User talk:166.147.88.26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Young Adult (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 03:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Henry David Thoreau has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Reversed map has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pato Banton has been reverted.
Your edit here to Pato Banton was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/patobantonandthenowgeneration) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sarahj2107. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wi-Fi because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Moriori. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Forehead because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Moriori (talk) 03:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chewing gum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Moriori (talk) 03:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Possible vandal[edit]

The IP 166.147.88.26 has been used for multiple instances of vandalism, as has the IP 166.147.88.36 which seems to belong to the same person, as similar edits have been made with often similar IPs. Most of those edits have been reverted. Other IPs that could possible sometimes belong to the same person are 166.147.88.46, 166.147.88.44 and 198.228.200.147 which have vandalism but also constructive edits. IMHO, every edit by these IPs that does not name a reliable source should be checked for vandalism. It seems, edits by IPs in the range 166.147.88.* deserve some special attention, as from some of those IPs, vandalizing edits did happen. --Micge (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)