User talk:167.206.189.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

hi me wanted to everthing in hacking

Your edit to The Mousetrap[edit]

Thanks for your edit. I'm afraid that Wikipedia doesn't carry spoiler warnings, except for the content disclaimer and section headings (such as "Plot" or "Ending" – or in this case, "Identity of the murderer") which imply the presence of spoilers. I have correspondingly reversed the change you made to the article. Cheers. --Dominic Hardstaff (talk) 10:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page So Solid Crew has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps TalkContribs 15:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

February 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Ariel Gasperini has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Reach Out to the Truth 18:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Sabayon a rolling release?[edit]

I saw that you added Sabayon Linux as an example of a rolling release. My understanding that while users are allowed to upgrade from portage, new binary packages are only released with new releases of Sabayon. If so, then it would not qualify as a rolling release. Reub2000 (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

May 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page System integration testing worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 09:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

September 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Brigham Young University has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Gary King (talk · scripts) 21:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lindenwood University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bhockey10 (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010[edit]

Information.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jordin Tootoo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jordin Tootoo was changed by 167.206.189.6 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-11-04T19:48:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

October 2012[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Rizwan Manji. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 20:17, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sukhoi Su-35 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you have any questions, post it at Talk:Sukhoi Su-35. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomson Reuters Eikon concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomson Reuters Eikon, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomson Reuters Eikon[edit]

Hello 167.206.189.6. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Thomson Reuters Eikon".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomson Reuters Eikon}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)