User talk:128.187.97.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

January 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sphincter with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 07:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Lang Stane of Auquhollie. Shadowjams (talk) 07:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Carl Friedrich Gauss, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Carl Friedrich Gauss was changed by 128.187.97.19 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953405 on 2012-02-09T17:25:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Friedrich Gauss with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Esperanza Spalding, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Esperanza Spalding was changed by 128.187.97.19 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873234 on 2012-02-12T20:29:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012 Lawrence O'Donnell[edit]

This is a living person. Yes, his reported statements on The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints offended many, perhaps even millions, and they do not promote religious tolerance and civility. Some may even question why he has a job. Wikipedia is very clear that when talking about Living Persons, there are very specific rules to publish. It is obvious the statements were received disgust. What isn't know is if he believed them or not. If he did, should he be fired? Great question. Archf 1 (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Webclient101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Male lactation, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Webclient101talk 02:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Charlesdrakew. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Joseph Smith without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Charles (talk) 16:24, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edits to February 15[edit]

Some of your edits on the page February 15 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Daniel C. Peterson without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I am One of Many (talk) 07:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Newyorkadam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Binary option, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Newyorkadam (talk) 23:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Agricultural subsidy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Indian Agriculture." Economic and Political Weekly , Vol. 31, No. 13 (Mar. 30, 1996), pp. 818-820. (Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/4403965</ref>
  • y4671e08.htm#fnB52 |title=Chapter 4. Trade liberalization and food security in developing countries[45] |publisher=Fao.org |date=12 July 2002 |accessdate=12 April 2012}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2014 (UTC)