User talk:TakuyaMurata
- See the page history to retrieve old talks.
[edit] Proposed deletion of Ginjiro Fujiwara
The article Ginjiro Fujiwara has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kudpung (talk) 15:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
|
|||
[edit] The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
[edit] Proposed deletion of Algae (programming language)
The article Algae (programming language) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No outside reliable and verifiable sources given to establish notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaksar (let's chat) 20:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination of Algae (programming language) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Algae (programming language) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algae (programming language) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yaksar (let's chat) 21:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Wikipedia has a userbox available for you, TakuyaMurata
 |
This user is a member of WikiProject Wikipedia dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of itself. |
|---|
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/userbox/UserWikiProjectWikipedia}}
Pandelver (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
[edit] MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Committee of Wikipedians
Wikipedia:Committee of Wikipedians, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Committee of Wikipedians and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Committee of Wikipedians during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kleinzach 02:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Marc Millican
The article Marc Millican has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The article does not pass WP:POLITICIAN and a Google search does not readily return content from a WP:RS about this person.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
|
[edit] La fille de Monaco
Hello, :) I added an info box, looks like a great film! Good job.l santry (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
|
[edit] Request for comment
This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 16:45, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Augustus William Hare
The article Augustus William Hare has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --jjron (talk) 15:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
|
[edit] File:Annie hall scene.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Annie hall scene.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. damiens.rf 21:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination of Advanced Perl Programming for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Advanced Perl Programming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Perl Programming until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FuFoFuEd (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination of Learning Perl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Learning Perl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning Perl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Msnicki (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Your opinion would be appreciated
As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at List of sovereign states. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the Discussion of criteria. Best regards, Nightw 06:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
[edit] A kitten for you!
Hi Taku, I haven't seen much of you around recently. I'm just stopping by to say "Hi", and offering you a kitten. I hope all is well, and that you're busy with exciting research IRL. Best,
Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] midpoints in Hadamard spaces
According to what you wrote,
-
- The point m is then a midpoint of x and y: d(x,z) = d(z,y) = d(x,y) / 2.
After the colon, the point m is not mentioned, and the statement that appears there looks as if it says that z, rather than m, is a midpoint between x and y. Michael Hardy (talk) 12:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
|
[edit] Localizations
Hi, this is concerning the question I had that came up about localizations which are domains. My commutative algebra is not very well exercised, but I think you can help. My first thought was "If two nonzero elements of R were such that ab=0, then in a localization at a multiplicative set S, wouldn't (a,1)(b,1)=(0,1)?" I think I'm just overlooking something special that happens when P is prime, which probably makes one of (a,1) or (b,1) zero in the localization. So far, whenever I try to look at (a,1) and (b,1) being nonzero, I just get "a and b are both in P", and then I don't see a path. Thanks for looking at this, Rschwieb (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, of course, this just shows that zero divisors turning into non-zero divisors is consistent :P I will find myself a nice example to look at and thank you for your time. Rschwieb (talk) 19:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't do anything. But maybe I did something. So, you're welcome :) -- Taku (talk) 13:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I figured if I'm nice now, then you'll answer questions later too. My first being: do you know if normal rings are always reduced? In the Noetherian case, they're reduced by that structure theorem cited. I didn't see a direct proof of my hunch, though. Rschwieb (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Well, in [1], they define a normal ring to be (i) reduced and (ii) integrally closed everywhere. So, no probably not in general. (But this begs a counterexample.) -- Taku (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I also saw that requirement in Eisenbud's book. BTW, being in a business where logic is important, I hope you're aware of the misuse of the phrase "begs the question", which has now become a sad fact of life. I never use "begs a noun" or "begs the noun" mainly so that I don't encourage the misuse, but also I would be afraid of eliciting smirks at conferences... Anyhow, compromising with "begs for a counterexample" is a (sensical) substitute. I am interested in a counterexample then, if you run across one.Rschwieb (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not sure if you noticed, but I left a footnote in integrally closed domain to explain that if all localizations of R are reduced, then so is R. I think the argument is complete but let me know if I slipped. Rschwieb (talk) 20:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Well, in [1], they define a normal ring to be (i) reduced and (ii) integrally closed everywhere. So, no probably not in general. (But this begs a counterexample.) -- Taku (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I figured if I'm nice now, then you'll answer questions later too. My first being: do you know if normal rings are always reduced? In the Noetherian case, they're reduced by that structure theorem cited. I didn't see a direct proof of my hunch, though. Rschwieb (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't do anything. But maybe I did something. So, you're welcome :) -- Taku (talk) 13:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Actually, I completely missed your edit: I have been caught up by other stuff. Also, I couldn't find any source saying "reduced" is a local property. But I think the proof is correct: so it must be true, then? I tweaked the proof. I hope you don't mind. -- Taku (talk) 22:29, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- I don't mind, I would have done it myself if I weren't worried about the length of the footnote. But there aren't a lot of footnotes really so it shouldn't matter. Does 'local property' here just mean that if the localizations at primes have a property, so does the original ring? Or does the property have to go both ways?
I don't know enough about algebraic geometry to deduce what a geometric interpretation of 'reduced' means. In the noncommutative case I just think of reduced and nonsingular rings as having very nice (self injective von Neumann regular) maximal quotient rings. Rschwieb (talk) 00:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Well, "reduced" means no nonzero nilpotent and, geometrically speaking (long pause) I think it's very hard to explain it: there are no "nilpotent" in classical algebraic geometry, as I understand. Maybe an alternative approach is to consider the relation between "reduced" and "separable". Unfortunately, neither our reduced ring and separable extension don't answer your questions (but they should.) -- 14:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:46, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Request for translation
Hi Takyua, I saw your name on the list of translators from Japanese to English and I have a request to make of you. It could be quite challenging. Could you possibly translate the text from Hokusai's 1820 erotic woodcut The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife, at File:Tako to ama retouched.jpg? It is already transcribed, but the transcription may need a double check. It may feature old slang and terms with different connotations than modern Japanese. Thanks in advance. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:29, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'm not knowledgeable enough with the classic Japanese to translate it. Try asking someone with expertise on ukiyoe. (though I wonder if there is any in Wikipedia.) -- Taku (talk) 14:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. MSJapan said he'd give it a shot. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Merge and something else on localizations
Your speedy action on the merge makes me feel like a bully now. I half expected you'd have half a dozen paragraphs of interesting results on f.g.f.e. and we'd have to merge adjunction into it. Or maybe you already have that in the works... Anyhow about the localization thing, I found out that Kap's Theorem 168 basically makes our ad-hoc proof obsolete, and so I'm going to incorporate it and remove the proof. I had assumed the structure theorem made special use of "normal" but it looks like it's beside the point. Rschwieb (talk) 16:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC) Ah, hold on, I need to modify that modification. Perhaps what we have is needed after all. Rschwieb (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- (Laugh) No, I didn't have any "grand vision" for the future of the article: I started it without much thought, and so there is no trouble merging. wiki is supposed to be quick after all. About the proof, I realized that it's also related to the fact that a scheme is reduced iff it is so locally (i.e., the stalks are reduced). Hartshorne ex 2.3. So, the statement is definitely correct. What we really need is the creation of reduced scheme and the expansion of reduced ring. A trouble is the two concepts are closely related (actually the same?) In any case, I don't think the proof is a big deal. -- Taku (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
-
- This might be my excuse to start learning about schemes. As a ring theorist, I never really ran into a reason why reduced rings should be so interesting, but since in the commutative case it corresponds to "nonsingular" I guess they can get more mileage out of it. When you add in geometric meaning, there's another whole layer of meaning also, so I guess I missed out on some stuff. Rschwieb (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
- I don't have the book with me, but I think I remember this: For any commutative ring R with nilradical N, Spec(R) is homeomorphic to Spec(R/N) (I mean to say both are equipped with the Zariski topology). I read briefly in the wiki that schemes were a useful generalization of varieties which allowed nilpotence to be studied, but if what I'm vaguely recalling is true it looks like nilpotent elements aren't important for varieties. Thoughts? Rschwieb (talk) 01:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
You raised an important point: the topology of a scheme (as I understand) cannot detect nilpotent elements. So, the geometry of scheme is something very algebraic. (duh, it's algebraic geometry.) Since the classical algebraic geometry didn't have nilpotens, the geometry with nilpotent elements is something that doesn't have counterpart in the classical case. This geometry is, apparently, important, in, for example, the study of algebraic groups. (cf. Milne, http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/ALA.pdf. He stresses the importance of allowing nilpotent elements.) -- Taku (talk) 14:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is an interesting fact, and thanks for the link. It's all consistent: to paraphrase Klein, "Algebra⊇Geometry". If that really were the case though I shouldn't be feeling so clueless about the study of geometry :) Rschwieb (talk) 14:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Prince Naruhiko Higashikuni
Hey Taku, would you mind taking a look at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Japan-related_articles#Name_order I understand that you were the original author of Higashikuni Naruhiko Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 04:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination of Augustus William Hare for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Augustus William Hare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augustus William Hare (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Student7 (talk) 23:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello TakuyaMurata! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
[edit] English 2 Japanese translation
Hello, I found you on the Wikipedia:Translators_available page. I would like to ask you if you are still available for translating simple and short articles. The topic would be fashion. Thank you ----★ Pikks ★ MsG 23:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Translation request of interview of Yuji Horii
If/when possible, could you translateInterview by Japan's Media Arts Festival. Unfortunatly, their English page does not contain a translation. :( This appears to be one of the better resources out their too. It is also the last source I'm waiting on before bringing Dragon Warrior to FAC. I have been asking around on the Japanese-English page translators for 2 months now to no avial for various reason.
I got the jist of the first 2 sections being background info on Horii, but the kanji is beyond me for most of that article. I'd like to use this to improve his article, and bring Dragon Warrior and Dragon Quest to FA level. If it's too much for to translate the whole article, concentrate on the stuff about Dragon Quest. Thanks.∞陣内Jinnai 19:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm afraid I simply don't have time to fulfill your request. Maybe you can ask someone else. I will also remove my name from the list. -- Taku (talk) 17:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of JamVM
The article JamVM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No reliable independent secondary sources; not updated in over 18 months
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Nomination of JamVM for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JamVM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JamVM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 09:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] File source problem with File:Arashiyama 013.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Arashiyama 013.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
[edit] Another localizations oriented request
- "The ring R has property X iff the localization RP has property X for every prime ideal P"
- "The ring R has property X iff the localization RM has property X for every maximal ideal M"
How many properties X are you aware of that fit either of these two statements? I would appreciate the help collecting them here, or on my talk page. Thanks! Rschwieb (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Copyright-free
The article Copyright-free has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Completely unsourced, Not mentioned anywhere but in Wikipedia, and no sources IDed in Wikipedia, either. So vague that a reader cannot determine what "copyright-free" means.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 00:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
