User talk:184.59.23.98

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

July 2011[edit]

{ Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ralph Nader. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bryce53 | talk 01:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC) I did. I removed it. I could move it to a better place. Like the trash. 184.59.23.98 (talk)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ralph Nader. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mystylplx (talk) 02:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Nothing was removed. What are you talknig about??? The content you keep removing. Claiming it's been "moved" and then removing it is still removing it, as has been explained to you before. Mystylplx (talk) 14:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC) "Moving" content is the same as "removing"? Go away. 184.59.23.98 (talk) 02:07, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ralph Nader. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ralph Nader, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Mystylplx (talk) 18:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Ignore this person. He is a drama queen/meat/sock of a long time banned user named Griot, whose RW identity is known and has been reported. Anyone can see you moved content, you did not remove anything. But this person accuses vandalism, when in fact he's just a Ralph Nader-hater who lives in a decade past and still boo-hoos over the 2000 U.S. presidential elections. I suspect his life is very sad and empty. He is thought to be disturbed and dangerous, however, so I do not recommend you engage with him in any way. 99.93.194.84 (talk) 06:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.