User talk:173.66.211.53

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2013[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Ultrasound, unencyclopedic personal opinion, constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 07:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ultrasound. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 18:24, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Someone has to point out that high-frequency noise and ultrasound is painful for many of us who can hear it.[edit]

  • Saying that it's "unhelpful" or "(slur ommitted)" or the like is ableist nonsense. 173.66.211.53 (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
  • About your edits to page Ultrasound, your best policy would be to register on Wikipedia as a user with a username. There is a page Hyperacusis. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

WP:POINT[edit]

Do not make disruptive edits like this to prove a point. Please see the guideline WP:POINT. Thanks, OSborn arfcontribs. 20:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 173.66.211.53. You have new messages at OSborn's talk page.
Message added 21:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

OSborn arfcontribs. 21:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Just some info[edit]

Hi, it seems that you've gotten very involved/interested in the Chelsea Manning/Bradley Manning article name move and surrounding issues. I understand that you believe the decision to place the article at Bradley, rather than Chelsea, is a misgendering attack on Chelsea. A consensus of other editors did not find that to be case, and re-discussion of the issue will take place in 30 days. In all honestly, as long as media sources continue making the switchover, Wikipedia will follow suit and move the article to Chelsea Manning. A key point you should consider is that Wikipedia does not lead, it follows the trends seen elsewhere in the media, as it is simply a reflection of common practice or understanding.

Anyway, you have come into the debate as it is winding down. If you're interested in participating in the ANI [1] or at ArbCom, I would highly suggest that you register an account (partially so you're not locked out). In fact, I would suggest that anyway, given the volume you're editing at. Consider looking over the ANI and the talkpage to make sure you're not creating a new section repeating a discussion that has already occurred and come to a conclusion. If you're generally new to Wikipedia, I would suggest brushing up on our rules about WP:CIVILITY (so you know how to deal with the civility issues we are seeing on the Manning talkpage) and WP:NPOV (so you understand why Wikipedia is slow/reluctant to take activist positions). Otherwise take a look at these general guidelines:

More than anything, unless someone is a blatant troll, you should assume good faith WP:AGF of all editors, even if you happen to disagree with them.

Thanks! NewAccount4Me (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC)