User:Wslack/Desk

For AMA business

Links

1. Wikipedia:Policy Library

WP:LOP

WP:Guidelines

1. Wikipedia:Resolving Disputes
2. Foundation issues on Meta
3. Wikipedia:Copyrights
4. Wikipedia:General disclaimer
5. Wikipedia:Civility
6. Wikipedia:Etiquette
7. Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith
8. Wikipedia:No Personal Attacks
9. WP:LAWYER

AMA business

Hi all, I'm --\/\/slack (talk) with the AMA. I've been looking over this page and its related ones. Here are some observations:

• Realsched.exe violates NPOV, and contains almost no useful content. As a part of RealPlayer, issues with it should be in the criticism section, with link for both sides of the pro-con argument.
• There is no reason to call RealPlayer a good audio/video player without a citation. There is also no reason to call it a bad audio/video player without a citation.
• A reviews section would be helpful with leading reviews from various sources. The "Worst 25" listing would go here.
• RealAlternative would go under the Criticisms section (which differs from reviews in that it focuses on negative aspects found, as opposed to features, which does positive aspects)
• Users must keep their personal feelings out of this article. Everything said should be referenced , especially considering what has been said.

Comments

• A reviews section would be helpful with leading reviews from various sources. The "Worst 25" listing would go here.
• RealAlternative would go under the Criticisms section (which differs from reviews in that it focuses on negative aspects found, as opposed to features, which does positive aspects)

You mean, it should be three sections: Criticism, Reviews, and Features? Or only Criticisms (negative aspects) and Reviews (positive aspects)? --Urod 15:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)