User talk:Matthew Stannard

Leave a Message
It is now 17:04 on Thursday, February 2, 2012 Wikitime

---

Useful stuff

/Archive 1

Some tags:

• ^{[citation needed]}
• Wikipedia:List of shortcuts
• About templates:[1].

Some or all of the following is based off User:Angela/useful stuff.

• Recent changes (anonymous users)
• Wikipedia:Goings-on
• Recent changes (Wikipedia: namespace)
• Angela's Useful Stuff (remember to change out names! =b)
• Post a copyvio notice
• user:Matthew Stannard/Scratch
• user:Matthew Stannard/Research
• user:Matthew Stannard/list of family separation research articles

do you have the diffs for this?

"The difficulty here is that the subscribers to Prem Rawat's services hold that any site that contains material that they don't like means that any link to anywhere on that site should be removed from wikipedia, regardless of whether a particular link is to something useful and informative" Hohohahaha (talk) 02:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey there.

Thanks for all the diffs.... and I am not clear, are you asking me to insert them in the evidence section for you? Hohohahaha (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of People's jury

A tag has been placed on People's jury, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

• I've removed the tag - looks like it may have been placed accidentally or something, as the article is clearly not nonsense. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 03:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of People's jury

I have nominated People's jury, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People's jury. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bum-Jae You

A tag has been placed on Bum-Jae You requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jiuguang Wang (talk) 20:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ElgooG

The article ElgooG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Since the article has already survived AfD, where its notability was asserted, I've opted to rescind my PROD nomination. I'll work on introducing information about why the website is notable. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Matthew Stannard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 212 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Guido Daniele - Find sources: "Guido Daniele" – news · books · scholar · free images
2. Terence Frisby - Find sources: "Terence Frisby" – news · books · scholar · free images

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG 3753a.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:IMG 3753a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Feminism

Hello, friend! Please accept this invitation to join a discussion on creating a full-fledged WikiProject Feminism. If you support this idea, please register your support here. All feedback is appreciated! Thanks!

- Kittybrewster ☎ 00:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:RDawkins saint.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RDawkins saint.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Calmer Waters 11:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ElgooG

The article ElgooG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability, violates WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here 18:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Playlist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playlist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playlist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 03:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Weinberg's law of twins

The article Weinberg's law of twins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Anecdote with no secondayr sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 17:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)