User talk:ماني

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, ماني! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kingturtle (talk) 12:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Please be more careful[edit]

Please, when the source document says "Farsi" then don't replace it with "Persian". Geo Swan (talk) 02:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Kurdistan[edit]

Please stop tagging this page for speedy deletion. There has been a nomination for deletion in 2007 (as you might have seen on the talk page) and the result was "keep". If you wish to nominate this page again, please do so at WP:AfD. Speedy deletion is only meant for newly created pages, not for those which exist for years. De728631 (talk) 20:28, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

zabanha[edit]

zabanha dar maghaleye Iran agha Mani be tajziyetalabha bahaneh nadeh lotfan. Damet garm--Babakexorramdin (talk) 00:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC) again. What is your purpose? Be sincere.Your edits serve only as confirmation for the separatists and ghomgarayan--Babakexorramdin (talk) 21:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC) hi. We are not here to fight separatism or confirm anything. We are here to write the existing facts as they are. This is an encyclopaedia and nothing else. Take care.--ماني (talk) 12:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Your actions are detrimental and I do not see any necessity to create separatism either. Moreover you remove the reliable facts due to selfish reasons. I doubt that you are an expert on Iranian studies either. So please stop this behavior. I did respect you however. --Babakexorramdin (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
As a matter of fact I am an expert on Iranian studies. You know what is detrimental? Giving wrong information about your country.

Constitutionally the only official language of Iran is Persian and nothing else. See the text. Do not try to impose your wishful thinking as facts here.--ماني (talk) 15:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC) Article 15 of the constitution: زبان و خط رسمی و مشترک مردم ایران فارسی است. اسناد و مکاتبات و متون رسمی و کتب درسی باید با این زبان و خط باشد ولی استفاده از زبانهای محلی و قومی در مطبوعات و رسانه‏های گروهی و تدریس ادبیات آنها در مدارس، در کنار زبان فارسی آزاد است. If you have trouble, understanding Persian, let me know. I explain it to you.--ماني (talk) 15:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Look dear Mani, before you came from Afghanistan to Tafresh (!!!!), I knew Persian. So please watch your dirty mouth and no personal insult. I think you have some trouble in understanding simple concepts. No one said that kurdish etc... is the official language of Iran. Iran knows something like constitutional recognition of regional languages. this is a non-territorially defined recognition of other languages, yet short of giving them official status. This is a unique case. But I guess you do not know anything about law or politics. so please no vandalization any more. --Babakexorramdin (talk) 16:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
I have to report your personal insult to a moderator here.--ماني (talk) 16:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Good for you. I have to do this too. because you were the one first to begin. Moreover be honest to yourself. mani you know a lot about natural sciences, but please stay away from politics, history etc... and do not try to teach other people Persian. --Babakexorramdin (talk) 16:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
You know nothing about me. So far all your guesses about me have been wrong. I just wait for admins to do something about you and your insults. That's all.--ماني (talk) 16:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Oh oh. I won't make trouble for you, nor would I anounce publicly your identity--Babakexorramdin (talk) 16:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Signature[edit]

Hello. Could you perhaps go into Special:Preferences and place something under "Signature" such that your username is parsed in the English alphabet when you sign your posts? It may be difficult for users to communicate with you if they do not know what to call you.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello. I did that. Thanks for your attention.--a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
If you press the "Raw signature" button you can make it appear as "a.k.a. User:Mani1" when you sign instead of what it appears as now. Just want to help out :)—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

some points[edit]

- == some points == - - Dear Mani, sorry that I write in english. I have no Persian keyboard and you do not checkk your English talkpage. hamvatane gerami, duste azize az ostane markazi, ey bamaram. Shoma lotfan gush kon . Dear mani, I do not know why you insist on deleting other languages from the Iran box. Those languages have a special status in Iran. despite what the separatists and Panthis or panthat complain they are free and are in use. This is not the case in all countries. Some countries have the category of territorially recognized regional languages. these are in federal systems, whhich I mostly despise. Some other countries do not recognize regional languages and try to assimilate them or in any case prohibit them± like Turkey, Saudi Arabia or Spain under franco dictatorship. France has been like this too! Iran is a special case. And therefore it is worth mentioning it in the box. If you think it is not appropriate to name them after the Persian, then make a new box below official language with the title"languages with special status"I have tried to make it, I couldn't. Secondly I think you should not revert everything I write. You wrote in your talkpage that you read cyrilic, therefore You should not write Mikail Saakashvili or Chkhinvali. I read cyrilic and many other alphabets and I can assure you the that the pronounciation I use is correct. If you have doubts, you are free to contact Georgians, ossetians and Russians. I hope now that problems are solved.--Babakexorramdin ‏۴ سپتامبر ۲۰۰۸، ساعت ۱۱:۱۸ (UTC) --Babakexorramdin (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I am not from Markazi Province. I am not in the field of natural sciences, I am not reverting everything you edit ... Stop making random guesses about me. Just talk about the point at hand and not about the person (in this case me). This is the first thing a Wikipedian should know.
About the official language. As you agree now, that item says only official languages. In the text you can add whatever explanation you like (with reference). But I personally am against making too much additional items in the infoboxes. It makes them too heavy and unclear and it stands in the way of standardization of those boxes.

About the Georgian names and Cyrillic. In the case of Saakashvili we have decided to use the most current form in the Persian media. In the case of Ирыстон، I as a catalogiser of the Russian books can tell you your Persian transliteration is wrong. You should discuss it in the discussion page of that article in Persian, if you have some points about it.--a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 11:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

O in tajik and uzbek can be transliterated into the perso-Arabic A.But O in ossetian cannot. it is a clear O. Moreover the cyrilic bl sign is not equal to the long persian i. It is is equal to the Turkish i without point. Something the linguists usually yuse as y. About Saakashvili. persian media is wrong. They also use Zhozef Stalin that is wrong. I think we have the duty to rectify these names in persian, before it gets out of the hand. Right now everybody uses another variant in persian which is very unfortunate. About the infobox I should say, that I disagree with you. The best thing is to add a new section in the box, because this is a special status and worth mentioning it. I think we can work on it instead of accusing each other. talking about goodwill! --Babakexorramdin (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
About the original Ossetian sounds of the Cyrillic letters I should check sources then. About Saakashvili and the like, we've had huge amounts of discussions in the Persian Wikipedia on these matters and the result was that the current forms (even if not completely correct according to the linguists) should be used. If you want to change that agreement in PW, you should start that discussion there, again. About extra items in the infobox, I disagree but I saw you added it so I will not omit that information from the box.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 12:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Ok I see now that the problem with Iran is solved. About Ossetian and georgian things I should say: Although I am very much into these things myself and read both alphabets and languages, I would say we can refer to a third person expert. We can make a new word in persian such as Irestan but if you want to represent the Ossetian pronounciation it is Iryston. the Yston thing is indeed a borrowing from persian via Turkic languages though. It is much different thatn Tajik and uzbek. Tajik and Uzbek directly use persian words, but they write the Persian a as o. Moreover they sued perso-Arabic alphabet before which shows clearly that their O was an a. Ossetian is different. they never used Perso-Arabic alphabet but the Georgian alpbaet. The ancient Alan tribes, also, did not have writing system. Although an Iranian language, ossetian is very far from persian and also very far from other Arabic-persian influenced languages of Eastern iranian branch. Thanks for your cooperation --Babakexorramdin (talk) 12:28, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I know about the history of the Ossetian language. I need to check the pronunciation of their land in their own language first, then we can see what's the right pronunciation in Perso-Arabic alphabet. Till then, do not try to impose your edits in WP.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

another thing: I see that you have added "for the litteraturë of"although it is not totally incorrect but the article says that they are also going to be used in the Media and press. Which is now truely the case in Iran. I do not know what is the best solution. Only literature is too narrow, constitutional status is very vague and broad. I though it is better. But You can aslo add constitutional recognition of..... instead of constitutional status and omit literature. Ok?--Babakexorramdin (talk) 12:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

The best solution is to take this vague and long sentence out of the infobox and add it to the text.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

O pronounciation in Ossetian[edit]

Please notice the pronounciation of the Ossetian O http://www.omniglot.com/writing/ossetian.htm http://www.omniglot.com/soundfiles/udhr/udhr_ossetian.mp3

It is a clear O --Babakexorramdin (talk) 13:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Your source shows that И in Ossetian is pronounced as i. Not as hamzeh+y or Turkis i (without point). On O we can agree. I proposed to ban me from Persian Wikipedia along with you and they agreed and gave you 3 times heavier ban time. I wanted to challenge you to come to Den Haag Centraal for an encounter but for now things are going better.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 18:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Is your challenge a threat? LOL And I did not say that И is the hamze but that bl thing. I with long i Iryston. To be honest I do not care if they ban me from Fa.wikipedia but they are not allowed to write wrong info there. Someone has changed the pronounciation of Saakahsvili there. You can revert it to my version to show your goodwill. --Babakexorramdin (talk) 21:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
There is no goodwill left in me towards you. You distort everything with your wrong gusses so badly that there is no discussion possible with you anymore. Go your way and do not bother me anymore.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 21:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
No I really know who you are but I respect your privacy. It was you who 1- began to fihght and insult 2- wrote threats and nonsense on my talkpage 3- asked childishliy to ban me 4- threatened me--Babakexorramdin (talk) 21:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Wrong again. You should really learn only to talk about the subjects here and not about the users. This is your problem. This was the last message for you. Daaaag.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
I talked about the subjects, and do not change the topics and DO NOT GET PERSONAL. If you know Cyrlic as you said on your user page you should know the difference between the vowels И and ы. In addition I provided you a sound file, and I offered to consult Caucasologoist. And I am not getting softer as you thaought. In fact I was talking you some sense. But it seems that you are not the right person for that. To be honest with you I am fed up with you now, and will take appropriate action against you --Babakexorramdin (talk) 05:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Stalking[edit]

Hi, your recent contributions are considered a violation of WP:STALK. Please stop following other users around via their contributions and mass-reverting them (especially without any explanation). It is extremely disruptive and if you continue you could risk getting blocked. Khoikhoi 08:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I am finished with correcting the recent misinformation droped by one special user here with no knowledge. I just made some corrections nothing else.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 08:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
You need to provide explanations for your reverts, mass-undoing another users' contributions with a simple "rv" in your edit summary is inappropriate. Khoikhoi 08:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to have to block you and Babak for the recent edit war that went on at Iran. It doesn't matter who is right or wrong, it is required that you discuss your changes on the talk page instead of constantly reverting. You also need to do it in a civil manner. Warning your opponent to stop edit warring when you are doing it yourself is pointless. Aggressive language ([1]) is also inappropriate. Please review some of these policies while you are blocked and return ready to resolved this dispute calmly and in a civil manner. Khoikhoi 09:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

That edit war is stopped. The example you named for aggressive language was actually a question for him asking whether I should consider his threat actually as an aggressive approach or not.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 09:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
It is not fair. Please take a minute and check the messages. He has called me names (childish, ego, shut up your big mouth ...) in almost every message he wrote while you can not find even one insult by me towards him. Why should I get blocked because of my politeness?--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 09:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
It is clearly ongoing as is evident from the article history. But the problem was that instead of trying to follow the dispute resolution process all the way through, both of you resorted to edit warring. I have already left a message on Babak's talk page regarding personal attacks ([2]) -- he has been blocked as well. IMO if at least one of you followed 1RR we wouldn't be talking right now. Khoikhoi 09:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I know. Thank you for your attention.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Mani, please calm down. I am referring to this comment. Statements such as these are anything but helpful: "I advise you to go read some books on Iran first, before trying to edit anything further. It will save the time of the users here." Try to stay cool. If necessary I can mediate the dispute, but please be more civil in the future. Khoikhoi 05:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Iran[edit]

I really don't want this dispute to keep going on like this. I think it's time for some sort of mediation or something. If you would like me to mediate the dispute, I would be willing to do so. I would honestly just like this to stop though, and I'm hoping that we can work on a version that makes both sides happy. What do you think? Khoikhoi 05:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi. The problem is that, that guy Babakxorramdin who interfers with discussions is so insulting and irrational that no discussion is possible with him. If other users want to continue the discussion (and not him) I am willing to repeat my argument for them with your mediation. Thanks.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 06:07, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Mani, the dispute is mostly between you and Babak. I don't see how it can be resolved if you don't want to talk to him. This is similar to the John McCain approach on foreign policy vs. Barack Obama's (if you've been following the US election you would understand). ;-) Anyways please post your argument here on my talk page and I'll see if I can come up with a compromise version. Khoikhoi 05:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
No. The discussion is between me and users Alboz Fallah and Raayen now.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 07:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to have to ask you to stop reverting the Iran page until there is a consensus then. This is starting to become very disruptive. Khoikhoi 00:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
I am not reverting it. This was the shape the article had before that user started those edits. I suggest we keep the original shape (without that disputed part) and add it only when a concensus has been achieved. Keeping a disputed part while there are disputes about it is not right.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 09:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
I have fully protected the article, and no I did not protect to Babak's version on purpose. This was the version that was up there at the time, and I am not endorsing either version. But the reverting needed to stop so I felt there was no other option than to protect. Also, Babak is allowed to delete comments from his own talk page if he wants to. However, I will warn him about making allegations such as the ones he made here. Both of you honestly need to take a deep breath and calm down. This is a minor editing dispute over a few sentences and could have been resolved easily through the dispute resolution process a long time ago. Khoikhoi 10:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of chirality (biology)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

I have nominated your article on chirality (biology) for deletion because it seems to have been copied and pasted from another page on Wikipedia. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 23:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Note[edit]

I'm trying something new. I've unprotected the Iran article, but any future reverts made against a clear consensus on the talk page will result in blocks. Since I initially protected the page there hasn't been much discussion, so I'm assuming that all users are fine with this version. If you aren't, please address specifically what you want changed on the talk page. I will block the next user to initiate an edit war on this page, it has gone on for far too long. Khoikhoi 04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Persian language[edit]

Mani Jan, There is a default parameter for regional languages in that language box:

|official_languages =

|regional_languages =

|languages_type =

|languages =

By removing the regional languages, not only we have opposed the wiki rules, but also we have helped to neglect other Iranian minorities of Iran! I can't explain more over here, but please answer my question there in your talk page so that we come to a conclusion. --Wayiran (talk) 11:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Wayiran jan. Which wiki rule are you refering to?
In my opinion an infobox is made for giving a summarized overview of a subject and should be reserved for giving that overview. Putting a lot of details in that box makes it complicated and it looses its function. People are already so confused about Iran and its language. By putting so much explanation in that box we make people more confused. Almost everybody in the world thinks Iran's official language is Arabic! Now, if somebody comes to that infobox for a clear cut first information, and encounters four lines of detailed explanation will still leave that page with doubts about Iran's language. Those explanations and the status of the literature of Iran's local languages are explained in the text and that should be enough.
P.S. That extra section in the infobox about the "status of the local languages" was created recently by an angry person just for the purpose of opposing me. It hasn't been the "official" part of this infobox.
Take care.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 13:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
following wayiran's arguments. I understand your concern about the western ignorance. However there is section for regional languages for ALL countries where it does apply. The reality is that the article 15 of Iran, recognizes the regional languages. It is unlike Turkey and other of these countries which supress local languages. In the infobox is clearly readable that Persian is the official language of Iran. Denying the constitutional recognition of other languages in Iran will be very unfair, unjust and factually not correct. Moreover denying this will give support to the Panturks and Pankurds who scream that the local languages in Iran are forbidden. We all know that the facts are different. Iran is a different country than Turkey and many other European countries. You are in the Netherlands and you know the senstivities with the Rotterdam model of "one language" even though the Turks/ Moroccans/Surinamese are small minorities, and are migrant to this country. In the Iranian case these are no minorities but native Iranians with different languages. Even Turkey is now improving and has its own Kurdish TV. I hope you agree with me that speaking another language than persian does not necessariily mean being disloyal to Iran. At this moment I only can say 1- article 15 exists 2- It is a good thing for Iran. If any one disagrees, he should first abolish or modify the article 15. --145.18.125.110 (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi !
I think the the term "local languages" is interpretable .Official languages and local languages may have levels of officiality . Thank you , --Alborz Fallah (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Mani, I agree with your point too. --Wayiran (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. In the current shape (with a link to that category) looks also not bad to me. Take care.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 16:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries[edit]

Please use edit summaries, even for minor edits.

Thanks.

ِYes sure. Take care.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

RICeST[edit]

Hello, I noticed your edit to Islamic World Science Citation Database. Thank you.

Could you also help me with the topic "Regional Information Center for Science and Technology"?

It was created here by many accounts Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ricesr ctrl and deleted because of this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional Information Center for Science and Technology.

I have been given permission to write about it again. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 22.

Also see fa:مرکز منطقه ای اطلاع رسانی علوم و فناوری written by fa:کاربر:Ricest. It was deleted on Farsi Wikipedia as well.

Is this organisation important? Can you help find sources about it? Thank you, John Vandenberg (chat) 13:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Unfortunately I don't know much about those organizations. I found the article in the Persian Wikipedia and made an interwiki link with the English one. Take care!--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Double check this[edit]

Your interwiki on Lamniformes doesn't work.[3] EVula // talk // // 22:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

It does now. Thanks.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 22:31, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, just saw that the article had been made. Keep up the good work. :) EVula // talk // // 22:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Could we talk?[edit]

So I'm willing to retract the SPI case. But there seems to be issues that we need to talk about. Could we talk about them? Elockid (Talk·Contribs) 22:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Sure.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 22:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. So my biggest concern was with the "non-reliable" vs. "real numbers" being stated in the article. To me, this seems to sway to the opinion that one is better or preferred or bias was involved. Although this is most likely true, I'm also in dispute with some figures myself, there shouldn't be opinion to it per WP:NPOV. The article is already tagged as having disputed factual accuracy, so it's most likely that the figure is unreliable anyway. In this case, adding a {{dubious}} tag could have been done since this is what I've seen to be standard when data is disputed.
My other concern is with the CIA sources. I'm not sure if they measure the data is for native speakers or including total speakers. Since it just says languages with some percentages.
I was also trying to fix the article, moving the figures to the right sections and conforming to the format of the article (the article ranking note stated that it was based on the two websites), but they seem to have gotten the opposite effect. The current figure for 110-134 million figure is in the Encarta estimates section.
A couple of editors and I are also having a discussion on reformatting the article. Perhaps you could add some input also? I'm sorry if this whole incident cause you and the other editors any trouble. Elockid (Talk·Contribs) 23:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem,. Thank you for the message. I'll try to find all the reliable sources on this and give a more accurate range for the number of the speakers then I'll add it to the article in the coming days. But if changing the rank would then seem necessary I'll check it with you first.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
I actually self reverted. So the rank is changed to what you put. Elockid (Talk·Contribs) 23:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caspian Gates of Derbent[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Caspian Gates of Derbent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mkeranat (talk) 10:02, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gamosepalous[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Gamosepalous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tommy (msg) 19:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Iran[edit]

You've been here for a little bit, so as a courtesy I'll refrain from placing warning templates on your talk page. However, please remember that removal of sourced information without discussion is inappropriate, especially considering that other editors seem to support the inclusion of this information. Start a new discussion on the talk page if you have any arguments to present. Edit warring, as I'm sure you know, isn't acceptable here. ClovisPt (talk) 22:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for the message. Regarding the reason for keeping that information in the text and not in the infobox, I have explained everything in the discussion page and edit sumaries many times. But I will do that again in the discussion page.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 23:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. I am very much a newcomer to this dispute, and so I'm more than open to the possibility that I'm missing something. Regards, ClovisPt (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Copy-paste moves[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Persian people a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. cab (call) 02:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Because I don't have the Move tab appearing on that article, I did it this way to bring it under attention of other users to move it in proper way. Thanks for the message.--ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 02:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Medieval Islam[edit]

I reverted your changes that weren't discussed beforehand. The naming of the articles is quite controversial and has been discussed to death on the talk pages. For the record, the articles on "Medieval Islam" follow the definition used by Medieval Islamic Civilization : An Encyclopaedia, Meri, Josef W. Meri and Bacharach, Jere L., Routledge, London 2006, ISBN 0415966906. The aforementioned reference states the following under the "Choice of Entries" section in the Introduction:

"The editorial board discussed the entries extensively, and certain additions and emendations were made to compensate for underrepresented themes. Unlike other volumes in this highly acclaimed Routledge series on the Middle Ages that are more geographically specific and are focused on the European Middle Ages from the fifth through sixteenth centuries CE, Medieval Islamic Civilization posed a considerable challenge given the geographical expanse of the Islamic world, from the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa to the Middle East, South and Southeast Asia from roughly the sixth through seventeenth centuries."

Hope it's clearer now. Al-Andalusi (talk) 17:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Please check the talk pages first, this has been discussed so many times on Talk:Science in medieval Islam. I would recommend this as a start. Al-Andalusi (talk) 18:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Reliability[edit]

Thanks for the message. So which is more reliable when it comes to correct usage of the English language? The Oxford English Dictionary, Collins English Dictionary, Cassell's English Dictionary, Websters English Dictionary etc etc on the one hand; or your Iranian website, on the other? Regards, Ericoides (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Template:Persian Constitutional Revolution Persions[edit]

Hi mani, I translated Template:Persian Constitutional Revolution Persions from fa.wiki :) would please correct me? yoursReza1615 (talk) 20:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Clifford Edmund Bosworth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Qasem-e Anvar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilaki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Periplus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Tulip[edit]

Hi, :ماني. You've been a Wikipedian for a long time now. Surely you don't think that the sources you added meet WP:RS. In any event, the section is a bit of a mess and an overhaul of the whole article is on my to-do list. Any constructive help will be appreciated. Rivertorch (talk) 07:40, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kunduz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timurid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avar people (Caucasus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mozambique, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Persian and Persians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

WARNING[edit]

Please stop edit warring, or you may be blocked. When others disagree with the changes you've made, you should take them to the talk page. In this case, your ref does not support your claim, as you could see by simply checking the Persian-language article. — kwami (talk) 21:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

It is interesting. Somebody else is deleting my sourced information without citing any reason and I get the warning?! (from that same person!!) If you see the article on Persian you see the same source there. ماني a.k.a. [[User:Mani1]] (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ziryab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acta Iranica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo-Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Science in the medieval Islamic world (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Persian
Turquoise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Khorasan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalash people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo-Iranian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)