User talk:Þadius

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, Þadius! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Contents

Fred Anderson (politician)[edit]

Thanks for this great article - it is always nice to see good work when I'm patrolling new pages :). Ironholds (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Calgary Glenmore[edit]

Ok, sure, I'm sorry I thought it was just a typo or something. Are you ok with me putting the boundaries under the election that they took place in? I think they are easier to read that way... TastyCakes (talk) 16:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, ok. I do like the boxes, but I thought they looked a little strange all lined up in their own section like that. Are you sure you want to put boundary histories in their own section rather than having them attached to their relevant elections? TastyCakes (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Hmm ya I guess I see the benefit of doing it your way, it makes it easier to compare boundaries from different years for sure. I've reverted to what was there before. Do you know why it says the riding is vacant? The Ron Stevens page does say anything about it... TastyCakes (talk) 16:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
You mean for each election? Sure I can move them back...
Ah ok, I'll look into it and update the Ron Stevens article. Feel free to undo anything I've done... TastyCakes (talk) 16:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Kudos[edit]

I just stumbled on Olds (provincial electoral district) which caused me to take a look through your contributions. You're doing great work. Steve Smith (talk) (formerly Sarcasticidealist) 16:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Don't remove offices from succession boxes[edit]

Please avoid edits like this one that removed information about political terms in succession boxes. I realize the change was made about a month ago, but since you made similar changes to several articles it seems appropriate to warn you not to do so in the future. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 11:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Per WP:TCREEP (a widely accepted essay), succession boxes shouldn't duplicate information already found in infoboxes; the edit was appropriate. Steve Smith (talk) 11:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Willy-nilly deleting some succession boxes and leaving others is not acceptable - especially within the same article - you note that the edit arbitrarily removed the one for the House and left the one for the Senate despite both being reflected in the infobox. Additionally, succession boxes for state legislative office are often not duplicating the information in infoboxes (b/c redistricting and moving between legislative houses results in otherwise ungainly infoboxes) and for consistency and navigability these succession boxes should be left intact across such articles.
On a more fundamental level, all of the {{s-par}} and most of the {{s-start}} series are designed with the purpose of presenting largely similar information for ease of navigation, and per WP:CSL (a guideline, not an essay) should be considered complimentary, not redundant. Ironically, the "duplicate" succession boxes for Featured Article Barack Obama's state legislative office are not even hidden, but you consider two identical succession boxes on an Iowa legislator's page to be "template creep"? --Philosopher Let us reason together. 12:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Broyce Jacobs[edit]

My print sources turn up nothing (nothing on Thompson either, actually - stupid print sources). I've sent a message to a few people I know who might know the answer. Alternatively, it might just be worth sending an e-mail to his constituency office. Steve Smith (talk) 04:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually, there's one more place we could check: Alberta Election Results 1882–1992 by Austin and Ernest Mardon. If I recall correctly, it sometimes gives full names when the abheritage site only gives initials. I don't own a copy, but my university library does; it's closed tomorrow, but I'll check it out Thursday. Steve Smith (talk) 04:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
That article is definitely saying he's still alive; the "deceased" applies only to Marilyn Tebbs (who obviously shouldn't be listed in the "survived by" category as a consequence, but what are you going to do?). I'm beginning to strongly suspect that he's our guy, but let's see if either the Mardon book or your e-mail bear fruit. Steve Smith (talk) 04:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
And of course I missed the most obvious sign, which is that both Broyce Jacobses are married to women named Linda. I think they're pretty clearly one and the same; the remaining question is whether he's also our B. G. Jacobs. Steve Smith (talk) 04:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
The Mardon book confirms that Thompson's 1979 SoCred opponent was Broyce G. Jacobs. Good catch. Here's the citation:
  • Mardon, Ernest; Mardon, Austin (1993). Alberta Election Results 1882–1992. Edmonton: Documentary Heritage Society of Alberta. p. 50. 

Steve Smith (talk) 12:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


WP:NPA[edit]

You have been around long enough to know better than [1]. --BozMo talk 07:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

You had a fair warning and went ahead an hour later with another personal attack [2] (fraudster etc). I have blocked you for a week. --BozMo talk 10:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
It's sourced and all true, he is a fraudster, that's not a personal attack but the truth. You can ban me if you like. In fact I really don't care. All you are is just showing that your in league with him and a looser. --Þadius (talk) 20:15, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Merv Leitch[edit]

Hi there, I'm one of the children of the late (1990) Merv Leitch, the gentleman referred to in the following URL - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merv_Leitch. I wasn't aware that there was such a page, and am curious to find out who the author is.

I've let other members of the family know, and so far no one knows anything about the page having been set up. I'm not per se upset with the content (though there are afew corrections that we would/will make), but again I'm curious as to who the author is and what prompted him/her to set the page up.

Jim Leitch Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Jazzhed (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

28th Alberta general election[edit]

Regarding your recent edits to 28th Alberta general election. When did they pass legislation making 87 ridings? 117Avenue (talk) 00:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Glen Murray[edit]

Wait until the results are complete, please. Although it certainly looks like he's going to win, it really won't kill us to wait 30 more minutes until all polls have reported. We're an encyclopedia, not the media — we don't have to rush to be first to report anything. Bearcat (talk) 02:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Party affiliations of pre-1905 NWT politicians[edit]

What sources do you use to research these? Steve Smith (talk) 07:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks - for now I'm just going to delete party affiliations from the individuals' articles (I currently have Alexander Cameron Rutherford running as a Liberal-Conservative, which I don't think can be right), though I'll leave it to you what to do with the election/riding articles. Steve Smith (talk) 15:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I know he supported Haultain; I believe the Babcock biography of him says something to the effect of "he pledged non-partisan support for the Haultain government". But I can't imagine that he did so as a Liberal-Conservative, just as I can't imagine R. B. Bennett opposing the government as a Liberal. Rutherford did sort of flirt with the Conservatives towards the end of his career, after the A&GWR scandal, but I'm pretty sure he was solidly Liberal pre-1905. I suspect this adds up to him being an independent in territorial politics, but we really can't say without sources. Steve Smith (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Alberta general election, 2008[edit]

Hello again. I know you have been busy editing historic Alberta general elections, and the provincial ridings. So I was wondering if you were aware of the mass change of results in the Alberta general election, 2008 [3] ? I don't know what results are correct. 117Avenue (talk) 23:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I checked into this; the new results line up with what's in the official report at elections.ab.ca. I'm not sure where the old numbers came from (they may have been unofficial results). Steve Smith (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Linda Fox-Mellway[edit]

I have closed the DRV and restored Linda Fox-Mellway. Please see that the article gets much needed third-party sources. Toddst1 (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Nice job. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 22:41, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Dear Mr Þad Ius[edit]

Please stop your in-hospital crusade against useful messages.

  1. Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion, as are members of the main citywide government or council of a major metropolitan city.

"generally" and "likely", not "they should all be default keep because they will definitely meet these criterion. It is not a crusade, and your lack of knowledge to the effect that I stopped AfDing those articles many weeks ago does not look good on you. Please try to leave accurate messages, even if you can't leave productive and useful ones. Kind regards, Ironholds (talk) 19:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to David Mullen. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:25, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

56th New Brunswick Legislative Assembly‎[edit]

Hello. A group of us are trying to clear up the backlog at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Articles_lacking_sources_from_October_2006. The article by the above title is lacking reliable sources. Can you help out? Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 06:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Bill Bennett[edit]

I get that your issue with Bill Bennett (politician)'s old title was that he's not in the Liberal caucus anymore, but given that the primary Bill Bennett that he needs to be disambiguated from was also a politician, we do need something more than just "(politician)". Is there some kind of "compromise" title that can be worked out? (Kootenay politician? Cranbrook politician?) Bearcat (talk) 07:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Þadius. You have new messages at Template talk:Canadian federal election, 2011.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Mathieu Ravignat[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:FormerAlberta partylogo1998to2009.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:FormerAlberta partylogo1998to2009.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FormerAlberta partylogo1998to2009.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:FormerAlberta partylogo1998to2009.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, the logo is from the Old Alberta Party website, I had originally posted the image years ago, but it was deleted by a bot. The image was taken from the top banner of the old page, and cut out. The example of that is here. [4] --Þadius (talk) 02:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I believed you, but the problem is, is that Wikipedia likes a verifiable source. 117Avenue (talk) 02:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Albertaparty.jpg[edit]

Why do you think that the grey background is better than the white background for the new Alberta Party logo? I found this picture when looking for a free image of Taylor (unsuccessfully), and it appears that they use the logo with the words (and slogan) to the left of the crest. The pdf I got the image from is another example. 117Avenue (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, the back of the Alberta Party logo looks black to me, I didn't realize it was grey. I mainly wanted something without the slogan, because those change all the time. --Þadius (talk) 02:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
I've created a version with no background, File:Albertaparty.png. 117Avenue (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Steve Cardiff[edit]

Bonjour, pouvais-vous traduit la page de Steve Cardiff celle de l'anglais dans une autre langue fr:Steve Cardiff S.V.P., parce que moi je suis bloqué du wikipédia français pour rien par Maurilbert. 204.237.12.81 (talk) 8 juillet 2011 à 18h41 (UTC)

27th Alberta Legislative Assembly[edit]

Why have you made the changes to 27th Alberta Legislative Assembly making Sherman apart of the Liberal caucus? Do you have a reference saying that he is? 117Avenue (talk) 02:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

According to a Google search I performed after writing the previous comment, it was announced 3 hours ago. 117Avenue (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Somerset–Bridlewood (C-Train)[edit]

You added the section stating this station opened in the late '90s as 162 Avenue Station. What is your reference for the timeline and the station name? I could not find any reference of this either in the article or on the web.

 Zippanova 20:41, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
I used to ride it --Þadius (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Ann Meekitjuk Hanson[edit]

Just a quick note to say that she was not the commissioner of the NWT. She was the deputy and she also served as the commissioner of Nunavut. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Oops, I got confused that what happens when your half asleep. --Þadius (talk) 23:25, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Þadius. You have new messages at Talk:List of senators in the 41st Parliament of Canada.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wildrose Party of Alberta[edit]

Do you have a reference that the Wildrose Party of Alberta was never registered? 117Avenue (talk) 03:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

It never was registered, the party was close to registration in 2007 but never completed it, Elections Alberta never had a registration for it. The only thing the Alberta Alliance did after a merger meeting was submit an application for name change with elections Alberta to accommodate the convention and the convention delegates voted to adopt the by-laws. If there was a registration the Wildrose Party of Alberta would have had to file a financial statement for fiscal year 2007 to which none exists. Page 2 of the 2008 Annual General Report from Elections Alberta [5]

Quote

Alberta Alliance Party was granted approval for an official party name change to the Wildrose Alliance Party of Alberta on January 31, 2008

--Þadius (talk) 04:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Interesting, it says "Alberta Greens". Does that mean Green Party of Alberta is incorrect? 117Avenue (talk) 04:48, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
To add on [6] The previous years Annual Report page 2 has the listings of Registered Provincial Parties in Alberta current to December 31, 2007. With no mention of Wildrose Party of Alberta registration. Page 16 in that report also mentions the Alberta Alliance Party name change the same as the 2008 report. --Þadius (talk) 04:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Any who I was working on a more precise history for the Alberta Alliance, Wildrose, and Eleanor Maroes because she jumped from the Alberta Alliance for the Wildrose Party after the leadership race. The surviving example is a brochure here. [7]. That brochure from the party founding even advertises her time as Alberta Alliance leader. It also has John Hilton O'Brien in the brochure who ran as a candidate for the Alberta Alliance, went to the Wildrose and later became Wildrose Alliance president. I hope to document the split that led to the creation of the Wildrose Party from the Alberta Alliance and than re-merger. But official sources from that period are slim. --Þadius (talk) 05:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Dunvegan-Central Peace-Notley[edit]

What is your reference for the name of Dunvegan-Central Peace-Notley? 117Avenue (talk) 00:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Elections Alberta Maps, [8] and Electoral Divisions Act 2010 Bill 28 Sub Amendment 1 [9] --Þadius (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
That second link looks good. I thought you were using the proposed names from June 2009, [10]. But my ref is sketchy, the Elections Alberta list [11] hyphenates it all, but clicking on the map show a space between Central and Peace, and I thought typically separate place names were separated by a dash. I suppose Leduc Beaumont is wrong. 117Avenue (talk)

Did you know all the electoral district mentions and article titles don't follow MOS:DASH? The articles will need to be moved, and all the links fixed. 117Avenue (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Nope, i'm not going to change them, they are named the way they're named. This was discussed here ages ago Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electoral_districts_in_Canada#Em-dash_use --Þadius (talk) 05:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
I don't see how a six year old discussion, that didn't result in any policy, is a reason to violate today's MOS. Fort Saskatchewan-Vegreville has already been moved several times, and I don't want to start a move war. Eventually someone will come along, and start moving these, and I don't there to be a conflict. 117Avenue (talk) 23:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
That particular riding is a perfect example of why dashes should be used. "Fort Saskatchewan-Vegreville" makes it look like there is a single place, presumably the site of an old fort called "Fort Saskatchewan-Vegreville". A dash makes it clear that Fort Saskatchewan and Vegreville are two different places. -Rrius (talk) 05:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Edmonton-McClung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grant Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Ray Prins[edit]

You've made a number of changes to articles regarding Ray Prins that are incorrect. He has only announced he will not run for re-election so he is still an MLA and will remain one for several months. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 21:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Not several, but yes. 117Avenue (talk) 05:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Alberta election articles[edit]

Why should Alberta riding articles looks completely different from all other Canadian riding articles (both federal and provincial)? Look around, the templates being used now are very much NOT standard. For one thing, we always have the articles in order of newest election to oldest. It's also unnecessary to have separate "party" and "personal" swing columns, they rarely if ever have different numbers. I also don't see why every election result should be its own subsection unless there is accompanying text. I appreciate the work you've done, but that seems to be the one main reason you're attached to the old templates. If you ask anyone else involved in editing Canadian election articles, they'll probably agree we should migrate articles to the new centralized template. --Noname2 (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Based on your logic Canada should look the same as the UK because were part of the Commonwealth or perhaps look the same as the US because were part of North America. As for percent change People change parties, banners affiliations, its there to present a consistent Percentage of Party change isn't the only measure of popularity we have a representative system.

Quite frankly As I began I first felt that the current system didn't deal well with occasions when it could be measured, so I Innovated. You could have asked me if your curious instead of simply just destroying my work with your snobbish attitude. Also the look of your so called new templates frankly looks shoe horned and awful and the table I used to display the history of representation was an evolution of the one you tried to put back in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Þadius (talkcontribs) 08:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I tend to agree with most of this. Þadius, you are using templates that are being phased out, to be replaced by the ones Noname2 had added. Þadius, I also ask what is the purpose of separate party and personal swing columns, and election section breaks? Noname2, you are wrong about one thing, list articles are to be in chronological order, that is from oldest to newest. I found this out in Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Alberta general elections/archive1, that all featured lists are in chronological order. I think we should just stick with the format being used now, during the election, because they are all consistent. And then after the election, figure out what changes need to be made. 117Avenue (talk) 01:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

I raised all these articles from bare stubs that started with USER:Cloveious and made the decisions of how they look and did the research and put the time and energy into writing. For some reason you mostly seem to criticize and hinder maps aside, I've done this for my own enjoyment and for others benefit. I've made decisions based on look and feel what works and what works and what doesn't. I've compromised and revised and changed it around, rewrote revised, tried to innovate and rewrote again. Since these were bare stubs there have been 5 significant generations in table designs. I've dealt with how to define a riding and its changes over time. How to structure a riding article for the addition of prose related to election information. One of my early test labratories on that was Lorne (electoral district). The election tables, I made have also been designed to be consistent with single transferable vote results pre 1957. Plebiscites and Senate elections Quite frankly there is nothing that says that Alberta ridings have to resemble any other provinces ridings. I'm trying to go beyond what other riding articles look like and display information better than anyone else.--Þadius (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Personally, I find the standard templates much cleaner and easier to read. And there seems to be a consensus that we want to use these templates across all riding articles. There's nothing that says Alberta articles should use different templates. Again, you putting a lot of work into this is not a proper justification to keep your own templates. --Noname2 (talk) 16:16, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Þadius, I don't want to hate on your work, I know you have put a lot of time in to it. Perhaps your knowledge can be spread, and I hope you encourage others as to what innovations should be implemented to other pages. You said it yourself, there is consistency across the Alberta ridings, shouldn't there be consistency across Wikipedia? To me, the new templates make cleaner tables, and the only thing lost is the personal swing column. But I agree with you, I don't like the think lines and shaded headers in the Representation history table Noname2 added. 117Avenue (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
I changed the representation history table to be consistent with the ones used on federal riding pages and many provincial riding pages. I also don't like how the current tables are on the right and in between two sections. --Noname2 (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm willing to compromise, the new party color tables that combine the party name with the party color are great, I just tried them out with Calgary-Shaw and I will start implementing them. I honestly didn't know about those before.--Þadius (talk) 04:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
That's because they're still in development. And I have been busy working on these election related articles, that I haven't been working on the templates. 117Avenue (talk) 07:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Well, weather we decide to arrange results oldest or newest first, it should be the same on all pages, and not different on Alberta pages. But I much prefer ordering them newest first. When I look at a riding page I'm usually most interested in the newest election results and it's annoying to have to scroll to the bottom every time. --Noname2 (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

That's what a table of contents is for so you don't have to waste the 2 seconds and scroll. --Þadius (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

So what should we do now? Do I reinstate the new templates, and in what order? And how do I fix the placement of the representation table without changing it to the thick bordered table used on federal riding pages? --Noname2 (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you[edit]

Modest Barnstar.png The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.179 (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Atlantica/row[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Atlantica/row requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 23:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Atlantica[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Atlantica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 23:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Evergreen Party of Alberta/meta/shortname[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Evergreen Party of Alberta/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 00:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Alberta Alliance Party/meta/shortname[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Alberta Alliance Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 11:38, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Evergreen Party of Alberta/meta/color[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Evergreen Party of Alberta/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 22:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Alberta New Democratic Party/meta/shortname[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Alberta New Democratic Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 05:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Alberta Alliance Party/meta/color[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Alberta Alliance Party/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 06:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:40th Canadian Parliament standings[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:40th Canadian Parliament standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 117Avenue (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)