User talk:Pjacobi

On 80%-break!

All rights released to all minor edits

I agree to release all rights, unless otherwise stated, to all my English Wikipedia text contributions marked as minor edits, enabling anyone to use them for any purpose. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to freely use my minor edit contributions, please check the multi-licensing guide.

• Interwiki de:User talk:Pjacobi

• Archived discussions User talk:Pjacobi/Archive1 User talk:Pjacobi/Archive2 User talk:Pjacobi/Archive3

• Old userpages [1] [2]
• Subpages [3]
• Watch User:Byrgenwulf/CTMU saga

AfD nomination of Scalar field theory (pseudoscience)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Scalar field theory (pseudoscience). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scalar field theory (pseudoscience). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Explaining you a few things, so you wouldn't be in trouble when being in a more uncensored atmosphere of English Wikipedia

Hi, Pjacobi, were you canvassed at your WP:Vandalismusmeldung? If you haven't noticed yet, please do note that we are here writing an encyclopedia that is not inherently biased towards any political ideology. What is more, valid criticism of Wikipedia(s) - see e.g. Criticism of Wikipedia, is not only allowed but encouraged. Neither do we censor unpleasant facts. Quite unlike the totalitarian 100% 'politically correct' piece that you and your comrades are in possession of. As evident from the blind reverts of you and Matthias, you have severe troubles adjusting to free, uncensored media. If you two continue like this, I'm pretty sure you'll end up in a big trouble. Take care. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 12:47, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Repeatedly accusing your co-editors of being totalitarian can be seen as a violation of WP:NPA. --Pjacobi (talk) 14:54, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Repeated blind reverts (totally disregarding minor improvements made in the meantime) are indicative of a black and white mindset. I'm pretty sure the section will remain there once I go through all the dispute resolution processes. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 15:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

A notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 17:25, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Luboš Motl

As a contributor to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luboš Motl back in 2005, you may be interested to know it has been re-nominated for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luboš Motl (3rd nomination). Robofish (talk) 16:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Fictional

Category:Fictional, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Two things

Hi!

1. I archived your talk page. I hope you don't mind - it was getting very long!
2. I've replied to your question at WT:WPAFC.

Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for both. Unfortunately a lot of work made me postpone my rescue operation for Heinrich Scholz, but I will do it really soon now. --Pjacobi (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Aqua Buddha listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aqua Buddha. Since you had some involvement with the Aqua Buddha redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Pjacobi. Please check your e-mail – you've got mail!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Ben.MQ (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Pjacobi,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.206.39 (talk) 03:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)