User talk:129.33.19.254

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

January 2006[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link.
  • Your own user page.
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address.
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
  • The ability to start new pages.
  • The ability to rename pages.
  • The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
  • The ability to upload images.
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
  • The eligibility to become an administrator.
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections.
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. --LV (Dark Mark) 01:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to refer you to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, with regards to your recent edits of Media bias in the United States. Whatever your personal beliefs, wikipedia is not the place for them. Please refer to the above policy for how you can make sure articles remain neutral and unbiased. Repeated failure to observe NPOV is seen as vandalism. Thank you! -Kasreyn 21:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Politicians editing their own Wikipedia articles is not in itself notable. Please do not add such comments to Wikipedia. Thank you. DS 17:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

July 2006[edit]

Hello (or should I say hello again?) - we cannot accept your edits to Tom Harrison and Reading Eagle because of our strict policy on biographies of living persons. We are very sensitive to the possibility of libel and slander, and require reliable sources to document any information, especially of a pejorative nature, about a living person. Please don't add it again. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Nope, thanks for checking back but our policies still haven't changed. Source it or forget it. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Reading Eagle. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mattbr30 18:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Steel 18:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding reversions[1] made on July 3 2006 (UTC) to [[2]]: Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning, but aviod making any reverts within 24 hours of this warning in order to avoid any confusion. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

If you can't tell the difference between describing the statements of another user and accusing users of unsubstantiated crimes, you will be blocked for personal attacks. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

October 2006[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Washington Park, Chicago, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vectro 21:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

March 2007[edit]

Information.svg With regards to your comments on Popping (dance): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. K.Z Talk Vandal Contrib 21:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

May 2007[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Chiranjeevi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas(talk) 19:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

March 2008[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page No Country for Old Men (film). Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 18:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to C Sharp (programming language). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 21:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

March 2009[edit]

Your edit to Rickey Henderson was obvious vandalism. Please find something better to do with your time. Timneu22 (talk) 00:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

August 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Schreyer Honors College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Avono♂ (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Cary Grant. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. You have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 17:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011[edit]

A tag has been placed on a page you created requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hang on}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 01:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop using the "expand" template. It's deprecated. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

OK. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ultimate Iron Man (character), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm not seeing the problem here - please explain? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Gloom (comics) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Snowolf How can I help? 15:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

I redirected that one because it was PRODded and was about to be deleted. Better to redirect it in case the information is needed in the future at some point, I figured. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 129.33.19.254. You have new messages at Talk:Kender.
Message added 05:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I just had a quick question on how to use the word kender. Details are on the talk page... Pax85 (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree with your edit that the information needs issue citations, but you were a little excessive. You can limit the issue tag to one for every sentence at the very most (you had two per sentence a few times there) or even one for every paragraph. The article still has to be readable with the tags in place and the excessive amount of tags made it harder to read. Spidey104 13:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, I had no idea we had this page! I'll try to do some sourcing and expanding as I get time. Thanks, --Cerebellum (talk) 21:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Christopher Kubasik has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://newmediamatters.wordpress.com/about-christopher-kubasik/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

D'oh! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

This image come from the Amazing Spider-Man 238's latest page. A splash-page. In these fistful of issues, penciler was John Romita Senior and his own son, JRJR, inker. Really, Amazing 238 credits number, reports "John Romita, Sr and John Romita, Jr, co-artists" and so, i'll write that it. References the next time, please!--151.66.189.157 (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I should've specified better what I meant on the talk page or in a hidden comment. I removed the sentence directly in front of that citation, and I wasn't sure if it applied to the entire paragraph or just the sentence I moved. So, I wanted confirmation that it was sourcing the whole paragraph. Basically, I didn't want to leave it there without making a note that I wasn't sure if it was really the citation for those other bits. Torchiest talkedits 23:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Living Tribunal has been reverted.
Your edit here to Living Tribunal was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/4025/tribunalj.jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please disregard my last message to you. I reverted an edit of yours in error and the message was sent automatically. I do not believe your edit was vandalism and I was mistaken in reverting it. I've undone my revert. Sorry again, and don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

It's cool.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

The Working Man's Barnstar

Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Now that you've caught my eye (well, mine and GLOO's), I 'm seeing just how much good work you've put in around here, so for your continued efforts in the improvement of Wikipedia, I hereby award you this Working Wikipedian's Barnstar! --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dwarf deities, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cyrrollalee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 19:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Dividing an article into sections is vandalism? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Oops. I hit the wrong button, wrongly reverted your edit and didn't notice. Sorry about that! My bad. Gscshoyru (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
No problem, thanks. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will try to answer your questions as best as I can. Again, welcome, and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. ScottSteiner 16:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011[edit]

Cyber's issue references are listed in their chronological order. He does not appear in any one singular issue alone, as all of his appearances were in multiple issue arcs. Much of his character was created through flashback and recollection sequences that I and some of the editors here decided years ago would be best summed up through referencing the the arcs themselves, rather than trying to flesh out and interpret what was actually revealed in one particular issue of the arc. This way we could list Cyber's issue references in their chronological order, otherwise some issues are referenced twice. I'm not an editor here, I just do this for fun, but some of these guys here were ready to strangle me over the smallest rules they see fit to enforce. There's an editor named "Odin's Beard" who watches these Marvel articles like a hawk, and he can answer any questions you have if you think the article should be revised to your liking. Look at Cyber's discussion page and you'll see the headache we both gave each other hammering down this article years ago. I'm making small revisions now because I'm going to appeal to the editors later on that I feel Cyber should listed as officially "dead". Sure to be a hornet's nest if not done precicely to the editors' approval.

Thanks. FA Shotgun (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Bulezau do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Bulezau was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://d20npcs.wikia.com/wiki/D&D_Named_Demon_Project#Bulezau) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Okie dokie! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Information.svg An article that you have been involved in editing, Dungeons & Dragons simulacrums , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. zorblek (talk) 05:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Just an FYI, I've added what I believe is relevant info in a matter you commented on at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Bill_Slavicsek--Cube lurker (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I fixed it. PTJoshua (talk) 16:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

De nada. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011[edit]

Hey there. I saw you re-added that line about the module being a tournament adventure for a DM and a thief PC. I originally removed that because it is pretty redundant. All that information is either mentioned in the intro or in the previous section, and it's sourced to the same reference. I just figured it was a bit repetitive. Torchiest talkedits 18:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Ah, good point. I didn't notice they were referring to the original versus the expanded module. I did a little rewrite to mix it up some. Torchiest talkedits 18:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

September 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kas the Bloody-Handed with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Trusilver 22:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

October 2011[edit]

Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't even think about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Argento Surfer (talkcontribs) 13:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

De nada.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011[edit]

When you consider that it changes the whole way you play another character and will effect all character choices when fighting against an Iceman knowing you can possibly kill the character easily that way, I don't consider that trival a tleast not less trival then the fact that he practically invincible against almost all other kinds of attacks.-71.202.72.88 (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I suggest trying to read that section and see how all those Doctor Octopii actually sound. If you still think it's better, fine, I'm not the type to edit war, and we can leave it like you want it. Vranak (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not going to edit war either, which is why I left it alone. It's generally my opinion that using nicknames like "Doc Ock", "Spidey", and "Cap" in place of the character's proper name is non-encylopedic and lazy, but YMMV. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Oh but I think he's referred to that way in the canon. Couldn't say definitively but I strongly suspect so. Maybe you know better than me though. Vranak (talk) 23:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello! While I appreciate the good faith effort you've made, in adding D&D characters to {{WikiProject Fictional characters}}, please do not continue to add the template to EVERY SINGLE type of creature that exists in D&D. Your criteria for what constitutes a fictional character should be refined to only include unique characters in D&D. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 17:31, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011[edit]

Hi

You said to merge the following articles to List of minor Marvel Comics characters.

"After proposing the merger, place your reasons on the talk page."

I would like to know them especially for the orphan articles. --Crazy runner (talk) 08:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012[edit]

http://www.wolverinefiles.com/008-ogun/ if you missed it somehow when I was "rambling". --194.145.185.229 (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Thanks! Hopefully we will live in a world without such a restrictive law as the one proposed.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Greetings! I recently added a reference table to the entry for, "Blastaar", in order to begin cataloging Marvel's collected editions which feature this character. You deleted the table noting, "sections like this are for main characters". Can you please help me to find the guidelines for including tables in Wikipedia entries? I am rather new to editing Wikipedia articles, so I'm not sure where to locate this information.

The table was added under the presumption that a catalog of readily available publications containing appearances by this character would be of benefit to those researching this fictional character. Is there another preferred way to list such publications?

Thanks for your help! Muppet1962 (talk) 02:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Jean Wells do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Jean Wells was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://grognardia.blogspot.com/2010/02/interview-jean-wells-part-i.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

February 2012[edit]

I have placed them in order as Inhumans, bird-people and alpha primitves are all homo inhumanus. I also added homo mermanus as this includes Atlanteans and Lemurians. I have also added discription of the races such as Eternals and Deviants. I added Molans as they are a new subteranean races recently featured in Spider-Man. I also placed Savage land as a sub-category as Cat-People and the "People" reside there.Leowilk (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

You want to talk about the articles for the branches there?96.238.36.171 (talk) 12:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

You want to revert the articles back to what they're supposed to be?Removing the Nefaria barnch or something and the roman numerals???96.238.36.171 (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Why you reverting me?24.38.181.81 (talk) 00:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

The IPA template you've been using, {{pron-en}}, is being phased out, and will eventually be deleted. You seem to be the only one still using it. Could you use {{IPA-en}} instead?

The default of that template displays "English pronunciation". To get rid of that, just add a pipe at the end: {{IPA-en|word|}}. To display "pronunciation", the way {{pron-en}} does (though smaller), add 'pron' after the pipe: {{IPA-en|word|pron}}. To display 'English', use 'lang': {{IPA-en|word|lang}}. Etc.

Thanks, — kwami (talk) 08:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 129.33.19.254. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

March 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Russ Nicholson do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Russ Nicholson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://fightingfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Russ_Nicholson) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Yeah yeah silly bot, I've reverted it back without that link. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Please hold off on further copyediting - I'm in the middle of a huge copyedit of this whole article and your changes are conflicting with what I am doing. I should be done shortly. Thanks! LivitEh?/What? 19:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

OK, I'm done - whack away! LivitEh?/What? 19:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, will do! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop using {{pron-en}}. We are going to delete the template, and all your articles will get screwed up. You're the only one still using it. Please use {{IPA-en}} instead. — kwami (talk) 07:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

No, no-one is likely to check. But if you like you can drop me a line when you've added a few, and I can go over them.
Oh, a very petty pet peeve of mine: when you give the IPA, and then say "or" followed by the respelling (people do this a lot), it sounds like you're saying there are two pronunciations, when really there's just the one. (Like saying you can use the letter D "or" the letter dee.) I prefer to put only a space between the two templates. Not that anyone's likely to get confused, but I have seen cases where the two were different pronunciations. — kwami (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
IPA-en has a default display you normally won't want. Just add an extra pipe at the end to override it. — kwami (talk) 15:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Don't forget the pipe at the end!
I'm often unclear whether an "a" is supposed to be the 'cat' vowel or the 'spa' vowel. Maybe the dictionary is ambiguous; the pronunciations often are rather unlikely for fluent pronunciation.
Well, that lead to a fun song I ref'd. — kwami (talk) 03:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Why don't you expand sections like these [3] [4] (which are tagged) before someone deletes them. Spidey104 17:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

I only have so much time in my day - if someone else can get to them before I can, then I invite the help of other people in doing so. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012[edit]

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aboleth. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Reyk YO! 01:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

My mistake, I was just trying to help. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey[edit]

Thank you for lending your time to help us improve Wikipedia. If you are interested in editing more often than once in a while, we welcome you to log in and participate in our WikiCommunity.Yasht101 15:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome.  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Do inform me if you log in. Yasht101 15:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Dungeons & Dragons monster articles[edit]

Hello, 129.33.19.254. You've been turning D&D redirects I've created into articles. I'd like to point out that that isn't the only way to create an article on a D&D monster - you could instead simply start an article yourself, from scratch (though an account might be required for that; I'm not sure IPs can start new pages). Furthermore, there are several monsters in the Fiend Folio that I wouldn't start redirects for - the Apparition, for instance, and the Assassin bug - because the names would not make suitable redirects ("Apparition" is too generic a term to redirect to a D&D article). So, if you want to start articles on these monsters, you'll need to find a different way of doing it than waiting for me to create a redirect for them, because that won't happen. Maybe you should register an account? Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 08:41, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm fine with just creating articles out of other people's redirects. Notice that I haven't used several of the ones you created, such as dire corby, screaming devilkin, or witherstench, because those creatures only appeared in the Fiend Folio. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
I see. Well, please remember that there are other D&D redirects besides the ones I've created, for example, there's Booka (Dungeons & Dragons), which was created by BOZ. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 05:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Got it - I'll try to be on the lookout for more. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:46, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your discussion and just wanted to make you aware of Wikipedia's notability guidelines for elements of fiction if you didn't already know about it. Articles need to be covered in a significant number of reliable, secondary sources in order to justify their own articles, so most redirects named after elements of fiction should remain redirects. Neelix (talk) 00:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
It's true that notability is an issue to keep in mind, but I don't think people should be discouraged from starting articles on subjects that are at least potentially notable. D&D monsters are discussed in periodicals associated with the role-playing game industry, and these count as reliable sources, helping to establish notability. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 22:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Draconomicon. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SudoGhost 14:27, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'm not edit warring. I'm looking for a compromise. Do you not want to discuss the issue? 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Lists of people need to be notable and sourced, and this amount of detail is completely unnecessary and the article is not meant to be a complete exposition of all possible details. A reader of the article is not going to read such a listing, it has no context and is meaningless to them; it's just a list of names. They cannot be expected to and should not be required to skim through over 1kb of names to find information that will increase the reader's understanding of the article's subject. - SudoGhost 14:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
OK, so look again at my latest edit and see that I did not revert back to that point. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:49, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Canvassing for Ankheg AFD[edit]

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Ankheg. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large.

Note: This is the second time you're suspected of canvassing on a D&D related AfD. Clearly you did not understand the consequences of your actions the first time, so I advise you to be very careful about your next actions, and to stop contacting people for D&D related AfDs.Folken de Fanel (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I learned from my mistakes last time. I also addressed these concerns in the AFD - if other people disagree with my points, they can bring it up at the discussion. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
And I replied in the AfD. Considering how you were warned last time, you should have known better than to start contacting users who had already voted keep in the previous nomination. I warned you because you didn't seem to have understood the first warning given to you. You had already contacted 2 "keep" users, but for all I know, it could have been more by now if I hadn't done anything. Considering your history, you should stop contacting people for AfDs. If you continue, I will take this matter to WP:ANB.Folken de Fanel (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Note: user Folken de Fanel "has started a canvassing campain to try to win this AfD" (to use his own words, as per above). [5] [6] [7] 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:16, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm not canvassing, I'm merely notifying participants in a similar AfD about another D&D monster. If you paid attention, you would have noticed that all the other users not notified by me have already expressed themselves here, otherwise I would have notified them also. Your comment is borderline personal attack and harassment, and anyway has nothing to do in an AfD discussion. If you consider you have a conflict with me, please contact me on my talk page or go to WP:ANB and stop polluting AfD discussions (which is why I moved your comment here).Folken de Fanel (talk) 20:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Oh, PLEASE. So you can break the same rules that you would crucify me for? That's some serious nerve. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Carl Critchlow[edit]

Hi, 129.33.19.254; someone from this IP address requested a copy-edit to the above article at the GOCE request page; I'm now beginning that task. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Done - Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 00:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Rv[edit]

See section above, "Dungeons & Dragons monster articles": I have reverted you on Cyclopskin since there is no evidence presented of independent notability. Being included in a manual on the game is not enough: such a book would list everything, and existence does not equal notability. Outside sources would help. Drmies (talk) 00:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

On your recent edits to Deva, Marraenoloth, Dergholoth, etc[edit]

I appreciate the efforts to made to find more sources for these D&D monster articles. Unfortunately the only source you found, Tome of Horrors, which you are using to justify a restoration of the articles, doesn't correspond to the standard established by WP:GNG. Indeed, for a topic to deserve a stand-alone article, it must have received "significant coverage (more than a trivial mention)" in "multiple", "secondary sources" that are "independent of the topic or the creator". A secondary source makes "analytic or evaluative claims" about primary sources.

Tome of Horrors is a supplement to the official D&D 3rd edition game. It is a primary source in that it doesn't make any out-of-universe analysis, it is just in-game content, pure story. It is not independent in that it is solely made as a companion to the official D&D game and cannot be used without it.

This source doesn't meet the requirements to establish notability for these D&D monsters, and even if it met them one single source wouldn't be enough. There has already been an AfD on Apparition, which also had ToH as a source and it was deemed non-notable, and the article redirected.

The consensus is that most D&D monsters make better redirects than articles. That you found one primary source is no valid justification to restore articles that had beed redirected, so I ask you not to do that. If you are determined to find sources that would estbalish notability for this kind of article, then you have to forget all that is supplementary material (campains, monsters...) or even other primary sources like other RPGs. If you want to know what kind of sources WP expects, this comment (written about another source for another D&D monster) from the Reliable Sources Noticeboard can help you: [8].

Thank you.Folken de Fanel (talk) 00:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

I see you've continued editing the concerned articles, while not responding to my above message. I take it that you've been made aware of the issue and that you won't try to restore the articles when I'll redirect them again.Folken de Fanel (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
I didn’t know you wanted a response, I figured you were going to just lecture me and then redirect them. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Actually it would be great if you restored them. Folken is taking me to the brink of 3RR with his edit warring, and help would be appreciated. Joefromrandb (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Joe, please don't try to involve other users in your downfall. 129.33.19.254 seems like a reasonable contributor and pushing him to edit war in order to violate WP:V, WP:RS and WP:GNG wouldn't be wise, for you and for 129.33.19.254. Joe, your behavioral problems are your own, trying to raise a mayhem in D&D articles won't lead you anywhere.Folken de Fanel (talk) 13:55, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
WP:DFTT Joefromrandb (talk) 23:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Nice! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 23:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 Conversion of redirects[edit]

Note that your restoration of Adherer failed to include any "significant coverage by reliable third party sources" which is required for a stand alone article. Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Dungeons_&_Dragons#Next_step_regarding_non-notable_creatures) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death watch beetle (Dungeons & Dragons) and stop converting redirects until you have actual significant coverage by third party sources upon which you can base the article.-- The Red Pen of Doom 15:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm acting in good faith, just trying to do the right thing. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
The "right thing" and "acting in good faith" is to not recreate "articles" until you can base them on signficant coverage in third party reliable sources. As the AfD concluded you cannot base them on the same in game content because that does not meet the requirements of the WP:N threshold for a stand alone article. -- The Red Pen of Doom 15:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your opinion. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
If you're acting in good faith, then you should acknowledge the consensus that was reached at AfD 4 days ago, and particularly its conclusion that the sources you're proposing are not sufficient to earn a stand-alone article. If you consider the "right thing" for you to do is to have your way and disregard this consensus, then I'm afraid we won't be able to continue assuming good-faith for too long. As per User_talk:Jclemens#Pathfinder Bestiaries, you seem to be taking this more as a way of getting back at "a gang of thugs" rather than a legitimate attempt at improving WP in a consensus-building mindset. I guess you've had enough warnings.Folken de Fanel (talk) 15:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your opinion. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Actually, on the articles withdrawn from the AfD, it appears that the IP address is not the one doing the edit warring against consensus. I've left appropriate warnings, which have, as of now, gone unheeded. Jclemens (talk) 16:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

To my new best friend[edit]

Since you seem to want to watch my every move and follow me around wherever I go, and comment about whatever I do to anyone whom you think will listen, I might as well explain myself now for the benefit of those who might stop by. I know you see everything I do in the worst possible light, and always assume the worst about me (is that hyperbole? Well, prove me wrong), but your inherent distrust of me is not going to stop me from editing Wikipedia in good faith. Maybe you don’t know what it’s like to actually edit articles, add sources to them, improve and rewrite them and clean them up – you should try it some time, it’s a lot more rewarding than just arguing with people constantly about rules and policies and such (unless that’s just your thing, which it appears to be)!

Anyway, enough diatribe. I am merely adding sources to articles which have been redirected as a result of AFD, and then immediately redirecting them – that, and nothing more. Since you gave me a “warning” the other day about restoring articles which had not been redirected as a result of AFD (I know, you have your longwinded explanation about how they really were redirected as a result of AFD even though they were not, yadda yadda, spare me) and adding a source, I am expecting another “warning” of some sort from you, or maybe you feel you have “warned” me enough and since I’m so awful you will just jump straight to AN/I to try to get me blocked or something.

If you are a decent person, you will allow me to finish in peace. If you want to prove me right about you, you will try to disrupt me before I have finished. Thank you and good day. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, looks like I was quick enough to finish before you could stop me - what a lucky break! But will there be some kind of reprimand, I wonder? Hmmm. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your work! -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Is that sarcasm, or do you really mean it? With you, it's hard to tell. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Dungeons & Dragons: The Book of Vile Darkness[edit]

The mention of the book, as a fictional magical item, is not in italic type. Please, read Talk:Dungeons & Dragons: The Book of Vile Darkness. Regards. Kintaro (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Whenever the names of magic items appear in D&D books, traditionally they have been italicized. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Greenwood[edit]

Hey, that could've been a really nice end table! —Torchiest talkedits 21:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

LOL - thanks for the laugh! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 21:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Restoring redirects[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chemosh (Dragonlance). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I don't think that was vandalism, but if you think it needs to stay as a redirect I won't challenge it. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
I didn't call your actions vandalism. I would simply appreciate it in the future if you would start a new discussion with involved users before reverting an action that was decided on based on a prior discussion. Neelix (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
My apologies, I did use the word "vandalism"; I checked my message to you rather than the edit summary. Neelix (talk) 18:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for coming in behind me to do some clean up! It is appreciated. Web Warlock (talk) 23:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Happy to help! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Advanced Idea Mechanics[edit]

Thanks for your edit at Advanced Idea Mechanics. Sadly you added material that is unsourced and has remained unsourced for over three years. Per policy such information should not be replaced in the article until a source is found. I hope that clarifies why the material has been removed, please see the article talk page where I detailed my removal and the reasons for it. Happy editing, Hiding T 16:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Hi again. Obviously the same reason applies to my removal of material at Agamemnon (comics). Please use the article talk page to discuss any possible sources. Hiding T 16:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough... 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:19, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Idiot, don't screw me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Han2007 (talkcontribs) 20:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Holiday Cheer[edit]

Christmas tree.svg Holiday Cheer
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

Thank you sincerely!  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy Festivus[edit]

Festivus Pole.jpg Happy Festivus!
Here's wishing you a happy Festivus!
May you emerge victorious from the Feats of Strength,
may your list of Grievances be short,
and may your days be filled with Festivus Miracles.
Torchiest talkedits 16:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you as well!  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

D&D characters[edit]

Hello! I know that we touched upon this once before, but please do not add the {{WikiProject Fictional characters}} template to EVERY SINGLE type of creature that exists in D&D. While I appreciate the good faith effort that you've made in adding D&D characters to the project, your criteria for what constitutes a fictional character should be refined to only include unique characters in D&D. Also, there is now a {{D&D-char-stub}} that can be added to specific D&D characters, instead of the {{D&D-stub}} for generic D&D stub articles. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 18:22, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

You're right - sorry about that. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Dwarf (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

Thanks for going back and catching all those author links. Let's hope it's good enough for GA! —Torchiest talkedits 19:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem, and good luck! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Care to explain how that was vandalism? I will try it again with a more descriptive edit summary. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I just checked Dictionary.com, which one of the sentences said 'wreaked havoc'. Students like me always don't really know about this, and thanks for teaching me something new, sir. Face-smile.svg Hop n hop (on the arctic ice) 16:24, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
No problem, and happy editing. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

D&D Devils[edit]

Thanks for the help on Bensozia and Asmodeus. I usually only edit wikipedia when I'm procrastinating; it was nice to have a regular come through and set me straight! ZedZed77 (talk) 20:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Hah, no problem. Drop by anytime! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Reverts[edit]

Thanks for letting me know. The reverts do look quite suspicious, particularly as reverting my edits are the user's only recent activity on Wikipedia, and the only editing he's done outside of Ys (series) and Ys IV: The Dawn of Ys. I haven't had any interactions with the user on any talk pages, either, so I can't venture a guess as to what this is about. Do you think I should report this to WP: Administrator's noticeboard? Whatever the user's reasons, any attempts at communication coming from me are only liable to make things worse.--NukeofEarl (talk) 19:24, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

No problem - hopefully that works out for you at AN/I. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Section heading[edit]

Sorry about removing the "Fictional character biography" section heading from Brothers Grimm (comics); that was a copy-and-paste error. Thanks for catching and correcting it!--NukeofEarl (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

No worries. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Ross Andru[edit]

Thank you for finding that much more official birth date! Clearly, Social Security Records are more credible than virtually any other source, and though I have to run out now, I think we should make 1927 date the primary date in text and note the 1925 date in a footnote. Excellent research work! --Tenebrae (talk) 16:32, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Glad to be of help! :) I will probably be doing more of this soon, but probably not today. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
No, hey, as I said before, you're doing great, important work and I, for one, am really appreciative! --Tenebrae (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. :) Did you get my other messages? I can't edit your talk page, so I need to be creative. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 23:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Gene Colan[edit]

Oops! Yeah, you're right. Sorry about that. I keep forgetting that he's dead. It just seems like yesterday. One other reason that such sites may be problematic (and I've seen other editors arguing this) is the question of whether the person at that Social Security Index is one and the same. In any event, while I'm not sure about using that source in the future for deceased people, if you felt that the New York Times story that was already cited in the article for his dob was not sufficient because the information in question was not visible to non-subscribers, I've replaced it with a CBR story. But thanks for pointing out my goof. :-) Nightscream (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

No problem – hopefully reminding you of his death was not upsetting, because I meant no offense. When I add a link like that I do my best to be as certain as possible that we have the right person, and if I think there is any question at all I will post it to the talk page instead of in the article (see Talk:Jerry Bittle for example). As far as I am aware, the SSDI is as accurate as it is going to get, because of how the information is supplied. If you have an SSN (and I assume you do if you are an American) then you are already in their database; when a person with an SSN dies, they are eventually added to the SSDI. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Issue template[edit]

I don't think you need to put the issue template after every single paragraph, man. Just discuss it on the talk page instead of cluttering the article like that. –TCN7JM 23:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Well, that is your opinion. I have found that issue citations on well-watched articles tend to more attention and get the citations needed. It's either that, or these need a huge trim due to the excessive in-universe text. But I can stop here if I am making you uneasy. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 23:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
It's probably fine. I just find it to clutter the article, but if you think they work, then go ahead. –TCN7JM 23:52, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Chthon[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 129.33.19.254. You have new messages at NukeofEarl's talk page.
Message added 12:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

April 2013[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Erlkazar. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Erlkazar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Castle/2566/ss-impresk.htm, http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Castle/2566/ss-jivan.htm, http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Castle/2566/ss-impresk.htm) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Mandarin (comics)[edit]

My workload is already a bit high. Is there a particular problem with the article, like vandalism, persistent addition of unsourced material? Policy violations or bad writing? I have an idea: Why don't you summarize the major problem or problems you've been experiencing, and provide example edit diffs for each problem, and I'll look into it, okay? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

I'll put it on my watch list for now. Nightscream (talk) 04:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Michael Komarck, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Michael Komarck was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Michael_Komarck) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dantrag Baenre. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 00:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gromph, you may be blocked from editing. I am One of Many (talk) 00:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
It's not vandalism, but if you like I can just merge them into the character list. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 00:52, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Forgotten Realms characters with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

That wasn't disruptive, I was sorting the characters alphabetically with that edit. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 01:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Some of the copy and pastes you have been doing look like you are attempting to circumvent AfD by breaking up an article into pieces. You need to talk to other editors on the relevant talk pages before you make these unilateral changes. I also encourage you to make an account, which will make communication easier in the future.--I am One of Many (talk) 01:14, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
I probably went about that the wrong way. I should have just merged the characters into the list in the first place. I am sorry if that seemed to be disruptive. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 01:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
I believe you had good intentions! The thing is that Wikipedia is complicated. Some of these article are undergoing discussion for possible deletion and there might not be consensus for the changes you are making, so I suggest go easy at first. Check articles for grammatical errors , etc. Once you understand how things work, then you can be more bold.--I am One of Many (talk) 01:22, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for WP:AGF. :) I am very much done editing for the night - I hope you have a good night too. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 01:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
I wholeheartedly support the suggestion to create an account, and I confirm that you really need to communicate more before accomplishing unilateral actions for which you might lack consensus, such as removing dispute and clean-up templates from articles, restoring articles previously merged per AfD/discussion, and using redirects to create articles that are likely to end up at AfD and be redirected anyway. If you want my opinion, it would be a much better and efficient idea to edit List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters straight away and only split after reaching a consensus on notability.Folken de Fanel (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia[edit]

Thanks for using descriptive and wikilinked edit summaries when copying text between articles, as required by WP:Copying within Wikipedia. I have put List of Forgotten Realms characters and the various Baenre and Do'Urden articles on my to-do list, but it would be very helpful if you placed {{Copied}} templates also. Flatscan (talk) 04:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Merging during live AfD[edit]

Please do not copy content from articles that are currently listed at AfD, per WP:Guide to deletion#You may edit the article during the discussion #5. You copied to many articles during WP:Articles for deletion/House Baenre (2nd nomination) and WP:Articles for deletion/House Do'Urden (2nd nomination). The warnings above hint at this, but they did not cite the correct page. Flatscan (talk) 04:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive editing on redirected articles[edit]

Copying here my warning message to IP 24.12.74.21, for good measure.

Please stop restoring articles that had previously been redirected/merged per consensus decisions at WP:AfD, as you did with Molydeus.

Sure, consensus can change, however you cannot overrule a previous consensus decision all by yourself, without even notifying any of the people who formed the consensus, or the closing administrator. Policy is that changes to a previously established consensus should be proposed by discussion first. On the long term, constantly ignoring previous consensuses can be seen as disruptive editing.

Now, as another user has noted above, it is very likely, per your edit pattern and interest for D&D, that you are also behind IP 129.33.19.254. Seeing how, as IP 129.33.19.254, you've been warned several times about not restoring articles redirected per consensus, I'm afraid that you could be making use of your dynamic IPs from Chicago in order to continue your non-consensual edits away from scrutiny.

I note you've been asked several times (both under 129.33.19.254, and this IP) to register an account, and given the nature of your edits I find it particularly concerning that you've repeatedly ignored it. You may be find with being an IP, but others are not.

Note that this is my final warning: you should register an account, and above all stop restoring articles that had previously been redirected/merged per AfD. If I find any more of these non-consensual edits from 129.33.19.254 or any of your Chicago IP, I will report you at WP:ANI and your main IP may be blocked from editing.Folken de Fanel (talk) 10:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your accusation that these two IP addresses are the same person is baseless. They geolocate to entirely different states in the U.S. Furthermore, no one is obligated to register with an account, and making demands that they do is inappropriate. —Torchiest talkedits 13:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Editor Interaction Analyzer clearly suggests they are. Even if they don't correspond to the same geolocation, obviously, open proxies exist, and 129.33.19.254 being a corporate IP there is clearly the possibility for the same person to have easy access to a different IP. Other users suspected it and 24.12.74.21 admitted as much. No one is obligated to register an account, but as I've said, the fact is that the same person has been constantly switching between IPs without telling anyone and repeated problematic edits for which main IP was warned. The constant switches also make it difficult to properly monitor the problematic edits in question. In any case I have not made any demands, I merely said he/she should register an account. User can keep switching between IPs for all I care, as long as he/she stops the pattern of disruptive editing and doesn't distribute it over several different and unidentified IPs.Folken de Fanel (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
That suggests nothing. Compare myself and 129. Does that mean we're also the same user? Even you and I have a lot of overlap. It's indicative of nothing. —Torchiest talkedits 16:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
There are 221 overlaping articles between the 2 IPs, and only 108 than between you and the IP (and 46 between you and me). The number is huge and clearly this suggests something. Besides, several of your overlaps with IP clocked under a minute: if that had happened between the two IPs then it might have been proof of coincidence, but IPs have never edited under a 2 hours difference (just enough time to change States). This is a corporate IP, and not a private one. Both IPs have the same edit pattern of restoring redirected D&D articles with the very same edit summary: [9], [10]. Also, both add IPA to D&D articles: [11], [12]. Also, other users suspected it and 24.12.74.21 admitted as much. Strange how with so much elements you keep contradicting me for no apparent reason.Folken de Fanel (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bastion of Broken Souls, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk   19:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Hopefully I can find some sources for that one. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:40, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Elektra[edit]

In response to the question in your edit summary at Elektra (comics): neither. The source uses the asterisks, and since the interview was conducted through e-mail, I assumed that's also how Chichester typed it. I know it's not proper written English, but I figured I should transcribe the quote verbatim.--NukeofEarl (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough! 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Use of the template copyedit[edit]

Hi! I saw you added the above template to multiple articles. On first inspection these articles do not seem to be in need of copyediting, so I've reverted a number of your edits. If you think I've made a mistake please contact me on my talk page! TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 16:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

It's not so much a matter of need, as it's just a request for a set of eyes to see what can be done to improve an article. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ACE Limited may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in Zurich, Switzerland, is the parent company of the [[ACE Group]]<ref>{{cite web|url=[http://www.acegroup.com}}</ref>, a global provider of insurance products covering property and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Dragonchess Oliphant[edit]

Thanks for your recent correction! Cheers, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 16:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baldur's Gate: Enhanced Edition may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{cite journal | author=Murray, Bryan | work=[[Empire (magazine)|Empire]] | date=July 1, 2012 }}}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

D&D[edit]

Thanks for all the work you do in the D&D area! I am merging the content in and loving how clearly you have listed the source materials and referenced them. This is very important for players and people interested in learning about D&D. I am trying to save these articles from deletion by the merging. I noticed all the improvements you made and they are really helpful! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you![edit]

That was indeed an improvement! Sportfan5000 (talk) 19:47, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Glad to have helped out on Jennell Jaquays. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Allip because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The article does not meet the guidelines at WP:GNG Oddbodz (talk) 18:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ben Templesmith may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * ''Ten Grand'' (artist), with [[J. Michael Straczynski]], Image Comics, 2013)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Zeus (comics) page[edit]

I don't know, but I don't believe that what you removed was "very" trivial. No offence, but I have the feeling that you hate the other character. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.178.186.33 (talk) 10:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Shocker/Montana amalgram situation[edit]

It's obvious that there are both the same character. You can look here to see they are one and the same...but I don't seem to like the idea that one article is more about the character than the article. He really was a big deal in the cartoon IMO because he became the Shocker. If he was just Montana he would be just a character in the Enforcers IMO. So if I had to choose just one I actually prefer the main information being in the Shocker article just because that he was a big deal antagonist as him because the Shocker was a more big deal antagonist of Spider-Man. His whole plot was to just set him up as that character in the first place. But I also don't see why we have to choose just one for particular information in one article. But the main disagreement is what image where. I believe the Shocker image should be on Shocker and the Montana article should have a image on his alter-ego. Something like this. That's my two cents. Jhenderson 777 00:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thank you very much for your help --Crazy runner (talk) 20:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I am here to help. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Hybrid (Scott Washington)[edit]

You don't have a problem with me merging him there then. Do you? BTW Happy New Year! Jhenderson 777 01:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Blackheart[edit]

Good catch - Thanks! KylieTastic (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

No problem. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Apologies wrt Jeff Grubb[edit]

Many apologies for the edit on Jeff Grubb. I didn't mean to remove the person data - I just made a mistake in sorting out an edit conflict. I was referring to the capitalization of the Marvel Comics title in a couple of places and some spacing. That's all. Sorry for the inconvenience. Myrtle Myrtlegroggins (talk) 03:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Linking to redirects response[edit]

Recently, most of the comic pages have been merged into lists by contributors like J Greb and TTN. I'm just letting you know that. --Rtkat3 (talk) 23:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

The only time I know of a page being restored was when Fandraltastic merged Blizzard with List of Marvel Comics characters: B. He later had a change of heart about this and restored the page with Donnie Gill being redirected to that page. That's an example of a page being restored. --Rtkat3 (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Storm (Marvel Comics)[edit]

Hello. We appreciate your contribution(s) to article Storm (Marvel Comics). I have reverted your edits in good faith for the following reason. When considering any aspect of infobox design, keep in mind the purpose of an infobox: to summarize key facts in the article in which it appears. The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance. For further information, please refer to this special Wikipedia page Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Purpose of an infobox. Thank you! Marvelct124 (talk) 10:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hey there. Just thought I'd let you know about this, since you might not be aware of it yet. Cheers. —Torchiest talkedits 15:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks – I saw that, but I am puzzled as to why such a thing is even necessary. If an admin wants me to respond, I will. If anyone else thinks I have done anything wrong, I will answer to it, but otherwise I imagine you are right that it can be closed. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
I thought it was necessary because you and User:2601:d:9400:5ff:7497:d9e6:4df2:cbce were making the same edits and revisions. Together, you show the same editing style. It was also strange how a "new" user began going to the same pages you were. Ex. "rvt - there already is a citation". I doubt a new user would say that on his/her first edit. Your commentaries in "Edit Summaries" are the exact same way. Ex. "rvt - just a rumor at this point, nothing confirmed". So, I thought an investigation was appropriate. Also, you have a new message on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Marvelct124 (talk) 02:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, now hopefully you have enjoyed writing your character assassination of me. I started those discussions on the comics Wikiproject talk page to attempt to establish a consensus. I have done this before when I encounter a dispute with another user (rather than report someone and try to get them in trouble right off the bat), and when consensus goes against me I respect that and leave it alone. If consensus goes against you, I expect you to do the same. IP users are not second class citizens, so I expect the same level of respect from you as you would give to a user with an account, until I have actually been proven to have been misbehaving in some way (you throwing around accusations and speculating on my motives and future behavior does not count as "proof" of anything). As I see support for my positions in various venues, and so far none for you, it would be nice to see a bit less of a hostile approach from you. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Torchiest, isn't it ironic when someone turns out to be guilty of the very thing they accuse you of?  :\ 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Haha, wow. And not just one sock, but a whole farm of them going back for years! —Tourchiest talkedits 16:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eilistraee may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • & Dragons)|celestials]] can serve in the supplement ''Warriors of Heaven'' (1999).<ref>[[Christopher Perkins (game designer)|Perkins, Christopher[[. ''[[Warriors of Heaven]]'' (TSR, 1999)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Copy edit tags[edit]

Hi, I notice that earlier today you tagged several articles about board game creators as needing copy edits. At first glance, these seem to be in fairly good shape compared to articles that normally get this tag. Is there something in particular that you think needs to be fixed with these? Cheers, Tdslk (talk) 22:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I think a good copyedit really improves the quality of an article, that's all. It's not so much that they need a copyedit, just that it would help with overall article improvement. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Do you know about the Guild of Copy Editors request page? That's the place to go for articles that are in decent shape but need that extra polish, while the copy editing tag is usually placed on articles that do desperately need a copy edit. The GOCE requests page is monitored by some of the more experienced copy editors, while newbie editors are often directed to copy edit tagged articles as a way to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Cheers, Tdslk (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Oh, OK! I love the work that the GOCE does. I didn't want to overburden anyone with a bunch of requests, so I figured the tag would eventually attract attention over a period of time from editors who aren't too busy or are looking for something to do on a backlog drive. Guess I have it backwards then?  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 23:14, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
The tag does get the GOCE's attention (that's how I found it), but we have informally lower standards for the amount of work to do for removing tags (which the articles I looked at had already exceeded) than for the requests list, which often includes articles being nominated as good/featured articles. Tdslk (talk) 23:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Belasco (comics)[edit]

Thanks for your recent edit to this article. That was just an oversight of mine. Not sure how it happened as I'm usually careful about stuff like that (or at least I like to think so), but whichever way, I'm glad you caught it!--NukeofEarl (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

No worries - and thank you for all you do!  :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 15:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 129.33.19.254. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Kitty Pryde, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you have any questions, you may ask for assistance at the help desk.

  • There's no need to fill a small section with the same tag 28 times. It makes the section difficult to read. A simple message box at the top will do. - theWOLFchild 02:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Also, you should consider creating an account. - theWOLFchild 02:27, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

War edit[edit]

I do not know if you know nothing about the subject of the article (and judging by your talk page, it is excluded), or just not understanding roll back, copypast comment. Therefore, I will write again. Their father - a Jew, that there has never concealed in the comics, and what open the article says ("Magneto was born Max Eisenhardt sometime in the late 1920s to a middle class German Jewish family whose father, Jakob Eisenhardt, was a highly decorated World War I veteran", "The character first appears with his twin sister, the Scarlet Witch (Wanda Maximoff), as a part of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants. The siblings are mutants, with Pietro possessing superhuman speed and Wanda able to control probability. The pair are recruited by their father Magneto after he saves Wanda from a mob after she accidentally causes a house to burst into fire"). What do you need? Further attempts to roll back this argument "does not say in this article," I will be perceived as an attempt to bring to the point of absurdity. As for the Iceman, the sources should be discussed, and not deleted without any dialogue with the self-assessment "is not a source of" if you do not like. Mistery Spectre (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Very well, I will not revert, but I will bring this up for a wider discussion. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:38, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
I apologize for the possible expression, but I can not figure out what could be controversial, if the roots of his parents' open and obvious. Mistery Spectre (talk) 20:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Dracotaur-related[edit]

Hi. I saw your revert on the Draconic creature page revolving around the comparison of the Dracotaurs and the Dragonspawn from World of Warcraft with them being similar in their description and their worshipping of dragons. If you do not believe me, look up their pages on their respectful Wikis and you'll see what I mean. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

If you want to add a comparison between one creature in one medium to another creature in another medium, you need to have a reliable source that states that there is some kind of connection between the two. Other wikis are not considered reliable sources. It is also considered original research for editors to look at two different items and draw their own conclusions; we leave it up to people who write the reliable source which we cite to draw those conclusions. So, unless you have a reliable source stating that the dracotaurs from Dungeons & Dragons inspired the dragonspawn from World of Warcraft, we should not be including information like that on Wikipedia pages. Thank you. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Firbolg (Dungeons & Dragons) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The firbolg appeared in the second edition in the ''[[Monstrous Compendium|Monstrous Compendium Volume Two[['' (1989),<ref>[[David "Zeb" Cook|Cook, David]], et al. [[Monstrous Compendium|Monstrous Compendium

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kuo-toa may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Bruce R]], [[Gwendolyn FM Kestrel]], and [[Jeff Quick]]. ''Underdark (supplement)|Underdark]]'' ([[Wizards of the Coast]], 2003)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Imix (Dungeons & Dragons) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Imix appears in ''[[Monster Manual 3]]'' (2010).<ref>[[Mike Mearls|Mearls, Mike]], ]]Greg Bilsland]], and [[Robert J. Schwalb]]. ''[[Monster Manual 3]]''. Renton, WA: Wizards of the Coast, 2010</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beholder (Dungeons & Dragons) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • later appears in the ''[[Dungeons & Dragons Companion Set|Companion Rules]]'' set, in the ''[[Dungeon Masters Companion: Book Two'' (1984).<ref>[[Frank Mentzer|Mentzer, Frank]]. ''[[Dungeons &

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Removal of sources with the comment "need sources"[edit]

That is, you accidentally insisting on "the presence of sources" demolition desired category of sources, while leaving another article "national category" to which you suddenly also demolished sources. What does it mean? The Irish are not a nationality, or Irish sources do not need? I am ready to discuss the issue with the appropriate people, but expose himself for a fool, I will not give Mistery Spectre (talk) 07:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

First of all, it is very hard to understand your English, but I will try. I did not accidentally insist on anything, I correctly insisted on needing a reliable source for the information you are insisting on. Based on the archived discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics/Archive 48#Jewish superheroes, it was pretty clear that adherents.com was not going to work as a source, and that we need to know which stories in the comics actually discuss Iceman being Jewish. If you think that discussion did not resolve the issue, we can always start it back up again on the WikiProject talk page, but I doubt you will get the answer you are looking for. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I remember that discussion came to the conclusion that Jews are primarily national, and later religious views, that you playing the fool, tried hard to invisible. And if it is the source, it may be in the article. Second, you have not answered, if you insist on sources why you raze source on Irish roots, while leaving it in the article? I added the source, do not agree - are submitted for evaluation. Manipulate the rules for some of their goals, I will not. P.S Not to mention the fact that the official results of that discussion is not summed up, not even the last word. Mistery Spectre (talk) 12:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
And yes, just mindlessly endure lengthy sources with "find a better source of" an other burocratic trick, I do not give. Mistery Spectre (talk) 12:36, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aasimar may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • last2=Forbeck|first2=Matt|authorlink3=James Jacobs (game designer)|last3=Jacobs|first3=James]]|authorlink4=Eric L. Boyd|last4=Boyd|first4=Eric L.|title= [[Races of Faerûn]]|edition= 3rd|date=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

The Ronan Pic[edit]

Thanks for the correction on the Ronan image. The user I reverted apparently changed the image caption before he the image. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Nogai Horde[edit]

I reverted your edit to the above as the link was incorrect. regards Denisarona (talk) 18:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

It's the right guy, for what it's worth, but I will leave it alone. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Scott Lang[edit]

Hello.

I reverted your edit that undid mine because the Avengers: the Children's Crusade story arc effectively retconned Scott's death as having never happened, as he was brought into the future by the actions of his daughter and the Scarlet Witch, as it is plainly stated in the comic itself. Before, Scott was believed dead because his teammates (after Jack of Hearts' explosion) came and saw a hand reduced to bone and believed it to be what remained of Ant-Man; however, it was never said clearly that it was in fact his body, and therefore now we can say it was Jack of Hearts'. It is also in line with what is written on the Marvel wikia's page of Scott Lang.

If you have any more doubts, you can read the comic and see for yourself.

Italianhistorian88 (talk) 15:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)