User talk:Titusfox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:Titusfox)
Jump to: navigation, search
Stalk this page Don't click here! Awards and wikilove Trout this user Kill this user
User Talk   Chess   Awards And Wikilove!    
Wikipedia Reviewer.svg This user has reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
LIVE
This user plays on Xbox Live with the gamertag Titusfoxlives.
4

WikiDefcon 4
Low to moderate level of vandalism.

3.7CVS / 4.0RPM according to DefconBot —10:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Motto Logo.png This user frequently contributes to the Motto of the Day. Do you?
遊戯王 This user is prepared to duel.
Yu-Gi-Oh! icon.png This user plays Yu-Gi-Oh!
Nuvola apps kdmconfig.png This user has an alternate account, TitusfoxInPeril.


Today's motto...

So it goes.
This page was last edited or modified by MediaWiki message delivery (talk).

User:TitusfoxInPeril For Perilous Places

Hi! I'm Titusfox (pronounced Tytusfox)!

Admin Noticeboard Incidents

Pending Changes

Recent Changes (Edits, New Accounts, Yada Yada Yada...)

The Last Titus... So Lonely...

Out Of Date? Purge!


Barnstar![edit]

Guestbook barnstar.png Solarra's Guestbook Barnstar
This user has signed my guestbook and been presented with a barnstar. Sign my guestbook now if you have not yet! ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀

Shaiwatna Kupratakul[edit]

Hi,

With this edit, you reinstated unreferenced information about a living person, which contravenes wikipedia policy WP:V.

I realise it was just a 'revert', but per WP:BURDEN, the principle applies.

Please can you undo your edit, and let's discuss it on the article talk page? Thanks,

Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk) 10:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Not likely. Has the bunny checked all the refs on the article - including the Thai ones - to verify this info is not ref'd? Hardly looks made up at all. Legacypac (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
I Just saw what you did and did the same. He's on WP:ANI accussed of being WP:NOTHERE so, logical conclusion, revert. TF { Contribs } 10:41, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Please consider 'burden'.

You've added that he was "Lecturer at Department of Physics, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, during 1970–1982", but you cannot provide a reference for it.

And so forth.

If you can't provide a verification, it shouldn't be on the article. Per policy.

Do you disagree?

If not, please undo and we can discuss it further on the article talk page. Thanks. 88.104.24.116 (talk) 11:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Please Don't bring the WP:WAR Here Please. Thanks, TF { Contribs } 11:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
No war. I'm just asking you nicely to please 'undo' an edit in which you added unreferenced info to a BLP. Is all.
I won't bother you again on your talk page. I hope you will undo your edit. Best, and goodbye, Igor the facetious xmas bunny (talk) 11:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Pending changes on Anthony Hopkins[edit]

Your use of pending changes on Anthony Hopkins seems like you where using it to edit war rather reject edits in accordance with the criteria. Please ensure you follow the criteria in the future. Thank you, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

I Did try to reject changes, but the other user Reverted my edits and so the cycle continued until I hit the WP:3RR and Didn't want to get into any more trouble. TF { Contribs } 13:42, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
If the content isn't covered by those criteria you need to undo it normally or accept it then undo it normally. You cannot use the pending changes feature to edit war. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

MOTD 2015 Service Award and Happy 2015[edit]

MOTD trial finale.png The MOTD Barnstar
We at Motto of the Day would like to thank you for your participation and contributions to MOTD during 2014. We hope to see you around in 2015. Happy New Year to you and yours from MOTD!!! –pjoef (talkcontribs) 11:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter[edit]

Trophy.png

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter[edit]

One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Australia Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)