disagreements over the content in articles, Steve is a strong adherent to seeking honorable compromises that maintain factuality and proper balance above all else. However, there are times when some other contributors descend into game playing, personal attacks, muddying tangential discussion or repeated circular argumentation rather than faithfully discussing content disputes and answering straight questions (usually, "Do you have evidence or sources for your position?"). These folks are usually dealt with via consensus of the other involved contributors.

Louisville disambiguation[edit]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Louisville#Louisville disambiguation. This activity isn't as anal as you may think. :)

Stevie's Top 40 edited articles[edit]

Following are Steve's 40 most edited articles (as of April 23, 2015):

Article creations[edit]

Following are articles and other pages created by Steve:

My home area: Louisville and Kentucky[edit]


Note: I've created many Louisville-related categories that have been renamed via deletion followed by creation of the new ones, without credit made to the original creators.

WikiProject Louisville[edit]

Politics and political science[edit]

Computer science[edit]

Disambiguation pages[edit]

Categories for articles[edit]


To do's[edit]

This is my list of things I am planning to do in the Wikipedia. Of course, please feel free to beat me to the punch in getting any of these things done.

edit·history·watch·refresh Stock post message.svg To-do list for User:Stevietheman:

Major accomplishments and innovations[edit]

  • Founded WikiProject Louisville
  • Developed the first project-wide change patrol
  • Added what ultimately became the "Click here to start a new topic" link to {{Talk header}} -- Thank me (or yell at me) for making it easier for people to talk about Wikipedia pages. :)
  • Innovated project banner design in the earlier days of WikiProjects, with ideas now used widely
  • Set up a project alert system in WikiProject Louisville and other projects that displays project-wide alerts on project pages, member banners and project to-do lists (displayed within talk page project banners).


Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
For your continued excellent work on the PHP article! --james // bornhj (talk) 10:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
I award this Barnstar to Stevie for his tireless efforts in WikiProject Louisville and because he has received entirely too few barnstars for his hard work.

--Carl (talk contribs) 06:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Editors Barnstar.png The Editor's Barnstar
For all you have done for Wikipedia, especially in regards to the Louisville Metro, I award you, Stevietheman, the Editor's Barnstar. Keep up the awesome work! --Moreau36 16:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar of Reversion2.png The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your help in preventing recent vandalism at Louisville, Kentucky and at other articles in the past. Your efforts are much appreciated! Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
KY Barnstar.png The Bluegrass Barnstar
I hereby award you with this bluegrass barnstar for your invaluable work to improve articles for the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Keep up the outstanding work! -- Steven Williamson (HiB2Bornot2B) - talk 17:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your watchful eye! It is greatly appreciated. Taxee (talk) 16:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your help. I appreciate your attention to the Louisville-related articles. Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Steve's hometown — Louisville, Kentucky

Steve was born and raised in Louisville, Kentucky. Steve attended public school at Auburndale Elementary, Parkland Elementary, Lassiter Middle, Butler High and Fairdale High.

In 1984, he began attending J. B. Speed School of Engineering (formerly Speed Scientific School) at the University of Louisville, majoring in Engineering Math and Computer Science (concentrating in Computer Science), and received his B.S. in Engineering Science in 1989. Subsequently, he worked alternately as a permanent employee and contractor with various firms and organizations (including two Fortune 500 companies) as a software developer. Since graduating from college, he has lived in Endicott, New York, Atlanta, Georgia, Charlotte, North Carolina and Fremont, California.

Favorite Wikipedia/Wikimedia pages[edit]




External links[edit]

Steve's stuff[edit]


This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at

Wikimedia Foundation