User talk:Taeyebaar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:Taeyebaar)
Jump to: navigation, search

Disambiguation link notification for August 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hindustani language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Opting out[edit]

Adding "overpopulation" to India[edit]

Hi, please note this is the second time that I've been forced to revert you per this discussion at Talk:India/Archive 38#Overpopulation some months ago. India is a featured article and per WP:OWN#Featured articles, read the discussion and propose this change again on the talk page instead (if you disagree with the previous consensus). Thank you, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry[edit]

Sorry if I came off a little harsh. We've had a string of people add weird genres to The X-Files, and I'm so used to reverting them. I apologize, seeing that yours was an actual, legitimate source.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

It was a good addition, and like I said, it was a hasty revert and I was in a bad mood. Please don't think I'm a butt.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:09, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Good point. Episodes like "How the Ghosts Stole Christmas", or "The Gift" definitely are more "supernatural" than sci-fi. And yeah... that last "movie". :P--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

That's an interesting genre (and to be honest, I didn't know it existed). While I think the show is definitely an example, I would hold off until a source can be found, but I'm sure one exists out there somewhere.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Space opera/Military science fiction and their lists[edit]

Hello I saw your objection on the list of space opera media that you are for the merge. When I tried merging after a sleepless night - everybody jumped against it. Can you put on the talk pages, if you are still for it, why these lists: list of so and list of msf should be merged? Thanks beforehand!

Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk)

Your edit at Celestial Seasonings[edit]

I have reverted your re-addition of text at Celestial Seasonings. The text was removed precisely because it is unverifiable (see WP:V) because it is referenced to blogs and other unreliable sources (see WP:RS). If you think it should be included, it needs to be properly sourced and you should discuss it on the talk page. Thank you. Kindzmarauli (talk) 15:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Anne Castles[edit]

Hi, I have added several more wikilinks to the Anne Castles article - others could be made from the various Dyslexia and Cognitive science articles, but this needs a specialist to do so, otherwise I may misrepresent and garble her contribution in these area.Garyvines (talk) 04:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Frontier (subgenre) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frontier (subgenre) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frontier (subgenre) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 03:19, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Frontier[edit]

@Taeyebaar:: I will see what I can do about it. I am having much time devoted to historical fiction and its related media exemples. I will try to return back to msf and space opera, frontier included. I wanna also turn your attention to space western and its further expansion.

Kindest regards: The Mad Hatter (talk)

Proposed deletion of Adventure science fiction[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Adventure science fiction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a recognised subgenre. This article instead describes space opera, military science fiction, science fiction opera, cyberpunk etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 14:03, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia:DEPROD, I have removed the prod tag from article. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. To remove the article you need a consensus, see Wikipedia:Consensus. Please do not continue the edit-war, if you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Edit warring, Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2)
16:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Hain Celestial Group[edit]

Sorry, but I put the word organic back in the description of Hain Celestial group. You already started a section on the controversy and a court case. The company's brands still carry the organic certification label and use the word natural. If you have more to say, it belongs in the section on the controversy. If you think about it, there would be no controversy if the company's own description, and the labels on its food, did not claim opposite to the charges laid against it. The way to make the controversy clear is to describe the company as it is. If there is a loss in court where none of its foods carry the organic certification on the labels, then it will be time to change the lead in this article. I do not mean to start a dispute. Your information on the court case is new, and of course, interesting, if terse. That is, I would not mind a few more sentences on the specifics of the case. California only, or national? How far along are the court proceedings? Are there any food industry articles on the strength of the case, etc. --Prairieplant (talk) 10:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)