From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
♂ This user is male.
Flag of the United States.svg This user lives in the
United States of America.
Flag of Chicago, Illinois.svg This user proudly lives in Chicago, Illinois.
en This user is a native speaker of English.
ja-2 この利用者はある程度日本語ができます。
Tento uživatel má středně pokročilé znalosti češtiny.
de-2 Dieser Benutzer hat fortgeschrittene Deutschkenntnisse.
pt-1 Este usuário/utilizador pode contribuir com um nível básico de português.
.هذا المستخدم يتحدث اللغة العربية بمستوى مبتدئ ar-1
nv-1 Díí choyoołʼįįhí Diné Bizaad t'áá áłts'íísígo bił bééhózin.
ga-1 bun-Ghaeilge ag an úsáideoir seo.
Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
Not Admin.svg This editor is not an administrator and does not wish to be one.
Noia 64 apps karm.svg This user has been on Wikipedia for 6 years, 11 months and 6 days.
3,102 This user is ranked 3,102 on the list of Wikipedians by number of edits.
20,000+ This user has made more than 20,000 contributions to Wikipedia.
I'm an awesome Wikipedian!
This user has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian and was awarded his or her own day.
Four Award.svg This user received a Four Award because they started, had displayed as a Did You Know..., improved to Good Article status, and improved to Featured Article status Sonic: After the Sequel.
Million award logo.svg This user won the Quarter Million Award for bringing Czech language to Good Article status.
incl This user is an inclusionist.
imm This editor is an immediatist.
Wikipedia-in-Sunglasses.png This user supports the right of anonymous users to edit Wikipedia.
Red copyright.svg This editor thinks Wikipedia should readily allow copyrighted images and supports fair use. We should teach and not let copyright stop learning.
Unbalanced scales.svg This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues.
WP Conservatism.png Wikipedia should attempt to achieve neutrality,
Not advance the bias of sources.
A, B, and C This user prefers the serial comma.
. The This user does not put two spaces after a full stop.
Graduation hat.svg This user is an undergraduate student majoring in Mathematics.
Stratocaster detail DSC06937.jpg This user likes alternative rock.
Masterkeyboard.jpg This user appreciates progressive rock.
Masterkeyboard.jpg This user enjoys electronic music.
🎸 This user plays the guitar.
5-string bass.png This useriplays the bass guitar.
Nexuiz - screenshot 3.jpg This user is a Video game developer.
Java-2 This user is an intermediate Java programmer.
C++-1 This user is a beginning C++ programmer.
HTML-1 This user is a beginning HTML user.
css-1 This user is a beginning Cascading Style Sheets user.
Quill and ink.svg This user enjoys writing.
This user writes
fan fiction.
KV This user enjoys
the works of
Kurt Vonnegut.

Quenya Example.svg This user is interested in conworlding/conlanging. Sample conworld.jpg
Chichen-Itza-Castillo-Seen-From-East.JPG This user is interested in the Ancient American civilizations.
This user is a troper.
^_^ This user watches anime.
cvg-3 This user is an advanced gamer.
Diff M This user plays Video Games on Medium or the default difficulty.
BlankMap-World6.svg This user is opposed to regional lockout.
Blue circle with white highlight.svg This user plays the Sonic the Hedgehog series.
P This user plays Pokémon games.
Team Fortress 2 style logo.svg This user plays Team Fortress 2.
Aperture Science.svg This user is thinking with Portals!
FF This user plays Final Fantasy games.
Rpg video game.svg This user is a fan of Role-playing video games.
fan-3 This user's favorite computer or video game character is Blaze the Cat.
fan-2 This user is a big fan of the computer or video game character Andrew Ryan (BioShock).
fan-2 This user is a big fan of the computer or video game character Bowser (character).
fan-2 This user is a big fan of the computer or video game character Fidget (Dust: An Elysian Tail).
fan-2 This user is a big fan of the computer or video game character Goombella.
fan-2 This user is a big fan of the computer or video game character N (Pokémon).
fan-2 This user is a big fan of the computer or video game character Tails (character).
INTP This user's MBTI type is INTP.
Asexuality Symbol.svg This user identifies as asexual.
¿!? This user is an Agnostic atheist
NoAlcoholics.gif This user is a teetotaler.
Cannabis prohibited sign This user is drug-free.
Toppledominos.jpg This user is a compatibilist.
V This user is a vegetarian.
Black Paw.svg This user cares about animals.
Map symbol park 02.png It's a fact: This user is a tree hugger. People.svg
Female.svg This male user supports feminism.
Bike-icon.svg This user is a bicycle commuter.
This user has experienced one or more episodes of major depression.
PTSD This user has Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Flag of the Czech Republic.svg This user is of Czech ancestry.
This user is of Welsh descent
Flag of the Arab League This user is of
Arab ancestry
هذا المستخدم من أصل عربي
Here comes rain again.jpg This user loves rainy days.
Face-angel.svg This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.

I pronounce my name /təˈzɛr/ ("teh-ZEH-roh"), but you can however you want. In the spirit of summarizing, I'm a college student who likes editing articles on video games (especially Sonic and other cute things with animal characters) and, more recently, languages. I like to think of myself as pretty impartial (though the trout is raring to go if you think otherwise), and while I don't agree with all of Wikipedia's policies and informal consensuses, my enjoyment of editing and not being too much of a jerk outweighs this. Hope to see you around.

Incomplete projects[edit]



History and editing preferences[edit]

My first inclination to join Wikipedia came around the summer of 2007, when I asked my mom if I could get an account to add a mention of the "cloning" cheat to the Pokémon Emerald article. She said no, but in my rebellious ways I did it anyway (only for it to get reverted not long after), and I joined that December; I was 13, in seventh grade, and pretty immature at the time. I mainly edited Linkin Park and Blessid Union of Souls articles, tricked out my userpage, and crafted userboxes. (While I no longer do this, here's a list of them.) I won a brief period of infamy after creating a userbox for people who feel that homosexuality is immoral. (To be clear, I'm not homophobic [or heterophobic, etc.], nor was I at the time. To the extent that I really understand what sexual attraction is, I'm asexual and biromantic.) My reasoning was that it's a viewpoint like any other and should be afforded some space here – to put it nicely, the community disagreed. That pretty much turned me off userboxes for good.

In mid-2008, I got acquainted with Escape Artist Swyer, with whom I worked on No Doubt album articles for a little over a year. She did most of the work; I mainly just found sources for the more obscure ones and reworked a lot of her additions to Tragic Kingdom. This was better, but not quite fulfilling.

I started editing Shadow the Hedgehog (the video game) at the tail-end of 2008. I'm a big fan of the Sonic series, having been introduced to it circa 2003 with Sonic 3, and was one of the few who genuinely enjoyed Shadow's game and thought it took the series in an interesting direction. I was elated when it became my first solo GA and, in May 2009, my first FA. This whisked me into the gaming world on Wikipedia, and video games remain my largest area of contribution – particularly Sonic, as well as Pokémon and quirky indie games.

After a period of dwindling enthusiasm, though, I went on semi-retirement in July 2011. I became involved with a girl that fall; I was under a lot of social pressure to date (her specifically), so I thought that was what I needed. It ended quickly and angrily due to her emotional manipulation of multiple parties and my own awful communication skills, and now we never speak or look at each other when in proximity. As a result, I was seriously depressed for months, expending a lot of time on self-harm and suicidal ideation, and certainly had no motivations to edit. None of my other periods of depression had, or have since, reached that level, and I feel that it helped keep me off Wikipedia for the next couple of years as well. However, I came roaring back into commission in January 2014. I'm not sure what influenced this, but I've been more active than ever. It's been nice seeing familiar faces (well, usernames) and new ones and building up articles about games I enjoy once more. I also took a brief Wikibreak in July 2014 to recollect my thoughts and cool down from some heated arguments; since I've been back, I've taken an interest in language articles, Czech being the first of them.

Generally speaking, I don't take articles of upper C-class or higher under my wing, as these are likely to be well-written, complete, and well-referenced enough for the majority of readers. That being said, when I do start heavy work on an article, I usually take it all the way to GA or FA status because, hey, I've come so far already; why stop?

My piece of work here that I'm most proud of is Sonic X, since in the process of preparing it for GAN and, later, FAC, I spent numerous hours tediously scavenging the Internet for any reliable sources I could find and even located some print sources, and now I feel that the article is the most complete resource available anywhere for the show. The process did not, by any means, "go fast". Also, I turned Green Hill Zone from a redirect to a GAN in two and a half hours – that was invigorating.

Aside from mainspace editing, I sometimes review candidates for GAN, FAC, and peer review. If you'd like me to review an article for you, I can usually make time to do that, so just ask. Keep in mind that I'm better at nitpicking for layout, formatting, and grammar than I am for prose clarity and completeness.

Editing philosophy[edit]

czar (right) and I in person. The leather and (would you have guessed it?) the sunglasses aren't real, but the joys of real-life connection are.

Something I hold intense respect for is Wikipedia's principle of the neutral point of view. To some extent, my preference for neutrality surpasses Wikipedia's: I'm unsatisfied with certain assumptions and biases in numerous discrimination/social justice-related articles—including some ranked as GAs and FAs—but have accepted that they're not changing anytime soon. I can't stand unstated ideological biases in writing, and have inadvertently entered more than my share of real-life arguments by speaking without emotion about controversial topics and playing devil's advocate. While I find TV Tropes a valuable site overall, I dislike its preservation of pages like "So Bad, It's Good", and I value our generally stifling attitude toward assumptions that most people have but that aren't objective or too likely to go unchallenged.

Less widespread here is my feeling that all subjects with even a few third-party sources covering them briefly or tangentially ought to be considered notable for inclusion in independent pages on Wikipedia (provided that they don't overlap too much with individual existing articles). Moreover, I think we should consider reader outcry (such as what JonTron's late article got when it was proposed for deletion) in deciding whether to keep articles, as it shows demand. I'm one of the most inclusionist editors among long-time contributors to the Video games WikiProject. While these are officially just my own ideals, I have also created some articles for video game characters previously not considered notable, with the understanding that official policy on notability would allow these. However, many of them have been re-merged due to Wikipedia's bizarre, changing, and inconsistent apparent attitudes toward notability.

It surprises me that Wikimedia states that immediatism and inclusionism don't usually go hand-in-hand, as I follow both ideologies for much the same reason: In my eyes, readers typically come here to look for as much (accessible) information as is available, not to read polished, concise pieces of work. They may be doing so at any time, so I prefer articles to be available (rather than in my sandbox or one of my tempspaces) when they do.

Most editors with GAs and FAs on their brag lists wouldn't admit this—if indeed they feel it—but I like getting articles to recognized status largely because it helps me feel useful here. A green disc or gold star is a tangible goal, which can turn building a page into a fun project. I do also care about genuinely improving them, and have done decent work on articles I've never intended for recognition, but unlike someone like Sergecross73 (whom I do respect for his selfless attitude toward improvement), I'm more inclined to continue editing when I score a quality emblem once in a while to validate my efforts.

Wikipedia policies toward which I'm neutral or unfavorable towards include those on biographies of living people, external links, dialect-specific language, sitebanning for first-time sockpuppetry, some types of original synthesis, and some finer points of reliable sources and due and undue weight (in particular, the complete silencing of fringe viewpoints). However, my job here is not to enforce my own views, but those established by the community, and so I don't think any of these make me unfit for editing.

While I don't agree with all of his views, Dream Focus's userpage is very much an interesting read, in a countercultural coffee-table way, and I think he especially makes great points about the nature of "merging" and how the vast majority of the time there's no real merge of content whatsoever.

Major contributions[edit]



Former GAs redirected for notability[edit]

Sometimes the mother wolf doesn't give up when her children are eaten by predators. Sometimes she does.

Other worked-on articles[edit]

Other created articles[edit]

Did you know? articles[edit]


References? You want references? This section only exists because I don't like the lingering feeling of a page ending with a level-3 header. Aesthetic taste; there's your reference.