User:The Devil's Advocate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please click here to leave me a new message.

[edit] My editing philosophy
In my editing I strive to take the approach of a Bohemian Wikipedian. I draw my inspiration from the values espoused in the film Moulin Rouge! of Truth, Beauty, Freedom, and Love. These also reflect the kind of values I try to uphold in life. As it pertains to Wikipedia I apply these values in this way:
- Truth - Far too often people take the dictum of verifiability, not truth too far by presuming that if a reliable source can be found to make the claim then it is ok for Wikipedia to say it in the editorial voice. Usually this occurs because of an editor's own bias seeping into his or her editing process. At times because there is an absence of contravening sources editors similarly feel confident in using stronger language than that of their sources. However, I believe this goes against an unspoken rule that Wikipedia should always strive for factual accuracy. I seek to counter the systemic bias that often works its way into contentious topic areas in pursuit of the greater truth. That means using the most neutral wording the sources support and, save for "sky is blue"-type situations, in-text attribution should be the norm. The goal is making the project a place to find the whole story with eyes unclouded by prejudice, contrary to the more controlled sources of information in the world.
- Beauty - When it comes to any article one is likely to find more than a few instances of repetition and less-than-engaging wording. One of my objectives in contributing to Wikipedia is to improve the stylistic appearance of any article I come across. That means, to provide an example, trimming down the instances of paragraphs starting with the same letter, and especially the same word. Another big issue is avoiding the timeline-like style certain articles about ongoing events tend to take on out of a general apathy of editors. By beautifying the project wherever I can my hope is that more readers will be engaged with the repository of knowledge Wikipedia represents.
- Freedom - This project is first and foremost an experiment in information democracy. Submitting the whole of human ingenuity and knowledge to the task of building a source of knowledge for all requires great care and consideration. As predicted by the iron law of oligarchy, Wikipedia has fallen prey to the same abusive tendencies of any governance system. Rule by consensus may appear to be a policy to cherish, but it is all too often misused by editors to impose their own will on the project. Assuming good faith keeps us willfully blind to some extent about what is taking place. Look through any article in a contentious topic area and you are liable to find a consortium of editors from the same ideological persuasion who have become the page's self-appointed gatekeepers. Enterprising users who go against their will often find themselves driven away, whether it is by falling into a revert trap or simply becoming frustrated with endless stone-walling. Unfortunately, Wikipedia looks more favorably upon the gatekeepers as they greatly outnumber their opponent. Always looking for a way to satisfy all parties without compromising my principles and drawing attention to the biases of all sides is the best way I can think of to insure this experiment remains open to as many people as possible.
- Love - Above all things I believe in WikiLove. WikiLove is like oxygen. WikiLove lifts us up where we belong. All you need is WikiLove. For me it means keeping an open mind on all things. Were more editors to leave themselves open it would be easier to defuse most disputes. Remain open to having your edits rewritten. Remain open to changing your mind. Remain open to changing your actions even if you won't change your mind. Too much potential is lost in the ideological rigidity of groupthink and confirmation bias. Pursuit of WikiLove means that the only things we should try to take seriously are the feelings of others. Sometimes it is hard to stay cool and we have all been there at one point or another. Keep in mind that we do this not for ourselves, but for all those who may witness this body of work.
To sum it all up, my goal is to try and uphold the idea of what Wikipedia can be, while dealing with the reality of what Wikipedia is at this moment. More than anything I want this project to be a great service to all truth-seekers in the world. It should be a light of knowledge in dark places when all other lights go out. One could say that I am a true believer when it comes to this idea and, even if it leaves me battered and bruised, I will strive to defend the principles of this project above all else.
[edit] Things to do
- Create article on E*Trade baby.
- Turn Wikipedia:Inaccuracy into a fitting proposal for a guideline.
- Write essay on "camping" at articles.
- Write essay on "railroading" by groups to potentially link with camping.
- Write essay on "echo chamber" to discuss groupthink on Wikipedia to link from camping and railroading.
- Write essay on "doubling down" in contentious disputes.
- Create article on Consolidated Restaurant Operations for possible merge with Dixie House article.
- Create article on WiseGeek.
- Expand article on Google Panda and content farm.
- Create article on Caroline Rose Hunt.
- Create article on Maritz, Wolff & Co
- Create article on Sheppard King
- Create article on Americas Lodging Investment Summit
- Expand AAA Five Diamond Award article.
- Rewrite Perkins Coie article.
- Rewrite articles on Rosewood properties.
- Expand New World China Land article.
- Rewrite articles on Resort and Hotel.
- Expand Sowwah article.
- Create article on Sonia Cheng.
- Write Essay on under-served topic areas.
- Create article on US Azeris Network.
- Write Essay on wikipartisans.
- Create article on Ben Swann
- Expand article on Stefaan Engels
- Create article on Chuck Engle
- Create article on Running Times Magazine
- Improve article on Runner's World Magazine
- Create article on Melissa Gillette
- Create article on Doug Kurtis
- Expand article on Association of Road Racing Statisticians
- Create article on indoor marathons
- Turn Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) into a fitting proposal for a guideline.
- Create article on Tim Siedell
[edit] Articles I've created
[edit] Articles where I've made major contributions
[edit] Userboxes
| Politics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This user supports immigration and the right to travel freely upon the planet we share. |
|
|
 |
This user supports the legalization of all drugs for adults. |
|
|
|
 |
This user trusts the EU about as far as they can throw it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Music |
 |
This user likes all types of music. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Science Fiction |
|
|
|
|
 |
This user believes that the Jedi have not found the true light.
Told you did I, reckless is he! Now, matters are worse.
|
|
 |
This user is interested in the belief that there is no light or dark side of the Force, but only a single Unifying Force. |
|
|
|
| Literature |
|
|
|
|
 |
This user wonders who is watching the Watchmen |
|
|
|
|
| Science and Philosophy |
|
|
|
|
 |
This user advocates personal belief but does not support organised religion. |
|
|
|
|
| Animé |
|
|
アニメ
sub |
This user prefers to watch
his/her anime subbed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|